Interference Moral Hazard in Large Multihop Networks
Cooperation between network nodes is critical for supporting services in ad hoc networks. Cooperation, however, is an idealized assumption that may not always be present. This assumption can fail because of moral hazard, a scenario in part caused by misaligned incentives between the requesting node...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE/ACM transactions on networking 2023-02, Vol.31 (1), p.15-29 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 29 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 15 |
container_title | IEEE/ACM transactions on networking |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Ruzomberkaand, Eric Love, David J. |
description | Cooperation between network nodes is critical for supporting services in ad hoc networks. Cooperation, however, is an idealized assumption that may not always be present. This assumption can fail because of moral hazard, a scenario in part caused by misaligned incentives between the requesting node and supporting node. In this paper, we characterize a moral hazard that perversely incentivizes nodes to increase their routing payments by transmitting interference into the multi-hop network. We refer to this as the interference moral hazard (IMH) problem which is inherent to strategyproof mechanisms with low overpayments. We investigate IMH as a non-cooperative game played by network nodes on a random graph. For large networks, we show that IMH can be solved in the network design space. We provide sufficient conditions on the network distribution that guarantee an equilibrium path with interference-free play. This is achieved by 1) lower-bounding the number of nodes and 2) bounding the network density slightly above the 2-connectedness threshold and below a proposed upper-bound. Simulations suggest that density plays a fundamental role in IMH. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TNET.2022.3186234 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_9813517</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9813517</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2776795856</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-d648b00eb6a4601bafeb3cc13147eff96bb59fab53ffcb6071730fcb4ff50b003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_QLwseN46STaz2aOU2hZqvdRzSLYT3Vp3a7JF9Neb0uJpHsN7M4-PsVsOI86helgtJ6uRACFGkmsUsjhjA66UzoVCPE8aUOaIlbhkVzFuALgEgQNWzNuegqdAbU3ZcxfsNpvZXxvWWdNmCxve0na_7Zv3bpctqf_uwke8ZhfebiPdnOaQvT5NVuNZvniZzsePi7wWWvf5GgvtAMihLRC4s56crGsueVGS9xU6pypvnZLe1w6h5KWEpArvFaSgHLL7491d6L72FHuz6fahTS-NKEssK6UVJhc_uurQxRjIm11oPm34MRzMAY45wDEHOOYEJ2XujpmGiP79leZSpRJ_dvtf_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2776795856</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interference Moral Hazard in Large Multihop Networks</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Ruzomberkaand, Eric ; Love, David J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ruzomberkaand, Eric ; Love, David J.</creatorcontrib><description>Cooperation between network nodes is critical for supporting services in ad hoc networks. Cooperation, however, is an idealized assumption that may not always be present. This assumption can fail because of moral hazard, a scenario in part caused by misaligned incentives between the requesting node and supporting node. In this paper, we characterize a moral hazard that perversely incentivizes nodes to increase their routing payments by transmitting interference into the multi-hop network. We refer to this as the interference moral hazard (IMH) problem which is inherent to strategyproof mechanisms with low overpayments. We investigate IMH as a non-cooperative game played by network nodes on a random graph. For large networks, we show that IMH can be solved in the network design space. We provide sufficient conditions on the network distribution that guarantee an equilibrium path with interference-free play. This is achieved by 1) lower-bounding the number of nodes and 2) bounding the network density slightly above the 2-connectedness threshold and below a proposed upper-bound. Simulations suggest that density plays a fundamental role in IMH.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1063-6692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-2566</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TNET.2022.3186234</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IEANEP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>ad hoc ; Ad hoc networks ; Cooperation ; Costs ; Density ; Ethics ; Games ; Hazards ; Incentives ; Interference ; Jamming ; mechanism ; Moral hazard ; Network design ; network security ; Nodes ; noncooperative networks ; Routing ; Upper bounds</subject><ispartof>IEEE/ACM transactions on networking, 2023-02, Vol.31 (1), p.15-29</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-d648b00eb6a4601bafeb3cc13147eff96bb59fab53ffcb6071730fcb4ff50b003</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3817-6584 ; 0000-0001-5922-4787</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9813517$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,796,27924,27925,54758</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9813517$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ruzomberkaand, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Love, David J.</creatorcontrib><title>Interference Moral Hazard in Large Multihop Networks</title><title>IEEE/ACM transactions on networking</title><addtitle>TNET</addtitle><description>Cooperation between network nodes is critical for supporting services in ad hoc networks. Cooperation, however, is an idealized assumption that may not always be present. This assumption can fail because of moral hazard, a scenario in part caused by misaligned incentives between the requesting node and supporting node. In this paper, we characterize a moral hazard that perversely incentivizes nodes to increase their routing payments by transmitting interference into the multi-hop network. We refer to this as the interference moral hazard (IMH) problem which is inherent to strategyproof mechanisms with low overpayments. We investigate IMH as a non-cooperative game played by network nodes on a random graph. For large networks, we show that IMH can be solved in the network design space. We provide sufficient conditions on the network distribution that guarantee an equilibrium path with interference-free play. This is achieved by 1) lower-bounding the number of nodes and 2) bounding the network density slightly above the 2-connectedness threshold and below a proposed upper-bound. Simulations suggest that density plays a fundamental role in IMH.</description><subject>ad hoc</subject><subject>Ad hoc networks</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Games</subject><subject>Hazards</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Interference</subject><subject>Jamming</subject><subject>mechanism</subject><subject>Moral hazard</subject><subject>Network design</subject><subject>network security</subject><subject>Nodes</subject><subject>noncooperative networks</subject><subject>Routing</subject><subject>Upper bounds</subject><issn>1063-6692</issn><issn>1558-2566</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_QLwseN46STaz2aOU2hZqvdRzSLYT3Vp3a7JF9Neb0uJpHsN7M4-PsVsOI86helgtJ6uRACFGkmsUsjhjA66UzoVCPE8aUOaIlbhkVzFuALgEgQNWzNuegqdAbU3ZcxfsNpvZXxvWWdNmCxve0na_7Zv3bpctqf_uwke8ZhfebiPdnOaQvT5NVuNZvniZzsePi7wWWvf5GgvtAMihLRC4s56crGsueVGS9xU6pypvnZLe1w6h5KWEpArvFaSgHLL7491d6L72FHuz6fahTS-NKEssK6UVJhc_uurQxRjIm11oPm34MRzMAY45wDEHOOYEJ2XujpmGiP79leZSpRJ_dvtf_A</recordid><startdate>202302</startdate><enddate>202302</enddate><creator>Ruzomberkaand, Eric</creator><creator>Love, David J.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3817-6584</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5922-4787</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202302</creationdate><title>Interference Moral Hazard in Large Multihop Networks</title><author>Ruzomberkaand, Eric ; Love, David J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-d648b00eb6a4601bafeb3cc13147eff96bb59fab53ffcb6071730fcb4ff50b003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>ad hoc</topic><topic>Ad hoc networks</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Games</topic><topic>Hazards</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Interference</topic><topic>Jamming</topic><topic>mechanism</topic><topic>Moral hazard</topic><topic>Network design</topic><topic>network security</topic><topic>Nodes</topic><topic>noncooperative networks</topic><topic>Routing</topic><topic>Upper bounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ruzomberkaand, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Love, David J.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>IEEE/ACM transactions on networking</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ruzomberkaand, Eric</au><au>Love, David J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interference Moral Hazard in Large Multihop Networks</atitle><jtitle>IEEE/ACM transactions on networking</jtitle><stitle>TNET</stitle><date>2023-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>15-29</pages><issn>1063-6692</issn><eissn>1558-2566</eissn><coden>IEANEP</coden><abstract>Cooperation between network nodes is critical for supporting services in ad hoc networks. Cooperation, however, is an idealized assumption that may not always be present. This assumption can fail because of moral hazard, a scenario in part caused by misaligned incentives between the requesting node and supporting node. In this paper, we characterize a moral hazard that perversely incentivizes nodes to increase their routing payments by transmitting interference into the multi-hop network. We refer to this as the interference moral hazard (IMH) problem which is inherent to strategyproof mechanisms with low overpayments. We investigate IMH as a non-cooperative game played by network nodes on a random graph. For large networks, we show that IMH can be solved in the network design space. We provide sufficient conditions on the network distribution that guarantee an equilibrium path with interference-free play. This is achieved by 1) lower-bounding the number of nodes and 2) bounding the network density slightly above the 2-connectedness threshold and below a proposed upper-bound. Simulations suggest that density plays a fundamental role in IMH.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TNET.2022.3186234</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3817-6584</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5922-4787</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1063-6692 |
ispartof | IEEE/ACM transactions on networking, 2023-02, Vol.31 (1), p.15-29 |
issn | 1063-6692 1558-2566 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_9813517 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | ad hoc Ad hoc networks Cooperation Costs Density Ethics Games Hazards Incentives Interference Jamming mechanism Moral hazard Network design network security Nodes noncooperative networks Routing Upper bounds |
title | Interference Moral Hazard in Large Multihop Networks |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A07%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interference%20Moral%20Hazard%20in%20Large%20Multihop%20Networks&rft.jtitle=IEEE/ACM%20transactions%20on%20networking&rft.au=Ruzomberkaand,%20Eric&rft.date=2023-02&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=15-29&rft.issn=1063-6692&rft.eissn=1558-2566&rft.coden=IEANEP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TNET.2022.3186234&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E2776795856%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2776795856&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=9813517&rfr_iscdi=true |