Contrasting human influences and macro-environmental factors on fire activity inside and outside protected areas of North America

Human activities threaten the effectiveness of protected areas (PAs) in achieving their conservation goals across the globe. In this study, we contrast the influence of human and macro-environmental factors driving fire activity inside and outside PAs. Using area burned between 1984 and 2014 for 11...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental research letters 2019-06, Vol.14 (6), p.64007
Hauptverfasser: Mansuy, Nicolas, Miller, Carol, Parisien, Marc-André, Parks, Sean A, Batllori, Enric, Moritz, Max A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 64007
container_title Environmental research letters
container_volume 14
creator Mansuy, Nicolas
Miller, Carol
Parisien, Marc-André
Parks, Sean A
Batllori, Enric
Moritz, Max A
description Human activities threaten the effectiveness of protected areas (PAs) in achieving their conservation goals across the globe. In this study, we contrast the influence of human and macro-environmental factors driving fire activity inside and outside PAs. Using area burned between 1984 and 2014 for 11 ecoregions in Canada and the United States, we built and compared statistical models of fire likelihood using the MaxEnt software and a set of 11 key anthropogenic, climatic, and physical variables. Overall, the full model (i.e. including all variables) performed better (adjusted area under the curve ranging from 0.71 to 0.95 for individual ecoregions) than the model that excluded anthropogenic variables. Both model types (with and without anthropogenic variables) generally performed better inside than outside the PAs. Climatic variables were usually of foremost importance in explaining fire activity inside and outside PAs, with anthropogenic variables being the second most important predictors, even inside PAs. While the individual contributions of anthropogenic variables indicate that fire activity decreased as of function of increasing human footprint, the anthropogenic effects were often substantially greater than those of physical features and were comparable to or even greater than climatic effects in some densely developed ecoregions, both outside and within PAs (e.g. Mediterranean California, Eastern Temperate Forest, and Tropical Wet Forests). Together, these results show the pervasive impact of humans on fire regimes inside PAs, as well as outside PAs. Given the increasing attractiveness of PAs, the implications for adaptive fire management beyond the concept of naturalness in the PAs are discussed. Our assessment of human-altered fire activity could serve as an indicator of human pressure in PAs; however, we suggest that further analysis is needed to understand specific interactions among fire, human pressures, and the environmental conditions at the scale of PAs.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1748-9326/ab1bc5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_1748_9326_ab1bc5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_93e24be201a94b5894a1248267f9577c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2548933424</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-b5eb377db94eb38a0cd0fec98afe5b3249c188ac56de6eb386e5ce28900b251f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UU1v1TAQjBBIlMKdoyUOXAi1HTuxj9UTH5UquMDZ2jjr1k-J_bD9KvXIP6_zgkoPcNrZ1cys19M0bxn9yKhSF2wQqtUd7y9gZKOVz5qzx9HzJ_hl8yrnPaVSyEGdNb93MZQEufhwQ26PCwTig5uPGCxmAmEiC9gUWwx3PsWwYCgwEwe2xJRJDMT5hKS2_s6X-6rNfsKTLh7LCR9SLGgLTgQSQtU48i2mcksuF0zewuvmhYM545s_9bz5-fnTj93X9vr7l6vd5XVrJWWlHSWO3TBMoxYVKKB2og6tVuBQjh0X2jKlwMp-wn5l9CgtcqUpHblkrjtvrjbfKcLeHJJfIN2bCN6cBjHdGEjF2xmN7pCLETlloMUolRbAuFC8H5yWw2Cr17vNqx7364i5mH08plCfb7gUSned4KKy6MaqH5hzQve4lVGzhmbWVMyaitlCq5L3m8THw19PTLNhwvSG9oLSwRym9ZwP_2D-1_gBTM2oMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548933424</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contrasting human influences and macro-environmental factors on fire activity inside and outside protected areas of North America</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>IOPscience extra</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Mansuy, Nicolas ; Miller, Carol ; Parisien, Marc-André ; Parks, Sean A ; Batllori, Enric ; Moritz, Max A</creator><creatorcontrib>Mansuy, Nicolas ; Miller, Carol ; Parisien, Marc-André ; Parks, Sean A ; Batllori, Enric ; Moritz, Max A</creatorcontrib><description>Human activities threaten the effectiveness of protected areas (PAs) in achieving their conservation goals across the globe. In this study, we contrast the influence of human and macro-environmental factors driving fire activity inside and outside PAs. Using area burned between 1984 and 2014 for 11 ecoregions in Canada and the United States, we built and compared statistical models of fire likelihood using the MaxEnt software and a set of 11 key anthropogenic, climatic, and physical variables. Overall, the full model (i.e. including all variables) performed better (adjusted area under the curve ranging from 0.71 to 0.95 for individual ecoregions) than the model that excluded anthropogenic variables. Both model types (with and without anthropogenic variables) generally performed better inside than outside the PAs. Climatic variables were usually of foremost importance in explaining fire activity inside and outside PAs, with anthropogenic variables being the second most important predictors, even inside PAs. While the individual contributions of anthropogenic variables indicate that fire activity decreased as of function of increasing human footprint, the anthropogenic effects were often substantially greater than those of physical features and were comparable to or even greater than climatic effects in some densely developed ecoregions, both outside and within PAs (e.g. Mediterranean California, Eastern Temperate Forest, and Tropical Wet Forests). Together, these results show the pervasive impact of humans on fire regimes inside PAs, as well as outside PAs. Given the increasing attractiveness of PAs, the implications for adaptive fire management beyond the concept of naturalness in the PAs are discussed. Our assessment of human-altered fire activity could serve as an indicator of human pressure in PAs; however, we suggest that further analysis is needed to understand specific interactions among fire, human pressures, and the environmental conditions at the scale of PAs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-9326</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-9326</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab1bc5</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ERLNAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>adaptive fire management ; altered fire regimes ; Anthropogenic factors ; Climate change ; Climate effects ; Environmental conditions ; Environmental factors ; human footprint ; Human influences ; land use ; Mathematical models ; MaxEnt ; Protected areas ; Rainforests ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical models ; Temperate forests ; Tropical forests ; wilderness</subject><ispartof>Environmental research letters, 2019-06, Vol.14 (6), p.64007</ispartof><rights>2019 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-b5eb377db94eb38a0cd0fec98afe5b3249c188ac56de6eb386e5ce28900b251f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-b5eb377db94eb38a0cd0fec98afe5b3249c188ac56de6eb386e5ce28900b251f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0665-3064 ; 0000-0002-2982-5255</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ab1bc5/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,2096,27901,27902,38845,38867,53815,53842</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mansuy, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parisien, Marc-André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parks, Sean A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batllori, Enric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moritz, Max A</creatorcontrib><title>Contrasting human influences and macro-environmental factors on fire activity inside and outside protected areas of North America</title><title>Environmental research letters</title><addtitle>ERL</addtitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Lett</addtitle><description>Human activities threaten the effectiveness of protected areas (PAs) in achieving their conservation goals across the globe. In this study, we contrast the influence of human and macro-environmental factors driving fire activity inside and outside PAs. Using area burned between 1984 and 2014 for 11 ecoregions in Canada and the United States, we built and compared statistical models of fire likelihood using the MaxEnt software and a set of 11 key anthropogenic, climatic, and physical variables. Overall, the full model (i.e. including all variables) performed better (adjusted area under the curve ranging from 0.71 to 0.95 for individual ecoregions) than the model that excluded anthropogenic variables. Both model types (with and without anthropogenic variables) generally performed better inside than outside the PAs. Climatic variables were usually of foremost importance in explaining fire activity inside and outside PAs, with anthropogenic variables being the second most important predictors, even inside PAs. While the individual contributions of anthropogenic variables indicate that fire activity decreased as of function of increasing human footprint, the anthropogenic effects were often substantially greater than those of physical features and were comparable to or even greater than climatic effects in some densely developed ecoregions, both outside and within PAs (e.g. Mediterranean California, Eastern Temperate Forest, and Tropical Wet Forests). Together, these results show the pervasive impact of humans on fire regimes inside PAs, as well as outside PAs. Given the increasing attractiveness of PAs, the implications for adaptive fire management beyond the concept of naturalness in the PAs are discussed. Our assessment of human-altered fire activity could serve as an indicator of human pressure in PAs; however, we suggest that further analysis is needed to understand specific interactions among fire, human pressures, and the environmental conditions at the scale of PAs.</description><subject>adaptive fire management</subject><subject>altered fire regimes</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate effects</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>human footprint</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>land use</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>MaxEnt</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Rainforests</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>Temperate forests</subject><subject>Tropical forests</subject><subject>wilderness</subject><issn>1748-9326</issn><issn>1748-9326</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UU1v1TAQjBBIlMKdoyUOXAi1HTuxj9UTH5UquMDZ2jjr1k-J_bD9KvXIP6_zgkoPcNrZ1cys19M0bxn9yKhSF2wQqtUd7y9gZKOVz5qzx9HzJ_hl8yrnPaVSyEGdNb93MZQEufhwQ26PCwTig5uPGCxmAmEiC9gUWwx3PsWwYCgwEwe2xJRJDMT5hKS2_s6X-6rNfsKTLh7LCR9SLGgLTgQSQtU48i2mcksuF0zewuvmhYM545s_9bz5-fnTj93X9vr7l6vd5XVrJWWlHSWO3TBMoxYVKKB2og6tVuBQjh0X2jKlwMp-wn5l9CgtcqUpHblkrjtvrjbfKcLeHJJfIN2bCN6cBjHdGEjF2xmN7pCLETlloMUolRbAuFC8H5yWw2Cr17vNqx7364i5mH08plCfb7gUSned4KKy6MaqH5hzQve4lVGzhmbWVMyaitlCq5L3m8THw19PTLNhwvSG9oLSwRym9ZwP_2D-1_gBTM2oMw</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Mansuy, Nicolas</creator><creator>Miller, Carol</creator><creator>Parisien, Marc-André</creator><creator>Parks, Sean A</creator><creator>Batllori, Enric</creator><creator>Moritz, Max A</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0665-3064</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2982-5255</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Contrasting human influences and macro-environmental factors on fire activity inside and outside protected areas of North America</title><author>Mansuy, Nicolas ; Miller, Carol ; Parisien, Marc-André ; Parks, Sean A ; Batllori, Enric ; Moritz, Max A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-b5eb377db94eb38a0cd0fec98afe5b3249c188ac56de6eb386e5ce28900b251f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>adaptive fire management</topic><topic>altered fire regimes</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate effects</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>human footprint</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>land use</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>MaxEnt</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Rainforests</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>Temperate forests</topic><topic>Tropical forests</topic><topic>wilderness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mansuy, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parisien, Marc-André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parks, Sean A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batllori, Enric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moritz, Max A</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Environmental research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mansuy, Nicolas</au><au>Miller, Carol</au><au>Parisien, Marc-André</au><au>Parks, Sean A</au><au>Batllori, Enric</au><au>Moritz, Max A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contrasting human influences and macro-environmental factors on fire activity inside and outside protected areas of North America</atitle><jtitle>Environmental research letters</jtitle><stitle>ERL</stitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Lett</addtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>64007</spage><pages>64007-</pages><issn>1748-9326</issn><eissn>1748-9326</eissn><coden>ERLNAL</coden><abstract>Human activities threaten the effectiveness of protected areas (PAs) in achieving their conservation goals across the globe. In this study, we contrast the influence of human and macro-environmental factors driving fire activity inside and outside PAs. Using area burned between 1984 and 2014 for 11 ecoregions in Canada and the United States, we built and compared statistical models of fire likelihood using the MaxEnt software and a set of 11 key anthropogenic, climatic, and physical variables. Overall, the full model (i.e. including all variables) performed better (adjusted area under the curve ranging from 0.71 to 0.95 for individual ecoregions) than the model that excluded anthropogenic variables. Both model types (with and without anthropogenic variables) generally performed better inside than outside the PAs. Climatic variables were usually of foremost importance in explaining fire activity inside and outside PAs, with anthropogenic variables being the second most important predictors, even inside PAs. While the individual contributions of anthropogenic variables indicate that fire activity decreased as of function of increasing human footprint, the anthropogenic effects were often substantially greater than those of physical features and were comparable to or even greater than climatic effects in some densely developed ecoregions, both outside and within PAs (e.g. Mediterranean California, Eastern Temperate Forest, and Tropical Wet Forests). Together, these results show the pervasive impact of humans on fire regimes inside PAs, as well as outside PAs. Given the increasing attractiveness of PAs, the implications for adaptive fire management beyond the concept of naturalness in the PAs are discussed. Our assessment of human-altered fire activity could serve as an indicator of human pressure in PAs; however, we suggest that further analysis is needed to understand specific interactions among fire, human pressures, and the environmental conditions at the scale of PAs.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1748-9326/ab1bc5</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0665-3064</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2982-5255</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1748-9326
ispartof Environmental research letters, 2019-06, Vol.14 (6), p.64007
issn 1748-9326
1748-9326
language eng
recordid cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_1748_9326_ab1bc5
source IOP Publishing Free Content; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; IOPscience extra; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects adaptive fire management
altered fire regimes
Anthropogenic factors
Climate change
Climate effects
Environmental conditions
Environmental factors
human footprint
Human influences
land use
Mathematical models
MaxEnt
Protected areas
Rainforests
Statistical analysis
Statistical models
Temperate forests
Tropical forests
wilderness
title Contrasting human influences and macro-environmental factors on fire activity inside and outside protected areas of North America
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T03%3A20%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contrasting%20human%20influences%20and%20macro-environmental%20factors%20on%20fire%20activity%20inside%20and%20outside%20protected%20areas%20of%20North%20America&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20research%20letters&rft.au=Mansuy,%20Nicolas&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=64007&rft.pages=64007-&rft.issn=1748-9326&rft.eissn=1748-9326&rft.coden=ERLNAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1748-9326/ab1bc5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E2548933424%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548933424&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_93e24be201a94b5894a1248267f9577c&rfr_iscdi=true