Democratic participation in the discursive management of Usenet

Internet voting, sometimes proposed as a means of enhancing democratic participation, is partly inspired by the democratic process of newsgroup creation on Usenet. To better understand how online voting might influence democratic participation more generally, we conducted an empirical investigation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Paolillo, J.C., Heald, D.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1049
container_issue
container_start_page 1040
container_title
container_volume
creator Paolillo, J.C.
Heald, D.
description Internet voting, sometimes proposed as a means of enhancing democratic participation, is partly inspired by the democratic process of newsgroup creation on Usenet. To better understand how online voting might influence democratic participation more generally, we conducted an empirical investigation into the voting activity on newsgroups in the comp hierarchy of Usenet since 1989. Counter to expectation, participation does not appear to be organized into factions or interest groups, but rather there are distinct, individualized patterns of voting. At a coarser level of analysis, some interest-based patterns do emerge, but these appear to correspond to frequent individual voters instead of coherent groups of voters. Noting that the Usenet voting protocol is designed to function principally as a gauge of participant interest, rather than as a genuine plebiscite, we conclude that the design of the Usenet voting system may not adequately gauge the electorate's will in an electronic democracy where voter turnout and democratic participation are chief concerns.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/HICSS.2002.994060
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_994060</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>994060</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>994060</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i89t-2364a64f139d47c68f22bc7c36d38a33e1db61a7bb67f2ecc895322d1a02996e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj8tKxDAYRgMijIx9gHGVF2hN8qe5rETqZQYGXMy4HtL0j0ZsWpoq-PYWZs7mcDYffIRsOKs4Z_Z-u2sOh0owJiprJVPsihRWG6aVrbmEWqxIkfMXW5A11xpuyMMT9oOf3Bw9Hd20KI5LDInGROdPpF3M_mfK8Rdp75L7wB7TTIdA3zMmnG_JdXDfGYuL1-T48nxstuX-7XXXPO7LaOxcClDSKRk42E5qr0wQovXag-rAOADkXau4022rdBDovbE1CNFxx4S1CmFN7s6zERFP4xR7N_2dzifhH_1dR9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Democratic participation in the discursive management of Usenet</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Paolillo, J.C. ; Heald, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Paolillo, J.C. ; Heald, D.</creatorcontrib><description>Internet voting, sometimes proposed as a means of enhancing democratic participation, is partly inspired by the democratic process of newsgroup creation on Usenet. To better understand how online voting might influence democratic participation more generally, we conducted an empirical investigation into the voting activity on newsgroups in the comp hierarchy of Usenet since 1989. Counter to expectation, participation does not appear to be organized into factions or interest groups, but rather there are distinct, individualized patterns of voting. At a coarser level of analysis, some interest-based patterns do emerge, but these appear to correspond to frequent individual voters instead of coherent groups of voters. Noting that the Usenet voting protocol is designed to function principally as a gauge of participant interest, rather than as a genuine plebiscite, we conclude that the design of the Usenet voting system may not adequately gauge the electorate's will in an electronic democracy where voter turnout and democratic participation are chief concerns.</description><identifier>ISBN: 9780769514352</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0769514359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2002.994060</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Computer science ; Counting circuits ; Electronic voting ; Government ; Informatics ; Internet ; IP networks ; Nominations and elections ; Pattern analysis ; Protocols</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2002, p.1040-1049</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/994060$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2052,4036,4037,27902,54895</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/994060$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paolillo, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heald, D.</creatorcontrib><title>Democratic participation in the discursive management of Usenet</title><title>Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences</title><addtitle>HICSS</addtitle><description>Internet voting, sometimes proposed as a means of enhancing democratic participation, is partly inspired by the democratic process of newsgroup creation on Usenet. To better understand how online voting might influence democratic participation more generally, we conducted an empirical investigation into the voting activity on newsgroups in the comp hierarchy of Usenet since 1989. Counter to expectation, participation does not appear to be organized into factions or interest groups, but rather there are distinct, individualized patterns of voting. At a coarser level of analysis, some interest-based patterns do emerge, but these appear to correspond to frequent individual voters instead of coherent groups of voters. Noting that the Usenet voting protocol is designed to function principally as a gauge of participant interest, rather than as a genuine plebiscite, we conclude that the design of the Usenet voting system may not adequately gauge the electorate's will in an electronic democracy where voter turnout and democratic participation are chief concerns.</description><subject>Computer science</subject><subject>Counting circuits</subject><subject>Electronic voting</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Informatics</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>IP networks</subject><subject>Nominations and elections</subject><subject>Pattern analysis</subject><subject>Protocols</subject><isbn>9780769514352</isbn><isbn>0769514359</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotj8tKxDAYRgMijIx9gHGVF2hN8qe5rETqZQYGXMy4HtL0j0ZsWpoq-PYWZs7mcDYffIRsOKs4Z_Z-u2sOh0owJiprJVPsihRWG6aVrbmEWqxIkfMXW5A11xpuyMMT9oOf3Bw9Hd20KI5LDInGROdPpF3M_mfK8Rdp75L7wB7TTIdA3zMmnG_JdXDfGYuL1-T48nxstuX-7XXXPO7LaOxcClDSKRk42E5qr0wQovXag-rAOADkXau4022rdBDovbE1CNFxx4S1CmFN7s6zERFP4xR7N_2dzifhH_1dR9Q</recordid><startdate>2002</startdate><enddate>2002</enddate><creator>Paolillo, J.C.</creator><creator>Heald, D.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2002</creationdate><title>Democratic participation in the discursive management of Usenet</title><author>Paolillo, J.C. ; Heald, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i89t-2364a64f139d47c68f22bc7c36d38a33e1db61a7bb67f2ecc895322d1a02996e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Computer science</topic><topic>Counting circuits</topic><topic>Electronic voting</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Informatics</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>IP networks</topic><topic>Nominations and elections</topic><topic>Pattern analysis</topic><topic>Protocols</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paolillo, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heald, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paolillo, J.C.</au><au>Heald, D.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Democratic participation in the discursive management of Usenet</atitle><btitle>Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences</btitle><stitle>HICSS</stitle><date>2002</date><risdate>2002</risdate><spage>1040</spage><epage>1049</epage><pages>1040-1049</pages><isbn>9780769514352</isbn><isbn>0769514359</isbn><abstract>Internet voting, sometimes proposed as a means of enhancing democratic participation, is partly inspired by the democratic process of newsgroup creation on Usenet. To better understand how online voting might influence democratic participation more generally, we conducted an empirical investigation into the voting activity on newsgroups in the comp hierarchy of Usenet since 1989. Counter to expectation, participation does not appear to be organized into factions or interest groups, but rather there are distinct, individualized patterns of voting. At a coarser level of analysis, some interest-based patterns do emerge, but these appear to correspond to frequent individual voters instead of coherent groups of voters. Noting that the Usenet voting protocol is designed to function principally as a gauge of participant interest, rather than as a genuine plebiscite, we conclude that the design of the Usenet voting system may not adequately gauge the electorate's will in an electronic democracy where voter turnout and democratic participation are chief concerns.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/HICSS.2002.994060</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISBN: 9780769514352
ispartof Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2002, p.1040-1049
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_994060
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Computer science
Counting circuits
Electronic voting
Government
Informatics
Internet
IP networks
Nominations and elections
Pattern analysis
Protocols
title Democratic participation in the discursive management of Usenet
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T02%3A22%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Democratic%20participation%20in%20the%20discursive%20management%20of%20Usenet&rft.btitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%2035th%20Annual%20Hawaii%20International%20Conference%20on%20System%20Sciences&rft.au=Paolillo,%20J.C.&rft.date=2002&rft.spage=1040&rft.epage=1049&rft.pages=1040-1049&rft.isbn=9780769514352&rft.isbn_list=0769514359&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/HICSS.2002.994060&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E994060%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=994060&rfr_iscdi=true