Landscape ecological risk assessment of chongming dongtan wetland in shanghai from 1990 to 2020

Landscape ecological risk assessment can assess the stability, vulnerability, and anti-interference ability of the ecosystem based on the characteristics, structure, and function of the landscape in order to determine the degree and distribution of landscape ecological risk. In recent years, due to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental Research Communications 2023-10, Vol.5 (10), p.105016
Hauptverfasser: Cao, Yong, Dong, Bin, Xu, Haifeng, Xu, Zhili, Wei, Zhezhu, Lu, Zhipeng, Liu, Xiao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page 105016
container_title Environmental Research Communications
container_volume 5
creator Cao, Yong
Dong, Bin
Xu, Haifeng
Xu, Zhili
Wei, Zhezhu
Lu, Zhipeng
Liu, Xiao
description Landscape ecological risk assessment can assess the stability, vulnerability, and anti-interference ability of the ecosystem based on the characteristics, structure, and function of the landscape in order to determine the degree and distribution of landscape ecological risk. In recent years, due to human activities and global climate change, the area and ecological quality of the Chongming Dongtan wetland have been decreasing. As an important wintering habitat and transit point on the ‘East Asia-Australia migration line’, the population and habitat security of wintering migratory birds are also threatened. Therefore, the landscape index method was used to assess the ecological risk of the Chongming Dongtan wetland. Based on transfer analysis and spatial autocorrelation analysis, the spatial and temporal changes of landscape ecological risk were revealed. The findings are as follows: (1) Natural landscapes such as mudflats, grasslands, and waters have been declining, while artificial landscapes such as cultivated land, construction land, and woodland have been gradually expanding, indicating a shift from natural to artificial landscapes. (2) Overall, the landscape ecological risk is showing an increasing trend. Wetlands have moved from being dominated by the lowest and medium ecological risks to being evenly distributed by all ecological risk classes. Notably, there has been a rapid increase in landscape ecological risk in 2000. The highest-risk areas have expanded by 9346.95 hm 2 , gradually encroaching from the buffer zone into the reclamation area and the nature reserve. Conversely, the lowest ecological risk areas have decreased by 7091.82 hm 2 , primarily concentrated in nature reserves. (3) The aggregation of landscape ecological risks continues to decrease, indicating a reduced likelihood of dramatic changes in ecological risks.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/2515-7620/ad03e0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_2515_7620_ad03e0</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_0cef66af53d446c69f049f021b316bec</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2882962119</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4eaee06fa67c561a73b38dbb4c748d260b198931cdf9f7171e9d66378ac966ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1v1DAQjRBIVG3vHC1x4MLS8Ucc-4gqKJVW4gJna2KPs16ycbBTIf49WYJKD4jDaEZP770ZzWuaVxzecTDmRrS83XVawA0GkATPmotH6PmT-WVzXesRAERnFXB10bg9TqF6nImRz2MekseRlVS_MayVaj3RtLAcmT_kaTilaWBhHRac2A9axlXM0sTqAafhgInFkk-MWwtsyUyAgKvmRcSx0vWfftl8_fjhy-2n3f7z3f3t-_3OK2WWnSIkAh1Rd77VHDvZSxP6XvlOmSA09NwaK7kP0caOd5xs0Fp2Br3V2qO8bO4335Dx6OaSTlh-uozJ_QZyGRyWJfmRHHiKWmNsZVBKe20jqLUE7yXXPfnV6_XmNZf8_YHq4o75oUzr-U4YI6wWnNuVBRvLl1xrofi4lYM7p-LOb3fnt7stlVXydpOkPP_1_A_9zT_oVLxrN1ELXLs5RPkL-luZLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2882962119</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Landscape ecological risk assessment of chongming dongtan wetland in shanghai from 1990 to 2020</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Cao, Yong ; Dong, Bin ; Xu, Haifeng ; Xu, Zhili ; Wei, Zhezhu ; Lu, Zhipeng ; Liu, Xiao</creator><creatorcontrib>Cao, Yong ; Dong, Bin ; Xu, Haifeng ; Xu, Zhili ; Wei, Zhezhu ; Lu, Zhipeng ; Liu, Xiao</creatorcontrib><description>Landscape ecological risk assessment can assess the stability, vulnerability, and anti-interference ability of the ecosystem based on the characteristics, structure, and function of the landscape in order to determine the degree and distribution of landscape ecological risk. In recent years, due to human activities and global climate change, the area and ecological quality of the Chongming Dongtan wetland have been decreasing. As an important wintering habitat and transit point on the ‘East Asia-Australia migration line’, the population and habitat security of wintering migratory birds are also threatened. Therefore, the landscape index method was used to assess the ecological risk of the Chongming Dongtan wetland. Based on transfer analysis and spatial autocorrelation analysis, the spatial and temporal changes of landscape ecological risk were revealed. The findings are as follows: (1) Natural landscapes such as mudflats, grasslands, and waters have been declining, while artificial landscapes such as cultivated land, construction land, and woodland have been gradually expanding, indicating a shift from natural to artificial landscapes. (2) Overall, the landscape ecological risk is showing an increasing trend. Wetlands have moved from being dominated by the lowest and medium ecological risks to being evenly distributed by all ecological risk classes. Notably, there has been a rapid increase in landscape ecological risk in 2000. The highest-risk areas have expanded by 9346.95 hm 2 , gradually encroaching from the buffer zone into the reclamation area and the nature reserve. Conversely, the lowest ecological risk areas have decreased by 7091.82 hm 2 , primarily concentrated in nature reserves. (3) The aggregation of landscape ecological risks continues to decrease, indicating a reduced likelihood of dramatic changes in ecological risks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2515-7620</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2515-7620</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/2515-7620/ad03e0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Buffer zones ; Climate change ; Cultivated lands ; Ecological risk assessment ; Environmental risk ; Global climate ; Grasslands ; land use ; Landscape ; landscape ecological risk ; landscape index ; Migratory birds ; Mud flats ; Nature reserves ; Reclamation ; Risk assessment ; Spatial analysis ; spatial and temporal differentiation ; Stability analysis ; Structure-function relationships ; the chongming dongtan wetland ; Wetlands ; Woodlands</subject><ispartof>Environmental Research Communications, 2023-10, Vol.5 (10), p.105016</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4eaee06fa67c561a73b38dbb4c748d260b198931cdf9f7171e9d66378ac966ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4eaee06fa67c561a73b38dbb4c748d260b198931cdf9f7171e9d66378ac966ca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8650-7974</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2515-7620/ad03e0/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,2096,27901,27902,38867,53842</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cao, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Haifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Zhili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Zhezhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Zhipeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xiao</creatorcontrib><title>Landscape ecological risk assessment of chongming dongtan wetland in shanghai from 1990 to 2020</title><title>Environmental Research Communications</title><addtitle>ERC</addtitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Commun</addtitle><description>Landscape ecological risk assessment can assess the stability, vulnerability, and anti-interference ability of the ecosystem based on the characteristics, structure, and function of the landscape in order to determine the degree and distribution of landscape ecological risk. In recent years, due to human activities and global climate change, the area and ecological quality of the Chongming Dongtan wetland have been decreasing. As an important wintering habitat and transit point on the ‘East Asia-Australia migration line’, the population and habitat security of wintering migratory birds are also threatened. Therefore, the landscape index method was used to assess the ecological risk of the Chongming Dongtan wetland. Based on transfer analysis and spatial autocorrelation analysis, the spatial and temporal changes of landscape ecological risk were revealed. The findings are as follows: (1) Natural landscapes such as mudflats, grasslands, and waters have been declining, while artificial landscapes such as cultivated land, construction land, and woodland have been gradually expanding, indicating a shift from natural to artificial landscapes. (2) Overall, the landscape ecological risk is showing an increasing trend. Wetlands have moved from being dominated by the lowest and medium ecological risks to being evenly distributed by all ecological risk classes. Notably, there has been a rapid increase in landscape ecological risk in 2000. The highest-risk areas have expanded by 9346.95 hm 2 , gradually encroaching from the buffer zone into the reclamation area and the nature reserve. Conversely, the lowest ecological risk areas have decreased by 7091.82 hm 2 , primarily concentrated in nature reserves. (3) The aggregation of landscape ecological risks continues to decrease, indicating a reduced likelihood of dramatic changes in ecological risks.</description><subject>Buffer zones</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Cultivated lands</subject><subject>Ecological risk assessment</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Global climate</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>land use</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>landscape ecological risk</subject><subject>landscape index</subject><subject>Migratory birds</subject><subject>Mud flats</subject><subject>Nature reserves</subject><subject>Reclamation</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Spatial analysis</subject><subject>spatial and temporal differentiation</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>Structure-function relationships</subject><subject>the chongming dongtan wetland</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><subject>Woodlands</subject><issn>2515-7620</issn><issn>2515-7620</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1v1DAQjRBIVG3vHC1x4MLS8Ucc-4gqKJVW4gJna2KPs16ycbBTIf49WYJKD4jDaEZP770ZzWuaVxzecTDmRrS83XVawA0GkATPmotH6PmT-WVzXesRAERnFXB10bg9TqF6nImRz2MekseRlVS_MayVaj3RtLAcmT_kaTilaWBhHRac2A9axlXM0sTqAafhgInFkk-MWwtsyUyAgKvmRcSx0vWfftl8_fjhy-2n3f7z3f3t-_3OK2WWnSIkAh1Rd77VHDvZSxP6XvlOmSA09NwaK7kP0caOd5xs0Fp2Br3V2qO8bO4335Dx6OaSTlh-uozJ_QZyGRyWJfmRHHiKWmNsZVBKe20jqLUE7yXXPfnV6_XmNZf8_YHq4o75oUzr-U4YI6wWnNuVBRvLl1xrofi4lYM7p-LOb3fnt7stlVXydpOkPP_1_A_9zT_oVLxrN1ELXLs5RPkL-luZLw</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Cao, Yong</creator><creator>Dong, Bin</creator><creator>Xu, Haifeng</creator><creator>Xu, Zhili</creator><creator>Wei, Zhezhu</creator><creator>Lu, Zhipeng</creator><creator>Liu, Xiao</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8650-7974</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Landscape ecological risk assessment of chongming dongtan wetland in shanghai from 1990 to 2020</title><author>Cao, Yong ; Dong, Bin ; Xu, Haifeng ; Xu, Zhili ; Wei, Zhezhu ; Lu, Zhipeng ; Liu, Xiao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-4eaee06fa67c561a73b38dbb4c748d260b198931cdf9f7171e9d66378ac966ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Buffer zones</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Cultivated lands</topic><topic>Ecological risk assessment</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Global climate</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>land use</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>landscape ecological risk</topic><topic>landscape index</topic><topic>Migratory birds</topic><topic>Mud flats</topic><topic>Nature reserves</topic><topic>Reclamation</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Spatial analysis</topic><topic>spatial and temporal differentiation</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>Structure-function relationships</topic><topic>the chongming dongtan wetland</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><topic>Woodlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cao, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Haifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Zhili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Zhezhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Zhipeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xiao</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Environmental Research Communications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cao, Yong</au><au>Dong, Bin</au><au>Xu, Haifeng</au><au>Xu, Zhili</au><au>Wei, Zhezhu</au><au>Lu, Zhipeng</au><au>Liu, Xiao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Landscape ecological risk assessment of chongming dongtan wetland in shanghai from 1990 to 2020</atitle><jtitle>Environmental Research Communications</jtitle><stitle>ERC</stitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Commun</addtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>105016</spage><pages>105016-</pages><issn>2515-7620</issn><eissn>2515-7620</eissn><abstract>Landscape ecological risk assessment can assess the stability, vulnerability, and anti-interference ability of the ecosystem based on the characteristics, structure, and function of the landscape in order to determine the degree and distribution of landscape ecological risk. In recent years, due to human activities and global climate change, the area and ecological quality of the Chongming Dongtan wetland have been decreasing. As an important wintering habitat and transit point on the ‘East Asia-Australia migration line’, the population and habitat security of wintering migratory birds are also threatened. Therefore, the landscape index method was used to assess the ecological risk of the Chongming Dongtan wetland. Based on transfer analysis and spatial autocorrelation analysis, the spatial and temporal changes of landscape ecological risk were revealed. The findings are as follows: (1) Natural landscapes such as mudflats, grasslands, and waters have been declining, while artificial landscapes such as cultivated land, construction land, and woodland have been gradually expanding, indicating a shift from natural to artificial landscapes. (2) Overall, the landscape ecological risk is showing an increasing trend. Wetlands have moved from being dominated by the lowest and medium ecological risks to being evenly distributed by all ecological risk classes. Notably, there has been a rapid increase in landscape ecological risk in 2000. The highest-risk areas have expanded by 9346.95 hm 2 , gradually encroaching from the buffer zone into the reclamation area and the nature reserve. Conversely, the lowest ecological risk areas have decreased by 7091.82 hm 2 , primarily concentrated in nature reserves. (3) The aggregation of landscape ecological risks continues to decrease, indicating a reduced likelihood of dramatic changes in ecological risks.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/2515-7620/ad03e0</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8650-7974</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2515-7620
ispartof Environmental Research Communications, 2023-10, Vol.5 (10), p.105016
issn 2515-7620
2515-7620
language eng
recordid cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_2515_7620_ad03e0
source IOP Publishing Free Content; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Buffer zones
Climate change
Cultivated lands
Ecological risk assessment
Environmental risk
Global climate
Grasslands
land use
Landscape
landscape ecological risk
landscape index
Migratory birds
Mud flats
Nature reserves
Reclamation
Risk assessment
Spatial analysis
spatial and temporal differentiation
Stability analysis
Structure-function relationships
the chongming dongtan wetland
Wetlands
Woodlands
title Landscape ecological risk assessment of chongming dongtan wetland in shanghai from 1990 to 2020
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T23%3A42%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Landscape%20ecological%20risk%20assessment%20of%20chongming%20dongtan%20wetland%20in%20shanghai%20from%201990%20to%202020&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20Research%20Communications&rft.au=Cao,%20Yong&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=105016&rft.pages=105016-&rft.issn=2515-7620&rft.eissn=2515-7620&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/2515-7620/ad03e0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E2882962119%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2882962119&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_0cef66af53d446c69f049f021b316bec&rfr_iscdi=true