Calibration curve and support vector regression methods applied for quantification of cement raw meal using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy
Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is a qualitative and quantitative analytical technique with great potential in the cement industrial analysis. Calibration curve (CC) and support vector regression (SVR) methods coupled with LIBS technology were applied for the quantification of three type...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plasma science & technology 2019-03, Vol.21 (3), p.34003 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 34003 |
container_title | Plasma science & technology |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | JIA, Junwei FU, Hongbo HOU, Zongyu WANG, Huadong NI, Zhibo DONG, Fengzhong |
description | Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is a qualitative and quantitative analytical technique with great potential in the cement industrial analysis. Calibration curve (CC) and support vector regression (SVR) methods coupled with LIBS technology were applied for the quantification of three types of cement raw meal samples to compare their analytical concentration range and the ability to reduce matrix effects, respectively. To reduce the effects of fluctuations of the pulse-to-pulse, the unstable ablation and improve the reproducibility, all of the analysis line intensities were normalized on a per-detector basis. The prediction results of the elements of interest in the three types of samples, Ca, Si, Fe, Al, Mg, Na, K and Ti, were compared with the results of the wet chemical analysis. The average relative error (ARE), relative standard deviation (RSD) and root mean squared error of prediction (RMSEP) were employed to investigate and evaluate the prediction accuracy and stability of the two prediction methods. The maximum average ARE of the CC and SVR methods is 34.62% instead of 6.13%, RSD is 40.89% instead of 7.60% and RMSEP is 1.34% instead of 0.43%. The results show that SVR method can accurately analyze samples within a wider concentration range and reduce the matrix effects, and LIBS coupled with it for a rapid, stable and accurate quantification of different types of cement raw meal samples is promising. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/2058-6272/aae3e1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>iop_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_2058_6272_aae3e1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>pstaae3e1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-48c7e4e2bb660b304558001cf4f7d2b5b0325721be684a93dd10862e5a6185923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtPwzAQxy0EEqWwM3pjIfRs59URVbykSiwwW459KS5pbOykFd-Cj0yiMDAgpjvp_o_Tj5BLBjcMynLBISuTnBd8oRQKZEdkxgCWCeQCjn_tp-Qsxi1Ali5LMSNfK9XYKqjOupbqPuyRqtbQ2HvvQkf3qDsXaMBNwBhHzQ67N2ciVd43Fg2th_NHr9rO1lZPMa6mGnfYdjSow2BQDe2jbTe0URFDYlvT68FZBVTvxh1aGv1QE1zUzn-ek5NaNREvfuacvN7fvawek_Xzw9Pqdp1owXiXpKUuMEVeVXkOlYA0y0oApuu0LgyvsgoEzwrOKszLVC2FMQOlnGOmclZmSy7mBKZcPRTHgLX0we5U-JQM5EhUjkTlSFRORAfL9WSxzsut60M7PPif_OoPuY-d5EwKCSIFENKbWnwDjJWI0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Calibration curve and support vector regression methods applied for quantification of cement raw meal using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy</title><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><creator>JIA, Junwei ; FU, Hongbo ; HOU, Zongyu ; WANG, Huadong ; NI, Zhibo ; DONG, Fengzhong</creator><creatorcontrib>JIA, Junwei ; FU, Hongbo ; HOU, Zongyu ; WANG, Huadong ; NI, Zhibo ; DONG, Fengzhong</creatorcontrib><description>Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is a qualitative and quantitative analytical technique with great potential in the cement industrial analysis. Calibration curve (CC) and support vector regression (SVR) methods coupled with LIBS technology were applied for the quantification of three types of cement raw meal samples to compare their analytical concentration range and the ability to reduce matrix effects, respectively. To reduce the effects of fluctuations of the pulse-to-pulse, the unstable ablation and improve the reproducibility, all of the analysis line intensities were normalized on a per-detector basis. The prediction results of the elements of interest in the three types of samples, Ca, Si, Fe, Al, Mg, Na, K and Ti, were compared with the results of the wet chemical analysis. The average relative error (ARE), relative standard deviation (RSD) and root mean squared error of prediction (RMSEP) were employed to investigate and evaluate the prediction accuracy and stability of the two prediction methods. The maximum average ARE of the CC and SVR methods is 34.62% instead of 6.13%, RSD is 40.89% instead of 7.60% and RMSEP is 1.34% instead of 0.43%. The results show that SVR method can accurately analyze samples within a wider concentration range and reduce the matrix effects, and LIBS coupled with it for a rapid, stable and accurate quantification of different types of cement raw meal samples is promising.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1009-0630</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1009-0630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/2058-6272/aae3e1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSTHC3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>calibration curves ; cement raw meal ; LIBS ; SVR</subject><ispartof>Plasma science & technology, 2019-03, Vol.21 (3), p.34003</ispartof><rights>2018 Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences and IOP Publishing</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-48c7e4e2bb660b304558001cf4f7d2b5b0325721be684a93dd10862e5a6185923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-48c7e4e2bb660b304558001cf4f7d2b5b0325721be684a93dd10862e5a6185923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2058-6272/aae3e1/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,53821</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>JIA, Junwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FU, Hongbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOU, Zongyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WANG, Huadong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NI, Zhibo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DONG, Fengzhong</creatorcontrib><title>Calibration curve and support vector regression methods applied for quantification of cement raw meal using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy</title><title>Plasma science & technology</title><addtitle>PST</addtitle><addtitle>Plasma Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is a qualitative and quantitative analytical technique with great potential in the cement industrial analysis. Calibration curve (CC) and support vector regression (SVR) methods coupled with LIBS technology were applied for the quantification of three types of cement raw meal samples to compare their analytical concentration range and the ability to reduce matrix effects, respectively. To reduce the effects of fluctuations of the pulse-to-pulse, the unstable ablation and improve the reproducibility, all of the analysis line intensities were normalized on a per-detector basis. The prediction results of the elements of interest in the three types of samples, Ca, Si, Fe, Al, Mg, Na, K and Ti, were compared with the results of the wet chemical analysis. The average relative error (ARE), relative standard deviation (RSD) and root mean squared error of prediction (RMSEP) were employed to investigate and evaluate the prediction accuracy and stability of the two prediction methods. The maximum average ARE of the CC and SVR methods is 34.62% instead of 6.13%, RSD is 40.89% instead of 7.60% and RMSEP is 1.34% instead of 0.43%. The results show that SVR method can accurately analyze samples within a wider concentration range and reduce the matrix effects, and LIBS coupled with it for a rapid, stable and accurate quantification of different types of cement raw meal samples is promising.</description><subject>calibration curves</subject><subject>cement raw meal</subject><subject>LIBS</subject><subject>SVR</subject><issn>1009-0630</issn><issn>1009-0630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kDtPwzAQxy0EEqWwM3pjIfRs59URVbykSiwwW459KS5pbOykFd-Cj0yiMDAgpjvp_o_Tj5BLBjcMynLBISuTnBd8oRQKZEdkxgCWCeQCjn_tp-Qsxi1Ali5LMSNfK9XYKqjOupbqPuyRqtbQ2HvvQkf3qDsXaMBNwBhHzQ67N2ciVd43Fg2th_NHr9rO1lZPMa6mGnfYdjSow2BQDe2jbTe0URFDYlvT68FZBVTvxh1aGv1QE1zUzn-ek5NaNREvfuacvN7fvawek_Xzw9Pqdp1owXiXpKUuMEVeVXkOlYA0y0oApuu0LgyvsgoEzwrOKszLVC2FMQOlnGOmclZmSy7mBKZcPRTHgLX0we5U-JQM5EhUjkTlSFRORAfL9WSxzsut60M7PPif_OoPuY-d5EwKCSIFENKbWnwDjJWI0g</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>JIA, Junwei</creator><creator>FU, Hongbo</creator><creator>HOU, Zongyu</creator><creator>WANG, Huadong</creator><creator>NI, Zhibo</creator><creator>DONG, Fengzhong</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>Calibration curve and support vector regression methods applied for quantification of cement raw meal using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy</title><author>JIA, Junwei ; FU, Hongbo ; HOU, Zongyu ; WANG, Huadong ; NI, Zhibo ; DONG, Fengzhong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-48c7e4e2bb660b304558001cf4f7d2b5b0325721be684a93dd10862e5a6185923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>calibration curves</topic><topic>cement raw meal</topic><topic>LIBS</topic><topic>SVR</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>JIA, Junwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FU, Hongbo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOU, Zongyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WANG, Huadong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NI, Zhibo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DONG, Fengzhong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Plasma science & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>JIA, Junwei</au><au>FU, Hongbo</au><au>HOU, Zongyu</au><au>WANG, Huadong</au><au>NI, Zhibo</au><au>DONG, Fengzhong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Calibration curve and support vector regression methods applied for quantification of cement raw meal using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy</atitle><jtitle>Plasma science & technology</jtitle><stitle>PST</stitle><addtitle>Plasma Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>34003</spage><pages>34003-</pages><issn>1009-0630</issn><eissn>1009-0630</eissn><coden>PSTHC3</coden><abstract>Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is a qualitative and quantitative analytical technique with great potential in the cement industrial analysis. Calibration curve (CC) and support vector regression (SVR) methods coupled with LIBS technology were applied for the quantification of three types of cement raw meal samples to compare their analytical concentration range and the ability to reduce matrix effects, respectively. To reduce the effects of fluctuations of the pulse-to-pulse, the unstable ablation and improve the reproducibility, all of the analysis line intensities were normalized on a per-detector basis. The prediction results of the elements of interest in the three types of samples, Ca, Si, Fe, Al, Mg, Na, K and Ti, were compared with the results of the wet chemical analysis. The average relative error (ARE), relative standard deviation (RSD) and root mean squared error of prediction (RMSEP) were employed to investigate and evaluate the prediction accuracy and stability of the two prediction methods. The maximum average ARE of the CC and SVR methods is 34.62% instead of 6.13%, RSD is 40.89% instead of 7.60% and RMSEP is 1.34% instead of 0.43%. The results show that SVR method can accurately analyze samples within a wider concentration range and reduce the matrix effects, and LIBS coupled with it for a rapid, stable and accurate quantification of different types of cement raw meal samples is promising.</abstract><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/2058-6272/aae3e1</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1009-0630 |
ispartof | Plasma science & technology, 2019-03, Vol.21 (3), p.34003 |
issn | 1009-0630 1009-0630 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_2058_6272_aae3e1 |
source | IOP Publishing Journals |
subjects | calibration curves cement raw meal LIBS SVR |
title | Calibration curve and support vector regression methods applied for quantification of cement raw meal using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T21%3A59%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-iop_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Calibration%20curve%20and%20support%20vector%20regression%20methods%20applied%20for%20quantification%20of%20cement%20raw%20meal%20using%20laser-induced%20breakdown%20spectroscopy&rft.jtitle=Plasma%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=JIA,%20Junwei&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=34003&rft.pages=34003-&rft.issn=1009-0630&rft.eissn=1009-0630&rft.coden=PSTHC3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/2058-6272/aae3e1&rft_dat=%3Ciop_cross%3Epstaae3e1%3C/iop_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |