Loss of information in quantum guessing game

Incompatibility of certain measurements-impossibility of obtaining deterministic outcomes simultaneously-is a well known property of quantum mechanics. This feature can be utilized in many contexts, ranging from Bell inequalities to device dependent QKD protocols. Typically, in these applications th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:New journal of physics 2018-02, Vol.20 (2), p.23018
Hauptverfasser: Plesch, Martin, Pivoluska, Matej
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 23018
container_title New journal of physics
container_volume 20
creator Plesch, Martin
Pivoluska, Matej
description Incompatibility of certain measurements-impossibility of obtaining deterministic outcomes simultaneously-is a well known property of quantum mechanics. This feature can be utilized in many contexts, ranging from Bell inequalities to device dependent QKD protocols. Typically, in these applications the measurements are chosen from a predetermined set based on a classical random variable. One can naturally ask, whether the non-determinism of the outcomes is due to intrinsic hiding property of quantum mechanics, or rather by the fact that classical, incoherent information entered the system via the choice of the measurement. Authors Rozpedek et al (2017 New J. Phys. 19 023038) examined this question for a specific case of two mutually unbiased measurements on systems of different dimensions. They have somewhat surprisingly shown that in case of qubits, if the measurements are chosen coherently with the use of a controlled unitary, outcomes of both measurements can be guessed deterministically. Here we extend their analysis and show that specifically for qubits, measurement result for any set of measurements with any a priori probability distribution can be faithfully guessed by a suitable state preparation and measurement. We also show that up to a small set of specific cases, this is not possible for higher dimensions. This result manifests a deep difference in properties of qubits and higher dimensional systems and suggests that these systems might offer higher security in specific cryptographic protocols. More fundamentally, the results show that the impossibility of predicting a result of a measurement is not caused solely by a loss of coherence between the choice of the measurement and the guessing procedure.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1367-2630/aaa5f8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_1367_2630_aaa5f8</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c71249b5e9c04555a5dc76f7d8ec9978</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2312526746</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-98c2103b0032bf2af96d7652a98e84124a9cf3af993f1ec17b90a31ffd2b78393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDtPwzAURi0EEqWwM0ZiYGmoH3Fsj6jiUakSC8zWjWNHiZo4dZKBf49LEDDA5KtP3z22D0LXBN8RLOWasFykNGd4DQDcyRO0-I5Of83n6GIYGowJkZQu0GrnhyHxLqk750MLY-27OCeHCbpxapNqssNQd1VSQWsv0ZmD_WCvvs4lent8eN08p7uXp-3mfpeaLJNjqqShBLMCY0YLR8GpvBQ5p6CklRmhGSjjWIwVc8QaIgqFgRHnSloIyRRbou3MLT00ug91C-Fde6j1Z-BDpSGMtdlbbUTkqYJbZXDGOQdeGpE7UUprlIq0JbqZWX3wh_iZUTd-Cl18vqaMUE5zkeWxheeWCdFHsO77VoL10a8-CtRHgXr2G1du55Xa9z_Mruk1xZpqTBkmUveli83VH81_wR-SM4cq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2312526746</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Loss of information in quantum guessing game</title><source>Institute of Physics IOPscience extra</source><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Plesch, Martin ; Pivoluska, Matej</creator><creatorcontrib>Plesch, Martin ; Pivoluska, Matej</creatorcontrib><description>Incompatibility of certain measurements-impossibility of obtaining deterministic outcomes simultaneously-is a well known property of quantum mechanics. This feature can be utilized in many contexts, ranging from Bell inequalities to device dependent QKD protocols. Typically, in these applications the measurements are chosen from a predetermined set based on a classical random variable. One can naturally ask, whether the non-determinism of the outcomes is due to intrinsic hiding property of quantum mechanics, or rather by the fact that classical, incoherent information entered the system via the choice of the measurement. Authors Rozpedek et al (2017 New J. Phys. 19 023038) examined this question for a specific case of two mutually unbiased measurements on systems of different dimensions. They have somewhat surprisingly shown that in case of qubits, if the measurements are chosen coherently with the use of a controlled unitary, outcomes of both measurements can be guessed deterministically. Here we extend their analysis and show that specifically for qubits, measurement result for any set of measurements with any a priori probability distribution can be faithfully guessed by a suitable state preparation and measurement. We also show that up to a small set of specific cases, this is not possible for higher dimensions. This result manifests a deep difference in properties of qubits and higher dimensional systems and suggests that these systems might offer higher security in specific cryptographic protocols. More fundamentally, the results show that the impossibility of predicting a result of a measurement is not caused solely by a loss of coherence between the choice of the measurement and the guessing procedure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1367-2630</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1367-2630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/aaa5f8</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NJOPFM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Bell's inequality ; Cryptography ; Incompatibility ; measurement incompatibility ; measurement problem ; Physics ; quantum guessing game ; Quantum mechanics ; Quantum physics ; Qubits (quantum computing) ; Random variables</subject><ispartof>New journal of physics, 2018-02, Vol.20 (2), p.23018</ispartof><rights>2018 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd on behalf of Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-98c2103b0032bf2af96d7652a98e84124a9cf3af993f1ec17b90a31ffd2b78393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-98c2103b0032bf2af96d7652a98e84124a9cf3af993f1ec17b90a31ffd2b78393</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1437-0980</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/aaa5f8/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,2096,27901,27902,38845,38867,53815,53842</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Plesch, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pivoluska, Matej</creatorcontrib><title>Loss of information in quantum guessing game</title><title>New journal of physics</title><addtitle>NJP</addtitle><addtitle>New J. Phys</addtitle><description>Incompatibility of certain measurements-impossibility of obtaining deterministic outcomes simultaneously-is a well known property of quantum mechanics. This feature can be utilized in many contexts, ranging from Bell inequalities to device dependent QKD protocols. Typically, in these applications the measurements are chosen from a predetermined set based on a classical random variable. One can naturally ask, whether the non-determinism of the outcomes is due to intrinsic hiding property of quantum mechanics, or rather by the fact that classical, incoherent information entered the system via the choice of the measurement. Authors Rozpedek et al (2017 New J. Phys. 19 023038) examined this question for a specific case of two mutually unbiased measurements on systems of different dimensions. They have somewhat surprisingly shown that in case of qubits, if the measurements are chosen coherently with the use of a controlled unitary, outcomes of both measurements can be guessed deterministically. Here we extend their analysis and show that specifically for qubits, measurement result for any set of measurements with any a priori probability distribution can be faithfully guessed by a suitable state preparation and measurement. We also show that up to a small set of specific cases, this is not possible for higher dimensions. This result manifests a deep difference in properties of qubits and higher dimensional systems and suggests that these systems might offer higher security in specific cryptographic protocols. More fundamentally, the results show that the impossibility of predicting a result of a measurement is not caused solely by a loss of coherence between the choice of the measurement and the guessing procedure.</description><subject>Bell's inequality</subject><subject>Cryptography</subject><subject>Incompatibility</subject><subject>measurement incompatibility</subject><subject>measurement problem</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>quantum guessing game</subject><subject>Quantum mechanics</subject><subject>Quantum physics</subject><subject>Qubits (quantum computing)</subject><subject>Random variables</subject><issn>1367-2630</issn><issn>1367-2630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDtPwzAURi0EEqWwM0ZiYGmoH3Fsj6jiUakSC8zWjWNHiZo4dZKBf49LEDDA5KtP3z22D0LXBN8RLOWasFykNGd4DQDcyRO0-I5Of83n6GIYGowJkZQu0GrnhyHxLqk750MLY-27OCeHCbpxapNqssNQd1VSQWsv0ZmD_WCvvs4lent8eN08p7uXp-3mfpeaLJNjqqShBLMCY0YLR8GpvBQ5p6CklRmhGSjjWIwVc8QaIgqFgRHnSloIyRRbou3MLT00ug91C-Fde6j1Z-BDpSGMtdlbbUTkqYJbZXDGOQdeGpE7UUprlIq0JbqZWX3wh_iZUTd-Cl18vqaMUE5zkeWxheeWCdFHsO77VoL10a8-CtRHgXr2G1du55Xa9z_Mruk1xZpqTBkmUveli83VH81_wR-SM4cq</recordid><startdate>20180207</startdate><enddate>20180207</enddate><creator>Plesch, Martin</creator><creator>Pivoluska, Matej</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1437-0980</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180207</creationdate><title>Loss of information in quantum guessing game</title><author>Plesch, Martin ; Pivoluska, Matej</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-98c2103b0032bf2af96d7652a98e84124a9cf3af993f1ec17b90a31ffd2b78393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bell's inequality</topic><topic>Cryptography</topic><topic>Incompatibility</topic><topic>measurement incompatibility</topic><topic>measurement problem</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>quantum guessing game</topic><topic>Quantum mechanics</topic><topic>Quantum physics</topic><topic>Qubits (quantum computing)</topic><topic>Random variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Plesch, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pivoluska, Matej</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>New journal of physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Plesch, Martin</au><au>Pivoluska, Matej</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Loss of information in quantum guessing game</atitle><jtitle>New journal of physics</jtitle><stitle>NJP</stitle><addtitle>New J. Phys</addtitle><date>2018-02-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>23018</spage><pages>23018-</pages><issn>1367-2630</issn><eissn>1367-2630</eissn><coden>NJOPFM</coden><abstract>Incompatibility of certain measurements-impossibility of obtaining deterministic outcomes simultaneously-is a well known property of quantum mechanics. This feature can be utilized in many contexts, ranging from Bell inequalities to device dependent QKD protocols. Typically, in these applications the measurements are chosen from a predetermined set based on a classical random variable. One can naturally ask, whether the non-determinism of the outcomes is due to intrinsic hiding property of quantum mechanics, or rather by the fact that classical, incoherent information entered the system via the choice of the measurement. Authors Rozpedek et al (2017 New J. Phys. 19 023038) examined this question for a specific case of two mutually unbiased measurements on systems of different dimensions. They have somewhat surprisingly shown that in case of qubits, if the measurements are chosen coherently with the use of a controlled unitary, outcomes of both measurements can be guessed deterministically. Here we extend their analysis and show that specifically for qubits, measurement result for any set of measurements with any a priori probability distribution can be faithfully guessed by a suitable state preparation and measurement. We also show that up to a small set of specific cases, this is not possible for higher dimensions. This result manifests a deep difference in properties of qubits and higher dimensional systems and suggests that these systems might offer higher security in specific cryptographic protocols. More fundamentally, the results show that the impossibility of predicting a result of a measurement is not caused solely by a loss of coherence between the choice of the measurement and the guessing procedure.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1367-2630/aaa5f8</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1437-0980</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1367-2630
ispartof New journal of physics, 2018-02, Vol.20 (2), p.23018
issn 1367-2630
1367-2630
language eng
recordid cdi_iop_journals_10_1088_1367_2630_aaa5f8
source Institute of Physics IOPscience extra; IOP Publishing Free Content; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Bell's inequality
Cryptography
Incompatibility
measurement incompatibility
measurement problem
Physics
quantum guessing game
Quantum mechanics
Quantum physics
Qubits (quantum computing)
Random variables
title Loss of information in quantum guessing game
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T17%3A10%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Loss%20of%20information%20in%20quantum%20guessing%20game&rft.jtitle=New%20journal%20of%20physics&rft.au=Plesch,%20Martin&rft.date=2018-02-07&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=23018&rft.pages=23018-&rft.issn=1367-2630&rft.eissn=1367-2630&rft.coden=NJOPFM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1367-2630/aaa5f8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E2312526746%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2312526746&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_c71249b5e9c04555a5dc76f7d8ec9978&rfr_iscdi=true