Stormwater management and ecosystem services: a review

Researchers and water managers have turned to green stormwater infrastructure, such as bioswales, retention basins, wetlands, rain gardens, and urban green spaces to reduce flooding, augment surface water supplies, recharge groundwater, and improve water quality. It is increasingly clear that green...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental research letters 2018-03, Vol.13 (3), p.33002
Hauptverfasser: Prudencio, Liana, Null, Sarah E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 33002
container_title Environmental research letters
container_volume 13
creator Prudencio, Liana
Null, Sarah E
description Researchers and water managers have turned to green stormwater infrastructure, such as bioswales, retention basins, wetlands, rain gardens, and urban green spaces to reduce flooding, augment surface water supplies, recharge groundwater, and improve water quality. It is increasingly clear that green stormwater infrastructure not only controls stormwater volume and timing, but also promotes ecosystem services, which are the benefits that ecosystems provide to humans. Yet there has been little synthesis focused on understanding how green stormwater management affects ecosystem services. The objectives of this paper are to review and synthesize published literature on ecosystem services and green stormwater infrastructure and identify gaps in research and understanding, establishing a foundation for research at the intersection of ecosystems services and green stormwater management. We reviewed 170 publications on stormwater management and ecosystem services, and summarized the state-of-the-science categorized by the four types of ecosystem services. Major findings show that: (1) most research was conducted at the parcel-scale and should expand to larger scales to more closely understand green stormwater infrastructure impacts, (2) nearly a third of papers developed frameworks for implementing green stormwater infrastructure and highlighted barriers, (3) papers discussed ecosystem services, but less than 40% quantified ecosystem services, (4) no geographic trends emerged, indicating interest in applying green stormwater infrastructure across different contexts, (5) studies increasingly integrate engineering, physical science, and social science approaches for holistic understanding, and (6) standardizing green stormwater infrastructure terminology would provide a more cohesive field of study than the diverse and often redundant terminology currently in use. We recommend that future research provide metrics and quantify ecosystem services, integrate disciplines to measure ecosystem services from green stormwater infrastructure, and better incorporate stormwater management into environmental policy. Our conclusions outline promising future research directions at the intersection of stormwater management and ecosystem services.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa81a
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_1748_9326_aaa81a</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5886476fa9a1423d9bdbcefd5af68d22</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2549136101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-876246a2a2a9c9fc7c032b25f347eb06753c20b0be178bb2c39e435cfc352c803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Lw0AQxYMoWKt3jwEPXozd72y8SfGjUPCgnpfJZrakNN26m7b0vzc1Uj2IzGGGx5s3wy9JLim5pUTrEc2FzgrO1AgANIWjZHCQjn_Np8lZjHNCpJC5HiTqtfWh2UKLIW1gCTNscNmmsKxStD7uYotNGjFsaovxLoU04KbG7Xly4mAR8eK7D5P3x4e38XM2fXmajO-nmRWFajOdKyYUsK4KWzibW8JZyaTjIseSqFxyy0hJSqS5LktmeYGCS-ssl8xqwofJpM-tPMzNKtQNhJ3xUJsvwYeZgdDWdoFGaq1ErhwUQAXjVVFWpUVXSXBKV4x1WVd91ir4jzXG1sz9Oiy79w2ToqBcUUI7F-ldNvgYA7rDVUrMnrTZozR7lKYn3a3c9Cu1X_1k_mO__sOOYWEoN9wQzglhZlU5_gnZ-ou4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2549136101</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stormwater management and ecosystem services: a review</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>IOPscience extra</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Prudencio, Liana ; Null, Sarah E</creator><creatorcontrib>Prudencio, Liana ; Null, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><description>Researchers and water managers have turned to green stormwater infrastructure, such as bioswales, retention basins, wetlands, rain gardens, and urban green spaces to reduce flooding, augment surface water supplies, recharge groundwater, and improve water quality. It is increasingly clear that green stormwater infrastructure not only controls stormwater volume and timing, but also promotes ecosystem services, which are the benefits that ecosystems provide to humans. Yet there has been little synthesis focused on understanding how green stormwater management affects ecosystem services. The objectives of this paper are to review and synthesize published literature on ecosystem services and green stormwater infrastructure and identify gaps in research and understanding, establishing a foundation for research at the intersection of ecosystems services and green stormwater management. We reviewed 170 publications on stormwater management and ecosystem services, and summarized the state-of-the-science categorized by the four types of ecosystem services. Major findings show that: (1) most research was conducted at the parcel-scale and should expand to larger scales to more closely understand green stormwater infrastructure impacts, (2) nearly a third of papers developed frameworks for implementing green stormwater infrastructure and highlighted barriers, (3) papers discussed ecosystem services, but less than 40% quantified ecosystem services, (4) no geographic trends emerged, indicating interest in applying green stormwater infrastructure across different contexts, (5) studies increasingly integrate engineering, physical science, and social science approaches for holistic understanding, and (6) standardizing green stormwater infrastructure terminology would provide a more cohesive field of study than the diverse and often redundant terminology currently in use. We recommend that future research provide metrics and quantify ecosystem services, integrate disciplines to measure ecosystem services from green stormwater infrastructure, and better incorporate stormwater management into environmental policy. Our conclusions outline promising future research directions at the intersection of stormwater management and ecosystem services.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-9326</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-9326</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa81a</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ERLNAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>aquifer recharge ; climate adaptation ; Ecosystem management ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Environmental management ; Environmental policy ; Flooding ; green stormwater infrastructure ; Groundwater quality ; Groundwater recharge ; Infrastructure ; Intersections ; Literature reviews ; Open spaces ; Retention basins ; runoff ; Settling basins ; Stormwater ; Stormwater management ; Strategic management ; Surface water ; Surface-groundwater relations ; Terminology ; Urban planning ; Water management ; Water quality ; Water supply</subject><ispartof>Environmental research letters, 2018-03, Vol.13 (3), p.33002</ispartof><rights>2018 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-876246a2a2a9c9fc7c032b25f347eb06753c20b0be178bb2c39e435cfc352c803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-876246a2a2a9c9fc7c032b25f347eb06753c20b0be178bb2c39e435cfc352c803</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5361-9841</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa81a/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2100,27922,27923,38866,38888,53838,53865</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prudencio, Liana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Null, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><title>Stormwater management and ecosystem services: a review</title><title>Environmental research letters</title><addtitle>ERL</addtitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Lett</addtitle><description>Researchers and water managers have turned to green stormwater infrastructure, such as bioswales, retention basins, wetlands, rain gardens, and urban green spaces to reduce flooding, augment surface water supplies, recharge groundwater, and improve water quality. It is increasingly clear that green stormwater infrastructure not only controls stormwater volume and timing, but also promotes ecosystem services, which are the benefits that ecosystems provide to humans. Yet there has been little synthesis focused on understanding how green stormwater management affects ecosystem services. The objectives of this paper are to review and synthesize published literature on ecosystem services and green stormwater infrastructure and identify gaps in research and understanding, establishing a foundation for research at the intersection of ecosystems services and green stormwater management. We reviewed 170 publications on stormwater management and ecosystem services, and summarized the state-of-the-science categorized by the four types of ecosystem services. Major findings show that: (1) most research was conducted at the parcel-scale and should expand to larger scales to more closely understand green stormwater infrastructure impacts, (2) nearly a third of papers developed frameworks for implementing green stormwater infrastructure and highlighted barriers, (3) papers discussed ecosystem services, but less than 40% quantified ecosystem services, (4) no geographic trends emerged, indicating interest in applying green stormwater infrastructure across different contexts, (5) studies increasingly integrate engineering, physical science, and social science approaches for holistic understanding, and (6) standardizing green stormwater infrastructure terminology would provide a more cohesive field of study than the diverse and often redundant terminology currently in use. We recommend that future research provide metrics and quantify ecosystem services, integrate disciplines to measure ecosystem services from green stormwater infrastructure, and better incorporate stormwater management into environmental policy. Our conclusions outline promising future research directions at the intersection of stormwater management and ecosystem services.</description><subject>aquifer recharge</subject><subject>climate adaptation</subject><subject>Ecosystem management</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Flooding</subject><subject>green stormwater infrastructure</subject><subject>Groundwater quality</subject><subject>Groundwater recharge</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Intersections</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Open spaces</subject><subject>Retention basins</subject><subject>runoff</subject><subject>Settling basins</subject><subject>Stormwater</subject><subject>Stormwater management</subject><subject>Strategic management</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Surface-groundwater relations</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><subject>Water management</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><issn>1748-9326</issn><issn>1748-9326</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1Lw0AQxYMoWKt3jwEPXozd72y8SfGjUPCgnpfJZrakNN26m7b0vzc1Uj2IzGGGx5s3wy9JLim5pUTrEc2FzgrO1AgANIWjZHCQjn_Np8lZjHNCpJC5HiTqtfWh2UKLIW1gCTNscNmmsKxStD7uYotNGjFsaovxLoU04KbG7Xly4mAR8eK7D5P3x4e38XM2fXmajO-nmRWFajOdKyYUsK4KWzibW8JZyaTjIseSqFxyy0hJSqS5LktmeYGCS-ssl8xqwofJpM-tPMzNKtQNhJ3xUJsvwYeZgdDWdoFGaq1ErhwUQAXjVVFWpUVXSXBKV4x1WVd91ir4jzXG1sz9Oiy79w2ToqBcUUI7F-ldNvgYA7rDVUrMnrTZozR7lKYn3a3c9Cu1X_1k_mO__sOOYWEoN9wQzglhZlU5_gnZ-ou4</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Prudencio, Liana</creator><creator>Null, Sarah E</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5361-9841</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Stormwater management and ecosystem services: a review</title><author>Prudencio, Liana ; Null, Sarah E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-876246a2a2a9c9fc7c032b25f347eb06753c20b0be178bb2c39e435cfc352c803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>aquifer recharge</topic><topic>climate adaptation</topic><topic>Ecosystem management</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Flooding</topic><topic>green stormwater infrastructure</topic><topic>Groundwater quality</topic><topic>Groundwater recharge</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Intersections</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Open spaces</topic><topic>Retention basins</topic><topic>runoff</topic><topic>Settling basins</topic><topic>Stormwater</topic><topic>Stormwater management</topic><topic>Strategic management</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Surface-groundwater relations</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><topic>Water management</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prudencio, Liana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Null, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Environmental research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prudencio, Liana</au><au>Null, Sarah E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stormwater management and ecosystem services: a review</atitle><jtitle>Environmental research letters</jtitle><stitle>ERL</stitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Lett</addtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>33002</spage><pages>33002-</pages><issn>1748-9326</issn><eissn>1748-9326</eissn><coden>ERLNAL</coden><abstract>Researchers and water managers have turned to green stormwater infrastructure, such as bioswales, retention basins, wetlands, rain gardens, and urban green spaces to reduce flooding, augment surface water supplies, recharge groundwater, and improve water quality. It is increasingly clear that green stormwater infrastructure not only controls stormwater volume and timing, but also promotes ecosystem services, which are the benefits that ecosystems provide to humans. Yet there has been little synthesis focused on understanding how green stormwater management affects ecosystem services. The objectives of this paper are to review and synthesize published literature on ecosystem services and green stormwater infrastructure and identify gaps in research and understanding, establishing a foundation for research at the intersection of ecosystems services and green stormwater management. We reviewed 170 publications on stormwater management and ecosystem services, and summarized the state-of-the-science categorized by the four types of ecosystem services. Major findings show that: (1) most research was conducted at the parcel-scale and should expand to larger scales to more closely understand green stormwater infrastructure impacts, (2) nearly a third of papers developed frameworks for implementing green stormwater infrastructure and highlighted barriers, (3) papers discussed ecosystem services, but less than 40% quantified ecosystem services, (4) no geographic trends emerged, indicating interest in applying green stormwater infrastructure across different contexts, (5) studies increasingly integrate engineering, physical science, and social science approaches for holistic understanding, and (6) standardizing green stormwater infrastructure terminology would provide a more cohesive field of study than the diverse and often redundant terminology currently in use. We recommend that future research provide metrics and quantify ecosystem services, integrate disciplines to measure ecosystem services from green stormwater infrastructure, and better incorporate stormwater management into environmental policy. Our conclusions outline promising future research directions at the intersection of stormwater management and ecosystem services.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1748-9326/aaa81a</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5361-9841</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1748-9326
ispartof Environmental research letters, 2018-03, Vol.13 (3), p.33002
issn 1748-9326
1748-9326
language eng
recordid cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_1748_9326_aaa81a
source IOP Publishing Free Content; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; IOPscience extra; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects aquifer recharge
climate adaptation
Ecosystem management
Ecosystem services
Ecosystems
Environmental management
Environmental policy
Flooding
green stormwater infrastructure
Groundwater quality
Groundwater recharge
Infrastructure
Intersections
Literature reviews
Open spaces
Retention basins
runoff
Settling basins
Stormwater
Stormwater management
Strategic management
Surface water
Surface-groundwater relations
Terminology
Urban planning
Water management
Water quality
Water supply
title Stormwater management and ecosystem services: a review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T21%3A08%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stormwater%20management%20and%20ecosystem%20services:%20a%20review&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20research%20letters&rft.au=Prudencio,%20Liana&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=33002&rft.pages=33002-&rft.issn=1748-9326&rft.eissn=1748-9326&rft.coden=ERLNAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa81a&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E2549136101%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2549136101&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_5886476fa9a1423d9bdbcefd5af68d22&rfr_iscdi=true