Sonographic measurement of diaphragmatic motion after upper abdominal surgery: A comparison of three breathing manoeuvres

The effects of three coached breathing manoeuvres on diaphragm excursion after upper abdominal surgery (UAS) were investigated using sonography: verbal instruction to deep breathe; coached diaphragmatic (abdominal) breathing; and thoracic expansion exercise (lateral costal breathing). Eighteen patie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physiotherapy theory and practice 1997, Vol.13 (3), p.207-215
Hauptverfasser: Blaney, Frances, Sawyer, Timothy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 215
container_issue 3
container_start_page 207
container_title Physiotherapy theory and practice
container_volume 13
creator Blaney, Frances
Sawyer, Timothy
description The effects of three coached breathing manoeuvres on diaphragm excursion after upper abdominal surgery (UAS) were investigated using sonography: verbal instruction to deep breathe; coached diaphragmatic (abdominal) breathing; and thoracic expansion exercise (lateral costal breathing). Eighteen patients aged 34-89 years, undergoing elective UAS at the Royal Adelaide Hospital, were tested. Diaphragm displacement was measured using sonography the day before and the day after surgery. Measurements were taken during deep breaths from functional residual capacity (FRC) to maximal inspiration. There was no difference in diaphragm displacement between the three types of deep breathing manoeuvres pre-operatively. On the first post-operative day, mean diaphragm displacement from FRC to maximal inspiration fell by 58%. Post-operatively, there were differences between the manoeuvres. A simple verbal instruction to deep breathe resulted in less diaphragm movement than coached diaphragmatic breathing and thoracic expansion breathing. There was no difference between coached diaphragmatic breathing and thoracic expansion breathing. We conclude that the techniques of coached diaphragmatic breathing and thoracic expansion used in this group of patients recovering from UAS elicited a greater excursion from the diaphragm than a simple instruction to deep breathe when measured in a 60° long sitting position.
doi_str_mv 10.3109/09593989709036464
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>informahealthcare_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_informahealthcare_journals_10_3109_09593989709036464</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_3109_09593989709036464</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-47bc02586a87f48f342f3cb17b1191d05d157e461ba2c9fde82f2708eda6300e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxEAQRRtRcHx8gLv-gWg_8lQ3Ir5AcKGuQ6VTPekhSYfqHmX-3gzjRkQ3VVD3nltwGTuT4lxLUV2IKqt0VVaFqITO0zzdYwuZaZVkIhX7bLHVk9mQHbKjEFZCCKUytWCbVz_6JcHUOcMHhLAmHHCM3FveuvlMsBwgbkUfnR852IjE19M0T2haP7gRej5jS6TNJb_hxg8TkAuzd86IHSHyhhBi58YlH2D0uP4gDCfswEIf8PR7H7P3-7u328fk-eXh6fbmOTEq1zFJi8YIlZU5lIVNS6tTZbVpZNFIWclWZK3MCkxz2YAylW2xVFYVosQWci0E6mMmd7mGfAiEtp7IDUCbWop62139q7uZud4xbrSeBvj01Ld1hE3vyRKMxoUt-jd-9QPvEPrYGSCsV35Nc2Hhn-dfT6mKLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sonographic measurement of diaphragmatic motion after upper abdominal surgery: A comparison of three breathing manoeuvres</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis:Master (3349 titles)</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Medical Library - CRKN</source><creator>Blaney, Frances ; Sawyer, Timothy</creator><creatorcontrib>Blaney, Frances ; Sawyer, Timothy</creatorcontrib><description>The effects of three coached breathing manoeuvres on diaphragm excursion after upper abdominal surgery (UAS) were investigated using sonography: verbal instruction to deep breathe; coached diaphragmatic (abdominal) breathing; and thoracic expansion exercise (lateral costal breathing). Eighteen patients aged 34-89 years, undergoing elective UAS at the Royal Adelaide Hospital, were tested. Diaphragm displacement was measured using sonography the day before and the day after surgery. Measurements were taken during deep breaths from functional residual capacity (FRC) to maximal inspiration. There was no difference in diaphragm displacement between the three types of deep breathing manoeuvres pre-operatively. On the first post-operative day, mean diaphragm displacement from FRC to maximal inspiration fell by 58%. Post-operatively, there were differences between the manoeuvres. A simple verbal instruction to deep breathe resulted in less diaphragm movement than coached diaphragmatic breathing and thoracic expansion breathing. There was no difference between coached diaphragmatic breathing and thoracic expansion breathing. We conclude that the techniques of coached diaphragmatic breathing and thoracic expansion used in this group of patients recovering from UAS elicited a greater excursion from the diaphragm than a simple instruction to deep breathe when measured in a 60° long sitting position.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-3985</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5040</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3109/09593989709036464</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Informa UK Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Physiotherapy theory and practice, 1997, Vol.13 (3), p.207-215</ispartof><rights>1997 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-47bc02586a87f48f342f3cb17b1191d05d157e461ba2c9fde82f2708eda6300e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-47bc02586a87f48f342f3cb17b1191d05d157e461ba2c9fde82f2708eda6300e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/09593989709036464$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/09593989709036464$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,59647,59753,60436,60542,61221,61256,61402,61437</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blaney, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawyer, Timothy</creatorcontrib><title>Sonographic measurement of diaphragmatic motion after upper abdominal surgery: A comparison of three breathing manoeuvres</title><title>Physiotherapy theory and practice</title><description>The effects of three coached breathing manoeuvres on diaphragm excursion after upper abdominal surgery (UAS) were investigated using sonography: verbal instruction to deep breathe; coached diaphragmatic (abdominal) breathing; and thoracic expansion exercise (lateral costal breathing). Eighteen patients aged 34-89 years, undergoing elective UAS at the Royal Adelaide Hospital, were tested. Diaphragm displacement was measured using sonography the day before and the day after surgery. Measurements were taken during deep breaths from functional residual capacity (FRC) to maximal inspiration. There was no difference in diaphragm displacement between the three types of deep breathing manoeuvres pre-operatively. On the first post-operative day, mean diaphragm displacement from FRC to maximal inspiration fell by 58%. Post-operatively, there were differences between the manoeuvres. A simple verbal instruction to deep breathe resulted in less diaphragm movement than coached diaphragmatic breathing and thoracic expansion breathing. There was no difference between coached diaphragmatic breathing and thoracic expansion breathing. We conclude that the techniques of coached diaphragmatic breathing and thoracic expansion used in this group of patients recovering from UAS elicited a greater excursion from the diaphragm than a simple instruction to deep breathe when measured in a 60° long sitting position.</description><issn>0959-3985</issn><issn>1532-5040</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKxEAQRRtRcHx8gLv-gWg_8lQ3Ir5AcKGuQ6VTPekhSYfqHmX-3gzjRkQ3VVD3nltwGTuT4lxLUV2IKqt0VVaFqITO0zzdYwuZaZVkIhX7bLHVk9mQHbKjEFZCCKUytWCbVz_6JcHUOcMHhLAmHHCM3FveuvlMsBwgbkUfnR852IjE19M0T2haP7gRej5jS6TNJb_hxg8TkAuzd86IHSHyhhBi58YlH2D0uP4gDCfswEIf8PR7H7P3-7u328fk-eXh6fbmOTEq1zFJi8YIlZU5lIVNS6tTZbVpZNFIWclWZK3MCkxz2YAylW2xVFYVosQWci0E6mMmd7mGfAiEtp7IDUCbWop62139q7uZud4xbrSeBvj01Ld1hE3vyRKMxoUt-jd-9QPvEPrYGSCsV35Nc2Hhn-dfT6mKLg</recordid><startdate>1997</startdate><enddate>1997</enddate><creator>Blaney, Frances</creator><creator>Sawyer, Timothy</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1997</creationdate><title>Sonographic measurement of diaphragmatic motion after upper abdominal surgery: A comparison of three breathing manoeuvres</title><author>Blaney, Frances ; Sawyer, Timothy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-47bc02586a87f48f342f3cb17b1191d05d157e461ba2c9fde82f2708eda6300e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blaney, Frances</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawyer, Timothy</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Physiotherapy theory and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blaney, Frances</au><au>Sawyer, Timothy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sonographic measurement of diaphragmatic motion after upper abdominal surgery: A comparison of three breathing manoeuvres</atitle><jtitle>Physiotherapy theory and practice</jtitle><date>1997</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>207</spage><epage>215</epage><pages>207-215</pages><issn>0959-3985</issn><eissn>1532-5040</eissn><abstract>The effects of three coached breathing manoeuvres on diaphragm excursion after upper abdominal surgery (UAS) were investigated using sonography: verbal instruction to deep breathe; coached diaphragmatic (abdominal) breathing; and thoracic expansion exercise (lateral costal breathing). Eighteen patients aged 34-89 years, undergoing elective UAS at the Royal Adelaide Hospital, were tested. Diaphragm displacement was measured using sonography the day before and the day after surgery. Measurements were taken during deep breaths from functional residual capacity (FRC) to maximal inspiration. There was no difference in diaphragm displacement between the three types of deep breathing manoeuvres pre-operatively. On the first post-operative day, mean diaphragm displacement from FRC to maximal inspiration fell by 58%. Post-operatively, there were differences between the manoeuvres. A simple verbal instruction to deep breathe resulted in less diaphragm movement than coached diaphragmatic breathing and thoracic expansion breathing. There was no difference between coached diaphragmatic breathing and thoracic expansion breathing. We conclude that the techniques of coached diaphragmatic breathing and thoracic expansion used in this group of patients recovering from UAS elicited a greater excursion from the diaphragm than a simple instruction to deep breathe when measured in a 60° long sitting position.</abstract><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><doi>10.3109/09593989709036464</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-3985
ispartof Physiotherapy theory and practice, 1997, Vol.13 (3), p.207-215
issn 0959-3985
1532-5040
language eng
recordid cdi_informahealthcare_journals_10_3109_09593989709036464
source Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles); Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN
title Sonographic measurement of diaphragmatic motion after upper abdominal surgery: A comparison of three breathing manoeuvres
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T00%3A35%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-informahealthcare_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sonographic%20measurement%20of%20diaphragmatic%20motion%20after%20upper%20abdominal%20surgery:%20A%20comparison%20of%20three%20breathing%20manoeuvres&rft.jtitle=Physiotherapy%20theory%20and%20practice&rft.au=Blaney,%20Frances&rft.date=1997&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=215&rft.pages=207-215&rft.issn=0959-3985&rft.eissn=1532-5040&rft_id=info:doi/10.3109/09593989709036464&rft_dat=%3Cinformahealthcare_infor%3E10_3109_09593989709036464%3C/informahealthcare_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true