Coil efficiency for inductive peripheral nerve stimulation
Magnetic stimulation of peripheral nerves is evoked by electric field gradients caused by high-intensity, pulsed magnetic fields created from a coil. Currents required for stimulation are very high, therefore devices are large, expensive, and often too complex for many applications like rehabilitati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering 2022, Vol.30, p.1-1 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Braun, Philipp Rapp, Jonathan Hemmert, Werner Gleich, Bernhard |
description | Magnetic stimulation of peripheral nerves is evoked by electric field gradients caused by high-intensity, pulsed magnetic fields created from a coil. Currents required for stimulation are very high, therefore devices are large, expensive, and often too complex for many applications like rehabilitation therapy. For repetitive stimulation, coil heating due to power loss poses a further limitation. The geometry of the magnetic coil determines field depth and focality, making it the most important factor that determines the current required for neuronal excitation. However, the comparison between different coil geometries is difficult and depends on the specific application. Especially the distance between nerve and coil plays a crucial role. In this investigation, the electric field distribution of 14 different coil geometries was calculated for a typical peripheral nerve stimulation with a 27mm distance between axon and coil. Coil parameters like field strength and focality were determined with electromagnetic field simulations. In a second analysis, the activating function along the axon was calculated, which quantifies the efficiency of neuronal stimulation. Moreover, coil designs were evaluated concerning power efficacy based on ohmic losses. Our results indicate that power efficacy of magnetic neurostimulation can be improved significantly by up to 40% with optimized coil designs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TNSRE.2022.3192761 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_ieee_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_9834319</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9834319</ieee_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_58e2f49de09a4004b4c5cca33c81f9f1</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2692072757</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-baa6a7f4c43f68fd13b52b61ef15b7871fd9fc57a10fe6341ee4e613068898323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUuLFDEUhYMozkP_gG4K3LipNjfvuJNmdAYGBR3XIZW60TTVlTapEubfm54eZuHqPvjO4V4OIW-AbgCo_XD39cf3qw2jjG04WKYVPCPnIKXpKQP6_Nhz0QvO6Bm5qHVHKWgl9UtyxqWRWjN5Tj5uc5o6jDGFhHO472IuXZrHNSzpL3YHLOnwG4ufuhlLW9Ql7dfJLynPr8iL6KeKrx_rJfn5-epue93ffvtys_102wfBzdIP3iuvo2hTVCaOwAfJBgUYQQ7aaIijjUFqDzSi4gIQBSrgVBljDWf8ktycfMfsd-5Q0t6Xe5d9cg-LXH45X5YUJnTSIIvCjkitF5SKQQQZguc8GIg2QvN6f_I6lPxnxbq4faoBp8nPmNfqmLKMaqalbui7_9BdXsvcPnVMN29QWtlGsRMVSq61YHw6EKg7puQeUnLHlNxjSk309iRKiPgkaM-KRvB_NSKLCg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2700416769</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coil efficiency for inductive peripheral nerve stimulation</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Braun, Philipp ; Rapp, Jonathan ; Hemmert, Werner ; Gleich, Bernhard</creator><creatorcontrib>Braun, Philipp ; Rapp, Jonathan ; Hemmert, Werner ; Gleich, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><description>Magnetic stimulation of peripheral nerves is evoked by electric field gradients caused by high-intensity, pulsed magnetic fields created from a coil. Currents required for stimulation are very high, therefore devices are large, expensive, and often too complex for many applications like rehabilitation therapy. For repetitive stimulation, coil heating due to power loss poses a further limitation. The geometry of the magnetic coil determines field depth and focality, making it the most important factor that determines the current required for neuronal excitation. However, the comparison between different coil geometries is difficult and depends on the specific application. Especially the distance between nerve and coil plays a crucial role. In this investigation, the electric field distribution of 14 different coil geometries was calculated for a typical peripheral nerve stimulation with a 27mm distance between axon and coil. Coil parameters like field strength and focality were determined with electromagnetic field simulations. In a second analysis, the activating function along the axon was calculated, which quantifies the efficiency of neuronal stimulation. Moreover, coil designs were evaluated concerning power efficacy based on ohmic losses. Our results indicate that power efficacy of magnetic neurostimulation can be improved significantly by up to 40% with optimized coil designs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1534-4320</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2022.3192761</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35857725</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITNSB3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Axons ; Coil Design ; Copper ; Electric fields ; Electromagnetic fields ; Field Simulation ; Field strength ; Geometry ; Magnetic coils ; Magnetic fields ; Magnetic stimulation ; Mathematical analysis ; Peripheral nerves ; Peripheral Stimulation ; Rehabilitation ; Stimulation ; Windings ; Wires</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering, 2022, Vol.30, p.1-1</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-baa6a7f4c43f68fd13b52b61ef15b7871fd9fc57a10fe6341ee4e613068898323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-baa6a7f4c43f68fd13b52b61ef15b7871fd9fc57a10fe6341ee4e613068898323</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7187-6972 ; 0000-0002-0574-7678 ; 0000-0002-2905-6118 ; 0000-0003-4486-7776</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2102,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Braun, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rapp, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemmert, Werner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gleich, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><title>Coil efficiency for inductive peripheral nerve stimulation</title><title>IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering</title><addtitle>TNSRE</addtitle><description>Magnetic stimulation of peripheral nerves is evoked by electric field gradients caused by high-intensity, pulsed magnetic fields created from a coil. Currents required for stimulation are very high, therefore devices are large, expensive, and often too complex for many applications like rehabilitation therapy. For repetitive stimulation, coil heating due to power loss poses a further limitation. The geometry of the magnetic coil determines field depth and focality, making it the most important factor that determines the current required for neuronal excitation. However, the comparison between different coil geometries is difficult and depends on the specific application. Especially the distance between nerve and coil plays a crucial role. In this investigation, the electric field distribution of 14 different coil geometries was calculated for a typical peripheral nerve stimulation with a 27mm distance between axon and coil. Coil parameters like field strength and focality were determined with electromagnetic field simulations. In a second analysis, the activating function along the axon was calculated, which quantifies the efficiency of neuronal stimulation. Moreover, coil designs were evaluated concerning power efficacy based on ohmic losses. Our results indicate that power efficacy of magnetic neurostimulation can be improved significantly by up to 40% with optimized coil designs.</description><subject>Axons</subject><subject>Coil Design</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Electric fields</subject><subject>Electromagnetic fields</subject><subject>Field Simulation</subject><subject>Field strength</subject><subject>Geometry</subject><subject>Magnetic coils</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Magnetic stimulation</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Peripheral nerves</subject><subject>Peripheral Stimulation</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Stimulation</subject><subject>Windings</subject><subject>Wires</subject><issn>1534-4320</issn><issn>1558-0210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ESBDL</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUuLFDEUhYMozkP_gG4K3LipNjfvuJNmdAYGBR3XIZW60TTVlTapEubfm54eZuHqPvjO4V4OIW-AbgCo_XD39cf3qw2jjG04WKYVPCPnIKXpKQP6_Nhz0QvO6Bm5qHVHKWgl9UtyxqWRWjN5Tj5uc5o6jDGFhHO472IuXZrHNSzpL3YHLOnwG4ufuhlLW9Ql7dfJLynPr8iL6KeKrx_rJfn5-epue93ffvtys_102wfBzdIP3iuvo2hTVCaOwAfJBgUYQQ7aaIijjUFqDzSi4gIQBSrgVBljDWf8ktycfMfsd-5Q0t6Xe5d9cg-LXH45X5YUJnTSIIvCjkitF5SKQQQZguc8GIg2QvN6f_I6lPxnxbq4faoBp8nPmNfqmLKMaqalbui7_9BdXsvcPnVMN29QWtlGsRMVSq61YHw6EKg7puQeUnLHlNxjSk309iRKiPgkaM-KRvB_NSKLCg</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Braun, Philipp</creator><creator>Rapp, Jonathan</creator><creator>Hemmert, Werner</creator><creator>Gleich, Bernhard</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>ESBDL</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7187-6972</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0574-7678</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2905-6118</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4486-7776</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Coil efficiency for inductive peripheral nerve stimulation</title><author>Braun, Philipp ; Rapp, Jonathan ; Hemmert, Werner ; Gleich, Bernhard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-baa6a7f4c43f68fd13b52b61ef15b7871fd9fc57a10fe6341ee4e613068898323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Axons</topic><topic>Coil Design</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Electric fields</topic><topic>Electromagnetic fields</topic><topic>Field Simulation</topic><topic>Field strength</topic><topic>Geometry</topic><topic>Magnetic coils</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Magnetic stimulation</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Peripheral nerves</topic><topic>Peripheral Stimulation</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Stimulation</topic><topic>Windings</topic><topic>Wires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Braun, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rapp, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemmert, Werner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gleich, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE Open Access Journals</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Braun, Philipp</au><au>Rapp, Jonathan</au><au>Hemmert, Werner</au><au>Gleich, Bernhard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coil efficiency for inductive peripheral nerve stimulation</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering</jtitle><stitle>TNSRE</stitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>30</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>1</epage><pages>1-1</pages><issn>1534-4320</issn><eissn>1558-0210</eissn><coden>ITNSB3</coden><abstract>Magnetic stimulation of peripheral nerves is evoked by electric field gradients caused by high-intensity, pulsed magnetic fields created from a coil. Currents required for stimulation are very high, therefore devices are large, expensive, and often too complex for many applications like rehabilitation therapy. For repetitive stimulation, coil heating due to power loss poses a further limitation. The geometry of the magnetic coil determines field depth and focality, making it the most important factor that determines the current required for neuronal excitation. However, the comparison between different coil geometries is difficult and depends on the specific application. Especially the distance between nerve and coil plays a crucial role. In this investigation, the electric field distribution of 14 different coil geometries was calculated for a typical peripheral nerve stimulation with a 27mm distance between axon and coil. Coil parameters like field strength and focality were determined with electromagnetic field simulations. In a second analysis, the activating function along the axon was calculated, which quantifies the efficiency of neuronal stimulation. Moreover, coil designs were evaluated concerning power efficacy based on ohmic losses. Our results indicate that power efficacy of magnetic neurostimulation can be improved significantly by up to 40% with optimized coil designs.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><pmid>35857725</pmid><doi>10.1109/TNSRE.2022.3192761</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7187-6972</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0574-7678</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2905-6118</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4486-7776</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1534-4320 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering, 2022, Vol.30, p.1-1 |
issn | 1534-4320 1558-0210 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_9834319 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Axons Coil Design Copper Electric fields Electromagnetic fields Field Simulation Field strength Geometry Magnetic coils Magnetic fields Magnetic stimulation Mathematical analysis Peripheral nerves Peripheral Stimulation Rehabilitation Stimulation Windings Wires |
title | Coil efficiency for inductive peripheral nerve stimulation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T05%3A35%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_ieee_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coil%20efficiency%20for%20inductive%20peripheral%20nerve%20stimulation&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20neural%20systems%20and%20rehabilitation%20engineering&rft.au=Braun,%20Philipp&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=30&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=1&rft.pages=1-1&rft.issn=1534-4320&rft.eissn=1558-0210&rft.coden=ITNSB3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TNSRE.2022.3192761&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_ieee_%3E2692072757%3C/proquest_ieee_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2700416769&rft_id=info:pmid/35857725&rft_ieee_id=9834319&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_58e2f49de09a4004b4c5cca33c81f9f1&rfr_iscdi=true |