British Opiate Users: II. Differences between Those Given an Opiate Script and Those Not Given One
The interview data from some of the people approaching London drug clinics during the 1-year period beginning mid-November 1970 were used to compare two groups of subjects: those who were given a regular opiate script (113 people) and those who were not (61 people who, for the most part, did not pro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of the addictions 1974, Vol.9 (2), p.205-220 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 220 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 205 |
container_title | International journal of the addictions |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Blumberg, Herbert H. Cohen, S. Daryl Dronfield, B. Elizabeth Mordecai, Elizabeth A. Roberts, J. Colin Hawks, David |
description | The interview data from some of the people approaching London drug clinics during the 1-year period beginning mid-November 1970 were used to compare two groups of subjects: those who were given a regular opiate script (113 people) and those who were not (61 people who, for the most part, did not produce an opiate-positive urine at the time). People who were given such a script were likely to have been using more illicit heroin or methadone (than were people not given an opiate script), and the script given was usually a small quantity of methadone. Significantly higher rates of unemployment, illegal activities, and physical complications were demonstrated in the group who were not given a regular opiate script; further differences between the Script Group and the No-Script Group are also described. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3109/10826087409057342 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_informahealthcare_journals_10_3109_10826087409057342</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4430519</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-598c274d3b14e113fde8a60e3fe3bd6e61b5e5348e8c569059f2c81cf99127243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBColMcHcEDKD6R4bSex4QQFSqWKHmjPUeKsFVdtEtkpiL_HqIELEqcd7TykGUKugE44UHUDVLKUykxQRZOMC3ZExpBwFjOh4DjgwMdBIE7JmfcbSkEChxEZCcFpAmpMygdne-vraNnZosdo7dH522g-n0SP1hh02Gj0UYn9B2ITrerWYzSz7wEXzY_pTTvb9eFRDYLXth9EywYvyIkpth4vh3tO1s9Pq-lLvFjO5tP7Ray5TPs4UVKzTFS8BIEA3FQoi5QiN8jLKsUUygQTLiRKnaShrzJMS9BGKWAZE_ycwCFXu9Z7hybvnN0V7jMHmn_Plf-ZK3iuD55uX-6w-nUM-wT-7sDbxrRuV9RYbPtaFw7zTbt3TejzT_oXS212HQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>British Opiate Users: II. Differences between Those Given an Opiate Script and Those Not Given One</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles)</source><source>Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN</source><creator>Blumberg, Herbert H. ; Cohen, S. Daryl ; Dronfield, B. Elizabeth ; Mordecai, Elizabeth A. ; Roberts, J. Colin ; Hawks, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Blumberg, Herbert H. ; Cohen, S. Daryl ; Dronfield, B. Elizabeth ; Mordecai, Elizabeth A. ; Roberts, J. Colin ; Hawks, David</creatorcontrib><description>The interview data from some of the people approaching London drug clinics during the 1-year period beginning mid-November 1970 were used to compare two groups of subjects: those who were given a regular opiate script (113 people) and those who were not (61 people who, for the most part, did not produce an opiate-positive urine at the time). People who were given such a script were likely to have been using more illicit heroin or methadone (than were people not given an opiate script), and the script given was usually a small quantity of methadone. Significantly higher rates of unemployment, illegal activities, and physical complications were demonstrated in the group who were not given a regular opiate script; further differences between the Script Group and the No-Script Group are also described.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1082-6084</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0020-773X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3109/10826087409057342</identifier><identifier>PMID: 4430519</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Attitude ; Attitude to Health ; Drug and Narcotic Control ; Drug Prescriptions ; Employment ; Female ; Heroin - administration & dosage ; Heroin Dependence - complications ; Heroin Dependence - therapy ; Heroin Dependence - urine ; Humans ; Interpersonal Relations ; Male ; Malingering ; Methadone - administration & dosage ; Opium - administration & dosage ; Personality ; Sex Factors ; Substance-Related Disorders - therapy ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>International journal of the addictions, 1974, Vol.9 (2), p.205-220</ispartof><rights>1974 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 1974</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-598c274d3b14e113fde8a60e3fe3bd6e61b5e5348e8c569059f2c81cf99127243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-598c274d3b14e113fde8a60e3fe3bd6e61b5e5348e8c569059f2c81cf99127243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/10826087409057342$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/10826087409057342$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,61221,61256,61402,61437</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4430519$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blumberg, Herbert H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, S. Daryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dronfield, B. Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mordecai, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, J. Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawks, David</creatorcontrib><title>British Opiate Users: II. Differences between Those Given an Opiate Script and Those Not Given One</title><title>International journal of the addictions</title><addtitle>Int J Addict</addtitle><description>The interview data from some of the people approaching London drug clinics during the 1-year period beginning mid-November 1970 were used to compare two groups of subjects: those who were given a regular opiate script (113 people) and those who were not (61 people who, for the most part, did not produce an opiate-positive urine at the time). People who were given such a script were likely to have been using more illicit heroin or methadone (than were people not given an opiate script), and the script given was usually a small quantity of methadone. Significantly higher rates of unemployment, illegal activities, and physical complications were demonstrated in the group who were not given a regular opiate script; further differences between the Script Group and the No-Script Group are also described.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Drug and Narcotic Control</subject><subject>Drug Prescriptions</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heroin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Heroin Dependence - complications</subject><subject>Heroin Dependence - therapy</subject><subject>Heroin Dependence - urine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malingering</subject><subject>Methadone - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Opium - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1082-6084</issn><issn>0020-773X</issn><issn>1532-2491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1974</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtOwzAQtBColMcHcEDKD6R4bSex4QQFSqWKHmjPUeKsFVdtEtkpiL_HqIELEqcd7TykGUKugE44UHUDVLKUykxQRZOMC3ZExpBwFjOh4DjgwMdBIE7JmfcbSkEChxEZCcFpAmpMygdne-vraNnZosdo7dH522g-n0SP1hh02Gj0UYn9B2ITrerWYzSz7wEXzY_pTTvb9eFRDYLXth9EywYvyIkpth4vh3tO1s9Pq-lLvFjO5tP7Ray5TPs4UVKzTFS8BIEA3FQoi5QiN8jLKsUUygQTLiRKnaShrzJMS9BGKWAZE_ycwCFXu9Z7hybvnN0V7jMHmn_Plf-ZK3iuD55uX-6w-nUM-wT-7sDbxrRuV9RYbPtaFw7zTbt3TejzT_oXS212HQ</recordid><startdate>1974</startdate><enddate>1974</enddate><creator>Blumberg, Herbert H.</creator><creator>Cohen, S. Daryl</creator><creator>Dronfield, B. Elizabeth</creator><creator>Mordecai, Elizabeth A.</creator><creator>Roberts, J. Colin</creator><creator>Hawks, David</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1974</creationdate><title>British Opiate Users: II. Differences between Those Given an Opiate Script and Those Not Given One</title><author>Blumberg, Herbert H. ; Cohen, S. Daryl ; Dronfield, B. Elizabeth ; Mordecai, Elizabeth A. ; Roberts, J. Colin ; Hawks, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-598c274d3b14e113fde8a60e3fe3bd6e61b5e5348e8c569059f2c81cf99127243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1974</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Drug and Narcotic Control</topic><topic>Drug Prescriptions</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heroin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Heroin Dependence - complications</topic><topic>Heroin Dependence - therapy</topic><topic>Heroin Dependence - urine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malingering</topic><topic>Methadone - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Opium - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blumberg, Herbert H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, S. Daryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dronfield, B. Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mordecai, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, J. Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawks, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of the addictions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blumberg, Herbert H.</au><au>Cohen, S. Daryl</au><au>Dronfield, B. Elizabeth</au><au>Mordecai, Elizabeth A.</au><au>Roberts, J. Colin</au><au>Hawks, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>British Opiate Users: II. Differences between Those Given an Opiate Script and Those Not Given One</atitle><jtitle>International journal of the addictions</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Addict</addtitle><date>1974</date><risdate>1974</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>205</spage><epage>220</epage><pages>205-220</pages><issn>1082-6084</issn><issn>0020-773X</issn><eissn>1532-2491</eissn><abstract>The interview data from some of the people approaching London drug clinics during the 1-year period beginning mid-November 1970 were used to compare two groups of subjects: those who were given a regular opiate script (113 people) and those who were not (61 people who, for the most part, did not produce an opiate-positive urine at the time). People who were given such a script were likely to have been using more illicit heroin or methadone (than were people not given an opiate script), and the script given was usually a small quantity of methadone. Significantly higher rates of unemployment, illegal activities, and physical complications were demonstrated in the group who were not given a regular opiate script; further differences between the Script Group and the No-Script Group are also described.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>4430519</pmid><doi>10.3109/10826087409057342</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1082-6084 |
ispartof | International journal of the addictions, 1974, Vol.9 (2), p.205-220 |
issn | 1082-6084 0020-773X 1532-2491 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_informahealthcare_journals_10_3109_10826087409057342 |
source | MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles); Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN |
subjects | Age Factors Attitude Attitude to Health Drug and Narcotic Control Drug Prescriptions Employment Female Heroin - administration & dosage Heroin Dependence - complications Heroin Dependence - therapy Heroin Dependence - urine Humans Interpersonal Relations Male Malingering Methadone - administration & dosage Opium - administration & dosage Personality Sex Factors Substance-Related Disorders - therapy United Kingdom |
title | British Opiate Users: II. Differences between Those Given an Opiate Script and Those Not Given One |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T20%3A38%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=British%20Opiate%20Users:%20II.%20Differences%20between%20Those%20Given%20an%20Opiate%20Script%20and%20Those%20Not%20Given%20One&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20the%20addictions&rft.au=Blumberg,%20Herbert%20H.&rft.date=1974&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=205&rft.epage=220&rft.pages=205-220&rft.issn=1082-6084&rft.eissn=1532-2491&rft_id=info:doi/10.3109/10826087409057342&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E4430519%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/4430519&rfr_iscdi=true |