Contrasting human influences and macro-environmental factors on fire activity inside and outside protected areas of North America
Human activities threaten the effectiveness of protected areas (PAs) in achieving their conservation goals across the globe. In this study, we contrast the influence of human and macro-environmental factors driving fire activity inside and outside PAs. Using area burned between 1984 and 2014 for 11...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental research letters 2019-06, Vol.14 (6), p.64007 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 64007 |
container_title | Environmental research letters |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Mansuy, Nicolas Miller, Carol Parisien, Marc-André Parks, Sean A Batllori, Enric Moritz, Max A |
description | Human activities threaten the effectiveness of protected areas (PAs) in achieving their conservation goals across the globe. In this study, we contrast the influence of human and macro-environmental factors driving fire activity inside and outside PAs. Using area burned between 1984 and 2014 for 11 ecoregions in Canada and the United States, we built and compared statistical models of fire likelihood using the MaxEnt software and a set of 11 key anthropogenic, climatic, and physical variables. Overall, the full model (i.e. including all variables) performed better (adjusted area under the curve ranging from 0.71 to 0.95 for individual ecoregions) than the model that excluded anthropogenic variables. Both model types (with and without anthropogenic variables) generally performed better inside than outside the PAs. Climatic variables were usually of foremost importance in explaining fire activity inside and outside PAs, with anthropogenic variables being the second most important predictors, even inside PAs. While the individual contributions of anthropogenic variables indicate that fire activity decreased as of function of increasing human footprint, the anthropogenic effects were often substantially greater than those of physical features and were comparable to or even greater than climatic effects in some densely developed ecoregions, both outside and within PAs (e.g. Mediterranean California, Eastern Temperate Forest, and Tropical Wet Forests). Together, these results show the pervasive impact of humans on fire regimes inside PAs, as well as outside PAs. Given the increasing attractiveness of PAs, the implications for adaptive fire management beyond the concept of naturalness in the PAs are discussed. Our assessment of human-altered fire activity could serve as an indicator of human pressure in PAs; however, we suggest that further analysis is needed to understand specific interactions among fire, human pressures, and the environmental conditions at the scale of PAs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/1748-9326/ab1bc5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_1748_9326_ab1bc5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_93e24be201a94b5894a1248267f9577c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2548933424</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-b5eb377db94eb38a0cd0fec98afe5b3249c188ac56de6eb386e5ce28900b251f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UU1v1TAQjBBIlMKdoyUOXAi1HTuxj9UTH5UquMDZ2jjr1k-J_bD9KvXIP6_zgkoPcNrZ1cys19M0bxn9yKhSF2wQqtUd7y9gZKOVz5qzx9HzJ_hl8yrnPaVSyEGdNb93MZQEufhwQ26PCwTig5uPGCxmAmEiC9gUWwx3PsWwYCgwEwe2xJRJDMT5hKS2_s6X-6rNfsKTLh7LCR9SLGgLTgQSQtU48i2mcksuF0zewuvmhYM545s_9bz5-fnTj93X9vr7l6vd5XVrJWWlHSWO3TBMoxYVKKB2og6tVuBQjh0X2jKlwMp-wn5l9CgtcqUpHblkrjtvrjbfKcLeHJJfIN2bCN6cBjHdGEjF2xmN7pCLETlloMUolRbAuFC8H5yWw2Cr17vNqx7364i5mH08plCfb7gUSned4KKy6MaqH5hzQve4lVGzhmbWVMyaitlCq5L3m8THw19PTLNhwvSG9oLSwRym9ZwP_2D-1_gBTM2oMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548933424</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contrasting human influences and macro-environmental factors on fire activity inside and outside protected areas of North America</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>IOPscience extra</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Mansuy, Nicolas ; Miller, Carol ; Parisien, Marc-André ; Parks, Sean A ; Batllori, Enric ; Moritz, Max A</creator><creatorcontrib>Mansuy, Nicolas ; Miller, Carol ; Parisien, Marc-André ; Parks, Sean A ; Batllori, Enric ; Moritz, Max A</creatorcontrib><description>Human activities threaten the effectiveness of protected areas (PAs) in achieving their conservation goals across the globe. In this study, we contrast the influence of human and macro-environmental factors driving fire activity inside and outside PAs. Using area burned between 1984 and 2014 for 11 ecoregions in Canada and the United States, we built and compared statistical models of fire likelihood using the MaxEnt software and a set of 11 key anthropogenic, climatic, and physical variables. Overall, the full model (i.e. including all variables) performed better (adjusted area under the curve ranging from 0.71 to 0.95 for individual ecoregions) than the model that excluded anthropogenic variables. Both model types (with and without anthropogenic variables) generally performed better inside than outside the PAs. Climatic variables were usually of foremost importance in explaining fire activity inside and outside PAs, with anthropogenic variables being the second most important predictors, even inside PAs. While the individual contributions of anthropogenic variables indicate that fire activity decreased as of function of increasing human footprint, the anthropogenic effects were often substantially greater than those of physical features and were comparable to or even greater than climatic effects in some densely developed ecoregions, both outside and within PAs (e.g. Mediterranean California, Eastern Temperate Forest, and Tropical Wet Forests). Together, these results show the pervasive impact of humans on fire regimes inside PAs, as well as outside PAs. Given the increasing attractiveness of PAs, the implications for adaptive fire management beyond the concept of naturalness in the PAs are discussed. Our assessment of human-altered fire activity could serve as an indicator of human pressure in PAs; however, we suggest that further analysis is needed to understand specific interactions among fire, human pressures, and the environmental conditions at the scale of PAs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-9326</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-9326</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab1bc5</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ERLNAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>adaptive fire management ; altered fire regimes ; Anthropogenic factors ; Climate change ; Climate effects ; Environmental conditions ; Environmental factors ; human footprint ; Human influences ; land use ; Mathematical models ; MaxEnt ; Protected areas ; Rainforests ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical models ; Temperate forests ; Tropical forests ; wilderness</subject><ispartof>Environmental research letters, 2019-06, Vol.14 (6), p.64007</ispartof><rights>2019 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-b5eb377db94eb38a0cd0fec98afe5b3249c188ac56de6eb386e5ce28900b251f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-b5eb377db94eb38a0cd0fec98afe5b3249c188ac56de6eb386e5ce28900b251f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0665-3064 ; 0000-0002-2982-5255</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ab1bc5/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,2096,27901,27902,38845,38867,53815,53842</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mansuy, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parisien, Marc-André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parks, Sean A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batllori, Enric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moritz, Max A</creatorcontrib><title>Contrasting human influences and macro-environmental factors on fire activity inside and outside protected areas of North America</title><title>Environmental research letters</title><addtitle>ERL</addtitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Lett</addtitle><description>Human activities threaten the effectiveness of protected areas (PAs) in achieving their conservation goals across the globe. In this study, we contrast the influence of human and macro-environmental factors driving fire activity inside and outside PAs. Using area burned between 1984 and 2014 for 11 ecoregions in Canada and the United States, we built and compared statistical models of fire likelihood using the MaxEnt software and a set of 11 key anthropogenic, climatic, and physical variables. Overall, the full model (i.e. including all variables) performed better (adjusted area under the curve ranging from 0.71 to 0.95 for individual ecoregions) than the model that excluded anthropogenic variables. Both model types (with and without anthropogenic variables) generally performed better inside than outside the PAs. Climatic variables were usually of foremost importance in explaining fire activity inside and outside PAs, with anthropogenic variables being the second most important predictors, even inside PAs. While the individual contributions of anthropogenic variables indicate that fire activity decreased as of function of increasing human footprint, the anthropogenic effects were often substantially greater than those of physical features and were comparable to or even greater than climatic effects in some densely developed ecoregions, both outside and within PAs (e.g. Mediterranean California, Eastern Temperate Forest, and Tropical Wet Forests). Together, these results show the pervasive impact of humans on fire regimes inside PAs, as well as outside PAs. Given the increasing attractiveness of PAs, the implications for adaptive fire management beyond the concept of naturalness in the PAs are discussed. Our assessment of human-altered fire activity could serve as an indicator of human pressure in PAs; however, we suggest that further analysis is needed to understand specific interactions among fire, human pressures, and the environmental conditions at the scale of PAs.</description><subject>adaptive fire management</subject><subject>altered fire regimes</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate effects</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>human footprint</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>land use</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>MaxEnt</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Rainforests</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>Temperate forests</subject><subject>Tropical forests</subject><subject>wilderness</subject><issn>1748-9326</issn><issn>1748-9326</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UU1v1TAQjBBIlMKdoyUOXAi1HTuxj9UTH5UquMDZ2jjr1k-J_bD9KvXIP6_zgkoPcNrZ1cys19M0bxn9yKhSF2wQqtUd7y9gZKOVz5qzx9HzJ_hl8yrnPaVSyEGdNb93MZQEufhwQ26PCwTig5uPGCxmAmEiC9gUWwx3PsWwYCgwEwe2xJRJDMT5hKS2_s6X-6rNfsKTLh7LCR9SLGgLTgQSQtU48i2mcksuF0zewuvmhYM545s_9bz5-fnTj93X9vr7l6vd5XVrJWWlHSWO3TBMoxYVKKB2og6tVuBQjh0X2jKlwMp-wn5l9CgtcqUpHblkrjtvrjbfKcLeHJJfIN2bCN6cBjHdGEjF2xmN7pCLETlloMUolRbAuFC8H5yWw2Cr17vNqx7364i5mH08plCfb7gUSned4KKy6MaqH5hzQve4lVGzhmbWVMyaitlCq5L3m8THw19PTLNhwvSG9oLSwRym9ZwP_2D-1_gBTM2oMw</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Mansuy, Nicolas</creator><creator>Miller, Carol</creator><creator>Parisien, Marc-André</creator><creator>Parks, Sean A</creator><creator>Batllori, Enric</creator><creator>Moritz, Max A</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0665-3064</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2982-5255</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Contrasting human influences and macro-environmental factors on fire activity inside and outside protected areas of North America</title><author>Mansuy, Nicolas ; Miller, Carol ; Parisien, Marc-André ; Parks, Sean A ; Batllori, Enric ; Moritz, Max A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-b5eb377db94eb38a0cd0fec98afe5b3249c188ac56de6eb386e5ce28900b251f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>adaptive fire management</topic><topic>altered fire regimes</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate effects</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>human footprint</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>land use</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>MaxEnt</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Rainforests</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>Temperate forests</topic><topic>Tropical forests</topic><topic>wilderness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mansuy, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parisien, Marc-André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parks, Sean A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batllori, Enric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moritz, Max A</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Environmental research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mansuy, Nicolas</au><au>Miller, Carol</au><au>Parisien, Marc-André</au><au>Parks, Sean A</au><au>Batllori, Enric</au><au>Moritz, Max A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contrasting human influences and macro-environmental factors on fire activity inside and outside protected areas of North America</atitle><jtitle>Environmental research letters</jtitle><stitle>ERL</stitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Lett</addtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>64007</spage><pages>64007-</pages><issn>1748-9326</issn><eissn>1748-9326</eissn><coden>ERLNAL</coden><abstract>Human activities threaten the effectiveness of protected areas (PAs) in achieving their conservation goals across the globe. In this study, we contrast the influence of human and macro-environmental factors driving fire activity inside and outside PAs. Using area burned between 1984 and 2014 for 11 ecoregions in Canada and the United States, we built and compared statistical models of fire likelihood using the MaxEnt software and a set of 11 key anthropogenic, climatic, and physical variables. Overall, the full model (i.e. including all variables) performed better (adjusted area under the curve ranging from 0.71 to 0.95 for individual ecoregions) than the model that excluded anthropogenic variables. Both model types (with and without anthropogenic variables) generally performed better inside than outside the PAs. Climatic variables were usually of foremost importance in explaining fire activity inside and outside PAs, with anthropogenic variables being the second most important predictors, even inside PAs. While the individual contributions of anthropogenic variables indicate that fire activity decreased as of function of increasing human footprint, the anthropogenic effects were often substantially greater than those of physical features and were comparable to or even greater than climatic effects in some densely developed ecoregions, both outside and within PAs (e.g. Mediterranean California, Eastern Temperate Forest, and Tropical Wet Forests). Together, these results show the pervasive impact of humans on fire regimes inside PAs, as well as outside PAs. Given the increasing attractiveness of PAs, the implications for adaptive fire management beyond the concept of naturalness in the PAs are discussed. Our assessment of human-altered fire activity could serve as an indicator of human pressure in PAs; however, we suggest that further analysis is needed to understand specific interactions among fire, human pressures, and the environmental conditions at the scale of PAs.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1748-9326/ab1bc5</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0665-3064</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2982-5255</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1748-9326 |
ispartof | Environmental research letters, 2019-06, Vol.14 (6), p.64007 |
issn | 1748-9326 1748-9326 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_1748_9326_ab1bc5 |
source | IOP Publishing Free Content; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; IOPscience extra; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | adaptive fire management altered fire regimes Anthropogenic factors Climate change Climate effects Environmental conditions Environmental factors human footprint Human influences land use Mathematical models MaxEnt Protected areas Rainforests Statistical analysis Statistical models Temperate forests Tropical forests wilderness |
title | Contrasting human influences and macro-environmental factors on fire activity inside and outside protected areas of North America |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T03%3A20%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contrasting%20human%20influences%20and%20macro-environmental%20factors%20on%20fire%20activity%20inside%20and%20outside%20protected%20areas%20of%20North%20America&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20research%20letters&rft.au=Mansuy,%20Nicolas&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=64007&rft.pages=64007-&rft.issn=1748-9326&rft.eissn=1748-9326&rft.coden=ERLNAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1748-9326/ab1bc5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E2548933424%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548933424&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_93e24be201a94b5894a1248267f9577c&rfr_iscdi=true |