A Photoelastic Study of Some Biomechanical Factors Affecting the Anchorage of Osseointegrated Implants in the Jaw
Photoelastic stress analyses of models of osseo-integrated oral implants were performed, comprising an investigation of the installation practice and load experiments. In the load experiments, single-threaded and unthreaded implants were loaded in horizontal and vertical planes. The results of the i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery 1980, Vol.14 (3), p.209-214 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 214 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 209 |
container_title | Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Haraldson, Torgny |
description | Photoelastic stress analyses of models of osseo-integrated oral implants were performed, comprising an investigation of the installation practice and load experiments. In the load experiments, single-threaded and unthreaded implants were loaded in horizontal and vertical planes. The results of the installation experiments showed that pre-tapping and careful screwing down of the implant reduced stresses in the test piece. When tightening the screw forcefully, high stress concentrations arose at the margin of the implant site. In the load experiments a threaded implant was analysed in three different anchorage situations: case A, illustrating complete bone anchorage up to the head of the implant; case B, vertical bone loss; and case C., horizontal bone loss. An unthreaded implant was also analysed. The results indicated only minor differences between the three anchorage cases in the vertical load experiments. However, the threaded implants displayed a more favourable stress distribution than the unthreaded one. In the horizontal load experiments high stress concentrations arose at the margin of the test piece on the compression side at minor load levels (98 N), Anchorage cases B and C showed the highest stress concentrations. The results have clinical relevance, both for installation practice and for the design of the oral implant bridge. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3109/02844318009106712 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_informahealthcare_journals_10_3109_02844318009106712</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>75477675</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-1d7d997208019c3679297ee588489aeacd2d7cad944159d70e82883d743a68473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFv1DAUhC0EKkvLD-CA5BO3gO04sS24LBWFokpFKpyjh_2ycZXYW9tRtf--2e4KCaFyee8w34xGQ8gbzt7XnJkPTGgpa64ZM5y1iotnZMXbhleCqfo5We31agH4S_Iq51vGmJBSnZATJZiRrFmRuzX9McQScYRcvKU3ZXY7Gnt6Eyekn_1y7QDBWxjpBdgSU6brvkdbfNjQMiBdBzvEBBvcu65zxuhDwU2Cgo5eTtsRQsnUh0f4O9yfkRc9jBlfH_8p-XXx5ef5t-rq-uvl-fqqsrUWpeJOOWOWnppxY-tWGWEUYqO11AYQrBNOWXBGSt4YpxhqoXXtlKyh1VLVp-TdIXeb4t2MuXSTzxbHpQ_GOXeqkUq1qllAfgBtijkn7Ltt8hOkXcdZt5-5-2fmxfP2GD7_ntD9cRx3XfRPB92HPqYJ7mMaXVdgN8bUJwjW53300_Ef_7IPCGMZLCTsbuOcwrLbf8o9AOPBnH0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75477675</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Photoelastic Study of Some Biomechanical Factors Affecting the Anchorage of Osseointegrated Implants in the Jaw</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles)</source><source>Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN</source><creator>Haraldson, Torgny</creator><creatorcontrib>Haraldson, Torgny</creatorcontrib><description>Photoelastic stress analyses of models of osseo-integrated oral implants were performed, comprising an investigation of the installation practice and load experiments. In the load experiments, single-threaded and unthreaded implants were loaded in horizontal and vertical planes. The results of the installation experiments showed that pre-tapping and careful screwing down of the implant reduced stresses in the test piece. When tightening the screw forcefully, high stress concentrations arose at the margin of the implant site. In the load experiments a threaded implant was analysed in three different anchorage situations: case A, illustrating complete bone anchorage up to the head of the implant; case B, vertical bone loss; and case C., horizontal bone loss. An unthreaded implant was also analysed. The results indicated only minor differences between the three anchorage cases in the vertical load experiments. However, the threaded implants displayed a more favourable stress distribution than the unthreaded one. In the horizontal load experiments high stress concentrations arose at the margin of the test piece on the compression side at minor load levels (98 N), Anchorage cases B and C showed the highest stress concentrations. The results have clinical relevance, both for installation practice and for the design of the oral implant bridge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0284-4311</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0036-5556</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1651-2073</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3109/02844318009106712</identifier><identifier>PMID: 7209405</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sweden: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena ; Computers ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous ; Dental Stress Analysis ; Graft Rejection ; Humans ; Mouth, Edentulous - surgery</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery, 1980, Vol.14 (3), p.209-214</ispartof><rights>1980 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 1980</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-1d7d997208019c3679297ee588489aeacd2d7cad944159d70e82883d743a68473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-1d7d997208019c3679297ee588489aeacd2d7cad944159d70e82883d743a68473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/02844318009106712$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/02844318009106712$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4023,27922,27923,27924,61220,61255,61401,61436</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7209405$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haraldson, Torgny</creatorcontrib><title>A Photoelastic Study of Some Biomechanical Factors Affecting the Anchorage of Osseointegrated Implants in the Jaw</title><title>Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery</title><addtitle>Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>Photoelastic stress analyses of models of osseo-integrated oral implants were performed, comprising an investigation of the installation practice and load experiments. In the load experiments, single-threaded and unthreaded implants were loaded in horizontal and vertical planes. The results of the installation experiments showed that pre-tapping and careful screwing down of the implant reduced stresses in the test piece. When tightening the screw forcefully, high stress concentrations arose at the margin of the implant site. In the load experiments a threaded implant was analysed in three different anchorage situations: case A, illustrating complete bone anchorage up to the head of the implant; case B, vertical bone loss; and case C., horizontal bone loss. An unthreaded implant was also analysed. The results indicated only minor differences between the three anchorage cases in the vertical load experiments. However, the threaded implants displayed a more favourable stress distribution than the unthreaded one. In the horizontal load experiments high stress concentrations arose at the margin of the test piece on the compression side at minor load levels (98 N), Anchorage cases B and C showed the highest stress concentrations. The results have clinical relevance, both for installation practice and for the design of the oral implant bridge.</description><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis</subject><subject>Graft Rejection</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mouth, Edentulous - surgery</subject><issn>0284-4311</issn><issn>0036-5556</issn><issn>1651-2073</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFv1DAUhC0EKkvLD-CA5BO3gO04sS24LBWFokpFKpyjh_2ycZXYW9tRtf--2e4KCaFyee8w34xGQ8gbzt7XnJkPTGgpa64ZM5y1iotnZMXbhleCqfo5We31agH4S_Iq51vGmJBSnZATJZiRrFmRuzX9McQScYRcvKU3ZXY7Gnt6Eyekn_1y7QDBWxjpBdgSU6brvkdbfNjQMiBdBzvEBBvcu65zxuhDwU2Cgo5eTtsRQsnUh0f4O9yfkRc9jBlfH_8p-XXx5ef5t-rq-uvl-fqqsrUWpeJOOWOWnppxY-tWGWEUYqO11AYQrBNOWXBGSt4YpxhqoXXtlKyh1VLVp-TdIXeb4t2MuXSTzxbHpQ_GOXeqkUq1qllAfgBtijkn7Ltt8hOkXcdZt5-5-2fmxfP2GD7_ntD9cRx3XfRPB92HPqYJ7mMaXVdgN8bUJwjW53300_Ef_7IPCGMZLCTsbuOcwrLbf8o9AOPBnH0</recordid><startdate>1980</startdate><enddate>1980</enddate><creator>Haraldson, Torgny</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1980</creationdate><title>A Photoelastic Study of Some Biomechanical Factors Affecting the Anchorage of Osseointegrated Implants in the Jaw</title><author>Haraldson, Torgny</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-1d7d997208019c3679297ee588489aeacd2d7cad944159d70e82883d743a68473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis</topic><topic>Graft Rejection</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mouth, Edentulous - surgery</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haraldson, Torgny</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haraldson, Torgny</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Photoelastic Study of Some Biomechanical Factors Affecting the Anchorage of Osseointegrated Implants in the Jaw</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>1980</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>209</spage><epage>214</epage><pages>209-214</pages><issn>0284-4311</issn><issn>0036-5556</issn><eissn>1651-2073</eissn><abstract>Photoelastic stress analyses of models of osseo-integrated oral implants were performed, comprising an investigation of the installation practice and load experiments. In the load experiments, single-threaded and unthreaded implants were loaded in horizontal and vertical planes. The results of the installation experiments showed that pre-tapping and careful screwing down of the implant reduced stresses in the test piece. When tightening the screw forcefully, high stress concentrations arose at the margin of the implant site. In the load experiments a threaded implant was analysed in three different anchorage situations: case A, illustrating complete bone anchorage up to the head of the implant; case B, vertical bone loss; and case C., horizontal bone loss. An unthreaded implant was also analysed. The results indicated only minor differences between the three anchorage cases in the vertical load experiments. However, the threaded implants displayed a more favourable stress distribution than the unthreaded one. In the horizontal load experiments high stress concentrations arose at the margin of the test piece on the compression side at minor load levels (98 N), Anchorage cases B and C showed the highest stress concentrations. The results have clinical relevance, both for installation practice and for the design of the oral implant bridge.</abstract><cop>Sweden</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>7209405</pmid><doi>10.3109/02844318009106712</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0284-4311 |
ispartof | Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery, 1980, Vol.14 (3), p.209-214 |
issn | 0284-4311 0036-5556 1651-2073 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_informahealthcare_journals_10_3109_02844318009106712 |
source | MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles); Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN |
subjects | Biomechanical Phenomena Computers Dental Implantation, Endosseous Dental Stress Analysis Graft Rejection Humans Mouth, Edentulous - surgery |
title | A Photoelastic Study of Some Biomechanical Factors Affecting the Anchorage of Osseointegrated Implants in the Jaw |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T09%3A00%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Photoelastic%20Study%20of%20Some%20Biomechanical%20Factors%20Affecting%20the%20Anchorage%20of%20Osseointegrated%20Implants%20in%20the%20Jaw&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20journal%20of%20plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery&rft.au=Haraldson,%20Torgny&rft.date=1980&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=209&rft.epage=214&rft.pages=209-214&rft.issn=0284-4311&rft.eissn=1651-2073&rft_id=info:doi/10.3109/02844318009106712&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E75477675%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75477675&rft_id=info:pmid/7209405&rfr_iscdi=true |