Reconciliation of top-down and bottom-up CO2 fluxes in Siberian larch forest
Carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes by different methods vary largely at global, regional and local scales. The net CO2 fluxes by three bottom-up methods (tower observation (TWR), biogeochemical models (GTM), and a data-driven model (SVR)), and an ensemble of atmospheric inversions (top-down method, INV) ar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental research letters 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.125012 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 125012 |
container_title | Environmental research letters |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Takata, Kumiko Patra, Prabir K Kotani, Ayumi Mori, Junko Belikov, Dmitry Ichii, Kazuhito Saeki, Tazu Ohta, Takeshi Saito, Kazuyuki Ueyama, Masahito Ito, Akihiko Maksyutov, Shamil Miyazaki, Shin Burke, Eleanor J Ganshin, Alexander Iijima, Yoshihiro Ise, Takeshi Machiya, Hirokazu Maximov, Trofim C Niwa, Yosuke O'ishi, Ryo'ta Park, Hotaek Sasai, Takahiro Sato, Hisashi Tei, Shunsuke Zhuravlev, Ruslan Machida, Toshinobu Sugimoto, Atsuko Aoki, Shuji |
description | Carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes by different methods vary largely at global, regional and local scales. The net CO2 fluxes by three bottom-up methods (tower observation (TWR), biogeochemical models (GTM), and a data-driven model (SVR)), and an ensemble of atmospheric inversions (top-down method, INV) are compared in Yakutsk, Siberia for 2004-2013. The region is characterized by highly homogeneous larch forest on a flat terrain. The ecosystem around Yakutsk shows a net sink of CO2 by all the methods (means during 2004-2007 were 10.9 g C m−2 month−1 by TWR, 4.28 g C m−2 month−1 by GTM, 5.62 g C m−2 month−1 and 0.863 g C m−2 month−1 by SVR at two different scales, and 4.89 g C m−2 month−1 by INV). Absorption in summer (June-August) was smaller by three bottom-up methods (ranged from 88.1 to 191.8 g C m−2 month−1) than the top-down method (223.6 g C m−2 month−1). Thus the peak-to-trough amplitude of the seasonal cycle is greater for the inverse models than bottom-up methods. The monthly-mean seasonal cycles agree among the four methods within the range of inter-model variations. The interannual variability estimated by an ensemble of inverse models and a site-scale data-driven model (the max-min range was 35.8 g C m−2 month−1and 34.2 g C m−2 month−1) is more similar to that of the tower observation (42.4 g C m−2 month−1) than those by the biogeochemical models and the large-scale data-driven model (9.5 g C m−2 month−1 and 1.45 g C m−2 month−1). The inverse models and tower observations captured a reduction in CO2 uptake after 2008 due to unusual waterlogging. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/1748-9326/aa926d |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_1748_9326_aa926d</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5d10d2c878fa41139e6562ab91ccdf23</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2549203613</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d356t-cb59dd39125c897b67c97cdc972f5c5fa879523282dcdd42ae62bb7361e5983a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkElLxEAQhRtBcBy9e2zw4sE4vaS3owwuAwMDLuem04v2kEnHToL6780Y0YtQVMHj41XVA-AMoyuMpFxgUcpCUcIXxijC3QGY_UpH4Ljrtgixkgk5A-sHb1NjYx1NH1MDU4B9aguX3htoGger1PdpVwwtXG4IDPXw4TsYG_gYK5-jaWBtsn2FIWXf9SfgMJi686c_cw6eb2-elvfFenO3Wl6vC0cZ7wtbMeUcVZgwK5WouLBKWDc2EphlwUihGKFEEmedK4nxnFSVoBx7piQ1dA5Wk69LZqvbHHcmf-pkov4WUn7RJvfR1l4zh5EjVgoZTIkxVZ4zTkylsLUuEDp6nU9ebU5vw_iE3qYhN-P5mrBSETSu3VOXExVT-wdgpPd56324eh-unvIe8Yt_cJ9rjclUDI2jdYF-AT2CgXM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2549203613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reconciliation of top-down and bottom-up CO2 fluxes in Siberian larch forest</title><source>Institute of Physics IOPscience extra</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Takata, Kumiko ; Patra, Prabir K ; Kotani, Ayumi ; Mori, Junko ; Belikov, Dmitry ; Ichii, Kazuhito ; Saeki, Tazu ; Ohta, Takeshi ; Saito, Kazuyuki ; Ueyama, Masahito ; Ito, Akihiko ; Maksyutov, Shamil ; Miyazaki, Shin ; Burke, Eleanor J ; Ganshin, Alexander ; Iijima, Yoshihiro ; Ise, Takeshi ; Machiya, Hirokazu ; Maximov, Trofim C ; Niwa, Yosuke ; O'ishi, Ryo'ta ; Park, Hotaek ; Sasai, Takahiro ; Sato, Hisashi ; Tei, Shunsuke ; Zhuravlev, Ruslan ; Machida, Toshinobu ; Sugimoto, Atsuko ; Aoki, Shuji</creator><creatorcontrib>Takata, Kumiko ; Patra, Prabir K ; Kotani, Ayumi ; Mori, Junko ; Belikov, Dmitry ; Ichii, Kazuhito ; Saeki, Tazu ; Ohta, Takeshi ; Saito, Kazuyuki ; Ueyama, Masahito ; Ito, Akihiko ; Maksyutov, Shamil ; Miyazaki, Shin ; Burke, Eleanor J ; Ganshin, Alexander ; Iijima, Yoshihiro ; Ise, Takeshi ; Machiya, Hirokazu ; Maximov, Trofim C ; Niwa, Yosuke ; O'ishi, Ryo'ta ; Park, Hotaek ; Sasai, Takahiro ; Sato, Hisashi ; Tei, Shunsuke ; Zhuravlev, Ruslan ; Machida, Toshinobu ; Sugimoto, Atsuko ; Aoki, Shuji</creatorcontrib><description>Carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes by different methods vary largely at global, regional and local scales. The net CO2 fluxes by three bottom-up methods (tower observation (TWR), biogeochemical models (GTM), and a data-driven model (SVR)), and an ensemble of atmospheric inversions (top-down method, INV) are compared in Yakutsk, Siberia for 2004-2013. The region is characterized by highly homogeneous larch forest on a flat terrain. The ecosystem around Yakutsk shows a net sink of CO2 by all the methods (means during 2004-2007 were 10.9 g C m−2 month−1 by TWR, 4.28 g C m−2 month−1 by GTM, 5.62 g C m−2 month−1 and 0.863 g C m−2 month−1 by SVR at two different scales, and 4.89 g C m−2 month−1 by INV). Absorption in summer (June-August) was smaller by three bottom-up methods (ranged from 88.1 to 191.8 g C m−2 month−1) than the top-down method (223.6 g C m−2 month−1). Thus the peak-to-trough amplitude of the seasonal cycle is greater for the inverse models than bottom-up methods. The monthly-mean seasonal cycles agree among the four methods within the range of inter-model variations. The interannual variability estimated by an ensemble of inverse models and a site-scale data-driven model (the max-min range was 35.8 g C m−2 month−1and 34.2 g C m−2 month−1) is more similar to that of the tower observation (42.4 g C m−2 month−1) than those by the biogeochemical models and the large-scale data-driven model (9.5 g C m−2 month−1 and 1.45 g C m−2 month−1). The inverse models and tower observations captured a reduction in CO2 uptake after 2008 due to unusual waterlogging.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1748-9326</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa926d</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ERLNAL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Atmospheric models ; Biogeochemistry ; Carbon dioxide ; flux ; Fluxes ; Forest ecosystems ; interannual variation ; Inversions ; multi method comparison ; net CO ; net CO2 flux ; Plankton ; seasonal cycle ; Siberian larch forest ; Waterlogging</subject><ispartof>Environmental research letters, 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.125012</ispartof><rights>2017 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2017. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-5700-9389 ; 0000-0002-1200-9577 ; 0000-0002-2158-141X ; 0000-0003-4622-8927</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aa926d/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,2096,27901,27902,38845,38867,53815,53842</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Takata, Kumiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patra, Prabir K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotani, Ayumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, Junko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belikov, Dmitry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ichii, Kazuhito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saeki, Tazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohta, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Kazuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueyama, Masahito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ito, Akihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maksyutov, Shamil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyazaki, Shin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, Eleanor J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganshin, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iijima, Yoshihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ise, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machiya, Hirokazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maximov, Trofim C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niwa, Yosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'ishi, Ryo'ta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hotaek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasai, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Hisashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tei, Shunsuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhuravlev, Ruslan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machida, Toshinobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugimoto, Atsuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aoki, Shuji</creatorcontrib><title>Reconciliation of top-down and bottom-up CO2 fluxes in Siberian larch forest</title><title>Environmental research letters</title><addtitle>ERL</addtitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Lett</addtitle><description>Carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes by different methods vary largely at global, regional and local scales. The net CO2 fluxes by three bottom-up methods (tower observation (TWR), biogeochemical models (GTM), and a data-driven model (SVR)), and an ensemble of atmospheric inversions (top-down method, INV) are compared in Yakutsk, Siberia for 2004-2013. The region is characterized by highly homogeneous larch forest on a flat terrain. The ecosystem around Yakutsk shows a net sink of CO2 by all the methods (means during 2004-2007 were 10.9 g C m−2 month−1 by TWR, 4.28 g C m−2 month−1 by GTM, 5.62 g C m−2 month−1 and 0.863 g C m−2 month−1 by SVR at two different scales, and 4.89 g C m−2 month−1 by INV). Absorption in summer (June-August) was smaller by three bottom-up methods (ranged from 88.1 to 191.8 g C m−2 month−1) than the top-down method (223.6 g C m−2 month−1). Thus the peak-to-trough amplitude of the seasonal cycle is greater for the inverse models than bottom-up methods. The monthly-mean seasonal cycles agree among the four methods within the range of inter-model variations. The interannual variability estimated by an ensemble of inverse models and a site-scale data-driven model (the max-min range was 35.8 g C m−2 month−1and 34.2 g C m−2 month−1) is more similar to that of the tower observation (42.4 g C m−2 month−1) than those by the biogeochemical models and the large-scale data-driven model (9.5 g C m−2 month−1 and 1.45 g C m−2 month−1). The inverse models and tower observations captured a reduction in CO2 uptake after 2008 due to unusual waterlogging.</description><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Biogeochemistry</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>flux</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>Forest ecosystems</subject><subject>interannual variation</subject><subject>Inversions</subject><subject>multi method comparison</subject><subject>net CO</subject><subject>net CO2 flux</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>seasonal cycle</subject><subject>Siberian larch forest</subject><subject>Waterlogging</subject><issn>1748-9326</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkElLxEAQhRtBcBy9e2zw4sE4vaS3owwuAwMDLuem04v2kEnHToL6780Y0YtQVMHj41XVA-AMoyuMpFxgUcpCUcIXxijC3QGY_UpH4Ljrtgixkgk5A-sHb1NjYx1NH1MDU4B9aguX3htoGger1PdpVwwtXG4IDPXw4TsYG_gYK5-jaWBtsn2FIWXf9SfgMJi686c_cw6eb2-elvfFenO3Wl6vC0cZ7wtbMeUcVZgwK5WouLBKWDc2EphlwUihGKFEEmedK4nxnFSVoBx7piQ1dA5Wk69LZqvbHHcmf-pkov4WUn7RJvfR1l4zh5EjVgoZTIkxVZ4zTkylsLUuEDp6nU9ebU5vw_iE3qYhN-P5mrBSETSu3VOXExVT-wdgpPd56324eh-unvIe8Yt_cJ9rjclUDI2jdYF-AT2CgXM</recordid><startdate>20171215</startdate><enddate>20171215</enddate><creator>Takata, Kumiko</creator><creator>Patra, Prabir K</creator><creator>Kotani, Ayumi</creator><creator>Mori, Junko</creator><creator>Belikov, Dmitry</creator><creator>Ichii, Kazuhito</creator><creator>Saeki, Tazu</creator><creator>Ohta, Takeshi</creator><creator>Saito, Kazuyuki</creator><creator>Ueyama, Masahito</creator><creator>Ito, Akihiko</creator><creator>Maksyutov, Shamil</creator><creator>Miyazaki, Shin</creator><creator>Burke, Eleanor J</creator><creator>Ganshin, Alexander</creator><creator>Iijima, Yoshihiro</creator><creator>Ise, Takeshi</creator><creator>Machiya, Hirokazu</creator><creator>Maximov, Trofim C</creator><creator>Niwa, Yosuke</creator><creator>O'ishi, Ryo'ta</creator><creator>Park, Hotaek</creator><creator>Sasai, Takahiro</creator><creator>Sato, Hisashi</creator><creator>Tei, Shunsuke</creator><creator>Zhuravlev, Ruslan</creator><creator>Machida, Toshinobu</creator><creator>Sugimoto, Atsuko</creator><creator>Aoki, Shuji</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5700-9389</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1200-9577</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2158-141X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4622-8927</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171215</creationdate><title>Reconciliation of top-down and bottom-up CO2 fluxes in Siberian larch forest</title><author>Takata, Kumiko ; Patra, Prabir K ; Kotani, Ayumi ; Mori, Junko ; Belikov, Dmitry ; Ichii, Kazuhito ; Saeki, Tazu ; Ohta, Takeshi ; Saito, Kazuyuki ; Ueyama, Masahito ; Ito, Akihiko ; Maksyutov, Shamil ; Miyazaki, Shin ; Burke, Eleanor J ; Ganshin, Alexander ; Iijima, Yoshihiro ; Ise, Takeshi ; Machiya, Hirokazu ; Maximov, Trofim C ; Niwa, Yosuke ; O'ishi, Ryo'ta ; Park, Hotaek ; Sasai, Takahiro ; Sato, Hisashi ; Tei, Shunsuke ; Zhuravlev, Ruslan ; Machida, Toshinobu ; Sugimoto, Atsuko ; Aoki, Shuji</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d356t-cb59dd39125c897b67c97cdc972f5c5fa879523282dcdd42ae62bb7361e5983a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Biogeochemistry</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>flux</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>Forest ecosystems</topic><topic>interannual variation</topic><topic>Inversions</topic><topic>multi method comparison</topic><topic>net CO</topic><topic>net CO2 flux</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>seasonal cycle</topic><topic>Siberian larch forest</topic><topic>Waterlogging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Takata, Kumiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patra, Prabir K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotani, Ayumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, Junko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belikov, Dmitry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ichii, Kazuhito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saeki, Tazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohta, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saito, Kazuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueyama, Masahito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ito, Akihiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maksyutov, Shamil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyazaki, Shin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, Eleanor J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganshin, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iijima, Yoshihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ise, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machiya, Hirokazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maximov, Trofim C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niwa, Yosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'ishi, Ryo'ta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hotaek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasai, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Hisashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tei, Shunsuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhuravlev, Ruslan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Machida, Toshinobu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugimoto, Atsuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aoki, Shuji</creatorcontrib><collection>Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Environmental research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Takata, Kumiko</au><au>Patra, Prabir K</au><au>Kotani, Ayumi</au><au>Mori, Junko</au><au>Belikov, Dmitry</au><au>Ichii, Kazuhito</au><au>Saeki, Tazu</au><au>Ohta, Takeshi</au><au>Saito, Kazuyuki</au><au>Ueyama, Masahito</au><au>Ito, Akihiko</au><au>Maksyutov, Shamil</au><au>Miyazaki, Shin</au><au>Burke, Eleanor J</au><au>Ganshin, Alexander</au><au>Iijima, Yoshihiro</au><au>Ise, Takeshi</au><au>Machiya, Hirokazu</au><au>Maximov, Trofim C</au><au>Niwa, Yosuke</au><au>O'ishi, Ryo'ta</au><au>Park, Hotaek</au><au>Sasai, Takahiro</au><au>Sato, Hisashi</au><au>Tei, Shunsuke</au><au>Zhuravlev, Ruslan</au><au>Machida, Toshinobu</au><au>Sugimoto, Atsuko</au><au>Aoki, Shuji</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reconciliation of top-down and bottom-up CO2 fluxes in Siberian larch forest</atitle><jtitle>Environmental research letters</jtitle><stitle>ERL</stitle><addtitle>Environ. Res. Lett</addtitle><date>2017-12-15</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>125012</spage><pages>125012-</pages><eissn>1748-9326</eissn><coden>ERLNAL</coden><abstract>Carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes by different methods vary largely at global, regional and local scales. The net CO2 fluxes by three bottom-up methods (tower observation (TWR), biogeochemical models (GTM), and a data-driven model (SVR)), and an ensemble of atmospheric inversions (top-down method, INV) are compared in Yakutsk, Siberia for 2004-2013. The region is characterized by highly homogeneous larch forest on a flat terrain. The ecosystem around Yakutsk shows a net sink of CO2 by all the methods (means during 2004-2007 were 10.9 g C m−2 month−1 by TWR, 4.28 g C m−2 month−1 by GTM, 5.62 g C m−2 month−1 and 0.863 g C m−2 month−1 by SVR at two different scales, and 4.89 g C m−2 month−1 by INV). Absorption in summer (June-August) was smaller by three bottom-up methods (ranged from 88.1 to 191.8 g C m−2 month−1) than the top-down method (223.6 g C m−2 month−1). Thus the peak-to-trough amplitude of the seasonal cycle is greater for the inverse models than bottom-up methods. The monthly-mean seasonal cycles agree among the four methods within the range of inter-model variations. The interannual variability estimated by an ensemble of inverse models and a site-scale data-driven model (the max-min range was 35.8 g C m−2 month−1and 34.2 g C m−2 month−1) is more similar to that of the tower observation (42.4 g C m−2 month−1) than those by the biogeochemical models and the large-scale data-driven model (9.5 g C m−2 month−1 and 1.45 g C m−2 month−1). The inverse models and tower observations captured a reduction in CO2 uptake after 2008 due to unusual waterlogging.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1748-9326/aa926d</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5700-9389</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1200-9577</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2158-141X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4622-8927</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1748-9326 |
ispartof | Environmental research letters, 2017-12, Vol.12 (12), p.125012 |
issn | 1748-9326 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_1748_9326_aa926d |
source | Institute of Physics IOPscience extra; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Atmospheric models Biogeochemistry Carbon dioxide flux Fluxes Forest ecosystems interannual variation Inversions multi method comparison net CO net CO2 flux Plankton seasonal cycle Siberian larch forest Waterlogging |
title | Reconciliation of top-down and bottom-up CO2 fluxes in Siberian larch forest |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T17%3A42%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reconciliation%20of%20top-down%20and%20bottom-up%20CO2%20fluxes%20in%20Siberian%20larch%20forest&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20research%20letters&rft.au=Takata,%20Kumiko&rft.date=2017-12-15&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=125012&rft.pages=125012-&rft.eissn=1748-9326&rft.coden=ERLNAL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1748-9326/aa926d&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E2549203613%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2549203613&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_5d10d2c878fa41139e6562ab91ccdf23&rfr_iscdi=true |