Calibration curve and support vector regression methods applied for quantification of cement raw meal using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy

Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is a qualitative and quantitative analytical technique with great potential in the cement industrial analysis. Calibration curve (CC) and support vector regression (SVR) methods coupled with LIBS technology were applied for the quantification of three type...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plasma science & technology 2019-03, Vol.21 (3), p.34003
Hauptverfasser: JIA, Junwei, FU, Hongbo, HOU, Zongyu, WANG, Huadong, NI, Zhibo, DONG, Fengzhong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 34003
container_title Plasma science & technology
container_volume 21
creator JIA, Junwei
FU, Hongbo
HOU, Zongyu
WANG, Huadong
NI, Zhibo
DONG, Fengzhong
description Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is a qualitative and quantitative analytical technique with great potential in the cement industrial analysis. Calibration curve (CC) and support vector regression (SVR) methods coupled with LIBS technology were applied for the quantification of three types of cement raw meal samples to compare their analytical concentration range and the ability to reduce matrix effects, respectively. To reduce the effects of fluctuations of the pulse-to-pulse, the unstable ablation and improve the reproducibility, all of the analysis line intensities were normalized on a per-detector basis. The prediction results of the elements of interest in the three types of samples, Ca, Si, Fe, Al, Mg, Na, K and Ti, were compared with the results of the wet chemical analysis. The average relative error (ARE), relative standard deviation (RSD) and root mean squared error of prediction (RMSEP) were employed to investigate and evaluate the prediction accuracy and stability of the two prediction methods. The maximum average ARE of the CC and SVR methods is 34.62% instead of 6.13%, RSD is 40.89% instead of 7.60% and RMSEP is 1.34% instead of 0.43%. The results show that SVR method can accurately analyze samples within a wider concentration range and reduce the matrix effects, and LIBS coupled with it for a rapid, stable and accurate quantification of different types of cement raw meal samples is promising.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/2058-6272/aae3e1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>iop_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_2058_6272_aae3e1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>pstaae3e1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-48c7e4e2bb660b304558001cf4f7d2b5b0325721be684a93dd10862e5a6185923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtPwzAQxy0EEqWwM3pjIfRs59URVbykSiwwW459KS5pbOykFd-Cj0yiMDAgpjvp_o_Tj5BLBjcMynLBISuTnBd8oRQKZEdkxgCWCeQCjn_tp-Qsxi1Ali5LMSNfK9XYKqjOupbqPuyRqtbQ2HvvQkf3qDsXaMBNwBhHzQ67N2ciVd43Fg2th_NHr9rO1lZPMa6mGnfYdjSow2BQDe2jbTe0URFDYlvT68FZBVTvxh1aGv1QE1zUzn-ek5NaNREvfuacvN7fvawek_Xzw9Pqdp1owXiXpKUuMEVeVXkOlYA0y0oApuu0LgyvsgoEzwrOKszLVC2FMQOlnGOmclZmSy7mBKZcPRTHgLX0we5U-JQM5EhUjkTlSFRORAfL9WSxzsut60M7PPif_OoPuY-d5EwKCSIFENKbWnwDjJWI0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Calibration curve and support vector regression methods applied for quantification of cement raw meal using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy</title><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><creator>JIA, Junwei ; FU, Hongbo ; HOU, Zongyu ; WANG, Huadong ; NI, Zhibo ; DONG, Fengzhong</creator><creatorcontrib>JIA, Junwei ; FU, Hongbo ; HOU, Zongyu ; WANG, Huadong ; NI, Zhibo ; DONG, Fengzhong</creatorcontrib><description>Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is a qualitative and quantitative analytical technique with great potential in the cement industrial analysis. Calibration curve (CC) and support vector regression (SVR) methods coupled with LIBS technology were applied for the quantification of three types of cement raw meal samples to compare their analytical concentration range and the ability to reduce matrix effects, respectively. To reduce the effects of fluctuations of the pulse-to-pulse, the unstable ablation and improve the reproducibility, all of the analysis line intensities were normalized on a per-detector basis. The prediction results of the elements of interest in the three types of samples, Ca, Si, Fe, Al, Mg, Na, K and Ti, were compared with the results of the wet chemical analysis. The average relative error (ARE), relative standard deviation (RSD) and root mean squared error of prediction (RMSEP) were employed to investigate and evaluate the prediction accuracy and stability of the two prediction methods. The maximum average ARE of the CC and SVR methods is 34.62% instead of 6.13%, RSD is 40.89% instead of 7.60% and RMSEP is 1.34% instead of 0.43%. The results show that SVR method can accurately analyze samples within a wider concentration range and reduce the matrix effects, and LIBS coupled with it for a rapid, stable and accurate quantification of different types of cement raw meal samples is promising.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1009-0630</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1009-0630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aae3e1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSTHC3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>calibration curves ; cement raw meal ; LIBS ; SVR</subject><ispartof>Plasma science &amp; technology, 2019-03, Vol.21 (3), p.34003</ispartof><rights>2018 Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences and IOP Publishing</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-48c7e4e2bb660b304558001cf4f7d2b5b0325721be684a93dd10862e5a6185923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-48c7e4e2bb660b304558001cf4f7d2b5b0325721be684a93dd10862e5a6185923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2058-6272/aae3e1/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,53821</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>JIA, Junwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FU, Hongbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOU, Zongyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WANG, Huadong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NI, Zhibo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DONG, Fengzhong</creatorcontrib><title>Calibration curve and support vector regression methods applied for quantification of cement raw meal using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy</title><title>Plasma science &amp; technology</title><addtitle>PST</addtitle><addtitle>Plasma Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is a qualitative and quantitative analytical technique with great potential in the cement industrial analysis. Calibration curve (CC) and support vector regression (SVR) methods coupled with LIBS technology were applied for the quantification of three types of cement raw meal samples to compare their analytical concentration range and the ability to reduce matrix effects, respectively. To reduce the effects of fluctuations of the pulse-to-pulse, the unstable ablation and improve the reproducibility, all of the analysis line intensities were normalized on a per-detector basis. The prediction results of the elements of interest in the three types of samples, Ca, Si, Fe, Al, Mg, Na, K and Ti, were compared with the results of the wet chemical analysis. The average relative error (ARE), relative standard deviation (RSD) and root mean squared error of prediction (RMSEP) were employed to investigate and evaluate the prediction accuracy and stability of the two prediction methods. The maximum average ARE of the CC and SVR methods is 34.62% instead of 6.13%, RSD is 40.89% instead of 7.60% and RMSEP is 1.34% instead of 0.43%. The results show that SVR method can accurately analyze samples within a wider concentration range and reduce the matrix effects, and LIBS coupled with it for a rapid, stable and accurate quantification of different types of cement raw meal samples is promising.</description><subject>calibration curves</subject><subject>cement raw meal</subject><subject>LIBS</subject><subject>SVR</subject><issn>1009-0630</issn><issn>1009-0630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDtPwzAQxy0EEqWwM3pjIfRs59URVbykSiwwW459KS5pbOykFd-Cj0yiMDAgpjvp_o_Tj5BLBjcMynLBISuTnBd8oRQKZEdkxgCWCeQCjn_tp-Qsxi1Ali5LMSNfK9XYKqjOupbqPuyRqtbQ2HvvQkf3qDsXaMBNwBhHzQ67N2ciVd43Fg2th_NHr9rO1lZPMa6mGnfYdjSow2BQDe2jbTe0URFDYlvT68FZBVTvxh1aGv1QE1zUzn-ek5NaNREvfuacvN7fvawek_Xzw9Pqdp1owXiXpKUuMEVeVXkOlYA0y0oApuu0LgyvsgoEzwrOKszLVC2FMQOlnGOmclZmSy7mBKZcPRTHgLX0we5U-JQM5EhUjkTlSFRORAfL9WSxzsut60M7PPif_OoPuY-d5EwKCSIFENKbWnwDjJWI0g</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>JIA, Junwei</creator><creator>FU, Hongbo</creator><creator>HOU, Zongyu</creator><creator>WANG, Huadong</creator><creator>NI, Zhibo</creator><creator>DONG, Fengzhong</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>Calibration curve and support vector regression methods applied for quantification of cement raw meal using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy</title><author>JIA, Junwei ; FU, Hongbo ; HOU, Zongyu ; WANG, Huadong ; NI, Zhibo ; DONG, Fengzhong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-48c7e4e2bb660b304558001cf4f7d2b5b0325721be684a93dd10862e5a6185923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>calibration curves</topic><topic>cement raw meal</topic><topic>LIBS</topic><topic>SVR</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>JIA, Junwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FU, Hongbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOU, Zongyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WANG, Huadong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NI, Zhibo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DONG, Fengzhong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Plasma science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>JIA, Junwei</au><au>FU, Hongbo</au><au>HOU, Zongyu</au><au>WANG, Huadong</au><au>NI, Zhibo</au><au>DONG, Fengzhong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Calibration curve and support vector regression methods applied for quantification of cement raw meal using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy</atitle><jtitle>Plasma science &amp; technology</jtitle><stitle>PST</stitle><addtitle>Plasma Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>34003</spage><pages>34003-</pages><issn>1009-0630</issn><eissn>1009-0630</eissn><coden>PSTHC3</coden><abstract>Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is a qualitative and quantitative analytical technique with great potential in the cement industrial analysis. Calibration curve (CC) and support vector regression (SVR) methods coupled with LIBS technology were applied for the quantification of three types of cement raw meal samples to compare their analytical concentration range and the ability to reduce matrix effects, respectively. To reduce the effects of fluctuations of the pulse-to-pulse, the unstable ablation and improve the reproducibility, all of the analysis line intensities were normalized on a per-detector basis. The prediction results of the elements of interest in the three types of samples, Ca, Si, Fe, Al, Mg, Na, K and Ti, were compared with the results of the wet chemical analysis. The average relative error (ARE), relative standard deviation (RSD) and root mean squared error of prediction (RMSEP) were employed to investigate and evaluate the prediction accuracy and stability of the two prediction methods. The maximum average ARE of the CC and SVR methods is 34.62% instead of 6.13%, RSD is 40.89% instead of 7.60% and RMSEP is 1.34% instead of 0.43%. The results show that SVR method can accurately analyze samples within a wider concentration range and reduce the matrix effects, and LIBS coupled with it for a rapid, stable and accurate quantification of different types of cement raw meal samples is promising.</abstract><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/2058-6272/aae3e1</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1009-0630
ispartof Plasma science & technology, 2019-03, Vol.21 (3), p.34003
issn 1009-0630
1009-0630
language eng
recordid cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_2058_6272_aae3e1
source IOP Publishing Journals
subjects calibration curves
cement raw meal
LIBS
SVR
title Calibration curve and support vector regression methods applied for quantification of cement raw meal using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T21%3A59%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-iop_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Calibration%20curve%20and%20support%20vector%20regression%20methods%20applied%20for%20quantification%20of%20cement%20raw%20meal%20using%20laser-induced%20breakdown%20spectroscopy&rft.jtitle=Plasma%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=JIA,%20Junwei&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=34003&rft.pages=34003-&rft.issn=1009-0630&rft.eissn=1009-0630&rft.coden=PSTHC3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/2058-6272/aae3e1&rft_dat=%3Ciop_cross%3Epstaae3e1%3C/iop_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true