Stormwater management and ecosystem services: a review
Researchers and water managers have turned to green stormwater infrastructure, such as bioswales, retention basins, wetlands, rain gardens, and urban green spaces to reduce flooding, augment surface water supplies, recharge groundwater, and improve water quality. It is increasingly clear that green...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental research letters 2018-03, Vol.13 (3), p.33002 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 33002 |
container_title | Environmental research letters |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Prudencio, Liana Null, Sarah E |
description | Researchers and water managers have turned to green stormwater infrastructure, such as bioswales, retention basins, wetlands, rain gardens, and urban green spaces to reduce flooding, augment surface water supplies, recharge groundwater, and improve water quality. It is increasingly clear that green stormwater infrastructure not only controls stormwater volume and timing, but also promotes ecosystem services, which are the benefits that ecosystems provide to humans. Yet there has been little synthesis focused on understanding how green stormwater management affects ecosystem services. The objectives of this paper are to review and synthesize published literature on ecosystem services and green stormwater infrastructure and identify gaps in research and understanding, establishing a foundation for research at the intersection of ecosystems services and green stormwater management. We reviewed 170 publications on stormwater management and ecosystem services, and summarized the state-of-the-science categorized by the four types of ecosystem services. Major findings show that: (1) most research was conducted at the parcel-scale and should expand to larger scales to more closely understand green stormwater infrastructure impacts, (2) nearly a third of papers developed frameworks for implementing green stormwater infrastructure and highlighted barriers, (3) papers discussed ecosystem services, but less than 40% quantified ecosystem services, (4) no geographic trends emerged, indicating interest in applying green stormwater infrastructure across different contexts, (5) studies increasingly integrate engineering, physical science, and social science approaches for holistic understanding, and (6) standardizing green stormwater infrastructure terminology would provide a more cohesive field of study than the diverse and often redundant terminology currently in use. We recommend that future research provide metrics and quantify ecosystem services, integrate disciplines to measure ecosystem services from green stormwater infrastructure, and better incorporate stormwater management into environmental policy. Our conclusions outline promising future research directions at the intersection of stormwater management and ecosystem services. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa81a |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_1748_9326_aaa81a</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5886476fa9a1423d9bdbcefd5af68d22</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2549136101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-876246a2a2a9c9fc7c032b25f347eb06753c20b0be178bb2c39e435cfc352c803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Lw0AQxYMoWKt3jwEPXozd72y8SfGjUPCgnpfJZrakNN26m7b0vzc1Uj2IzGGGx5s3wy9JLim5pUTrEc2FzgrO1AgANIWjZHCQjn_Np8lZjHNCpJC5HiTqtfWh2UKLIW1gCTNscNmmsKxStD7uYotNGjFsaovxLoU04KbG7Xly4mAR8eK7D5P3x4e38XM2fXmajO-nmRWFajOdKyYUsK4KWzibW8JZyaTjIseSqFxyy0hJSqS5LktmeYGCS-ssl8xqwofJpM-tPMzNKtQNhJ3xUJsvwYeZgdDWdoFGaq1ErhwUQAXjVVFWpUVXSXBKV4x1WVd91ir4jzXG1sz9Oiy79w2ToqBcUUI7F-ldNvgYA7rDVUrMnrTZozR7lKYn3a3c9Cu1X_1k_mO__sOOYWEoN9wQzglhZlU5_gnZ-ou4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2549136101</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stormwater management and ecosystem services: a review</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>IOPscience extra</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Prudencio, Liana ; Null, Sarah E</creator><creatorcontrib>Prudencio, Liana ; Null, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><description>Researchers and water managers have turned to green stormwater infrastructure, such as bioswales, retention basins, wetlands, rain gardens, and urban green spaces to reduce flooding, augment surface water supplies, recharge groundwater, and improve water quality. It is increasingly clear that green stormwater infrastructure not only controls stormwater volume and timing, but also promotes ecosystem services, which are the benefits that ecosystems provide to humans. Yet there has been little synthesis focused on understanding how green stormwater management affects ecosystem services. The objectives of this paper are to review and synthesize published literature on ecosystem services and green stormwater infrastructure and identify gaps in research and understanding, establishing a foundation for research at the intersection of ecosystems services and green stormwater management. We reviewed 170 publications on stormwater management and ecosystem services, and summarized the state-of-the-science categorized by the four types of ecosystem services. Major findings show that: (1) most research was conducted at the parcel-scale and should expand to larger scales to more closely understand green stormwater infrastructure impacts, (2) nearly a third of papers developed frameworks for implementing green stormwater infrastructure and highlighted barriers, (3) papers discussed ecosystem services, but less than 40% quantified ecosystem services, (4) no geographic trends emerged, indicating interest in applying green stormwater infrastructure across different contexts, (5) studies increasingly integrate engineering, physical science, and social science approaches for holistic understanding, and (6) standardizing green stormwater infrastructure terminology would provide a more cohesive field of study than the diverse and often redundant terminology currently in use. We recommend that future research provide metrics and quantify ecosystem services, integrate disciplines to measure ecosystem services from green stormwater infrastructure, and better incorporate stormwater management into environmental policy. Our conclusions outline promising future research directions at the intersection of stormwater management and ecosystem services.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-9326</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-9326</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa81a</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ERLNAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>aquifer recharge ; climate adaptation ; Ecosystem management ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Environmental management ; Environmental policy ; Flooding ; green stormwater infrastructure ; Groundwater quality ; Groundwater recharge ; Infrastructure ; Intersections ; Literature reviews ; Open spaces ; Retention basins ; runoff ; Settling basins ; Stormwater ; Stormwater management ; Strategic management ; Surface water ; Surface-groundwater relations ; Terminology ; Urban planning ; Water management ; Water quality ; Water supply</subject><ispartof>Environmental research letters, 2018-03, Vol.13 (3), p.33002</ispartof><rights>2018 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-876246a2a2a9c9fc7c032b25f347eb06753c20b0be178bb2c39e435cfc352c803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-876246a2a2a9c9fc7c032b25f347eb06753c20b0be178bb2c39e435cfc352c803</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5361-9841</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa81a/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2100,27922,27923,38866,38888,53838,53865</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prudencio, Liana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Null, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><title>Stormwater management and ecosystem services: a review</title><title>Environmental research letters</title><addtitle>ERL</addtitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Lett</addtitle><description>Researchers and water managers have turned to green stormwater infrastructure, such as bioswales, retention basins, wetlands, rain gardens, and urban green spaces to reduce flooding, augment surface water supplies, recharge groundwater, and improve water quality. It is increasingly clear that green stormwater infrastructure not only controls stormwater volume and timing, but also promotes ecosystem services, which are the benefits that ecosystems provide to humans. Yet there has been little synthesis focused on understanding how green stormwater management affects ecosystem services. The objectives of this paper are to review and synthesize published literature on ecosystem services and green stormwater infrastructure and identify gaps in research and understanding, establishing a foundation for research at the intersection of ecosystems services and green stormwater management. We reviewed 170 publications on stormwater management and ecosystem services, and summarized the state-of-the-science categorized by the four types of ecosystem services. Major findings show that: (1) most research was conducted at the parcel-scale and should expand to larger scales to more closely understand green stormwater infrastructure impacts, (2) nearly a third of papers developed frameworks for implementing green stormwater infrastructure and highlighted barriers, (3) papers discussed ecosystem services, but less than 40% quantified ecosystem services, (4) no geographic trends emerged, indicating interest in applying green stormwater infrastructure across different contexts, (5) studies increasingly integrate engineering, physical science, and social science approaches for holistic understanding, and (6) standardizing green stormwater infrastructure terminology would provide a more cohesive field of study than the diverse and often redundant terminology currently in use. We recommend that future research provide metrics and quantify ecosystem services, integrate disciplines to measure ecosystem services from green stormwater infrastructure, and better incorporate stormwater management into environmental policy. Our conclusions outline promising future research directions at the intersection of stormwater management and ecosystem services.</description><subject>aquifer recharge</subject><subject>climate adaptation</subject><subject>Ecosystem management</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Flooding</subject><subject>green stormwater infrastructure</subject><subject>Groundwater quality</subject><subject>Groundwater recharge</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Intersections</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Open spaces</subject><subject>Retention basins</subject><subject>runoff</subject><subject>Settling basins</subject><subject>Stormwater</subject><subject>Stormwater management</subject><subject>Strategic management</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Surface-groundwater relations</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><subject>Water management</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><issn>1748-9326</issn><issn>1748-9326</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1Lw0AQxYMoWKt3jwEPXozd72y8SfGjUPCgnpfJZrakNN26m7b0vzc1Uj2IzGGGx5s3wy9JLim5pUTrEc2FzgrO1AgANIWjZHCQjn_Np8lZjHNCpJC5HiTqtfWh2UKLIW1gCTNscNmmsKxStD7uYotNGjFsaovxLoU04KbG7Xly4mAR8eK7D5P3x4e38XM2fXmajO-nmRWFajOdKyYUsK4KWzibW8JZyaTjIseSqFxyy0hJSqS5LktmeYGCS-ssl8xqwofJpM-tPMzNKtQNhJ3xUJsvwYeZgdDWdoFGaq1ErhwUQAXjVVFWpUVXSXBKV4x1WVd91ir4jzXG1sz9Oiy79w2ToqBcUUI7F-ldNvgYA7rDVUrMnrTZozR7lKYn3a3c9Cu1X_1k_mO__sOOYWEoN9wQzglhZlU5_gnZ-ou4</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Prudencio, Liana</creator><creator>Null, Sarah E</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5361-9841</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Stormwater management and ecosystem services: a review</title><author>Prudencio, Liana ; Null, Sarah E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-876246a2a2a9c9fc7c032b25f347eb06753c20b0be178bb2c39e435cfc352c803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>aquifer recharge</topic><topic>climate adaptation</topic><topic>Ecosystem management</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Flooding</topic><topic>green stormwater infrastructure</topic><topic>Groundwater quality</topic><topic>Groundwater recharge</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Intersections</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Open spaces</topic><topic>Retention basins</topic><topic>runoff</topic><topic>Settling basins</topic><topic>Stormwater</topic><topic>Stormwater management</topic><topic>Strategic management</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Surface-groundwater relations</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><topic>Water management</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prudencio, Liana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Null, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Environmental research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prudencio, Liana</au><au>Null, Sarah E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stormwater management and ecosystem services: a review</atitle><jtitle>Environmental research letters</jtitle><stitle>ERL</stitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Lett</addtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>33002</spage><pages>33002-</pages><issn>1748-9326</issn><eissn>1748-9326</eissn><coden>ERLNAL</coden><abstract>Researchers and water managers have turned to green stormwater infrastructure, such as bioswales, retention basins, wetlands, rain gardens, and urban green spaces to reduce flooding, augment surface water supplies, recharge groundwater, and improve water quality. It is increasingly clear that green stormwater infrastructure not only controls stormwater volume and timing, but also promotes ecosystem services, which are the benefits that ecosystems provide to humans. Yet there has been little synthesis focused on understanding how green stormwater management affects ecosystem services. The objectives of this paper are to review and synthesize published literature on ecosystem services and green stormwater infrastructure and identify gaps in research and understanding, establishing a foundation for research at the intersection of ecosystems services and green stormwater management. We reviewed 170 publications on stormwater management and ecosystem services, and summarized the state-of-the-science categorized by the four types of ecosystem services. Major findings show that: (1) most research was conducted at the parcel-scale and should expand to larger scales to more closely understand green stormwater infrastructure impacts, (2) nearly a third of papers developed frameworks for implementing green stormwater infrastructure and highlighted barriers, (3) papers discussed ecosystem services, but less than 40% quantified ecosystem services, (4) no geographic trends emerged, indicating interest in applying green stormwater infrastructure across different contexts, (5) studies increasingly integrate engineering, physical science, and social science approaches for holistic understanding, and (6) standardizing green stormwater infrastructure terminology would provide a more cohesive field of study than the diverse and often redundant terminology currently in use. We recommend that future research provide metrics and quantify ecosystem services, integrate disciplines to measure ecosystem services from green stormwater infrastructure, and better incorporate stormwater management into environmental policy. Our conclusions outline promising future research directions at the intersection of stormwater management and ecosystem services.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1748-9326/aaa81a</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5361-9841</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1748-9326 |
ispartof | Environmental research letters, 2018-03, Vol.13 (3), p.33002 |
issn | 1748-9326 1748-9326 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_1748_9326_aaa81a |
source | IOP Publishing Free Content; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; IOPscience extra; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | aquifer recharge climate adaptation Ecosystem management Ecosystem services Ecosystems Environmental management Environmental policy Flooding green stormwater infrastructure Groundwater quality Groundwater recharge Infrastructure Intersections Literature reviews Open spaces Retention basins runoff Settling basins Stormwater Stormwater management Strategic management Surface water Surface-groundwater relations Terminology Urban planning Water management Water quality Water supply |
title | Stormwater management and ecosystem services: a review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T21%3A08%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stormwater%20management%20and%20ecosystem%20services:%20a%20review&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20research%20letters&rft.au=Prudencio,%20Liana&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=33002&rft.pages=33002-&rft.issn=1748-9326&rft.eissn=1748-9326&rft.coden=ERLNAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa81a&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E2549136101%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2549136101&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_5886476fa9a1423d9bdbcefd5af68d22&rfr_iscdi=true |