Breath analysis in detecting epilepsy

The aim of this proof of concept study is to investigate if an electronic nose (eNose) is able to make a distinction between breath profiles of diagnosed epilepsy patients and epilepsy-free control subjects. An eNose is a non-invasive device, with a working mechanism that is based on the presence of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of breath research 2020-04, Vol.14 (3), p.031001-031001
Hauptverfasser: van Dartel, Dieuwke, Schelhaas, H Jurgen, Colon, Albert J, Kho, Kuan H, de Vos, Cecile C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 031001
container_issue 3
container_start_page 031001
container_title Journal of breath research
container_volume 14
creator van Dartel, Dieuwke
Schelhaas, H Jurgen
Colon, Albert J
Kho, Kuan H
de Vos, Cecile C
description The aim of this proof of concept study is to investigate if an electronic nose (eNose) is able to make a distinction between breath profiles of diagnosed epilepsy patients and epilepsy-free control subjects. An eNose is a non-invasive device, with a working mechanism that is based on the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath. These VOCs interact with the sensors of the eNose, and the eNose has to be trained to distinguish between breath patterns from patients with a specific disease and control subjects without that disease. During the measurement participants were asked to breathe through the eNose for five minutes via a disposable mouthpiece. Seventy-four epilepsy patients and 110 control subjects were measured to train the eNose and create a classification model. To assess the effects of anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) usage on the classification, additional test groups were measured: seven patients who (temporarily) did not use AEDs and 11 patients without epilepsy who used AEDs. The results show that an eNose is able to make a distinction between epilepsy and control subjects with a sensitivity of 76%, a specificity of 67%, and an accuracy of 71%. The results of the two additional groups of subjects show that the created model classifies one out of seven epilepsy patients without AEDs and six out of 13 patients without epilepsy but with AEDs correctly. In this proof of concept study, the AeonoseTM is able to differentiate between epilepsy patients and control subjects. However, the number of false positives and false negatives is still high, which suggests that this first model is still mainly based on the usage of various AEDs.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1752-7163/ab6f14
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_1752_7163_ab6f14</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2344271926</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-d031fb49ddcf98eb24dd96716db0c845c0b8699ab1a3511699058b9dd59f4c553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9LwzAUx4Mobk7vnqQgogfrkuZHk-Mc_oKBFz2H_Kp2dG1N2sP-ezM6p4h4yiN83ve99wHgFMEbBDmfopxmaY4YnirNCkT2wHj3tf-jHoGjEJYQMgK5OAQjjESeUUrH4OLWO9W9J6pW1TqUISnrxLrOma6s3xLXlpVrw_oYHBSqCu5k-07A6_3dy_wxXTw_PM1ni9RgwbrUQowKTYS1phDc6YxYK1hcwGpoOKEGas6EUBopTBGKJaRcR5yKghhK8QRcDbmtbz56Fzq5KoNxVaVq1_RBZpiQLEciYxE9_4Uum97HKyKVYwwZFxRFCg6U8U0I3hWy9eVK-bVEUG4Uyo0juXEkB4Wx5Wwb3OuVs7uGL2cRuB6Asmm_h_6Td_kHvtReIiKxjMogRLK1Bf4EZrmE9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2733068951</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Breath analysis in detecting epilepsy</title><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>van Dartel, Dieuwke ; Schelhaas, H Jurgen ; Colon, Albert J ; Kho, Kuan H ; de Vos, Cecile C</creator><creatorcontrib>van Dartel, Dieuwke ; Schelhaas, H Jurgen ; Colon, Albert J ; Kho, Kuan H ; de Vos, Cecile C</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this proof of concept study is to investigate if an electronic nose (eNose) is able to make a distinction between breath profiles of diagnosed epilepsy patients and epilepsy-free control subjects. An eNose is a non-invasive device, with a working mechanism that is based on the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath. These VOCs interact with the sensors of the eNose, and the eNose has to be trained to distinguish between breath patterns from patients with a specific disease and control subjects without that disease. During the measurement participants were asked to breathe through the eNose for five minutes via a disposable mouthpiece. Seventy-four epilepsy patients and 110 control subjects were measured to train the eNose and create a classification model. To assess the effects of anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) usage on the classification, additional test groups were measured: seven patients who (temporarily) did not use AEDs and 11 patients without epilepsy who used AEDs. The results show that an eNose is able to make a distinction between epilepsy and control subjects with a sensitivity of 76%, a specificity of 67%, and an accuracy of 71%. The results of the two additional groups of subjects show that the created model classifies one out of seven epilepsy patients without AEDs and six out of 13 patients without epilepsy but with AEDs correctly. In this proof of concept study, the AeonoseTM is able to differentiate between epilepsy patients and control subjects. However, the number of false positives and false negatives is still high, which suggests that this first model is still mainly based on the usage of various AEDs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1752-7163</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1752-7155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1752-7163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1752-7163/ab6f14</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31972555</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBROBW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Aeonose ; breath analysis ; diagnosis ; electronic nose ; Epilepsy ; VOCs ; Volatile organic compounds</subject><ispartof>Journal of breath research, 2020-04, Vol.14 (3), p.031001-031001</ispartof><rights>2020 IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-d031fb49ddcf98eb24dd96716db0c845c0b8699ab1a3511699058b9dd59f4c553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-d031fb49ddcf98eb24dd96716db0c845c0b8699ab1a3511699058b9dd59f4c553</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3556-4522</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1752-7163/ab6f14/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,53846,53893</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31972555$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Dartel, Dieuwke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schelhaas, H Jurgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colon, Albert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kho, Kuan H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Vos, Cecile C</creatorcontrib><title>Breath analysis in detecting epilepsy</title><title>Journal of breath research</title><addtitle>JBR</addtitle><addtitle>J. Breath Res</addtitle><description>The aim of this proof of concept study is to investigate if an electronic nose (eNose) is able to make a distinction between breath profiles of diagnosed epilepsy patients and epilepsy-free control subjects. An eNose is a non-invasive device, with a working mechanism that is based on the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath. These VOCs interact with the sensors of the eNose, and the eNose has to be trained to distinguish between breath patterns from patients with a specific disease and control subjects without that disease. During the measurement participants were asked to breathe through the eNose for five minutes via a disposable mouthpiece. Seventy-four epilepsy patients and 110 control subjects were measured to train the eNose and create a classification model. To assess the effects of anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) usage on the classification, additional test groups were measured: seven patients who (temporarily) did not use AEDs and 11 patients without epilepsy who used AEDs. The results show that an eNose is able to make a distinction between epilepsy and control subjects with a sensitivity of 76%, a specificity of 67%, and an accuracy of 71%. The results of the two additional groups of subjects show that the created model classifies one out of seven epilepsy patients without AEDs and six out of 13 patients without epilepsy but with AEDs correctly. In this proof of concept study, the AeonoseTM is able to differentiate between epilepsy patients and control subjects. However, the number of false positives and false negatives is still high, which suggests that this first model is still mainly based on the usage of various AEDs.</description><subject>Aeonose</subject><subject>breath analysis</subject><subject>diagnosis</subject><subject>electronic nose</subject><subject>Epilepsy</subject><subject>VOCs</subject><subject>Volatile organic compounds</subject><issn>1752-7163</issn><issn>1752-7155</issn><issn>1752-7163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9LwzAUx4Mobk7vnqQgogfrkuZHk-Mc_oKBFz2H_Kp2dG1N2sP-ezM6p4h4yiN83ve99wHgFMEbBDmfopxmaY4YnirNCkT2wHj3tf-jHoGjEJYQMgK5OAQjjESeUUrH4OLWO9W9J6pW1TqUISnrxLrOma6s3xLXlpVrw_oYHBSqCu5k-07A6_3dy_wxXTw_PM1ni9RgwbrUQowKTYS1phDc6YxYK1hcwGpoOKEGas6EUBopTBGKJaRcR5yKghhK8QRcDbmtbz56Fzq5KoNxVaVq1_RBZpiQLEciYxE9_4Uum97HKyKVYwwZFxRFCg6U8U0I3hWy9eVK-bVEUG4Uyo0juXEkB4Wx5Wwb3OuVs7uGL2cRuB6Asmm_h_6Td_kHvtReIiKxjMogRLK1Bf4EZrmE9Q</recordid><startdate>20200415</startdate><enddate>20200415</enddate><creator>van Dartel, Dieuwke</creator><creator>Schelhaas, H Jurgen</creator><creator>Colon, Albert J</creator><creator>Kho, Kuan H</creator><creator>de Vos, Cecile C</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3556-4522</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200415</creationdate><title>Breath analysis in detecting epilepsy</title><author>van Dartel, Dieuwke ; Schelhaas, H Jurgen ; Colon, Albert J ; Kho, Kuan H ; de Vos, Cecile C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-d031fb49ddcf98eb24dd96716db0c845c0b8699ab1a3511699058b9dd59f4c553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aeonose</topic><topic>breath analysis</topic><topic>diagnosis</topic><topic>electronic nose</topic><topic>Epilepsy</topic><topic>VOCs</topic><topic>Volatile organic compounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Dartel, Dieuwke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schelhaas, H Jurgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colon, Albert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kho, Kuan H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Vos, Cecile C</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of breath research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Dartel, Dieuwke</au><au>Schelhaas, H Jurgen</au><au>Colon, Albert J</au><au>Kho, Kuan H</au><au>de Vos, Cecile C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Breath analysis in detecting epilepsy</atitle><jtitle>Journal of breath research</jtitle><stitle>JBR</stitle><addtitle>J. Breath Res</addtitle><date>2020-04-15</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>031001</spage><epage>031001</epage><pages>031001-031001</pages><issn>1752-7163</issn><issn>1752-7155</issn><eissn>1752-7163</eissn><coden>JBROBW</coden><abstract>The aim of this proof of concept study is to investigate if an electronic nose (eNose) is able to make a distinction between breath profiles of diagnosed epilepsy patients and epilepsy-free control subjects. An eNose is a non-invasive device, with a working mechanism that is based on the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath. These VOCs interact with the sensors of the eNose, and the eNose has to be trained to distinguish between breath patterns from patients with a specific disease and control subjects without that disease. During the measurement participants were asked to breathe through the eNose for five minutes via a disposable mouthpiece. Seventy-four epilepsy patients and 110 control subjects were measured to train the eNose and create a classification model. To assess the effects of anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) usage on the classification, additional test groups were measured: seven patients who (temporarily) did not use AEDs and 11 patients without epilepsy who used AEDs. The results show that an eNose is able to make a distinction between epilepsy and control subjects with a sensitivity of 76%, a specificity of 67%, and an accuracy of 71%. The results of the two additional groups of subjects show that the created model classifies one out of seven epilepsy patients without AEDs and six out of 13 patients without epilepsy but with AEDs correctly. In this proof of concept study, the AeonoseTM is able to differentiate between epilepsy patients and control subjects. However, the number of false positives and false negatives is still high, which suggests that this first model is still mainly based on the usage of various AEDs.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>31972555</pmid><doi>10.1088/1752-7163/ab6f14</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3556-4522</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1752-7163
ispartof Journal of breath research, 2020-04, Vol.14 (3), p.031001-031001
issn 1752-7163
1752-7155
1752-7163
language eng
recordid cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_1752_7163_ab6f14
source IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link
subjects Aeonose
breath analysis
diagnosis
electronic nose
Epilepsy
VOCs
Volatile organic compounds
title Breath analysis in detecting epilepsy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T02%3A14%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Breath%20analysis%20in%20detecting%20epilepsy&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20breath%20research&rft.au=van%20Dartel,%20Dieuwke&rft.date=2020-04-15&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=031001&rft.epage=031001&rft.pages=031001-031001&rft.issn=1752-7163&rft.eissn=1752-7163&rft.coden=JBROBW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1752-7163/ab6f14&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E2344271926%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2733068951&rft_id=info:pmid/31972555&rfr_iscdi=true