Treatment of chronic moderate-to-severe non-malignant pain with polymer-coated extended-release morphine sulfate capsules
ABSTRACT Objective: To demonstrate the efficacy and tolerability of polymer-coated extended-release morphine sulfate (P-ERMS) (KADIAN*) for the treatment of chronic, moderate-to-severe, non-malignant pain in a community-based outpatient population not satisfactorily relieved with their current thera...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current medical research and opinion 2006-03, Vol.22 (3), p.539-550 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ABSTRACT
Objective: To demonstrate the efficacy and tolerability of polymer-coated extended-release morphine sulfate (P-ERMS) (KADIAN*) for the treatment of chronic, moderate-to-severe, non-malignant pain in a community-based outpatient population not satisfactorily relieved with their current therapies.
*KADIAN is a registered trademark of Alpharma Branded Products Division Inc., Piscataway, NJ
Design: Phase IV, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint.
Participants: Adults (N = 1428) with chronic, moderate-to-severe, non-malignant pain with visual numeric scale scores ≥ 4 (0 = no pain; 10 = worst pain).
Interventions: Patients were randomized to P‐ERMS once daily in am or pm for a 4‐week treatment period. Dose increases were allowed; however, switching to twice-daily dosing was reserved until week 2.
Main outcome measures: Improvement from baseline in pain and sleep scales (0–10) (after weeks 2 and 4), quality of life (physical and mental component summary scores of the SF-36v2 Health Survey) (week 4), and patient (weeks 2 and 4) and clinician (week 4) assessments of current therapy (–4 to +4). Patient satisfaction was assessed again 1 month after the study.
Results: Approximately 70% of patients completed the study, with 2.4% (n = 34) discontinuing due to lack of efficacy, and 9.6% (n = 136) discontinuing due to an adverse event. Improvements were seen in pain and sleep scores, physical and mental component scores of the SF-36v2, and patient and clinician global assessment scores ( p < 0.0001, all assessments). Patients attained similar results regardless of am vs. pm dosing. More than half (55.4%) of patients were maintained on once-daily therapy, with the remainder on a twice-daily regimen, in accordance with the prescribing information. Most adverse events (71.6%) were mild to moderate in severity, the most common being constipation (11.6%) and nausea (9.2%). One‐month follow-up indicated continued satisfaction with P‐ERMS vs. previous medication ( p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: P‐ERMS was efficacious and well tolerated in patients with chronic, moderate-to-severe, non-malignant pain when used once or twice daily. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0300-7995 1473-4877 |
DOI: | 10.1185/030079906X89784 |