Emissions and uptake of volatiles by sampling components in breath analysis
The first and most crucial step in breath research is adequate sampling, which plays a pivotal role in quality assurance of breath datasets. In particular, the emissions or uptake of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by sampling interface materials present a risk of disrupting breath gas samples. Th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of breath research 2023-07, Vol.17 (3), p.37102 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 37102 |
container_title | Journal of breath research |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Pham, Y Lan Holz, Olaf Beauchamp, Jonathan |
description | The first and most crucial step in breath research is adequate sampling, which plays a pivotal role in quality assurance of breath datasets. In particular, the emissions or uptake of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by sampling interface materials present a risk of disrupting breath gas samples. This study investigated emissions and uptake by three interface components, namely a silicon facemask, a reusable 3D-printed mouthpiece adapter, and a pulmonary function test filter compatible with the commercial Respiration Collector for
Analysis (ReCIVA) breath sampling device. Emissions were examined before and after (hydro-)thermal treatment of the components, and uptake was assessed by exposing each material to 12 representative breath VOCs comprising alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, carboxylic acids, terpenes, sulphurous and nitrogenous compounds at different target concentration ranges (∼10 ppb
and ∼100 ppb
). Chemical analyses of VOCs were performed using proton transfer reaction-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry (PTR-TOFMS) with supporting analyses via thermal desorption comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-TOFMS (TD-GC×GC-TOFMS). The filter exhibited the lowest overall emissions compared to the mask or adapter, which both had equivalently high emissions (albeit for different compounds). Treatment of the materials reduced the total VOC emissions by 62% in the mask, 89% in the filter and 99% in the adapter. Uptakes of compounds were lowest for the adapter and most pronounced in the mask. In particular, 1-butanol, acetone, 2-butanone, 1,8-cineole and dimethyl sulphide showed negligible uptake across all materials, whereas ethanol, nonanal, acetic acid, butanoic acid, limonene and indole exhibited marked losses. Knowledge of emissions and/or uptake by sampling components is key to reducing the likelihood of erroneous data interpretation, ultimately expediting progress in the field of breath test development. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/1752-7163/acce34 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_1752_7163_acce34</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2803331254</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-fd91859ff1d617247865c754e5cbaa9e6e2006e99a9180fb80668a6ece30347a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LwzAYh4MoTqd3TxLwoAfnkuazRxnzAwde9BzSNNHOtqlNK-y_N7NzgoinhPD8fnnfB4ATjK4wknKKBUsmAnMy1cZYQnfAwfZpd3tnbAQOQ1gixCmS6T4YEYEE5QIfgId5VYRQ-DpAXeewbzr9ZqF38MOXuitKG2C2gkFXTVnUL9D4qvG1rbsAixpmrdXdawzqchWKcAT2nC6DPd6cY_B8M3-a3U0Wj7f3s-vFxFAiu4nLUyxZ6hzOORYJFZIzIxi1zGRap5bbJE5q01RHDrlMIs6l5jYuiAgVmozBxdDbtP69t6FTcQdjy1LX1vdBJRIRQnDCaETPfqFL37dx3i8qxZQgJiKFBsq0PoTWOtW0RaXblcJIrUWrtUm1tqoG0TFyuinus8rm28C32QhcDkDhm59P_-k7_wNfZm1EFVGICIwS1eSOfALm95Oe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2809143057</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Emissions and uptake of volatiles by sampling components in breath analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Pham, Y Lan ; Holz, Olaf ; Beauchamp, Jonathan</creator><creatorcontrib>Pham, Y Lan ; Holz, Olaf ; Beauchamp, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><description>The first and most crucial step in breath research is adequate sampling, which plays a pivotal role in quality assurance of breath datasets. In particular, the emissions or uptake of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by sampling interface materials present a risk of disrupting breath gas samples. This study investigated emissions and uptake by three interface components, namely a silicon facemask, a reusable 3D-printed mouthpiece adapter, and a pulmonary function test filter compatible with the commercial Respiration Collector for
Analysis (ReCIVA) breath sampling device. Emissions were examined before and after (hydro-)thermal treatment of the components, and uptake was assessed by exposing each material to 12 representative breath VOCs comprising alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, carboxylic acids, terpenes, sulphurous and nitrogenous compounds at different target concentration ranges (∼10 ppb
and ∼100 ppb
). Chemical analyses of VOCs were performed using proton transfer reaction-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry (PTR-TOFMS) with supporting analyses via thermal desorption comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-TOFMS (TD-GC×GC-TOFMS). The filter exhibited the lowest overall emissions compared to the mask or adapter, which both had equivalently high emissions (albeit for different compounds). Treatment of the materials reduced the total VOC emissions by 62% in the mask, 89% in the filter and 99% in the adapter. Uptakes of compounds were lowest for the adapter and most pronounced in the mask. In particular, 1-butanol, acetone, 2-butanone, 1,8-cineole and dimethyl sulphide showed negligible uptake across all materials, whereas ethanol, nonanal, acetic acid, butanoic acid, limonene and indole exhibited marked losses. Knowledge of emissions and/or uptake by sampling components is key to reducing the likelihood of erroneous data interpretation, ultimately expediting progress in the field of breath test development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1752-7155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-7163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1752-7163/acce34</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37074671</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBROBW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Breath Tests - methods ; emissions ; GC-MS ; Humans ; Mass Spectrometry - methods ; Protons ; PTR-MS ; Respiration ; sampling ; uptake ; VOCs ; Volatile organic compounds ; Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of breath research, 2023-07, Vol.17 (3), p.37102</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>Creative Commons Attribution license.</rights><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-fd91859ff1d617247865c754e5cbaa9e6e2006e99a9180fb80668a6ece30347a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-fd91859ff1d617247865c754e5cbaa9e6e2006e99a9180fb80668a6ece30347a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0665-7807 ; 0000-0002-6706-7328 ; 0000-0003-1405-7625</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1752-7163/acce34/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,53824,53871</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37074671$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pham, Y Lan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holz, Olaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beauchamp, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><title>Emissions and uptake of volatiles by sampling components in breath analysis</title><title>Journal of breath research</title><addtitle>JBR</addtitle><addtitle>J. Breath Res</addtitle><description>The first and most crucial step in breath research is adequate sampling, which plays a pivotal role in quality assurance of breath datasets. In particular, the emissions or uptake of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by sampling interface materials present a risk of disrupting breath gas samples. This study investigated emissions and uptake by three interface components, namely a silicon facemask, a reusable 3D-printed mouthpiece adapter, and a pulmonary function test filter compatible with the commercial Respiration Collector for
Analysis (ReCIVA) breath sampling device. Emissions were examined before and after (hydro-)thermal treatment of the components, and uptake was assessed by exposing each material to 12 representative breath VOCs comprising alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, carboxylic acids, terpenes, sulphurous and nitrogenous compounds at different target concentration ranges (∼10 ppb
and ∼100 ppb
). Chemical analyses of VOCs were performed using proton transfer reaction-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry (PTR-TOFMS) with supporting analyses via thermal desorption comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-TOFMS (TD-GC×GC-TOFMS). The filter exhibited the lowest overall emissions compared to the mask or adapter, which both had equivalently high emissions (albeit for different compounds). Treatment of the materials reduced the total VOC emissions by 62% in the mask, 89% in the filter and 99% in the adapter. Uptakes of compounds were lowest for the adapter and most pronounced in the mask. In particular, 1-butanol, acetone, 2-butanone, 1,8-cineole and dimethyl sulphide showed negligible uptake across all materials, whereas ethanol, nonanal, acetic acid, butanoic acid, limonene and indole exhibited marked losses. Knowledge of emissions and/or uptake by sampling components is key to reducing the likelihood of erroneous data interpretation, ultimately expediting progress in the field of breath test development.</description><subject>Breath Tests - methods</subject><subject>emissions</subject><subject>GC-MS</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><subject>Protons</subject><subject>PTR-MS</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>sampling</subject><subject>uptake</subject><subject>VOCs</subject><subject>Volatile organic compounds</subject><subject>Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis</subject><issn>1752-7155</issn><issn>1752-7163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1LwzAYh4MoTqd3TxLwoAfnkuazRxnzAwde9BzSNNHOtqlNK-y_N7NzgoinhPD8fnnfB4ATjK4wknKKBUsmAnMy1cZYQnfAwfZpd3tnbAQOQ1gixCmS6T4YEYEE5QIfgId5VYRQ-DpAXeewbzr9ZqF38MOXuitKG2C2gkFXTVnUL9D4qvG1rbsAixpmrdXdawzqchWKcAT2nC6DPd6cY_B8M3-a3U0Wj7f3s-vFxFAiu4nLUyxZ6hzOORYJFZIzIxi1zGRap5bbJE5q01RHDrlMIs6l5jYuiAgVmozBxdDbtP69t6FTcQdjy1LX1vdBJRIRQnDCaETPfqFL37dx3i8qxZQgJiKFBsq0PoTWOtW0RaXblcJIrUWrtUm1tqoG0TFyuinus8rm28C32QhcDkDhm59P_-k7_wNfZm1EFVGICIwS1eSOfALm95Oe</recordid><startdate>20230701</startdate><enddate>20230701</enddate><creator>Pham, Y Lan</creator><creator>Holz, Olaf</creator><creator>Beauchamp, Jonathan</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0665-7807</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6706-7328</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1405-7625</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230701</creationdate><title>Emissions and uptake of volatiles by sampling components in breath analysis</title><author>Pham, Y Lan ; Holz, Olaf ; Beauchamp, Jonathan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-fd91859ff1d617247865c754e5cbaa9e6e2006e99a9180fb80668a6ece30347a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Breath Tests - methods</topic><topic>emissions</topic><topic>GC-MS</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mass Spectrometry - methods</topic><topic>Protons</topic><topic>PTR-MS</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>sampling</topic><topic>uptake</topic><topic>VOCs</topic><topic>Volatile organic compounds</topic><topic>Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pham, Y Lan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holz, Olaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beauchamp, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of breath research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pham, Y Lan</au><au>Holz, Olaf</au><au>Beauchamp, Jonathan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Emissions and uptake of volatiles by sampling components in breath analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of breath research</jtitle><stitle>JBR</stitle><addtitle>J. Breath Res</addtitle><date>2023-07-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>37102</spage><pages>37102-</pages><issn>1752-7155</issn><eissn>1752-7163</eissn><coden>JBROBW</coden><abstract>The first and most crucial step in breath research is adequate sampling, which plays a pivotal role in quality assurance of breath datasets. In particular, the emissions or uptake of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by sampling interface materials present a risk of disrupting breath gas samples. This study investigated emissions and uptake by three interface components, namely a silicon facemask, a reusable 3D-printed mouthpiece adapter, and a pulmonary function test filter compatible with the commercial Respiration Collector for
Analysis (ReCIVA) breath sampling device. Emissions were examined before and after (hydro-)thermal treatment of the components, and uptake was assessed by exposing each material to 12 representative breath VOCs comprising alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, carboxylic acids, terpenes, sulphurous and nitrogenous compounds at different target concentration ranges (∼10 ppb
and ∼100 ppb
). Chemical analyses of VOCs were performed using proton transfer reaction-time-of-flight-mass spectrometry (PTR-TOFMS) with supporting analyses via thermal desorption comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography-TOFMS (TD-GC×GC-TOFMS). The filter exhibited the lowest overall emissions compared to the mask or adapter, which both had equivalently high emissions (albeit for different compounds). Treatment of the materials reduced the total VOC emissions by 62% in the mask, 89% in the filter and 99% in the adapter. Uptakes of compounds were lowest for the adapter and most pronounced in the mask. In particular, 1-butanol, acetone, 2-butanone, 1,8-cineole and dimethyl sulphide showed negligible uptake across all materials, whereas ethanol, nonanal, acetic acid, butanoic acid, limonene and indole exhibited marked losses. Knowledge of emissions and/or uptake by sampling components is key to reducing the likelihood of erroneous data interpretation, ultimately expediting progress in the field of breath test development.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>37074671</pmid><doi>10.1088/1752-7163/acce34</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0665-7807</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6706-7328</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1405-7625</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1752-7155 |
ispartof | Journal of breath research, 2023-07, Vol.17 (3), p.37102 |
issn | 1752-7155 1752-7163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_1752_7163_acce34 |
source | MEDLINE; IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link |
subjects | Breath Tests - methods emissions GC-MS Humans Mass Spectrometry - methods Protons PTR-MS Respiration sampling uptake VOCs Volatile organic compounds Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis |
title | Emissions and uptake of volatiles by sampling components in breath analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T07%3A58%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Emissions%20and%20uptake%20of%20volatiles%20by%20sampling%20components%20in%20breath%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20breath%20research&rft.au=Pham,%20Y%20Lan&rft.date=2023-07-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=37102&rft.pages=37102-&rft.issn=1752-7155&rft.eissn=1752-7163&rft.coden=JBROBW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1752-7163/acce34&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E2803331254%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2809143057&rft_id=info:pmid/37074671&rfr_iscdi=true |