Are There Spillover Effects from Munis?
This paper studies the spillover effects both within the bond markets for individual U.S. states and between the latter and the market for U.S. Treasury securities. We perform the Forbes and Rigobon (2002) spillover test using daily bond yield data over the period 2005 to 2011. Results are twofold....
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Candelon, Bertrand Arezki, Rabah Sy, Amadou N. R |
description | This paper studies the spillover effects both within the bond markets for individual U.S. states and between the latter and the market for U.S. Treasury securities. We perform the Forbes and Rigobon (2002) spillover test using daily bond yield data over the period 2005 to 2011. Results are twofold. First, we find that between most markets for individual U.S. state bonds there are negative spillovers. In other words, an increase in borrowing costs in one U.S. state results in better borrowing conditions for other states. Second, we find no substantial spillover effect between shocks originating from state securities and from federal markets, except for a few large issuers. Using causality tests in the frequency domain, we find that the Treasury bond market directly causes changes in the markets for municipal bonds in both the short and long run. There is also some evidence of causality from the municipal to the Treasury bond market, but only of a long-run nature. Our results shed some light on the policy debate on the nature of spillover effects within fiscal unions. |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_imf_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_imf_primary_100539781463927240</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>EBC1606462</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c10666-626dfc82543e31bd1564ac0fc73276b262a814ab5fc5770d0305c30797fd88693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNj01LxDAYhCOiuK77H3qRPRXefL1JTrKW-gErHly8ljRNsNpua9IV_PcW14OXGQYehpkTckkFcqOZEfT0fzgnC02lYlojXJBVSu8AQIXiAsSCrDfRZ7s3P-vL2Hbd8OVjVobg3ZSyEIc-ezrs23RzRc6C7ZJf_fmSvN6Vu-Ih3z7fPxabbe4oIGKODJvgNJOCe07rhkoU1kFwijOFNUNmNRW2lsFJpaABDtJxUEaFZl5o-JKsj8VjHD4PPk2Vr4fhw_n9FG1XlbcFRUCBbCavj2Tbh2qMbW_jd0UBJDdK__5nigngP1G_Sss</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>book</recordtype><pqid>EBC1606462</pqid></control><display><type>book</type><title>Are There Spillover Effects from Munis?</title><source>IMF E-Library</source><creator>Candelon, Bertrand ; Arezki, Rabah ; Sy, Amadou N. R</creator><creatorcontrib>Candelon, Bertrand ; Arezki, Rabah ; Sy, Amadou N. R</creatorcontrib><description>This paper studies the spillover effects both within the bond markets for individual U.S. states and between the latter and the market for U.S. Treasury securities. We perform the Forbes and Rigobon (2002) spillover test using daily bond yield data over the period 2005 to 2011. Results are twofold. First, we find that between most markets for individual U.S. state bonds there are negative spillovers. In other words, an increase in borrowing costs in one U.S. state results in better borrowing conditions for other states. Second, we find no substantial spillover effect between shocks originating from state securities and from federal markets, except for a few large issuers. Using causality tests in the frequency domain, we find that the Treasury bond market directly causes changes in the markets for municipal bonds in both the short and long run. There is also some evidence of causality from the municipal to the Treasury bond market, but only of a long-run nature. Our results shed some light on the policy debate on the nature of spillover effects within fiscal unions.</description><edition>1</edition><identifier>ISBN: 1463982941</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 146395932X</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 146392724X</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781463927240</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781463959326</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781463982942</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1463982941</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781463982942</identifier><identifier>OCLC: 815728860</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, D. C: International Monetary Fund</publisher><subject>Bond Market ; Bonds ; Economic assistance ; Economic policy ; Fiscal Analysis ; Fiscal Union ; International business enterprises ; International Monetary Fund ; Risk Management ; Spillover ; Spillovers</subject><creationdate>2011</creationdate><tpages>18</tpages><format>18</format><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>306,307,778,782,784,785,2599,2613,62125</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Candelon, Bertrand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arezki, Rabah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sy, Amadou N. R</creatorcontrib><title>Are There Spillover Effects from Munis?</title><description>This paper studies the spillover effects both within the bond markets for individual U.S. states and between the latter and the market for U.S. Treasury securities. We perform the Forbes and Rigobon (2002) spillover test using daily bond yield data over the period 2005 to 2011. Results are twofold. First, we find that between most markets for individual U.S. state bonds there are negative spillovers. In other words, an increase in borrowing costs in one U.S. state results in better borrowing conditions for other states. Second, we find no substantial spillover effect between shocks originating from state securities and from federal markets, except for a few large issuers. Using causality tests in the frequency domain, we find that the Treasury bond market directly causes changes in the markets for municipal bonds in both the short and long run. There is also some evidence of causality from the municipal to the Treasury bond market, but only of a long-run nature. Our results shed some light on the policy debate on the nature of spillover effects within fiscal unions.</description><subject>Bond Market</subject><subject>Bonds</subject><subject>Economic assistance</subject><subject>Economic policy</subject><subject>Fiscal Analysis</subject><subject>Fiscal Union</subject><subject>International business enterprises</subject><subject>International Monetary Fund</subject><subject>Risk Management</subject><subject>Spillover</subject><subject>Spillovers</subject><isbn>1463982941</isbn><isbn>146395932X</isbn><isbn>146392724X</isbn><isbn>9781463927240</isbn><isbn>9781463959326</isbn><isbn>9781463982942</isbn><isbn>1463982941</isbn><isbn>9781463982942</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>book</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>book</recordtype><sourceid>2BV</sourceid><recordid>eNpNj01LxDAYhCOiuK77H3qRPRXefL1JTrKW-gErHly8ljRNsNpua9IV_PcW14OXGQYehpkTckkFcqOZEfT0fzgnC02lYlojXJBVSu8AQIXiAsSCrDfRZ7s3P-vL2Hbd8OVjVobg3ZSyEIc-ezrs23RzRc6C7ZJf_fmSvN6Vu-Ih3z7fPxabbe4oIGKODJvgNJOCe07rhkoU1kFwijOFNUNmNRW2lsFJpaABDtJxUEaFZl5o-JKsj8VjHD4PPk2Vr4fhw_n9FG1XlbcFRUCBbCavj2Tbh2qMbW_jd0UBJDdK__5nigngP1G_Sss</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>Candelon, Bertrand</creator><creator>Arezki, Rabah</creator><creator>Sy, Amadou N. R</creator><general>International Monetary Fund</general><scope>2BV</scope><scope>C-M</scope><scope>KRY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>Are There Spillover Effects from Munis?</title><author>Candelon, Bertrand ; Arezki, Rabah ; Sy, Amadou N. R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c10666-626dfc82543e31bd1564ac0fc73276b262a814ab5fc5770d0305c30797fd88693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>books</rsrctype><prefilter>books</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Bond Market</topic><topic>Bonds</topic><topic>Economic assistance</topic><topic>Economic policy</topic><topic>Fiscal Analysis</topic><topic>Fiscal Union</topic><topic>International business enterprises</topic><topic>International Monetary Fund</topic><topic>Risk Management</topic><topic>Spillover</topic><topic>Spillovers</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Candelon, Bertrand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arezki, Rabah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sy, Amadou N. R</creatorcontrib><collection>IMF E-Library</collection><collection>IMF Books & Analytical Papers</collection><collection>International Monetary Fund (IMF)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Candelon, Bertrand</au><au>Arezki, Rabah</au><au>Sy, Amadou N. R</au><format>book</format><genre>book</genre><ristype>BOOK</ristype><btitle>Are There Spillover Effects from Munis?</btitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><isbn>1463982941</isbn><isbn>146395932X</isbn><isbn>146392724X</isbn><isbn>9781463927240</isbn><isbn>9781463959326</isbn><isbn>9781463982942</isbn><eisbn>1463982941</eisbn><eisbn>9781463982942</eisbn><abstract>This paper studies the spillover effects both within the bond markets for individual U.S. states and between the latter and the market for U.S. Treasury securities. We perform the Forbes and Rigobon (2002) spillover test using daily bond yield data over the period 2005 to 2011. Results are twofold. First, we find that between most markets for individual U.S. state bonds there are negative spillovers. In other words, an increase in borrowing costs in one U.S. state results in better borrowing conditions for other states. Second, we find no substantial spillover effect between shocks originating from state securities and from federal markets, except for a few large issuers. Using causality tests in the frequency domain, we find that the Treasury bond market directly causes changes in the markets for municipal bonds in both the short and long run. There is also some evidence of causality from the municipal to the Treasury bond market, but only of a long-run nature. Our results shed some light on the policy debate on the nature of spillover effects within fiscal unions.</abstract><cop>Washington, D. C</cop><pub>International Monetary Fund</pub><oclcid>815728860</oclcid><tpages>18</tpages><edition>1</edition><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISBN: 1463982941 |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_imf_primary_100539781463927240 |
source | IMF E-Library |
subjects | Bond Market Bonds Economic assistance Economic policy Fiscal Analysis Fiscal Union International business enterprises International Monetary Fund Risk Management Spillover Spillovers |
title | Are There Spillover Effects from Munis? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T05%3A33%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_imf_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.btitle=Are%20There%20Spillover%20Effects%20from%20Munis?&rft.au=Candelon,%20Bertrand&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.isbn=1463982941&rft.isbn_list=146395932X&rft.isbn_list=146392724X&rft.isbn_list=9781463927240&rft.isbn_list=9781463959326&rft.isbn_list=9781463982942&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_imf_p%3EEBC1606462%3C/proquest_imf_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1463982941&rft.eisbn_list=9781463982942&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=EBC1606462&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |