Democratic participation in the discursive management of Usenet
Internet voting, sometimes proposed as a means of enhancing democratic participation, is partly inspired by the democratic process of newsgroup creation on Usenet. To better understand how online voting might influence democratic participation more generally, we conducted an empirical investigation...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1049 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1040 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Paolillo, J.C. Heald, D. |
description | Internet voting, sometimes proposed as a means of enhancing democratic participation, is partly inspired by the democratic process of newsgroup creation on Usenet. To better understand how online voting might influence democratic participation more generally, we conducted an empirical investigation into the voting activity on newsgroups in the comp hierarchy of Usenet since 1989. Counter to expectation, participation does not appear to be organized into factions or interest groups, but rather there are distinct, individualized patterns of voting. At a coarser level of analysis, some interest-based patterns do emerge, but these appear to correspond to frequent individual voters instead of coherent groups of voters. Noting that the Usenet voting protocol is designed to function principally as a gauge of participant interest, rather than as a genuine plebiscite, we conclude that the design of the Usenet voting system may not adequately gauge the electorate's will in an electronic democracy where voter turnout and democratic participation are chief concerns. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/HICSS.2002.994060 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_994060</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>994060</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>994060</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i89t-2364a64f139d47c68f22bc7c36d38a33e1db61a7bb67f2ecc895322d1a02996e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj8tKxDAYRgMijIx9gHGVF2hN8qe5rETqZQYGXMy4HtL0j0ZsWpoq-PYWZs7mcDYffIRsOKs4Z_Z-u2sOh0owJiprJVPsihRWG6aVrbmEWqxIkfMXW5A11xpuyMMT9oOf3Bw9Hd20KI5LDInGROdPpF3M_mfK8Rdp75L7wB7TTIdA3zMmnG_JdXDfGYuL1-T48nxstuX-7XXXPO7LaOxcClDSKRk42E5qr0wQovXag-rAOADkXau4022rdBDovbE1CNFxx4S1CmFN7s6zERFP4xR7N_2dzifhH_1dR9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Democratic participation in the discursive management of Usenet</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Paolillo, J.C. ; Heald, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Paolillo, J.C. ; Heald, D.</creatorcontrib><description>Internet voting, sometimes proposed as a means of enhancing democratic participation, is partly inspired by the democratic process of newsgroup creation on Usenet. To better understand how online voting might influence democratic participation more generally, we conducted an empirical investigation into the voting activity on newsgroups in the comp hierarchy of Usenet since 1989. Counter to expectation, participation does not appear to be organized into factions or interest groups, but rather there are distinct, individualized patterns of voting. At a coarser level of analysis, some interest-based patterns do emerge, but these appear to correspond to frequent individual voters instead of coherent groups of voters. Noting that the Usenet voting protocol is designed to function principally as a gauge of participant interest, rather than as a genuine plebiscite, we conclude that the design of the Usenet voting system may not adequately gauge the electorate's will in an electronic democracy where voter turnout and democratic participation are chief concerns.</description><identifier>ISBN: 9780769514352</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0769514359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2002.994060</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Computer science ; Counting circuits ; Electronic voting ; Government ; Informatics ; Internet ; IP networks ; Nominations and elections ; Pattern analysis ; Protocols</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2002, p.1040-1049</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/994060$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2052,4036,4037,27902,54895</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/994060$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paolillo, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heald, D.</creatorcontrib><title>Democratic participation in the discursive management of Usenet</title><title>Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences</title><addtitle>HICSS</addtitle><description>Internet voting, sometimes proposed as a means of enhancing democratic participation, is partly inspired by the democratic process of newsgroup creation on Usenet. To better understand how online voting might influence democratic participation more generally, we conducted an empirical investigation into the voting activity on newsgroups in the comp hierarchy of Usenet since 1989. Counter to expectation, participation does not appear to be organized into factions or interest groups, but rather there are distinct, individualized patterns of voting. At a coarser level of analysis, some interest-based patterns do emerge, but these appear to correspond to frequent individual voters instead of coherent groups of voters. Noting that the Usenet voting protocol is designed to function principally as a gauge of participant interest, rather than as a genuine plebiscite, we conclude that the design of the Usenet voting system may not adequately gauge the electorate's will in an electronic democracy where voter turnout and democratic participation are chief concerns.</description><subject>Computer science</subject><subject>Counting circuits</subject><subject>Electronic voting</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Informatics</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>IP networks</subject><subject>Nominations and elections</subject><subject>Pattern analysis</subject><subject>Protocols</subject><isbn>9780769514352</isbn><isbn>0769514359</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotj8tKxDAYRgMijIx9gHGVF2hN8qe5rETqZQYGXMy4HtL0j0ZsWpoq-PYWZs7mcDYffIRsOKs4Z_Z-u2sOh0owJiprJVPsihRWG6aVrbmEWqxIkfMXW5A11xpuyMMT9oOf3Bw9Hd20KI5LDInGROdPpF3M_mfK8Rdp75L7wB7TTIdA3zMmnG_JdXDfGYuL1-T48nxstuX-7XXXPO7LaOxcClDSKRk42E5qr0wQovXag-rAOADkXau4022rdBDovbE1CNFxx4S1CmFN7s6zERFP4xR7N_2dzifhH_1dR9Q</recordid><startdate>2002</startdate><enddate>2002</enddate><creator>Paolillo, J.C.</creator><creator>Heald, D.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2002</creationdate><title>Democratic participation in the discursive management of Usenet</title><author>Paolillo, J.C. ; Heald, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i89t-2364a64f139d47c68f22bc7c36d38a33e1db61a7bb67f2ecc895322d1a02996e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Computer science</topic><topic>Counting circuits</topic><topic>Electronic voting</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Informatics</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>IP networks</topic><topic>Nominations and elections</topic><topic>Pattern analysis</topic><topic>Protocols</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paolillo, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heald, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paolillo, J.C.</au><au>Heald, D.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Democratic participation in the discursive management of Usenet</atitle><btitle>Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences</btitle><stitle>HICSS</stitle><date>2002</date><risdate>2002</risdate><spage>1040</spage><epage>1049</epage><pages>1040-1049</pages><isbn>9780769514352</isbn><isbn>0769514359</isbn><abstract>Internet voting, sometimes proposed as a means of enhancing democratic participation, is partly inspired by the democratic process of newsgroup creation on Usenet. To better understand how online voting might influence democratic participation more generally, we conducted an empirical investigation into the voting activity on newsgroups in the comp hierarchy of Usenet since 1989. Counter to expectation, participation does not appear to be organized into factions or interest groups, but rather there are distinct, individualized patterns of voting. At a coarser level of analysis, some interest-based patterns do emerge, but these appear to correspond to frequent individual voters instead of coherent groups of voters. Noting that the Usenet voting protocol is designed to function principally as a gauge of participant interest, rather than as a genuine plebiscite, we conclude that the design of the Usenet voting system may not adequately gauge the electorate's will in an electronic democracy where voter turnout and democratic participation are chief concerns.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/HICSS.2002.994060</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISBN: 9780769514352 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2002, p.1040-1049 |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_994060 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Computer science Counting circuits Electronic voting Government Informatics Internet IP networks Nominations and elections Pattern analysis Protocols |
title | Democratic participation in the discursive management of Usenet |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T02%3A22%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Democratic%20participation%20in%20the%20discursive%20management%20of%20Usenet&rft.btitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%2035th%20Annual%20Hawaii%20International%20Conference%20on%20System%20Sciences&rft.au=Paolillo,%20J.C.&rft.date=2002&rft.spage=1040&rft.epage=1049&rft.pages=1040-1049&rft.isbn=9780769514352&rft.isbn_list=0769514359&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/HICSS.2002.994060&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E994060%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=994060&rfr_iscdi=true |