Interference Moral Hazard in Large Multihop Networks

Cooperation between network nodes is critical for supporting services in ad hoc networks. Cooperation, however, is an idealized assumption that may not always be present. This assumption can fail because of moral hazard, a scenario in part caused by misaligned incentives between the requesting node...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE/ACM transactions on networking 2023-02, Vol.31 (1), p.15-29
Hauptverfasser: Ruzomberkaand, Eric, Love, David J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 29
container_issue 1
container_start_page 15
container_title IEEE/ACM transactions on networking
container_volume 31
creator Ruzomberkaand, Eric
Love, David J.
description Cooperation between network nodes is critical for supporting services in ad hoc networks. Cooperation, however, is an idealized assumption that may not always be present. This assumption can fail because of moral hazard, a scenario in part caused by misaligned incentives between the requesting node and supporting node. In this paper, we characterize a moral hazard that perversely incentivizes nodes to increase their routing payments by transmitting interference into the multi-hop network. We refer to this as the interference moral hazard (IMH) problem which is inherent to strategyproof mechanisms with low overpayments. We investigate IMH as a non-cooperative game played by network nodes on a random graph. For large networks, we show that IMH can be solved in the network design space. We provide sufficient conditions on the network distribution that guarantee an equilibrium path with interference-free play. This is achieved by 1) lower-bounding the number of nodes and 2) bounding the network density slightly above the 2-connectedness threshold and below a proposed upper-bound. Simulations suggest that density plays a fundamental role in IMH.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TNET.2022.3186234
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_9813517</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9813517</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2776795856</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-d648b00eb6a4601bafeb3cc13147eff96bb59fab53ffcb6071730fcb4ff50b003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_QLwseN46STaz2aOU2hZqvdRzSLYT3Vp3a7JF9Neb0uJpHsN7M4-PsVsOI86helgtJ6uRACFGkmsUsjhjA66UzoVCPE8aUOaIlbhkVzFuALgEgQNWzNuegqdAbU3ZcxfsNpvZXxvWWdNmCxve0na_7Zv3bpctqf_uwke8ZhfebiPdnOaQvT5NVuNZvniZzsePi7wWWvf5GgvtAMihLRC4s56crGsueVGS9xU6pypvnZLe1w6h5KWEpArvFaSgHLL7491d6L72FHuz6fahTS-NKEssK6UVJhc_uurQxRjIm11oPm34MRzMAY45wDEHOOYEJ2XujpmGiP79leZSpRJ_dvtf_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2776795856</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interference Moral Hazard in Large Multihop Networks</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Ruzomberkaand, Eric ; Love, David J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ruzomberkaand, Eric ; Love, David J.</creatorcontrib><description>Cooperation between network nodes is critical for supporting services in ad hoc networks. Cooperation, however, is an idealized assumption that may not always be present. This assumption can fail because of moral hazard, a scenario in part caused by misaligned incentives between the requesting node and supporting node. In this paper, we characterize a moral hazard that perversely incentivizes nodes to increase their routing payments by transmitting interference into the multi-hop network. We refer to this as the interference moral hazard (IMH) problem which is inherent to strategyproof mechanisms with low overpayments. We investigate IMH as a non-cooperative game played by network nodes on a random graph. For large networks, we show that IMH can be solved in the network design space. We provide sufficient conditions on the network distribution that guarantee an equilibrium path with interference-free play. This is achieved by 1) lower-bounding the number of nodes and 2) bounding the network density slightly above the 2-connectedness threshold and below a proposed upper-bound. Simulations suggest that density plays a fundamental role in IMH.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1063-6692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-2566</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TNET.2022.3186234</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IEANEP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>ad hoc ; Ad hoc networks ; Cooperation ; Costs ; Density ; Ethics ; Games ; Hazards ; Incentives ; Interference ; Jamming ; mechanism ; Moral hazard ; Network design ; network security ; Nodes ; noncooperative networks ; Routing ; Upper bounds</subject><ispartof>IEEE/ACM transactions on networking, 2023-02, Vol.31 (1), p.15-29</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-d648b00eb6a4601bafeb3cc13147eff96bb59fab53ffcb6071730fcb4ff50b003</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3817-6584 ; 0000-0001-5922-4787</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9813517$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,796,27924,27925,54758</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9813517$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ruzomberkaand, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Love, David J.</creatorcontrib><title>Interference Moral Hazard in Large Multihop Networks</title><title>IEEE/ACM transactions on networking</title><addtitle>TNET</addtitle><description>Cooperation between network nodes is critical for supporting services in ad hoc networks. Cooperation, however, is an idealized assumption that may not always be present. This assumption can fail because of moral hazard, a scenario in part caused by misaligned incentives between the requesting node and supporting node. In this paper, we characterize a moral hazard that perversely incentivizes nodes to increase their routing payments by transmitting interference into the multi-hop network. We refer to this as the interference moral hazard (IMH) problem which is inherent to strategyproof mechanisms with low overpayments. We investigate IMH as a non-cooperative game played by network nodes on a random graph. For large networks, we show that IMH can be solved in the network design space. We provide sufficient conditions on the network distribution that guarantee an equilibrium path with interference-free play. This is achieved by 1) lower-bounding the number of nodes and 2) bounding the network density slightly above the 2-connectedness threshold and below a proposed upper-bound. Simulations suggest that density plays a fundamental role in IMH.</description><subject>ad hoc</subject><subject>Ad hoc networks</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Games</subject><subject>Hazards</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Interference</subject><subject>Jamming</subject><subject>mechanism</subject><subject>Moral hazard</subject><subject>Network design</subject><subject>network security</subject><subject>Nodes</subject><subject>noncooperative networks</subject><subject>Routing</subject><subject>Upper bounds</subject><issn>1063-6692</issn><issn>1558-2566</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_QLwseN46STaz2aOU2hZqvdRzSLYT3Vp3a7JF9Neb0uJpHsN7M4-PsVsOI86helgtJ6uRACFGkmsUsjhjA66UzoVCPE8aUOaIlbhkVzFuALgEgQNWzNuegqdAbU3ZcxfsNpvZXxvWWdNmCxve0na_7Zv3bpctqf_uwke8ZhfebiPdnOaQvT5NVuNZvniZzsePi7wWWvf5GgvtAMihLRC4s56crGsueVGS9xU6pypvnZLe1w6h5KWEpArvFaSgHLL7491d6L72FHuz6fahTS-NKEssK6UVJhc_uurQxRjIm11oPm34MRzMAY45wDEHOOYEJ2XujpmGiP79leZSpRJ_dvtf_A</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Ruzomberkaand, Eric</creator><creator>Love, David J.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3817-6584</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5922-4787</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>Interference Moral Hazard in Large Multihop Networks</title><author>Ruzomberkaand, Eric ; Love, David J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-d648b00eb6a4601bafeb3cc13147eff96bb59fab53ffcb6071730fcb4ff50b003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>ad hoc</topic><topic>Ad hoc networks</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Games</topic><topic>Hazards</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Interference</topic><topic>Jamming</topic><topic>mechanism</topic><topic>Moral hazard</topic><topic>Network design</topic><topic>network security</topic><topic>Nodes</topic><topic>noncooperative networks</topic><topic>Routing</topic><topic>Upper bounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ruzomberkaand, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Love, David J.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>IEEE/ACM transactions on networking</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ruzomberkaand, Eric</au><au>Love, David J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interference Moral Hazard in Large Multihop Networks</atitle><jtitle>IEEE/ACM transactions on networking</jtitle><stitle>TNET</stitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>15-29</pages><issn>1063-6692</issn><eissn>1558-2566</eissn><coden>IEANEP</coden><abstract>Cooperation between network nodes is critical for supporting services in ad hoc networks. Cooperation, however, is an idealized assumption that may not always be present. This assumption can fail because of moral hazard, a scenario in part caused by misaligned incentives between the requesting node and supporting node. In this paper, we characterize a moral hazard that perversely incentivizes nodes to increase their routing payments by transmitting interference into the multi-hop network. We refer to this as the interference moral hazard (IMH) problem which is inherent to strategyproof mechanisms with low overpayments. We investigate IMH as a non-cooperative game played by network nodes on a random graph. For large networks, we show that IMH can be solved in the network design space. We provide sufficient conditions on the network distribution that guarantee an equilibrium path with interference-free play. This is achieved by 1) lower-bounding the number of nodes and 2) bounding the network density slightly above the 2-connectedness threshold and below a proposed upper-bound. Simulations suggest that density plays a fundamental role in IMH.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TNET.2022.3186234</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3817-6584</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5922-4787</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1063-6692
ispartof IEEE/ACM transactions on networking, 2023-02, Vol.31 (1), p.15-29
issn 1063-6692
1558-2566
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_9813517
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects ad hoc
Ad hoc networks
Cooperation
Costs
Density
Ethics
Games
Hazards
Incentives
Interference
Jamming
mechanism
Moral hazard
Network design
network security
Nodes
noncooperative networks
Routing
Upper bounds
title Interference Moral Hazard in Large Multihop Networks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A07%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interference%20Moral%20Hazard%20in%20Large%20Multihop%20Networks&rft.jtitle=IEEE/ACM%20transactions%20on%20networking&rft.au=Ruzomberkaand,%20Eric&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=15-29&rft.issn=1063-6692&rft.eissn=1558-2566&rft.coden=IEANEP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TNET.2022.3186234&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E2776795856%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2776795856&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=9813517&rfr_iscdi=true