Biomechanical evaluation of suture materials used for abdominal fascial closure

Background. While there are clear recommendations for the technique and suture material for abdominal fascial closure, surgeons may have personal preferences arising from prevoius experiences or influenced during training. The decision of which suture material to use should not influence the outcome...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Materials research express 2021-11, Vol.8 (11), p.115401, Article 115401
Hauptverfasser: Ortiz de Elguea-Lizarraga, Jose Ignacio, Segura-Ibarra, Victor, Vazquez-Armendariz, Javier, Garcia-Garcia, Ana Lucia, Diaz-Elizondo, Jose Antonio, Rodriguez, Ciro, Flores-Villalba, Eduardo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page 115401
container_title Materials research express
container_volume 8
creator Ortiz de Elguea-Lizarraga, Jose Ignacio
Segura-Ibarra, Victor
Vazquez-Armendariz, Javier
Garcia-Garcia, Ana Lucia
Diaz-Elizondo, Jose Antonio
Rodriguez, Ciro
Flores-Villalba, Eduardo
description Background. While there are clear recommendations for the technique and suture material for abdominal fascial closure, surgeons may have personal preferences arising from prevoius experiences or influenced during training. The decision of which suture material to use should not influence the outcome of fascial closure. The objective of this study is to analyze the influence of time and tension on the mechanical properties of sutures used for abdominal fascial closure. Methods. Polyglactin 910, polypropylene, and polydioxanone sutures were exposed to 8 and 10 newtons of constant tensile strain during a period of 7 and 14 days. They were then mechanically tested to assess changes in their properties regarding strength and deformation. Results. No significant changes were observed in maximum tensile force or extension within the different suture groups. Regarding deformation, polypropylene and polydioxanone did not exhibit alterations in their curve behavior, while polyglactin 910 did exhibit changes compared to the control group, as seen by the elevation in its Young modulus when manipulated. Conclusions. Our study finds that while different sutures behave differently, nor time or tension have a negative effect on their biomechanical resilience and can withstand tensile strengths well above any physiological or pathological condition.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/2053-1591/ac1002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_2053_1591_ac1002</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1240a6e7fab24e3297b21776f031eeb4</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2597845204</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-8d91db0d5b775065805bb750089f8017a536bf6c60e079e7d51d7fe7d162aeee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhiNEJarSO8dIHDjAtjNO_JEjrApUqtRLe7ZsZwxeJfFiJ1D-Pd4GLRwQqmRpRuPnHY_nrapXCBcISl0y4M0GeYeXxiEAe1adHkvP_8pfVOc576AQsms4E6fV7YcQR3JfzRScGWr6bobFzCFOdfR1XuYlUT2amVIwQ66XTH3tY6qN7eMYpqLwJrtyV7sh5gK_rE58Ien8dzyr7j9e3W0_b25uP11v399sXAs4b1TfYW-h51ZKDoIr4NaWDFTnFaA0vBHWCyeAQHYke4699CWiYIaImrPqeu3bR7PT-xRGk37qaIJ-LMT0RZs0BzeQRtaCESS9saylhnXSMpRSeGiQyLal1-u11z7FbwvlWe_iksrnsma8k6rlDA4UrJRLMedE_vgqgj64oA9r1oc169WFInm7Sn6Qjb7siSZHR1mxQaKQDWMlAyy0ejq9DfOjTdu4THORvlulIe7_DP-fud78Ax_Tg1YasRxeTNL73je_AA7YtHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2597845204</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biomechanical evaluation of suture materials used for abdominal fascial closure</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>IOPscience extra</source><creator>Ortiz de Elguea-Lizarraga, Jose Ignacio ; Segura-Ibarra, Victor ; Vazquez-Armendariz, Javier ; Garcia-Garcia, Ana Lucia ; Diaz-Elizondo, Jose Antonio ; Rodriguez, Ciro ; Flores-Villalba, Eduardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Ortiz de Elguea-Lizarraga, Jose Ignacio ; Segura-Ibarra, Victor ; Vazquez-Armendariz, Javier ; Garcia-Garcia, Ana Lucia ; Diaz-Elizondo, Jose Antonio ; Rodriguez, Ciro ; Flores-Villalba, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><description>Background. While there are clear recommendations for the technique and suture material for abdominal fascial closure, surgeons may have personal preferences arising from prevoius experiences or influenced during training. The decision of which suture material to use should not influence the outcome of fascial closure. The objective of this study is to analyze the influence of time and tension on the mechanical properties of sutures used for abdominal fascial closure. Methods. Polyglactin 910, polypropylene, and polydioxanone sutures were exposed to 8 and 10 newtons of constant tensile strain during a period of 7 and 14 days. They were then mechanically tested to assess changes in their properties regarding strength and deformation. Results. No significant changes were observed in maximum tensile force or extension within the different suture groups. Regarding deformation, polypropylene and polydioxanone did not exhibit alterations in their curve behavior, while polyglactin 910 did exhibit changes compared to the control group, as seen by the elevation in its Young modulus when manipulated. Conclusions. Our study finds that while different sutures behave differently, nor time or tension have a negative effect on their biomechanical resilience and can withstand tensile strengths well above any physiological or pathological condition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2053-1591</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2053-1591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ac1002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BRISTOL: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; biomechanical properties ; Biomechanics ; Deformation ; fascial closure ; Materials Science ; Materials Science, Multidisciplinary ; Mechanical properties ; Modulus of elasticity ; Polypropylene ; Science &amp; Technology ; suture behavior ; Sutures ; Technology ; tensile force ; Tensile strain</subject><ispartof>Materials research express, 2021-11, Vol.8 (11), p.115401, Article 115401</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>0</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000716732200001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-8d91db0d5b775065805bb750089f8017a536bf6c60e079e7d51d7fe7d162aeee3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6048-5957 ; 0000-0001-5400-8399</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2053-1591/ac1002/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,865,2103,2115,27929,27930,38873,38895,39263,53845,53872</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ortiz de Elguea-Lizarraga, Jose Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segura-Ibarra, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vazquez-Armendariz, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Garcia, Ana Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diaz-Elizondo, Jose Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, Ciro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flores-Villalba, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><title>Biomechanical evaluation of suture materials used for abdominal fascial closure</title><title>Materials research express</title><addtitle>MRX</addtitle><addtitle>MATER RES EXPRESS</addtitle><addtitle>Mater. Res. Express</addtitle><description>Background. While there are clear recommendations for the technique and suture material for abdominal fascial closure, surgeons may have personal preferences arising from prevoius experiences or influenced during training. The decision of which suture material to use should not influence the outcome of fascial closure. The objective of this study is to analyze the influence of time and tension on the mechanical properties of sutures used for abdominal fascial closure. Methods. Polyglactin 910, polypropylene, and polydioxanone sutures were exposed to 8 and 10 newtons of constant tensile strain during a period of 7 and 14 days. They were then mechanically tested to assess changes in their properties regarding strength and deformation. Results. No significant changes were observed in maximum tensile force or extension within the different suture groups. Regarding deformation, polypropylene and polydioxanone did not exhibit alterations in their curve behavior, while polyglactin 910 did exhibit changes compared to the control group, as seen by the elevation in its Young modulus when manipulated. Conclusions. Our study finds that while different sutures behave differently, nor time or tension have a negative effect on their biomechanical resilience and can withstand tensile strengths well above any physiological or pathological condition.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>biomechanical properties</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>fascial closure</subject><subject>Materials Science</subject><subject>Materials Science, Multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Modulus of elasticity</subject><subject>Polypropylene</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>suture behavior</subject><subject>Sutures</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>tensile force</subject><subject>Tensile strain</subject><issn>2053-1591</issn><issn>2053-1591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhiNEJarSO8dIHDjAtjNO_JEjrApUqtRLe7ZsZwxeJfFiJ1D-Pd4GLRwQqmRpRuPnHY_nrapXCBcISl0y4M0GeYeXxiEAe1adHkvP_8pfVOc576AQsms4E6fV7YcQR3JfzRScGWr6bobFzCFOdfR1XuYlUT2amVIwQ66XTH3tY6qN7eMYpqLwJrtyV7sh5gK_rE58Ien8dzyr7j9e3W0_b25uP11v399sXAs4b1TfYW-h51ZKDoIr4NaWDFTnFaA0vBHWCyeAQHYke4699CWiYIaImrPqeu3bR7PT-xRGk37qaIJ-LMT0RZs0BzeQRtaCESS9saylhnXSMpRSeGiQyLal1-u11z7FbwvlWe_iksrnsma8k6rlDA4UrJRLMedE_vgqgj64oA9r1oc169WFInm7Sn6Qjb7siSZHR1mxQaKQDWMlAyy0ejq9DfOjTdu4THORvlulIe7_DP-fud78Ax_Tg1YasRxeTNL73je_AA7YtHw</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Ortiz de Elguea-Lizarraga, Jose Ignacio</creator><creator>Segura-Ibarra, Victor</creator><creator>Vazquez-Armendariz, Javier</creator><creator>Garcia-Garcia, Ana Lucia</creator><creator>Diaz-Elizondo, Jose Antonio</creator><creator>Rodriguez, Ciro</creator><creator>Flores-Villalba, Eduardo</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><general>IOP Publishing Ltd</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6048-5957</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5400-8399</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Biomechanical evaluation of suture materials used for abdominal fascial closure</title><author>Ortiz de Elguea-Lizarraga, Jose Ignacio ; Segura-Ibarra, Victor ; Vazquez-Armendariz, Javier ; Garcia-Garcia, Ana Lucia ; Diaz-Elizondo, Jose Antonio ; Rodriguez, Ciro ; Flores-Villalba, Eduardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-8d91db0d5b775065805bb750089f8017a536bf6c60e079e7d51d7fe7d162aeee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>biomechanical properties</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>fascial closure</topic><topic>Materials Science</topic><topic>Materials Science, Multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Modulus of elasticity</topic><topic>Polypropylene</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>suture behavior</topic><topic>Sutures</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>tensile force</topic><topic>Tensile strain</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ortiz de Elguea-Lizarraga, Jose Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segura-Ibarra, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vazquez-Armendariz, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia-Garcia, Ana Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diaz-Elizondo, Jose Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, Ciro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flores-Villalba, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Materials research express</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ortiz de Elguea-Lizarraga, Jose Ignacio</au><au>Segura-Ibarra, Victor</au><au>Vazquez-Armendariz, Javier</au><au>Garcia-Garcia, Ana Lucia</au><au>Diaz-Elizondo, Jose Antonio</au><au>Rodriguez, Ciro</au><au>Flores-Villalba, Eduardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biomechanical evaluation of suture materials used for abdominal fascial closure</atitle><jtitle>Materials research express</jtitle><stitle>MRX</stitle><stitle>MATER RES EXPRESS</stitle><addtitle>Mater. Res. Express</addtitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>115401</spage><pages>115401-</pages><artnum>115401</artnum><issn>2053-1591</issn><eissn>2053-1591</eissn><abstract>Background. While there are clear recommendations for the technique and suture material for abdominal fascial closure, surgeons may have personal preferences arising from prevoius experiences or influenced during training. The decision of which suture material to use should not influence the outcome of fascial closure. The objective of this study is to analyze the influence of time and tension on the mechanical properties of sutures used for abdominal fascial closure. Methods. Polyglactin 910, polypropylene, and polydioxanone sutures were exposed to 8 and 10 newtons of constant tensile strain during a period of 7 and 14 days. They were then mechanically tested to assess changes in their properties regarding strength and deformation. Results. No significant changes were observed in maximum tensile force or extension within the different suture groups. Regarding deformation, polypropylene and polydioxanone did not exhibit alterations in their curve behavior, while polyglactin 910 did exhibit changes compared to the control group, as seen by the elevation in its Young modulus when manipulated. Conclusions. Our study finds that while different sutures behave differently, nor time or tension have a negative effect on their biomechanical resilience and can withstand tensile strengths well above any physiological or pathological condition.</abstract><cop>BRISTOL</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/2053-1591/ac1002</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6048-5957</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5400-8399</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2053-1591
ispartof Materials research express, 2021-11, Vol.8 (11), p.115401, Article 115401
issn 2053-1591
2053-1591
language eng
recordid cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_2053_1591_ac1002
source IOP Publishing Free Content; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; IOPscience extra
subjects Abdomen
biomechanical properties
Biomechanics
Deformation
fascial closure
Materials Science
Materials Science, Multidisciplinary
Mechanical properties
Modulus of elasticity
Polypropylene
Science & Technology
suture behavior
Sutures
Technology
tensile force
Tensile strain
title Biomechanical evaluation of suture materials used for abdominal fascial closure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T18%3A17%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biomechanical%20evaluation%20of%20suture%20materials%20used%20for%20abdominal%20fascial%20closure&rft.jtitle=Materials%20research%20express&rft.au=Ortiz%20de%20Elguea-Lizarraga,%20Jose%20Ignacio&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=115401&rft.pages=115401-&rft.artnum=115401&rft.issn=2053-1591&rft.eissn=2053-1591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/2053-1591/ac1002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E2597845204%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2597845204&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_1240a6e7fab24e3297b21776f031eeb4&rfr_iscdi=true