Dosimetry of a 6 MV flattening filter-free small photon beam using various detectors
The present study aimed to dosimetrically evaluate the small-fields of a 6 MV flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beam using different detectors.The 6 MV FFF photon beam was used for measurement of output factor, depth dose, and beam profile of small-fields of sizes 0.6 cm × 0.6 cm to 6.0 cm × 6.0 c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biomedical physics & engineering express 2021-07, Vol.7 (4), p.45004 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 45004 |
container_title | Biomedical physics & engineering express |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Dwivedi, Shekhar Kansal, Sandeep Dangwal, Vinod Kumar Bharati, Avinav Shukla, Jooli |
description | The present study aimed to dosimetrically evaluate the small-fields of a 6 MV flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beam using different detectors.The 6 MV FFF photon beam was used for measurement of output factor, depth dose, and beam profile of small-fields of sizes 0.6 cm × 0.6 cm to 6.0 cm × 6.0 cm. The five detectors used were SNC125c, PinPoint, EDGE, EBT3, and TLD-100. All measurements were performed as per the International Atomic Energy Agency TRS 483 protocol. Output factors measured using different detectors as direct reading ratios showed significant variation for the smallest fields, whereas after correcting them according to TRS 483, all sets of output factors were nearly compatible with each other when measurement uncertainty was also considered. The beam profile measured using SNC125c showed the largest penumbra for all field sizes, whereas the smallest was recorded with EDGE. Compared with that of EBT3, the surface dose was found to be much higher for all the other detectors. PinPoint, EBT3, TLD-100, and EDGE were found to be the detector of choice for small-field output factor measurements; however, PinPoint needs special attention when used for the smallest field size (0.6 cm × 0.6 cm). EDGE and EBT3 are optimal for measuring beam profiles. EBT3, PinPoint, and EDGE can be selected for depth dose measurements, and EBT3 is suitable for surface dose estimation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/2057-1976/abfd80 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_2057_1976_abfd80</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2520870180</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-456c33125db8bdbb4887170728881ad351ce518cef32f0c72aaff06ba8c7dd8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq2qqCDYe0-Vb-2BwDiOY--xouVDAnEBrpY_xm1QEqe2g-Dfk9VuUQ8VpxmNnnk18xDymcEJA6VOaxCyYmvZnhobvIIP5OBt9PGffp-scn4EANbWbbsWn8g-52sOSooDcvcj5m7Akl5oDNTQlt480NCbUnDsxl80dH3BVIWESPNg-p5Ov2OJI7VoBjrnDfNkUhfnTD0WdCWmfET2gukzrnb1kNyf_7w7u6yuby-uzr5fV463qlSNaB3nrBbeKuutbZSSTIKslVLMeC6YQ8GUw8DrAE7WxoQArTXKSe9V4Ifk2zZ3SvHPjLnoocsO-96MuByka1EvXwJTsKCwRV2KOScMekrdYNKLZqA3OvXGl9740ludy8qXXfpsB_RvC3_lLcDxFujipB_jnMbl2ffyvv4HtxM-a6kbDY0AaPTkA38FAeyMJg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2520870180</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dosimetry of a 6 MV flattening filter-free small photon beam using various detectors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Institute of Physics Journals</source><creator>Dwivedi, Shekhar ; Kansal, Sandeep ; Dangwal, Vinod Kumar ; Bharati, Avinav ; Shukla, Jooli</creator><creatorcontrib>Dwivedi, Shekhar ; Kansal, Sandeep ; Dangwal, Vinod Kumar ; Bharati, Avinav ; Shukla, Jooli</creatorcontrib><description>The present study aimed to dosimetrically evaluate the small-fields of a 6 MV flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beam using different detectors.The 6 MV FFF photon beam was used for measurement of output factor, depth dose, and beam profile of small-fields of sizes 0.6 cm × 0.6 cm to 6.0 cm × 6.0 cm. The five detectors used were SNC125c, PinPoint, EDGE, EBT3, and TLD-100. All measurements were performed as per the International Atomic Energy Agency TRS 483 protocol. Output factors measured using different detectors as direct reading ratios showed significant variation for the smallest fields, whereas after correcting them according to TRS 483, all sets of output factors were nearly compatible with each other when measurement uncertainty was also considered. The beam profile measured using SNC125c showed the largest penumbra for all field sizes, whereas the smallest was recorded with EDGE. Compared with that of EBT3, the surface dose was found to be much higher for all the other detectors. PinPoint, EBT3, TLD-100, and EDGE were found to be the detector of choice for small-field output factor measurements; however, PinPoint needs special attention when used for the smallest field size (0.6 cm × 0.6 cm). EDGE and EBT3 are optimal for measuring beam profiles. EBT3, PinPoint, and EDGE can be selected for depth dose measurements, and EBT3 is suitable for surface dose estimation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2057-1976</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2057-1976</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/abfd80</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33930875</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NJOPFM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>detector ; FFF photon beam ; International Agencies ; Nuclear Energy ; output factor ; Photons ; Radiometry ; small-field dosimetry ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Biomedical physics & engineering express, 2021-07, Vol.7 (4), p.45004</ispartof><rights>2021 IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2021 IOP Publishing Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-456c33125db8bdbb4887170728881ad351ce518cef32f0c72aaff06ba8c7dd8f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-456c33125db8bdbb4887170728881ad351ce518cef32f0c72aaff06ba8c7dd8f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8047-8036</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2057-1976/abfd80/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,53844,53891</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33930875$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dwivedi, Shekhar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kansal, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dangwal, Vinod Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bharati, Avinav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shukla, Jooli</creatorcontrib><title>Dosimetry of a 6 MV flattening filter-free small photon beam using various detectors</title><title>Biomedical physics & engineering express</title><addtitle>BPEX</addtitle><addtitle>Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express</addtitle><description>The present study aimed to dosimetrically evaluate the small-fields of a 6 MV flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beam using different detectors.The 6 MV FFF photon beam was used for measurement of output factor, depth dose, and beam profile of small-fields of sizes 0.6 cm × 0.6 cm to 6.0 cm × 6.0 cm. The five detectors used were SNC125c, PinPoint, EDGE, EBT3, and TLD-100. All measurements were performed as per the International Atomic Energy Agency TRS 483 protocol. Output factors measured using different detectors as direct reading ratios showed significant variation for the smallest fields, whereas after correcting them according to TRS 483, all sets of output factors were nearly compatible with each other when measurement uncertainty was also considered. The beam profile measured using SNC125c showed the largest penumbra for all field sizes, whereas the smallest was recorded with EDGE. Compared with that of EBT3, the surface dose was found to be much higher for all the other detectors. PinPoint, EBT3, TLD-100, and EDGE were found to be the detector of choice for small-field output factor measurements; however, PinPoint needs special attention when used for the smallest field size (0.6 cm × 0.6 cm). EDGE and EBT3 are optimal for measuring beam profiles. EBT3, PinPoint, and EDGE can be selected for depth dose measurements, and EBT3 is suitable for surface dose estimation.</description><subject>detector</subject><subject>FFF photon beam</subject><subject>International Agencies</subject><subject>Nuclear Energy</subject><subject>output factor</subject><subject>Photons</subject><subject>Radiometry</subject><subject>small-field dosimetry</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>2057-1976</issn><issn>2057-1976</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq2qqCDYe0-Vb-2BwDiOY--xouVDAnEBrpY_xm1QEqe2g-Dfk9VuUQ8VpxmNnnk18xDymcEJA6VOaxCyYmvZnhobvIIP5OBt9PGffp-scn4EANbWbbsWn8g-52sOSooDcvcj5m7Akl5oDNTQlt480NCbUnDsxl80dH3BVIWESPNg-p5Ov2OJI7VoBjrnDfNkUhfnTD0WdCWmfET2gukzrnb1kNyf_7w7u6yuby-uzr5fV463qlSNaB3nrBbeKuutbZSSTIKslVLMeC6YQ8GUw8DrAE7WxoQArTXKSe9V4Ifk2zZ3SvHPjLnoocsO-96MuByka1EvXwJTsKCwRV2KOScMekrdYNKLZqA3OvXGl9740ludy8qXXfpsB_RvC3_lLcDxFujipB_jnMbl2ffyvv4HtxM-a6kbDY0AaPTkA38FAeyMJg</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Dwivedi, Shekhar</creator><creator>Kansal, Sandeep</creator><creator>Dangwal, Vinod Kumar</creator><creator>Bharati, Avinav</creator><creator>Shukla, Jooli</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8047-8036</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Dosimetry of a 6 MV flattening filter-free small photon beam using various detectors</title><author>Dwivedi, Shekhar ; Kansal, Sandeep ; Dangwal, Vinod Kumar ; Bharati, Avinav ; Shukla, Jooli</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-456c33125db8bdbb4887170728881ad351ce518cef32f0c72aaff06ba8c7dd8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>detector</topic><topic>FFF photon beam</topic><topic>International Agencies</topic><topic>Nuclear Energy</topic><topic>output factor</topic><topic>Photons</topic><topic>Radiometry</topic><topic>small-field dosimetry</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dwivedi, Shekhar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kansal, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dangwal, Vinod Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bharati, Avinav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shukla, Jooli</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biomedical physics & engineering express</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dwivedi, Shekhar</au><au>Kansal, Sandeep</au><au>Dangwal, Vinod Kumar</au><au>Bharati, Avinav</au><au>Shukla, Jooli</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dosimetry of a 6 MV flattening filter-free small photon beam using various detectors</atitle><jtitle>Biomedical physics & engineering express</jtitle><stitle>BPEX</stitle><addtitle>Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express</addtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>45004</spage><pages>45004-</pages><issn>2057-1976</issn><eissn>2057-1976</eissn><coden>NJOPFM</coden><abstract>The present study aimed to dosimetrically evaluate the small-fields of a 6 MV flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beam using different detectors.The 6 MV FFF photon beam was used for measurement of output factor, depth dose, and beam profile of small-fields of sizes 0.6 cm × 0.6 cm to 6.0 cm × 6.0 cm. The five detectors used were SNC125c, PinPoint, EDGE, EBT3, and TLD-100. All measurements were performed as per the International Atomic Energy Agency TRS 483 protocol. Output factors measured using different detectors as direct reading ratios showed significant variation for the smallest fields, whereas after correcting them according to TRS 483, all sets of output factors were nearly compatible with each other when measurement uncertainty was also considered. The beam profile measured using SNC125c showed the largest penumbra for all field sizes, whereas the smallest was recorded with EDGE. Compared with that of EBT3, the surface dose was found to be much higher for all the other detectors. PinPoint, EBT3, TLD-100, and EDGE were found to be the detector of choice for small-field output factor measurements; however, PinPoint needs special attention when used for the smallest field size (0.6 cm × 0.6 cm). EDGE and EBT3 are optimal for measuring beam profiles. EBT3, PinPoint, and EDGE can be selected for depth dose measurements, and EBT3 is suitable for surface dose estimation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>33930875</pmid><doi>10.1088/2057-1976/abfd80</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8047-8036</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2057-1976 |
ispartof | Biomedical physics & engineering express, 2021-07, Vol.7 (4), p.45004 |
issn | 2057-1976 2057-1976 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_2057_1976_abfd80 |
source | MEDLINE; Institute of Physics Journals |
subjects | detector FFF photon beam International Agencies Nuclear Energy output factor Photons Radiometry small-field dosimetry Uncertainty |
title | Dosimetry of a 6 MV flattening filter-free small photon beam using various detectors |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T08%3A07%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dosimetry%20of%20a%206%20MV%20flattening%20filter-free%20small%20photon%20beam%20using%20various%20detectors&rft.jtitle=Biomedical%20physics%20&%20engineering%20express&rft.au=Dwivedi,%20Shekhar&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=45004&rft.pages=45004-&rft.issn=2057-1976&rft.eissn=2057-1976&rft.coden=NJOPFM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/2057-1976/abfd80&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E2520870180%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2520870180&rft_id=info:pmid/33930875&rfr_iscdi=true |