Is routine antenatal practice effective for detecting intra-uterine growth retardation?
Summary Ninety-eight growth retarded babies born in a peripheral district general hospital without routine ultrasound screening were analysed. Routine obstetric practice failed to diagnose antenatally 65 per cent of dysmature babies. The perinatal mortality and morbidity in babies that were diagnose...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 1984, Vol.5 (2), p.87-89 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 89 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 87 |
| container_title | Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology |
| container_volume | 5 |
| creator | Mwambingu, F. T. Ramaiah, R. S. Vlies, P. R. |
| description | Summary
Ninety-eight growth retarded babies born in a peripheral district general hospital without routine ultrasound screening were analysed. Routine obstetric practice failed to diagnose antenatally 65 per cent of dysmature babies. The perinatal mortality and morbidity in babies that were diagnosed antenatally was better than those not diagnosed (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3109/01443618409109121 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>informahealthcare_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_informahealthcare_journals_10_3109_01443618409109121</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_3109_01443618409109121</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-48056da11320967747675709eb18cc6faf738324c8fff19521574dac98fc16e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN1Kw0AQhRdRsFYfwLt9gehOdrNJUBAp_hQK3ihehnGz26aku2WysfTtTag3Ino1c5j5ZjiHsUsQVxJEeS1AKamhUKIcJKRwxCYgtUp0UcpjNhnnybCQnbKzrlsLIUBkasLe5x2n0MfGW44-Wo8RW74lNLExllvn7NB9Wu4C8drGUfklb3wkTPpoaQSXFHZxxclGpBpjE_zdOTtx2Hb24rtO2dvjw-vsOVm8PM1n94vESCFiogqR6RoBZCpKnecq13mWi9J-QGGMduhyWchUmcI5B2WWQparGk1ZOAPagpwyONw1FLqOrKu21GyQ9hWIakym-pXMwNwemMYPrja4C9TWVcR9G8gRetN0I_o3fvMDX1ls48og2WodevKD3X-efwEPzHvx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is routine antenatal practice effective for detecting intra-uterine growth retardation?</title><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Mwambingu, F. T. ; Ramaiah, R. S. ; Vlies, P. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mwambingu, F. T. ; Ramaiah, R. S. ; Vlies, P. R.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Ninety-eight growth retarded babies born in a peripheral district general hospital without routine ultrasound screening were analysed. Routine obstetric practice failed to diagnose antenatally 65 per cent of dysmature babies. The perinatal mortality and morbidity in babies that were diagnosed antenatally was better than those not diagnosed (P<0-05). It is concluded that the current antenatal practice for detecting fetal growth retardation is inadequate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-3615</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1364-6893</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3109/01443618409109121</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Informa UK Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 1984, Vol.5 (2), p.87-89</ispartof><rights>1984 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 1984</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-48056da11320967747675709eb18cc6faf738324c8fff19521574dac98fc16e13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/01443618409109121$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/01443618409109121$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902,59620,60409,61194,61375</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mwambingu, F. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramaiah, R. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vlies, P. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Is routine antenatal practice effective for detecting intra-uterine growth retardation?</title><title>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</title><description>Summary
Ninety-eight growth retarded babies born in a peripheral district general hospital without routine ultrasound screening were analysed. Routine obstetric practice failed to diagnose antenatally 65 per cent of dysmature babies. The perinatal mortality and morbidity in babies that were diagnosed antenatally was better than those not diagnosed (P<0-05). It is concluded that the current antenatal practice for detecting fetal growth retardation is inadequate.</description><issn>0144-3615</issn><issn>1364-6893</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kN1Kw0AQhRdRsFYfwLt9gehOdrNJUBAp_hQK3ihehnGz26aku2WysfTtTag3Ino1c5j5ZjiHsUsQVxJEeS1AKamhUKIcJKRwxCYgtUp0UcpjNhnnybCQnbKzrlsLIUBkasLe5x2n0MfGW44-Wo8RW74lNLExllvn7NB9Wu4C8drGUfklb3wkTPpoaQSXFHZxxclGpBpjE_zdOTtx2Hb24rtO2dvjw-vsOVm8PM1n94vESCFiogqR6RoBZCpKnecq13mWi9J-QGGMduhyWchUmcI5B2WWQparGk1ZOAPagpwyONw1FLqOrKu21GyQ9hWIakym-pXMwNwemMYPrja4C9TWVcR9G8gRetN0I_o3fvMDX1ls48og2WodevKD3X-efwEPzHvx</recordid><startdate>1984</startdate><enddate>1984</enddate><creator>Mwambingu, F. T.</creator><creator>Ramaiah, R. S.</creator><creator>Vlies, P. R.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1984</creationdate><title>Is routine antenatal practice effective for detecting intra-uterine growth retardation?</title><author>Mwambingu, F. T. ; Ramaiah, R. S. ; Vlies, P. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-48056da11320967747675709eb18cc6faf738324c8fff19521574dac98fc16e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mwambingu, F. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramaiah, R. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vlies, P. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mwambingu, F. T.</au><au>Ramaiah, R. S.</au><au>Vlies, P. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is routine antenatal practice effective for detecting intra-uterine growth retardation?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle><date>1984</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>87</spage><epage>89</epage><pages>87-89</pages><issn>0144-3615</issn><eissn>1364-6893</eissn><abstract>Summary
Ninety-eight growth retarded babies born in a peripheral district general hospital without routine ultrasound screening were analysed. Routine obstetric practice failed to diagnose antenatally 65 per cent of dysmature babies. The perinatal mortality and morbidity in babies that were diagnosed antenatally was better than those not diagnosed (P<0-05). It is concluded that the current antenatal practice for detecting fetal growth retardation is inadequate.</abstract><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><doi>10.3109/01443618409109121</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0144-3615 |
| ispartof | Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 1984, Vol.5 (2), p.87-89 |
| issn | 0144-3615 1364-6893 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_informahealthcare_journals_10_3109_01443618409109121 |
| source | Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
| title | Is routine antenatal practice effective for detecting intra-uterine growth retardation? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T22%3A52%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-informahealthcare_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20routine%20antenatal%20practice%20effective%20for%20detecting%20intra-uterine%20growth%20retardation?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology&rft.au=Mwambingu,%20F.%20T.&rft.date=1984&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=89&rft.pages=87-89&rft.issn=0144-3615&rft.eissn=1364-6893&rft_id=info:doi/10.3109/01443618409109121&rft_dat=%3Cinformahealthcare_cross%3E10_3109_01443618409109121%3C/informahealthcare_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |