Ensuring Physically Realizable Storage Operation in the Unit Commitment Problem
A linear and convex model has been recently presented for the operation of battery energy storage units that does not explicitly prevent their simultaneous charge and discharge in the problem formulation. This letter claims that the model in such a literature contribution is capable of ensuring the...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on power systems 2022-11, Vol.37 (6), p.4966-4969 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 4969 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 4966 |
| container_title | IEEE transactions on power systems |
| container_volume | 37 |
| creator | Arroyo, Jose M. |
| description | A linear and convex model has been recently presented for the operation of battery energy storage units that does not explicitly prevent their simultaneous charge and discharge in the problem formulation. This letter claims that the model in such a literature contribution is capable of ensuring the physical realizability of the battery dispatch only when nondiscrete decisions are considered in the optimization problem. This claim is demonstrated through the solution of two instances of a simple unit-commitment-based example comprising two generating units, one battery energy storage unit, and two time periods. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TPWRS.2022.3193035 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_ieee_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_9837443</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9837443</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2728570777</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-4b2e81a111ab3f58da6a235b6676d1c94104e59ba9214038f3d7daffd11cc41c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA7CxxDrFY8exvURVeUiVWvUhlpaTOK2rPIrtLsrXk9KK1Szmnjujg9AjkBEAUS-r-ddiOaKE0hEDxQjjV2gAnMuEZEJdowGRkidScXKL7kLYEUKyfjFAs0kbDt61GzzfHoMrTF0f8cKa2v2YvLZ4GTtvNhbP9tab6LoWuxbHrcXr1kU87prGxca2Ec991-ebe3RTmTrYh8scovXbZDX-SKaz98_x6zQpaKZikubUSjAAYHJWcVmazFDG8_6prIRCpUBSy1VuFIWUMFmxUpSmqkqAokihYEP0fO7d--77YEPUu-7g2_6kpoJKLogQok_Rc6rwXQjeVnrvXWP8UQPRJ3H6T5w-idMXcT30dIactfYfUJKJNGXsFxXtalc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2728570777</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ensuring Physically Realizable Storage Operation in the Unit Commitment Problem</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Arroyo, Jose M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Arroyo, Jose M.</creatorcontrib><description>A linear and convex model has been recently presented for the operation of battery energy storage units that does not explicitly prevent their simultaneous charge and discharge in the problem formulation. This letter claims that the model in such a literature contribution is capable of ensuring the physical realizability of the battery dispatch only when nondiscrete decisions are considered in the optimization problem. This claim is demonstrated through the solution of two instances of a simple unit-commitment-based example comprising two generating units, one battery energy storage unit, and two time periods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-8950</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0679</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2022.3193035</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITPSEG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Batteries ; Battery energy storage units ; Costs ; electrical energy storage ; Energy storage ; Mathematical models ; Optimization ; physically realizable dispatch ; Power generation dispatch ; simultaneous charge and discharge ; Storage units ; Unit commitment</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on power systems, 2022-11, Vol.37 (6), p.4966-4969</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-4b2e81a111ab3f58da6a235b6676d1c94104e59ba9214038f3d7daffd11cc41c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-4b2e81a111ab3f58da6a235b6676d1c94104e59ba9214038f3d7daffd11cc41c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9538-6748</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9837443$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,796,27924,27925,54758</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arroyo, Jose M.</creatorcontrib><title>Ensuring Physically Realizable Storage Operation in the Unit Commitment Problem</title><title>IEEE transactions on power systems</title><addtitle>TPWRS</addtitle><description>A linear and convex model has been recently presented for the operation of battery energy storage units that does not explicitly prevent their simultaneous charge and discharge in the problem formulation. This letter claims that the model in such a literature contribution is capable of ensuring the physical realizability of the battery dispatch only when nondiscrete decisions are considered in the optimization problem. This claim is demonstrated through the solution of two instances of a simple unit-commitment-based example comprising two generating units, one battery energy storage unit, and two time periods.</description><subject>Batteries</subject><subject>Battery energy storage units</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>electrical energy storage</subject><subject>Energy storage</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>physically realizable dispatch</subject><subject>Power generation dispatch</subject><subject>simultaneous charge and discharge</subject><subject>Storage units</subject><subject>Unit commitment</subject><issn>0885-8950</issn><issn>1558-0679</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ESBDL</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA7CxxDrFY8exvURVeUiVWvUhlpaTOK2rPIrtLsrXk9KK1Szmnjujg9AjkBEAUS-r-ddiOaKE0hEDxQjjV2gAnMuEZEJdowGRkidScXKL7kLYEUKyfjFAs0kbDt61GzzfHoMrTF0f8cKa2v2YvLZ4GTtvNhbP9tab6LoWuxbHrcXr1kU87prGxca2Ec991-ebe3RTmTrYh8scovXbZDX-SKaz98_x6zQpaKZikubUSjAAYHJWcVmazFDG8_6prIRCpUBSy1VuFIWUMFmxUpSmqkqAokihYEP0fO7d--77YEPUu-7g2_6kpoJKLogQok_Rc6rwXQjeVnrvXWP8UQPRJ3H6T5w-idMXcT30dIactfYfUJKJNGXsFxXtalc</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Arroyo, Jose M.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>ESBDL</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9538-6748</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Ensuring Physically Realizable Storage Operation in the Unit Commitment Problem</title><author>Arroyo, Jose M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-4b2e81a111ab3f58da6a235b6676d1c94104e59ba9214038f3d7daffd11cc41c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Batteries</topic><topic>Battery energy storage units</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>electrical energy storage</topic><topic>Energy storage</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>physically realizable dispatch</topic><topic>Power generation dispatch</topic><topic>simultaneous charge and discharge</topic><topic>Storage units</topic><topic>Unit commitment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arroyo, Jose M.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE Open Access Journals</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arroyo, Jose M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ensuring Physically Realizable Storage Operation in the Unit Commitment Problem</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power systems</jtitle><stitle>TPWRS</stitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>4966</spage><epage>4969</epage><pages>4966-4969</pages><issn>0885-8950</issn><eissn>1558-0679</eissn><coden>ITPSEG</coden><abstract>A linear and convex model has been recently presented for the operation of battery energy storage units that does not explicitly prevent their simultaneous charge and discharge in the problem formulation. This letter claims that the model in such a literature contribution is capable of ensuring the physical realizability of the battery dispatch only when nondiscrete decisions are considered in the optimization problem. This claim is demonstrated through the solution of two instances of a simple unit-commitment-based example comprising two generating units, one battery energy storage unit, and two time periods.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TPWRS.2022.3193035</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9538-6748</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0885-8950 |
| ispartof | IEEE transactions on power systems, 2022-11, Vol.37 (6), p.4966-4969 |
| issn | 0885-8950 1558-0679 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_9837443 |
| source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
| subjects | Batteries Battery energy storage units Costs electrical energy storage Energy storage Mathematical models Optimization physically realizable dispatch Power generation dispatch simultaneous charge and discharge Storage units Unit commitment |
| title | Ensuring Physically Realizable Storage Operation in the Unit Commitment Problem |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T16%3A45%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_ieee_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ensuring%20Physically%20Realizable%20Storage%20Operation%20in%20the%20Unit%20Commitment%20Problem&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20power%20systems&rft.au=Arroyo,%20Jose%20M.&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=4966&rft.epage=4969&rft.pages=4966-4969&rft.issn=0885-8950&rft.eissn=1558-0679&rft.coden=ITPSEG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TPWRS.2022.3193035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_ieee_%3E2728570777%3C/proquest_ieee_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2728570777&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=9837443&rfr_iscdi=true |