Quantification of visceral adiposity: evaluation of the body electrical loss analysis

Body electrical loss analysis (BELA) is a measurement of the electrical losses caused by the human abdomen when placed into an alternating magnetic field. This study aimed at finding a prediction formula for visceral fat area (VFA) from BELA. Thirty-eight test subjects covering the body mass index o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biomedical physics & engineering express 2018-03, Vol.4 (2), p.25034
Hauptverfasser: Blomqvist, Kim H, Kuutti, Jussi, Lundbom, Jesper, Pietiläinen, Kirsi H, Lundbom, Nina, Sepponen, Raimo E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 25034
container_title Biomedical physics & engineering express
container_volume 4
creator Blomqvist, Kim H
Kuutti, Jussi
Lundbom, Jesper
Pietiläinen, Kirsi H
Lundbom, Nina
Sepponen, Raimo E
description Body electrical loss analysis (BELA) is a measurement of the electrical losses caused by the human abdomen when placed into an alternating magnetic field. This study aimed at finding a prediction formula for visceral fat area (VFA) from BELA. Thirty-eight test subjects covering the body mass index of 19.6-39.4 kg m−2 and the waist circumference of 78-128 cm underwent BELA, single-frequency electrical abdominal impedance measurement (SAI), conventional bioelectrical impedance analysis and cross-sectional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The BELA was compared with the amount of visceral and subcutaneous fat calculated from MR images. The strongest correlation between BELA and VFA (r = 0.61, SEE = 59.30) was found at the height of umbilicus +5 cm, and it tended to decrease when the measurement height was lowered. The correlation to subcutaneus fat area (SFA) at the height of umbilicus +5 cm was r = 0.43 (lower is better), and it tended to increase when the measurement height was lowered. The correlation of BELA to VFA in the evaluation cohort is not strong enough to tolerate obtaining the prediction formula for VFA by regression among BELA and MRI. Also the large SEE value suggests a poor agreement with MRI. Thus the results suggest that in its current form BELA cannot be applied as a diagnostic device to measure visceral fat. Although SAI can help in identifying the abdominal SF layer thickness, it did not help when applied to BELA analysis.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/2057-1976/aaa5bc
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>iop_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_2057_1976_aaa5bc</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>bpexaaa5bc</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-474e44f001588ac8a03203e8c3f3a1c6c010a5682aab84888bae06c62ff8ad13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LAzEUDKJgqb17zM2La18-m3qTolUoiFDP4W02wZTYXTbb4v57t1SKB_H0hsfMezNDyDWDOwbGTDmoWcHmMz1FRFW6MzI6rc5_4UsyyXkDAExzredqRN7fdrjtYogOu1hvaR3oPmbnW0wUq9jUOXb9PfV7TLsTo_vwtKyrnvrkXdcO2kRTnTPFLaY-x3xFLgKm7Cc_c0zWT4_rxXOxel2-LB5WheNadYWcSS9lGOwoY9AZBMFBeONEEMicdsAAlTYcsTTSGFOiB-00D8FgxcSYwPGsa4fvrQ-2aeMntr1lYA_F2ENye0huj8UMktujJNaN3dS7dnCc_6Pf_EEvG_9lpeUWuAIhbVMF8Q0NV3Pe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantification of visceral adiposity: evaluation of the body electrical loss analysis</title><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Blomqvist, Kim H ; Kuutti, Jussi ; Lundbom, Jesper ; Pietiläinen, Kirsi H ; Lundbom, Nina ; Sepponen, Raimo E</creator><creatorcontrib>Blomqvist, Kim H ; Kuutti, Jussi ; Lundbom, Jesper ; Pietiläinen, Kirsi H ; Lundbom, Nina ; Sepponen, Raimo E</creatorcontrib><description>Body electrical loss analysis (BELA) is a measurement of the electrical losses caused by the human abdomen when placed into an alternating magnetic field. This study aimed at finding a prediction formula for visceral fat area (VFA) from BELA. Thirty-eight test subjects covering the body mass index of 19.6-39.4 kg m−2 and the waist circumference of 78-128 cm underwent BELA, single-frequency electrical abdominal impedance measurement (SAI), conventional bioelectrical impedance analysis and cross-sectional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The BELA was compared with the amount of visceral and subcutaneous fat calculated from MR images. The strongest correlation between BELA and VFA (r = 0.61, SEE = 59.30) was found at the height of umbilicus +5 cm, and it tended to decrease when the measurement height was lowered. The correlation to subcutaneus fat area (SFA) at the height of umbilicus +5 cm was r = 0.43 (lower is better), and it tended to increase when the measurement height was lowered. The correlation of BELA to VFA in the evaluation cohort is not strong enough to tolerate obtaining the prediction formula for VFA by regression among BELA and MRI. Also the large SEE value suggests a poor agreement with MRI. Thus the results suggest that in its current form BELA cannot be applied as a diagnostic device to measure visceral fat. Although SAI can help in identifying the abdominal SF layer thickness, it did not help when applied to BELA analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2057-1976</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2057-1976</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/aaa5bc</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NJOPFM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>electrical bioimpedance ; magnetic resonance imaging ; visceral obesity</subject><ispartof>Biomedical physics &amp; engineering express, 2018-03, Vol.4 (2), p.25034</ispartof><rights>2018 IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-474e44f001588ac8a03203e8c3f3a1c6c010a5682aab84888bae06c62ff8ad13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6700-7053</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2057-1976/aaa5bc/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,53821,53868</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blomqvist, Kim H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuutti, Jussi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundbom, Jesper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pietiläinen, Kirsi H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundbom, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sepponen, Raimo E</creatorcontrib><title>Quantification of visceral adiposity: evaluation of the body electrical loss analysis</title><title>Biomedical physics &amp; engineering express</title><addtitle>BPEX</addtitle><addtitle>Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express</addtitle><description>Body electrical loss analysis (BELA) is a measurement of the electrical losses caused by the human abdomen when placed into an alternating magnetic field. This study aimed at finding a prediction formula for visceral fat area (VFA) from BELA. Thirty-eight test subjects covering the body mass index of 19.6-39.4 kg m−2 and the waist circumference of 78-128 cm underwent BELA, single-frequency electrical abdominal impedance measurement (SAI), conventional bioelectrical impedance analysis and cross-sectional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The BELA was compared with the amount of visceral and subcutaneous fat calculated from MR images. The strongest correlation between BELA and VFA (r = 0.61, SEE = 59.30) was found at the height of umbilicus +5 cm, and it tended to decrease when the measurement height was lowered. The correlation to subcutaneus fat area (SFA) at the height of umbilicus +5 cm was r = 0.43 (lower is better), and it tended to increase when the measurement height was lowered. The correlation of BELA to VFA in the evaluation cohort is not strong enough to tolerate obtaining the prediction formula for VFA by regression among BELA and MRI. Also the large SEE value suggests a poor agreement with MRI. Thus the results suggest that in its current form BELA cannot be applied as a diagnostic device to measure visceral fat. Although SAI can help in identifying the abdominal SF layer thickness, it did not help when applied to BELA analysis.</description><subject>electrical bioimpedance</subject><subject>magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>visceral obesity</subject><issn>2057-1976</issn><issn>2057-1976</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UE1LAzEUDKJgqb17zM2La18-m3qTolUoiFDP4W02wZTYXTbb4v57t1SKB_H0hsfMezNDyDWDOwbGTDmoWcHmMz1FRFW6MzI6rc5_4UsyyXkDAExzredqRN7fdrjtYogOu1hvaR3oPmbnW0wUq9jUOXb9PfV7TLsTo_vwtKyrnvrkXdcO2kRTnTPFLaY-x3xFLgKm7Cc_c0zWT4_rxXOxel2-LB5WheNadYWcSS9lGOwoY9AZBMFBeONEEMicdsAAlTYcsTTSGFOiB-00D8FgxcSYwPGsa4fvrQ-2aeMntr1lYA_F2ENye0huj8UMktujJNaN3dS7dnCc_6Pf_EEvG_9lpeUWuAIhbVMF8Q0NV3Pe</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Blomqvist, Kim H</creator><creator>Kuutti, Jussi</creator><creator>Lundbom, Jesper</creator><creator>Pietiläinen, Kirsi H</creator><creator>Lundbom, Nina</creator><creator>Sepponen, Raimo E</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6700-7053</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Quantification of visceral adiposity: evaluation of the body electrical loss analysis</title><author>Blomqvist, Kim H ; Kuutti, Jussi ; Lundbom, Jesper ; Pietiläinen, Kirsi H ; Lundbom, Nina ; Sepponen, Raimo E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c265t-474e44f001588ac8a03203e8c3f3a1c6c010a5682aab84888bae06c62ff8ad13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>electrical bioimpedance</topic><topic>magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>visceral obesity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blomqvist, Kim H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuutti, Jussi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundbom, Jesper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pietiläinen, Kirsi H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundbom, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sepponen, Raimo E</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Biomedical physics &amp; engineering express</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blomqvist, Kim H</au><au>Kuutti, Jussi</au><au>Lundbom, Jesper</au><au>Pietiläinen, Kirsi H</au><au>Lundbom, Nina</au><au>Sepponen, Raimo E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantification of visceral adiposity: evaluation of the body electrical loss analysis</atitle><jtitle>Biomedical physics &amp; engineering express</jtitle><stitle>BPEX</stitle><addtitle>Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express</addtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>25034</spage><pages>25034-</pages><issn>2057-1976</issn><eissn>2057-1976</eissn><coden>NJOPFM</coden><abstract>Body electrical loss analysis (BELA) is a measurement of the electrical losses caused by the human abdomen when placed into an alternating magnetic field. This study aimed at finding a prediction formula for visceral fat area (VFA) from BELA. Thirty-eight test subjects covering the body mass index of 19.6-39.4 kg m−2 and the waist circumference of 78-128 cm underwent BELA, single-frequency electrical abdominal impedance measurement (SAI), conventional bioelectrical impedance analysis and cross-sectional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The BELA was compared with the amount of visceral and subcutaneous fat calculated from MR images. The strongest correlation between BELA and VFA (r = 0.61, SEE = 59.30) was found at the height of umbilicus +5 cm, and it tended to decrease when the measurement height was lowered. The correlation to subcutaneus fat area (SFA) at the height of umbilicus +5 cm was r = 0.43 (lower is better), and it tended to increase when the measurement height was lowered. The correlation of BELA to VFA in the evaluation cohort is not strong enough to tolerate obtaining the prediction formula for VFA by regression among BELA and MRI. Also the large SEE value suggests a poor agreement with MRI. Thus the results suggest that in its current form BELA cannot be applied as a diagnostic device to measure visceral fat. Although SAI can help in identifying the abdominal SF layer thickness, it did not help when applied to BELA analysis.</abstract><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/2057-1976/aaa5bc</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6700-7053</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2057-1976
ispartof Biomedical physics & engineering express, 2018-03, Vol.4 (2), p.25034
issn 2057-1976
2057-1976
language eng
recordid cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_2057_1976_aaa5bc
source IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link
subjects electrical bioimpedance
magnetic resonance imaging
visceral obesity
title Quantification of visceral adiposity: evaluation of the body electrical loss analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T20%3A38%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-iop_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantification%20of%20visceral%20adiposity:%20evaluation%20of%20the%20body%20electrical%20loss%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Biomedical%20physics%20&%20engineering%20express&rft.au=Blomqvist,%20Kim%20H&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=25034&rft.pages=25034-&rft.issn=2057-1976&rft.eissn=2057-1976&rft.coden=NJOPFM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/2057-1976/aaa5bc&rft_dat=%3Ciop_cross%3Ebpexaaa5bc%3C/iop_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true