Reconciliation of top-down and bottom-up CO2 fluxes in Siberian larch forest

Carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes by different methods vary largely at global, regional and local scales. The net CO2 fluxes by three bottom-up methods (tower observation (TWR), biogeochemical models (GTM), and a data-driven model (SVR)), and an ensemble of atmospheric inversions (top-down method, INV) ar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental research letters 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.125012
Hauptverfasser: Takata, Kumiko, Patra, Prabir K, Kotani, Ayumi, Mori, Junko, Belikov, Dmitry, Ichii, Kazuhito, Saeki, Tazu, Ohta, Takeshi, Saito, Kazuyuki, Ueyama, Masahito, Ito, Akihiko, Maksyutov, Shamil, Miyazaki, Shin, Burke, Eleanor J, Ganshin, Alexander, Iijima, Yoshihiro, Ise, Takeshi, Machiya, Hirokazu, Maximov, Trofim C, Niwa, Yosuke, O'ishi, Ryo'ta, Park, Hotaek, Sasai, Takahiro, Sato, Hisashi, Tei, Shunsuke, Zhuravlev, Ruslan, Machida, Toshinobu, Sugimoto, Atsuko, Aoki, Shuji
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 12
container_start_page 125012
container_title Environmental research letters
container_volume 12
creator Takata, Kumiko
Patra, Prabir K
Kotani, Ayumi
Mori, Junko
Belikov, Dmitry
Ichii, Kazuhito
Saeki, Tazu
Ohta, Takeshi
Saito, Kazuyuki
Ueyama, Masahito
Ito, Akihiko
Maksyutov, Shamil
Miyazaki, Shin
Burke, Eleanor J
Ganshin, Alexander
Iijima, Yoshihiro
Ise, Takeshi
Machiya, Hirokazu
Maximov, Trofim C
Niwa, Yosuke
O'ishi, Ryo'ta
Park, Hotaek
Sasai, Takahiro
Sato, Hisashi
Tei, Shunsuke
Zhuravlev, Ruslan
Machida, Toshinobu
Sugimoto, Atsuko
Aoki, Shuji
description Carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes by different methods vary largely at global, regional and local scales. The net CO2 fluxes by three bottom-up methods (tower observation (TWR), biogeochemical models (GTM), and a data-driven model (SVR)), and an ensemble of atmospheric inversions (top-down method, INV) are compared in Yakutsk, Siberia for 2004-2013. The region is characterized by highly homogeneous larch forest on a flat terrain. The ecosystem around Yakutsk shows a net sink of CO2 by all the methods (means during 2004-2007 were 10.9 g C m−2 month−1 by TWR, 4.28 g C m−2 month−1 by GTM, 5.62 g C m−2 month−1 and 0.863 g C m−2 month−1 by SVR at two different scales, and 4.89 g C m−2 month−1 by INV). Absorption in summer (June-August) was smaller by three bottom-up methods (ranged from 88.1 to 191.8 g C m−2 month−1) than the top-down method (223.6 g C m−2 month−1). Thus the peak-to-trough amplitude of the seasonal cycle is greater for the inverse models than bottom-up methods. The monthly-mean seasonal cycles agree among the four methods within the range of inter-model variations. The interannual variability estimated by an ensemble of inverse models and a site-scale data-driven model (the max-min range was 35.8 g C m−2 month−1and 34.2 g C m−2 month−1) is more similar to that of the tower observation (42.4 g C m−2 month−1) than those by the biogeochemical models and the large-scale data-driven model (9.5 g C m−2 month−1 and 1.45 g C m−2 month−1). The inverse models and tower observations captured a reduction in CO2 uptake after 2008 due to unusual waterlogging.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1748-9326/aa926d
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_1748_9326_aa926d</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5d10d2c878fa41139e6562ab91ccdf23</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2549203613</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d356t-cb59dd39125c897b67c97cdc972f5c5fa879523282dcdd42ae62bb7361e5983a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkElLxEAQhRtBcBy9e2zw4sE4vaS3owwuAwMDLuem04v2kEnHToL6780Y0YtQVMHj41XVA-AMoyuMpFxgUcpCUcIXxijC3QGY_UpH4Ljrtgixkgk5A-sHb1NjYx1NH1MDU4B9aguX3htoGger1PdpVwwtXG4IDPXw4TsYG_gYK5-jaWBtsn2FIWXf9SfgMJi686c_cw6eb2-elvfFenO3Wl6vC0cZ7wtbMeUcVZgwK5WouLBKWDc2EphlwUihGKFEEmedK4nxnFSVoBx7piQ1dA5Wk69LZqvbHHcmf-pkov4WUn7RJvfR1l4zh5EjVgoZTIkxVZ4zTkylsLUuEDp6nU9ebU5vw_iE3qYhN-P5mrBSETSu3VOXExVT-wdgpPd56324eh-unvIe8Yt_cJ9rjclUDI2jdYF-AT2CgXM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2549203613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reconciliation of top-down and bottom-up CO2 fluxes in Siberian larch forest</title><source>Institute of Physics IOPscience extra</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Takata, Kumiko ; Patra, Prabir K ; Kotani, Ayumi ; Mori, Junko ; Belikov, Dmitry ; Ichii, Kazuhito ; Saeki, Tazu ; Ohta, Takeshi ; Saito, Kazuyuki ; Ueyama, Masahito ; Ito, Akihiko ; Maksyutov, Shamil ; Miyazaki, Shin ; Burke, Eleanor J ; Ganshin, Alexander ; Iijima, Yoshihiro ; Ise, Takeshi ; Machiya, Hirokazu ; Maximov, Trofim C ; Niwa, Yosuke ; O'ishi, Ryo'ta ; Park, Hotaek ; Sasai, Takahiro ; Sato, Hisashi ; Tei, Shunsuke ; Zhuravlev, Ruslan ; Machida, Toshinobu ; Sugimoto, Atsuko ; Aoki, Shuji</creator><creatorcontrib>Takata, Kumiko ; Patra, Prabir K ; Kotani, Ayumi ; Mori, Junko ; Belikov, Dmitry ; Ichii, Kazuhito ; Saeki, Tazu ; Ohta, Takeshi ; Saito, Kazuyuki ; Ueyama, Masahito ; Ito, Akihiko ; Maksyutov, Shamil ; Miyazaki, Shin ; Burke, Eleanor J ; Ganshin, Alexander ; Iijima, Yoshihiro ; Ise, Takeshi ; Machiya, Hirokazu ; Maximov, Trofim C ; Niwa, Yosuke ; O'ishi, Ryo'ta ; Park, Hotaek ; Sasai, Takahiro ; Sato, Hisashi ; Tei, Shunsuke ; Zhuravlev, Ruslan ; Machida, Toshinobu ; Sugimoto, Atsuko ; Aoki, Shuji</creatorcontrib><description>Carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes by different methods vary largely at global, regional and local scales. The net CO2 fluxes by three bottom-up methods (tower observation (TWR), biogeochemical models (GTM), and a data-driven model (SVR)), and an ensemble of atmospheric inversions (top-down method, INV) are compared in Yakutsk, Siberia for 2004-2013. The region is characterized by highly homogeneous larch forest on a flat terrain. The ecosystem around Yakutsk shows a net sink of CO2 by all the methods (means during 2004-2007 were 10.9 g C m−2 month−1 by TWR, 4.28 g C m−2 month−1 by GTM, 5.62 g C m−2 month−1 and 0.863 g C m−2 month−1 by SVR at two different scales, and 4.89 g C m−2 month−1 by INV). Absorption in summer (June-August) was smaller by three bottom-up methods (ranged from 88.1 to 191.8 g C m−2 month−1) than the top-down method (223.6 g C m−2 month−1). Thus the peak-to-trough amplitude of the seasonal cycle is greater for the inverse models than bottom-up methods. The monthly-mean seasonal cycles agree among the four methods within the range of inter-model variations. The interannual variability estimated by an ensemble of inverse models and a site-scale data-driven model (the max-min range was 35.8 g C m−2 month−1and 34.2 g C m−2 month−1) is more similar to that of the tower observation (42.4 g C m−2 month−1) than those by the biogeochemical models and the large-scale data-driven model (9.5 g C m−2 month−1 and 1.45 g C m−2 month−1). The inverse models and tower observations captured a reduction in CO2 uptake after 2008 due to unusual waterlogging.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1748-9326</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa926d</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ERLNAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Atmospheric models ; Biogeochemistry ; Carbon dioxide ; flux ; Fluxes ; Forest ecosystems ; interannual variation ; Inversions ; multi method comparison ; net CO ; net CO2 flux ; Plankton ; seasonal cycle ; Siberian larch forest ; Waterlogging</subject><ispartof>Environmental research letters, 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.125012</ispartof><rights>2017 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2017. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-5700-9389 ; 0000-0002-1200-9577 ; 0000-0002-2158-141X ; 0000-0003-4622-8927</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aa926d/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,2096,27901,27902,38845,38867,53815,53842</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Takata, Kumiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patra, Prabir K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotani, Ayumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, Junko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belikov, Dmitry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ichii, Kazuhito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saeki, Tazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohta, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Kazuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueyama, Masahito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ito, Akihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maksyutov, Shamil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyazaki, Shin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, Eleanor J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganshin, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iijima, Yoshihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ise, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machiya, Hirokazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maximov, Trofim C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niwa, Yosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'ishi, Ryo'ta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hotaek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasai, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Hisashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tei, Shunsuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhuravlev, Ruslan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machida, Toshinobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugimoto, Atsuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aoki, Shuji</creatorcontrib><title>Reconciliation of top-down and bottom-up CO2 fluxes in Siberian larch forest</title><title>Environmental research letters</title><addtitle>ERL</addtitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Lett</addtitle><description>Carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes by different methods vary largely at global, regional and local scales. The net CO2 fluxes by three bottom-up methods (tower observation (TWR), biogeochemical models (GTM), and a data-driven model (SVR)), and an ensemble of atmospheric inversions (top-down method, INV) are compared in Yakutsk, Siberia for 2004-2013. The region is characterized by highly homogeneous larch forest on a flat terrain. The ecosystem around Yakutsk shows a net sink of CO2 by all the methods (means during 2004-2007 were 10.9 g C m−2 month−1 by TWR, 4.28 g C m−2 month−1 by GTM, 5.62 g C m−2 month−1 and 0.863 g C m−2 month−1 by SVR at two different scales, and 4.89 g C m−2 month−1 by INV). Absorption in summer (June-August) was smaller by three bottom-up methods (ranged from 88.1 to 191.8 g C m−2 month−1) than the top-down method (223.6 g C m−2 month−1). Thus the peak-to-trough amplitude of the seasonal cycle is greater for the inverse models than bottom-up methods. The monthly-mean seasonal cycles agree among the four methods within the range of inter-model variations. The interannual variability estimated by an ensemble of inverse models and a site-scale data-driven model (the max-min range was 35.8 g C m−2 month−1and 34.2 g C m−2 month−1) is more similar to that of the tower observation (42.4 g C m−2 month−1) than those by the biogeochemical models and the large-scale data-driven model (9.5 g C m−2 month−1 and 1.45 g C m−2 month−1). The inverse models and tower observations captured a reduction in CO2 uptake after 2008 due to unusual waterlogging.</description><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>flux</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>interannual variation</subject><subject>Inversions</subject><subject>multi method comparison</subject><subject>net CO</subject><subject>net CO2 flux</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>seasonal cycle</subject><subject>Siberian larch forest</subject><subject>Waterlogging</subject><issn>1748-9326</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkElLxEAQhRtBcBy9e2zw4sE4vaS3owwuAwMDLuem04v2kEnHToL6780Y0YtQVMHj41XVA-AMoyuMpFxgUcpCUcIXxijC3QGY_UpH4Ljrtgixkgk5A-sHb1NjYx1NH1MDU4B9aguX3htoGger1PdpVwwtXG4IDPXw4TsYG_gYK5-jaWBtsn2FIWXf9SfgMJi686c_cw6eb2-elvfFenO3Wl6vC0cZ7wtbMeUcVZgwK5WouLBKWDc2EphlwUihGKFEEmedK4nxnFSVoBx7piQ1dA5Wk69LZqvbHHcmf-pkov4WUn7RJvfR1l4zh5EjVgoZTIkxVZ4zTkylsLUuEDp6nU9ebU5vw_iE3qYhN-P5mrBSETSu3VOXExVT-wdgpPd56324eh-unvIe8Yt_cJ9rjclUDI2jdYF-AT2CgXM</recordid><startdate>20171215</startdate><enddate>20171215</enddate><creator>Takata, Kumiko</creator><creator>Patra, Prabir K</creator><creator>Kotani, Ayumi</creator><creator>Mori, Junko</creator><creator>Belikov, Dmitry</creator><creator>Ichii, Kazuhito</creator><creator>Saeki, Tazu</creator><creator>Ohta, Takeshi</creator><creator>Saito, Kazuyuki</creator><creator>Ueyama, Masahito</creator><creator>Ito, Akihiko</creator><creator>Maksyutov, Shamil</creator><creator>Miyazaki, Shin</creator><creator>Burke, Eleanor J</creator><creator>Ganshin, Alexander</creator><creator>Iijima, Yoshihiro</creator><creator>Ise, Takeshi</creator><creator>Machiya, Hirokazu</creator><creator>Maximov, Trofim C</creator><creator>Niwa, Yosuke</creator><creator>O'ishi, Ryo'ta</creator><creator>Park, Hotaek</creator><creator>Sasai, Takahiro</creator><creator>Sato, Hisashi</creator><creator>Tei, Shunsuke</creator><creator>Zhuravlev, Ruslan</creator><creator>Machida, Toshinobu</creator><creator>Sugimoto, Atsuko</creator><creator>Aoki, Shuji</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5700-9389</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1200-9577</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2158-141X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4622-8927</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171215</creationdate><title>Reconciliation of top-down and bottom-up CO2 fluxes in Siberian larch forest</title><author>Takata, Kumiko ; Patra, Prabir K ; Kotani, Ayumi ; Mori, Junko ; Belikov, Dmitry ; Ichii, Kazuhito ; Saeki, Tazu ; Ohta, Takeshi ; Saito, Kazuyuki ; Ueyama, Masahito ; Ito, Akihiko ; Maksyutov, Shamil ; Miyazaki, Shin ; Burke, Eleanor J ; Ganshin, Alexander ; Iijima, Yoshihiro ; Ise, Takeshi ; Machiya, Hirokazu ; Maximov, Trofim C ; Niwa, Yosuke ; O'ishi, Ryo'ta ; Park, Hotaek ; Sasai, Takahiro ; Sato, Hisashi ; Tei, Shunsuke ; Zhuravlev, Ruslan ; Machida, Toshinobu ; Sugimoto, Atsuko ; Aoki, Shuji</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d356t-cb59dd39125c897b67c97cdc972f5c5fa879523282dcdd42ae62bb7361e5983a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>flux</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>interannual variation</topic><topic>Inversions</topic><topic>multi method comparison</topic><topic>net CO</topic><topic>net CO2 flux</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>seasonal cycle</topic><topic>Siberian larch forest</topic><topic>Waterlogging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Takata, Kumiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patra, Prabir K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotani, Ayumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, Junko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belikov, Dmitry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ichii, Kazuhito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saeki, Tazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohta, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Kazuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueyama, Masahito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ito, Akihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maksyutov, Shamil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyazaki, Shin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, Eleanor J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganshin, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iijima, Yoshihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ise, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machiya, Hirokazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maximov, Trofim C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niwa, Yosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'ishi, Ryo'ta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hotaek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasai, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Hisashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tei, Shunsuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhuravlev, Ruslan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machida, Toshinobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugimoto, Atsuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aoki, Shuji</creatorcontrib><collection>Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Environmental research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Takata, Kumiko</au><au>Patra, Prabir K</au><au>Kotani, Ayumi</au><au>Mori, Junko</au><au>Belikov, Dmitry</au><au>Ichii, Kazuhito</au><au>Saeki, Tazu</au><au>Ohta, Takeshi</au><au>Saito, Kazuyuki</au><au>Ueyama, Masahito</au><au>Ito, Akihiko</au><au>Maksyutov, Shamil</au><au>Miyazaki, Shin</au><au>Burke, Eleanor J</au><au>Ganshin, Alexander</au><au>Iijima, Yoshihiro</au><au>Ise, Takeshi</au><au>Machiya, Hirokazu</au><au>Maximov, Trofim C</au><au>Niwa, Yosuke</au><au>O'ishi, Ryo'ta</au><au>Park, Hotaek</au><au>Sasai, Takahiro</au><au>Sato, Hisashi</au><au>Tei, Shunsuke</au><au>Zhuravlev, Ruslan</au><au>Machida, Toshinobu</au><au>Sugimoto, Atsuko</au><au>Aoki, Shuji</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reconciliation of top-down and bottom-up CO2 fluxes in Siberian larch forest</atitle><jtitle>Environmental research letters</jtitle><stitle>ERL</stitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Lett</addtitle><date>2017-12-15</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>125012</spage><pages>125012-</pages><eissn>1748-9326</eissn><coden>ERLNAL</coden><abstract>Carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes by different methods vary largely at global, regional and local scales. The net CO2 fluxes by three bottom-up methods (tower observation (TWR), biogeochemical models (GTM), and a data-driven model (SVR)), and an ensemble of atmospheric inversions (top-down method, INV) are compared in Yakutsk, Siberia for 2004-2013. The region is characterized by highly homogeneous larch forest on a flat terrain. The ecosystem around Yakutsk shows a net sink of CO2 by all the methods (means during 2004-2007 were 10.9 g C m−2 month−1 by TWR, 4.28 g C m−2 month−1 by GTM, 5.62 g C m−2 month−1 and 0.863 g C m−2 month−1 by SVR at two different scales, and 4.89 g C m−2 month−1 by INV). Absorption in summer (June-August) was smaller by three bottom-up methods (ranged from 88.1 to 191.8 g C m−2 month−1) than the top-down method (223.6 g C m−2 month−1). Thus the peak-to-trough amplitude of the seasonal cycle is greater for the inverse models than bottom-up methods. The monthly-mean seasonal cycles agree among the four methods within the range of inter-model variations. The interannual variability estimated by an ensemble of inverse models and a site-scale data-driven model (the max-min range was 35.8 g C m−2 month−1and 34.2 g C m−2 month−1) is more similar to that of the tower observation (42.4 g C m−2 month−1) than those by the biogeochemical models and the large-scale data-driven model (9.5 g C m−2 month−1 and 1.45 g C m−2 month−1). The inverse models and tower observations captured a reduction in CO2 uptake after 2008 due to unusual waterlogging.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1748-9326/aa926d</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5700-9389</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1200-9577</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2158-141X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4622-8927</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1748-9326
ispartof Environmental research letters, 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.125012
issn 1748-9326
language eng
recordid cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_1748_9326_aa926d
source Institute of Physics IOPscience extra; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Atmospheric models
Biogeochemistry
Carbon dioxide
flux
Fluxes
Forest ecosystems
interannual variation
Inversions
multi method comparison
net CO
net CO2 flux
Plankton
seasonal cycle
Siberian larch forest
Waterlogging
title Reconciliation of top-down and bottom-up CO2 fluxes in Siberian larch forest
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T17%3A42%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reconciliation%20of%20top-down%20and%20bottom-up%20CO2%20fluxes%20in%20Siberian%20larch%20forest&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20research%20letters&rft.au=Takata,%20Kumiko&rft.date=2017-12-15&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=125012&rft.pages=125012-&rft.eissn=1748-9326&rft.coden=ERLNAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1748-9326/aa926d&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E2549203613%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2549203613&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_5d10d2c878fa41139e6562ab91ccdf23&rfr_iscdi=true