Are There Spillover Effects from Munis?

This paper studies the spillover effects both within the bond markets for individual U.S. states and between the latter and the market for U.S. Treasury securities. We perform the Forbes and Rigobon (2002) spillover test using daily bond yield data over the period 2005 to 2011. Results are twofold....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Candelon, Bertrand, Arezki, Rabah, Sy, Amadou N. R
Format: Buch
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Candelon, Bertrand
Arezki, Rabah
Sy, Amadou N. R
description This paper studies the spillover effects both within the bond markets for individual U.S. states and between the latter and the market for U.S. Treasury securities. We perform the Forbes and Rigobon (2002) spillover test using daily bond yield data over the period 2005 to 2011. Results are twofold. First, we find that between most markets for individual U.S. state bonds there are negative spillovers. In other words, an increase in borrowing costs in one U.S. state results in better borrowing conditions for other states. Second, we find no substantial spillover effect between shocks originating from state securities and from federal markets, except for a few large issuers. Using causality tests in the frequency domain, we find that the Treasury bond market directly causes changes in the markets for municipal bonds in both the short and long run. There is also some evidence of causality from the municipal to the Treasury bond market, but only of a long-run nature. Our results shed some light on the policy debate on the nature of spillover effects within fiscal unions.
format Book
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_imf_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_imf_primary_100539781463927240</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>EBC1606462</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c10666-626dfc82543e31bd1564ac0fc73276b262a814ab5fc5770d0305c30797fd88693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNj01LxDAYhCOiuK77H3qRPRXefL1JTrKW-gErHly8ljRNsNpua9IV_PcW14OXGQYehpkTckkFcqOZEfT0fzgnC02lYlojXJBVSu8AQIXiAsSCrDfRZ7s3P-vL2Hbd8OVjVobg3ZSyEIc-ezrs23RzRc6C7ZJf_fmSvN6Vu-Ih3z7fPxabbe4oIGKODJvgNJOCe07rhkoU1kFwijOFNUNmNRW2lsFJpaABDtJxUEaFZl5o-JKsj8VjHD4PPk2Vr4fhw_n9FG1XlbcFRUCBbCavj2Tbh2qMbW_jd0UBJDdK__5nigngP1G_Sss</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>book</recordtype><pqid>EBC1606462</pqid></control><display><type>book</type><title>Are There Spillover Effects from Munis?</title><source>IMF E-Library</source><creator>Candelon, Bertrand ; Arezki, Rabah ; Sy, Amadou N. R</creator><creatorcontrib>Candelon, Bertrand ; Arezki, Rabah ; Sy, Amadou N. R</creatorcontrib><description>This paper studies the spillover effects both within the bond markets for individual U.S. states and between the latter and the market for U.S. Treasury securities. We perform the Forbes and Rigobon (2002) spillover test using daily bond yield data over the period 2005 to 2011. Results are twofold. First, we find that between most markets for individual U.S. state bonds there are negative spillovers. In other words, an increase in borrowing costs in one U.S. state results in better borrowing conditions for other states. Second, we find no substantial spillover effect between shocks originating from state securities and from federal markets, except for a few large issuers. Using causality tests in the frequency domain, we find that the Treasury bond market directly causes changes in the markets for municipal bonds in both the short and long run. There is also some evidence of causality from the municipal to the Treasury bond market, but only of a long-run nature. Our results shed some light on the policy debate on the nature of spillover effects within fiscal unions.</description><edition>1</edition><identifier>ISBN: 1463982941</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 146395932X</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 146392724X</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781463927240</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781463959326</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781463982942</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1463982941</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781463982942</identifier><identifier>OCLC: 815728860</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, D. C: International Monetary Fund</publisher><subject>Bond Market ; Bonds ; Economic assistance ; Economic policy ; Fiscal Analysis ; Fiscal Union ; International business enterprises ; International Monetary Fund ; Risk Management ; Spillover ; Spillovers</subject><creationdate>2011</creationdate><tpages>18</tpages><format>18</format><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>306,307,778,782,784,785,2599,2613,62125</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Candelon, Bertrand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arezki, Rabah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sy, Amadou N. R</creatorcontrib><title>Are There Spillover Effects from Munis?</title><description>This paper studies the spillover effects both within the bond markets for individual U.S. states and between the latter and the market for U.S. Treasury securities. We perform the Forbes and Rigobon (2002) spillover test using daily bond yield data over the period 2005 to 2011. Results are twofold. First, we find that between most markets for individual U.S. state bonds there are negative spillovers. In other words, an increase in borrowing costs in one U.S. state results in better borrowing conditions for other states. Second, we find no substantial spillover effect between shocks originating from state securities and from federal markets, except for a few large issuers. Using causality tests in the frequency domain, we find that the Treasury bond market directly causes changes in the markets for municipal bonds in both the short and long run. There is also some evidence of causality from the municipal to the Treasury bond market, but only of a long-run nature. Our results shed some light on the policy debate on the nature of spillover effects within fiscal unions.</description><subject>Bond Market</subject><subject>Bonds</subject><subject>Economic assistance</subject><subject>Economic policy</subject><subject>Fiscal Analysis</subject><subject>Fiscal Union</subject><subject>International business enterprises</subject><subject>International Monetary Fund</subject><subject>Risk Management</subject><subject>Spillover</subject><subject>Spillovers</subject><isbn>1463982941</isbn><isbn>146395932X</isbn><isbn>146392724X</isbn><isbn>9781463927240</isbn><isbn>9781463959326</isbn><isbn>9781463982942</isbn><isbn>1463982941</isbn><isbn>9781463982942</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>book</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>book</recordtype><sourceid>2BV</sourceid><recordid>eNpNj01LxDAYhCOiuK77H3qRPRXefL1JTrKW-gErHly8ljRNsNpua9IV_PcW14OXGQYehpkTckkFcqOZEfT0fzgnC02lYlojXJBVSu8AQIXiAsSCrDfRZ7s3P-vL2Hbd8OVjVobg3ZSyEIc-ezrs23RzRc6C7ZJf_fmSvN6Vu-Ih3z7fPxabbe4oIGKODJvgNJOCe07rhkoU1kFwijOFNUNmNRW2lsFJpaABDtJxUEaFZl5o-JKsj8VjHD4PPk2Vr4fhw_n9FG1XlbcFRUCBbCavj2Tbh2qMbW_jd0UBJDdK__5nigngP1G_Sss</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>Candelon, Bertrand</creator><creator>Arezki, Rabah</creator><creator>Sy, Amadou N. R</creator><general>International Monetary Fund</general><scope>2BV</scope><scope>C-M</scope><scope>KRY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>Are There Spillover Effects from Munis?</title><author>Candelon, Bertrand ; Arezki, Rabah ; Sy, Amadou N. R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c10666-626dfc82543e31bd1564ac0fc73276b262a814ab5fc5770d0305c30797fd88693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>books</rsrctype><prefilter>books</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Bond Market</topic><topic>Bonds</topic><topic>Economic assistance</topic><topic>Economic policy</topic><topic>Fiscal Analysis</topic><topic>Fiscal Union</topic><topic>International business enterprises</topic><topic>International Monetary Fund</topic><topic>Risk Management</topic><topic>Spillover</topic><topic>Spillovers</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Candelon, Bertrand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arezki, Rabah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sy, Amadou N. R</creatorcontrib><collection>IMF E-Library</collection><collection>IMF Books &amp; Analytical Papers</collection><collection>International Monetary Fund (IMF)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Candelon, Bertrand</au><au>Arezki, Rabah</au><au>Sy, Amadou N. R</au><format>book</format><genre>book</genre><ristype>BOOK</ristype><btitle>Are There Spillover Effects from Munis?</btitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><isbn>1463982941</isbn><isbn>146395932X</isbn><isbn>146392724X</isbn><isbn>9781463927240</isbn><isbn>9781463959326</isbn><isbn>9781463982942</isbn><eisbn>1463982941</eisbn><eisbn>9781463982942</eisbn><abstract>This paper studies the spillover effects both within the bond markets for individual U.S. states and between the latter and the market for U.S. Treasury securities. We perform the Forbes and Rigobon (2002) spillover test using daily bond yield data over the period 2005 to 2011. Results are twofold. First, we find that between most markets for individual U.S. state bonds there are negative spillovers. In other words, an increase in borrowing costs in one U.S. state results in better borrowing conditions for other states. Second, we find no substantial spillover effect between shocks originating from state securities and from federal markets, except for a few large issuers. Using causality tests in the frequency domain, we find that the Treasury bond market directly causes changes in the markets for municipal bonds in both the short and long run. There is also some evidence of causality from the municipal to the Treasury bond market, but only of a long-run nature. Our results shed some light on the policy debate on the nature of spillover effects within fiscal unions.</abstract><cop>Washington, D. C</cop><pub>International Monetary Fund</pub><oclcid>815728860</oclcid><tpages>18</tpages><edition>1</edition><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISBN: 1463982941
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_imf_primary_100539781463927240
source IMF E-Library
subjects Bond Market
Bonds
Economic assistance
Economic policy
Fiscal Analysis
Fiscal Union
International business enterprises
International Monetary Fund
Risk Management
Spillover
Spillovers
title Are There Spillover Effects from Munis?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T05%3A33%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_imf_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.btitle=Are%20There%20Spillover%20Effects%20from%20Munis?&rft.au=Candelon,%20Bertrand&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.isbn=1463982941&rft.isbn_list=146395932X&rft.isbn_list=146392724X&rft.isbn_list=9781463927240&rft.isbn_list=9781463959326&rft.isbn_list=9781463982942&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_imf_p%3EEBC1606462%3C/proquest_imf_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1463982941&rft.eisbn_list=9781463982942&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=EBC1606462&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true