Evaluation of Ammonia Co-fuelling in Modern Four Stroke Engines

Ammonia (NH3) is emerging as a promising alternative fuel for longer range decarbonised heavy transport, particularly in the marine sector due to highly favourable characteristics as an effective hydrogen carrier. This is despite generally unfavourable combustion and toxicity attributes, restricting...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Johnson Matthey technology review 2023-11
Hauptverfasser: Ambalakatte, Ajith, Hegab, Abdelrahman, Geng, Sikai, Cairns, Alasdair, Harrington, Anthony, Hall, Jonathan, Bassett, Mike
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Johnson Matthey technology review
container_volume
creator Ambalakatte, Ajith
Hegab, Abdelrahman
Geng, Sikai
Cairns, Alasdair
Harrington, Anthony
Hall, Jonathan
Bassett, Mike
description Ammonia (NH3) is emerging as a promising alternative fuel for longer range decarbonised heavy transport, particularly in the marine sector due to highly favourable characteristics as an effective hydrogen carrier. This is despite generally unfavourable combustion and toxicity attributes, restricting end use to applications where robust health and safety protocols can be upheld. In the currently reported work, a spark ignited thermodynamic single cylinder research engine equipped with gasoline direct injection was upgraded to include gaseous ammonia port injection fuelling, with the aim of understanding maximum viable ammonia substitution ratios across the speed-load operating map. The work was conducted under overall stoichiometric conditions with the spark timing re-optimised for maximum brake torque at all stable logged sites. The experiments included industry standard measurements of combustion, performance and engine-out emissions (including NH3 “slip”). With a geometric compression ratio of 12.4:1, it was possible to run the engine on pure ammonia at low engine speeds (1000-1800rpm) at low-to-moderate engine loads in a fully warmed up state. When progressively dropping down below a threshold load limit, an increasing amount of gasoline co-firing was required to avoid engine misfire. Due to the favourable anti-knock characteristics, pure ammonia operation was up to 5% more efficient than pure gasoline operation under stable operating regions. A maximum net indicated thermal efficiency of 40% was achieved, with efficiency tending to increase with speed and load. For the co-fuelling of gasoline and ammonia in a pure ammonia attainable operating region, it was found that addition of gasoline improved the combustion, but these improvements were not sufficient to translate into improved thermal efficiency. Emissions of NH3 slip reduced with increased gasoline co-fuelling, albeit with increased NOx. However, the reduction in NH3 slip was nearly 10 times the increase in NOx emissions. Comparing pure NH3 and pure gasoline operation, NOx reduced by ~60% when switching from pure gasoline to pure NH3 (as the latter is associated with longer and cooler combustion). Results were finally compared to those obtained a modern multi-cylinder Volvo “D8” turbo-diesel engine modified for dual fuel operation with ammonia port fuel injection, with the focus of the comparison being NH3 slip and NOx emissions.
doi_str_mv 10.1595/205651324X17005622661871
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubtec</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ingenta_journals_matthey_jmtr_10_1595_205651324x17005622661871</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ingid>matthey/jmtr/10.1595/205651324x17005622661871</ingid><sourcerecordid>matthey/jmtr/10.1595/205651324x17005622661871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i1121-cbaa009406aa36fb6839a1e777f27394416095821da3caf3713b12c2f345c5a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkN1KxDAUhIMouKz7DnmBak5-2ytZlq4KK16o4F057SZraptAm4q-vV0U0asZGJgZPkIosEtQhbriTGkFgssXMGz2nGsNuYETsjhG2Zyp0z_-nKzGsWWMQcG51GxBrst37CZMPgYaHV33fQwe6SZmbrJd58OB-kDv494OgW7jNNDHNMQ3S8tw8MGOF-TMYTfa1Y8uyfO2fNrcZruHm7vNepd5AA5ZUyMyVkimEYV2tc5FgWCNMY4bUUgJmhUq57BH0aATBkQNvOFOSNUo1GJJyu_e-ZENCat2_hLmxarHlF7tZ9X2aaiAVUcw1S-Yj_9gxBc1AFVq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Ammonia Co-fuelling in Modern Four Stroke Engines</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Ambalakatte, Ajith ; Hegab, Abdelrahman ; Geng, Sikai ; Cairns, Alasdair ; Harrington, Anthony ; Hall, Jonathan ; Bassett, Mike</creator><creatorcontrib>Ambalakatte, Ajith ; Hegab, Abdelrahman ; Geng, Sikai ; Cairns, Alasdair ; Harrington, Anthony ; Hall, Jonathan ; Bassett, Mike</creatorcontrib><description>Ammonia (NH3) is emerging as a promising alternative fuel for longer range decarbonised heavy transport, particularly in the marine sector due to highly favourable characteristics as an effective hydrogen carrier. This is despite generally unfavourable combustion and toxicity attributes, restricting end use to applications where robust health and safety protocols can be upheld. In the currently reported work, a spark ignited thermodynamic single cylinder research engine equipped with gasoline direct injection was upgraded to include gaseous ammonia port injection fuelling, with the aim of understanding maximum viable ammonia substitution ratios across the speed-load operating map. The work was conducted under overall stoichiometric conditions with the spark timing re-optimised for maximum brake torque at all stable logged sites. The experiments included industry standard measurements of combustion, performance and engine-out emissions (including NH3 “slip”). With a geometric compression ratio of 12.4:1, it was possible to run the engine on pure ammonia at low engine speeds (1000-1800rpm) at low-to-moderate engine loads in a fully warmed up state. When progressively dropping down below a threshold load limit, an increasing amount of gasoline co-firing was required to avoid engine misfire. Due to the favourable anti-knock characteristics, pure ammonia operation was up to 5% more efficient than pure gasoline operation under stable operating regions. A maximum net indicated thermal efficiency of 40% was achieved, with efficiency tending to increase with speed and load. For the co-fuelling of gasoline and ammonia in a pure ammonia attainable operating region, it was found that addition of gasoline improved the combustion, but these improvements were not sufficient to translate into improved thermal efficiency. Emissions of NH3 slip reduced with increased gasoline co-fuelling, albeit with increased NOx. However, the reduction in NH3 slip was nearly 10 times the increase in NOx emissions. Comparing pure NH3 and pure gasoline operation, NOx reduced by ~60% when switching from pure gasoline to pure NH3 (as the latter is associated with longer and cooler combustion). Results were finally compared to those obtained a modern multi-cylinder Volvo “D8” turbo-diesel engine modified for dual fuel operation with ammonia port fuel injection, with the focus of the comparison being NH3 slip and NOx emissions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2056-5135</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2056-5135</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1595/205651324X17005622661871</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Johnson Matthey</publisher><ispartof>Johnson Matthey technology review, 2023-11</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ambalakatte, Ajith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hegab, Abdelrahman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geng, Sikai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cairns, Alasdair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrington, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bassett, Mike</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Ammonia Co-fuelling in Modern Four Stroke Engines</title><title>Johnson Matthey technology review</title><description>Ammonia (NH3) is emerging as a promising alternative fuel for longer range decarbonised heavy transport, particularly in the marine sector due to highly favourable characteristics as an effective hydrogen carrier. This is despite generally unfavourable combustion and toxicity attributes, restricting end use to applications where robust health and safety protocols can be upheld. In the currently reported work, a spark ignited thermodynamic single cylinder research engine equipped with gasoline direct injection was upgraded to include gaseous ammonia port injection fuelling, with the aim of understanding maximum viable ammonia substitution ratios across the speed-load operating map. The work was conducted under overall stoichiometric conditions with the spark timing re-optimised for maximum brake torque at all stable logged sites. The experiments included industry standard measurements of combustion, performance and engine-out emissions (including NH3 “slip”). With a geometric compression ratio of 12.4:1, it was possible to run the engine on pure ammonia at low engine speeds (1000-1800rpm) at low-to-moderate engine loads in a fully warmed up state. When progressively dropping down below a threshold load limit, an increasing amount of gasoline co-firing was required to avoid engine misfire. Due to the favourable anti-knock characteristics, pure ammonia operation was up to 5% more efficient than pure gasoline operation under stable operating regions. A maximum net indicated thermal efficiency of 40% was achieved, with efficiency tending to increase with speed and load. For the co-fuelling of gasoline and ammonia in a pure ammonia attainable operating region, it was found that addition of gasoline improved the combustion, but these improvements were not sufficient to translate into improved thermal efficiency. Emissions of NH3 slip reduced with increased gasoline co-fuelling, albeit with increased NOx. However, the reduction in NH3 slip was nearly 10 times the increase in NOx emissions. Comparing pure NH3 and pure gasoline operation, NOx reduced by ~60% when switching from pure gasoline to pure NH3 (as the latter is associated with longer and cooler combustion). Results were finally compared to those obtained a modern multi-cylinder Volvo “D8” turbo-diesel engine modified for dual fuel operation with ammonia port fuel injection, with the focus of the comparison being NH3 slip and NOx emissions.</description><issn>2056-5135</issn><issn>2056-5135</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNpVkN1KxDAUhIMouKz7DnmBak5-2ytZlq4KK16o4F057SZraptAm4q-vV0U0asZGJgZPkIosEtQhbriTGkFgssXMGz2nGsNuYETsjhG2Zyp0z_-nKzGsWWMQcG51GxBrst37CZMPgYaHV33fQwe6SZmbrJd58OB-kDv494OgW7jNNDHNMQ3S8tw8MGOF-TMYTfa1Y8uyfO2fNrcZruHm7vNepd5AA5ZUyMyVkimEYV2tc5FgWCNMY4bUUgJmhUq57BH0aATBkQNvOFOSNUo1GJJyu_e-ZENCat2_hLmxarHlF7tZ9X2aaiAVUcw1S-Yj_9gxBc1AFVq</recordid><startdate>20231121</startdate><enddate>20231121</enddate><creator>Ambalakatte, Ajith</creator><creator>Hegab, Abdelrahman</creator><creator>Geng, Sikai</creator><creator>Cairns, Alasdair</creator><creator>Harrington, Anthony</creator><creator>Hall, Jonathan</creator><creator>Bassett, Mike</creator><general>Johnson Matthey</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20231121</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Ammonia Co-fuelling in Modern Four Stroke Engines</title><author>Ambalakatte, Ajith ; Hegab, Abdelrahman ; Geng, Sikai ; Cairns, Alasdair ; Harrington, Anthony ; Hall, Jonathan ; Bassett, Mike</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i1121-cbaa009406aa36fb6839a1e777f27394416095821da3caf3713b12c2f345c5a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ambalakatte, Ajith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hegab, Abdelrahman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geng, Sikai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cairns, Alasdair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrington, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bassett, Mike</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Johnson Matthey technology review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ambalakatte, Ajith</au><au>Hegab, Abdelrahman</au><au>Geng, Sikai</au><au>Cairns, Alasdair</au><au>Harrington, Anthony</au><au>Hall, Jonathan</au><au>Bassett, Mike</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Ammonia Co-fuelling in Modern Four Stroke Engines</atitle><jtitle>Johnson Matthey technology review</jtitle><date>2023-11-21</date><risdate>2023</risdate><issn>2056-5135</issn><eissn>2056-5135</eissn><abstract>Ammonia (NH3) is emerging as a promising alternative fuel for longer range decarbonised heavy transport, particularly in the marine sector due to highly favourable characteristics as an effective hydrogen carrier. This is despite generally unfavourable combustion and toxicity attributes, restricting end use to applications where robust health and safety protocols can be upheld. In the currently reported work, a spark ignited thermodynamic single cylinder research engine equipped with gasoline direct injection was upgraded to include gaseous ammonia port injection fuelling, with the aim of understanding maximum viable ammonia substitution ratios across the speed-load operating map. The work was conducted under overall stoichiometric conditions with the spark timing re-optimised for maximum brake torque at all stable logged sites. The experiments included industry standard measurements of combustion, performance and engine-out emissions (including NH3 “slip”). With a geometric compression ratio of 12.4:1, it was possible to run the engine on pure ammonia at low engine speeds (1000-1800rpm) at low-to-moderate engine loads in a fully warmed up state. When progressively dropping down below a threshold load limit, an increasing amount of gasoline co-firing was required to avoid engine misfire. Due to the favourable anti-knock characteristics, pure ammonia operation was up to 5% more efficient than pure gasoline operation under stable operating regions. A maximum net indicated thermal efficiency of 40% was achieved, with efficiency tending to increase with speed and load. For the co-fuelling of gasoline and ammonia in a pure ammonia attainable operating region, it was found that addition of gasoline improved the combustion, but these improvements were not sufficient to translate into improved thermal efficiency. Emissions of NH3 slip reduced with increased gasoline co-fuelling, albeit with increased NOx. However, the reduction in NH3 slip was nearly 10 times the increase in NOx emissions. Comparing pure NH3 and pure gasoline operation, NOx reduced by ~60% when switching from pure gasoline to pure NH3 (as the latter is associated with longer and cooler combustion). Results were finally compared to those obtained a modern multi-cylinder Volvo “D8” turbo-diesel engine modified for dual fuel operation with ammonia port fuel injection, with the focus of the comparison being NH3 slip and NOx emissions.</abstract><pub>Johnson Matthey</pub><doi>10.1595/205651324X17005622661871</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2056-5135
ispartof Johnson Matthey technology review, 2023-11
issn 2056-5135
2056-5135
language eng
recordid cdi_ingenta_journals_matthey_jmtr_10_1595_205651324x17005622661871
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
title Evaluation of Ammonia Co-fuelling in Modern Four Stroke Engines
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T14%3A20%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubtec&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Ammonia%20Co-fuelling%20in%20Modern%20Four%20Stroke%20Engines&rft.jtitle=Johnson%20Matthey%20technology%20review&rft.au=Ambalakatte,%20Ajith&rft.date=2023-11-21&rft.issn=2056-5135&rft.eissn=2056-5135&rft_id=info:doi/10.1595/205651324X17005622661871&rft_dat=%3Cpubtec%3Ematthey/jmtr/10.1595/205651324x17005622661871%3C/pubtec%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ingid=matthey/jmtr/10.1595/205651324x17005622661871&rfr_iscdi=true