Estimating refractivity from land clutter: another look at a simple approach

In a previous report, two methods of estimating refractivity from land clutter were discussed where one of the methods used a parabolic equation (PE) algorithm combined with a least squares technique, and the other used a ray trace algorithm combined with a rank correlation scheme (Barrios 2000). Ba...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Barrios, A.E.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 905 vol.2
container_issue
container_start_page 904
container_title
container_volume 2
creator Barrios, A.E.
description In a previous report, two methods of estimating refractivity from land clutter were discussed where one of the methods used a parabolic equation (PE) algorithm combined with a least squares technique, and the other used a ray trace algorithm combined with a rank correlation scheme (Barrios 2000). Based on simulations alone, both of these methods were fairly successful in estimating a tri-linear representation of a radiosonde-measured refractivity profile over two mixed land-sea paths. However, each method appears to favor a certain type of land topography. The PE/least-squares method performed well over land paths characterized by steep peaks and valleys and the ray trace/correlation method performed well over land paths which were not sharply varying in elevation. This latter method offers a more attractive alternative to the conventional least-squares technique because of its execution speed and simplicity, therefore we take a more extensive look at this technique.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/IGARSS.2001.976675
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_976675</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>976675</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>976675</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i104t-d3f9fd4eecb7a193f1070bd7421b57d133550dea6b108b22873c5bb9b782cb403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj8tKw0AYRgdEUGpeoKt5gcR_bpmMu1JqLQQEq-syVzuaG5NR6NsbqIcPzu6Dg9CaQEUIqMfDfvN2PFYUgFRK1rUUN6hQsoFlTAIj6g4V8_wFC1xwzuU9andzjr3OcfjEyYekbY6_MV9wSGOPOz04bLufnH16wnoY89kn3I3jN9YZazzHfuo81tOURm3PD-g26G72xb9X6ON59759KdvX_WG7actIgOfSsaCC495bIzVRLBCQYJzklBghHWFMCHBe14ZAYyhtJLPCGGVkQ63hwFZoff2N3vvTlJaAdDldk9kfI3JNWQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Estimating refractivity from land clutter: another look at a simple approach</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Barrios, A.E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Barrios, A.E.</creatorcontrib><description>In a previous report, two methods of estimating refractivity from land clutter were discussed where one of the methods used a parabolic equation (PE) algorithm combined with a least squares technique, and the other used a ray trace algorithm combined with a rank correlation scheme (Barrios 2000). Based on simulations alone, both of these methods were fairly successful in estimating a tri-linear representation of a radiosonde-measured refractivity profile over two mixed land-sea paths. However, each method appears to favor a certain type of land topography. The PE/least-squares method performed well over land paths characterized by steep peaks and valleys and the ray trace/correlation method performed well over land paths which were not sharply varying in elevation. This latter method offers a more attractive alternative to the conventional least-squares technique because of its execution speed and simplicity, therefore we take a more extensive look at this technique.</description><identifier>ISBN: 9780780370319</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0780370317</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.2001.976675</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Clutter ; Correlation ; Ducts ; Equations ; Least squares approximation ; Maximum likelihood estimation ; Ray tracing ; Refractive index ; Storage area networks ; Surface topography</subject><ispartof>IGARSS 2001. Scanning the Present and Resolving the Future. Proceedings. IEEE 2001 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37217), 2001, Vol.2, p.904-905 vol.2</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/976675$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,4050,4051,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/976675$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barrios, A.E.</creatorcontrib><title>Estimating refractivity from land clutter: another look at a simple approach</title><title>IGARSS 2001. Scanning the Present and Resolving the Future. Proceedings. IEEE 2001 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37217)</title><addtitle>IGARSS</addtitle><description>In a previous report, two methods of estimating refractivity from land clutter were discussed where one of the methods used a parabolic equation (PE) algorithm combined with a least squares technique, and the other used a ray trace algorithm combined with a rank correlation scheme (Barrios 2000). Based on simulations alone, both of these methods were fairly successful in estimating a tri-linear representation of a radiosonde-measured refractivity profile over two mixed land-sea paths. However, each method appears to favor a certain type of land topography. The PE/least-squares method performed well over land paths characterized by steep peaks and valleys and the ray trace/correlation method performed well over land paths which were not sharply varying in elevation. This latter method offers a more attractive alternative to the conventional least-squares technique because of its execution speed and simplicity, therefore we take a more extensive look at this technique.</description><subject>Clutter</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Ducts</subject><subject>Equations</subject><subject>Least squares approximation</subject><subject>Maximum likelihood estimation</subject><subject>Ray tracing</subject><subject>Refractive index</subject><subject>Storage area networks</subject><subject>Surface topography</subject><isbn>9780780370319</isbn><isbn>0780370317</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotj8tKw0AYRgdEUGpeoKt5gcR_bpmMu1JqLQQEq-syVzuaG5NR6NsbqIcPzu6Dg9CaQEUIqMfDfvN2PFYUgFRK1rUUN6hQsoFlTAIj6g4V8_wFC1xwzuU9andzjr3OcfjEyYekbY6_MV9wSGOPOz04bLufnH16wnoY89kn3I3jN9YZazzHfuo81tOURm3PD-g26G72xb9X6ON59759KdvX_WG7actIgOfSsaCC495bIzVRLBCQYJzklBghHWFMCHBe14ZAYyhtJLPCGGVkQ63hwFZoff2N3vvTlJaAdDldk9kfI3JNWQ</recordid><startdate>2001</startdate><enddate>2001</enddate><creator>Barrios, A.E.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2001</creationdate><title>Estimating refractivity from land clutter: another look at a simple approach</title><author>Barrios, A.E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i104t-d3f9fd4eecb7a193f1070bd7421b57d133550dea6b108b22873c5bb9b782cb403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Clutter</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Ducts</topic><topic>Equations</topic><topic>Least squares approximation</topic><topic>Maximum likelihood estimation</topic><topic>Ray tracing</topic><topic>Refractive index</topic><topic>Storage area networks</topic><topic>Surface topography</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barrios, A.E.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barrios, A.E.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Estimating refractivity from land clutter: another look at a simple approach</atitle><btitle>IGARSS 2001. Scanning the Present and Resolving the Future. Proceedings. IEEE 2001 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37217)</btitle><stitle>IGARSS</stitle><date>2001</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>2</volume><spage>904</spage><epage>905 vol.2</epage><pages>904-905 vol.2</pages><isbn>9780780370319</isbn><isbn>0780370317</isbn><abstract>In a previous report, two methods of estimating refractivity from land clutter were discussed where one of the methods used a parabolic equation (PE) algorithm combined with a least squares technique, and the other used a ray trace algorithm combined with a rank correlation scheme (Barrios 2000). Based on simulations alone, both of these methods were fairly successful in estimating a tri-linear representation of a radiosonde-measured refractivity profile over two mixed land-sea paths. However, each method appears to favor a certain type of land topography. The PE/least-squares method performed well over land paths characterized by steep peaks and valleys and the ray trace/correlation method performed well over land paths which were not sharply varying in elevation. This latter method offers a more attractive alternative to the conventional least-squares technique because of its execution speed and simplicity, therefore we take a more extensive look at this technique.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/IGARSS.2001.976675</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISBN: 9780780370319
ispartof IGARSS 2001. Scanning the Present and Resolving the Future. Proceedings. IEEE 2001 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37217), 2001, Vol.2, p.904-905 vol.2
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_976675
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Clutter
Correlation
Ducts
Equations
Least squares approximation
Maximum likelihood estimation
Ray tracing
Refractive index
Storage area networks
Surface topography
title Estimating refractivity from land clutter: another look at a simple approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T23%3A20%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Estimating%20refractivity%20from%20land%20clutter:%20another%20look%20at%20a%20simple%20approach&rft.btitle=IGARSS%202001.%20Scanning%20the%20Present%20and%20Resolving%20the%20Future.%20Proceedings.%20IEEE%202001%20International%20Geoscience%20and%20Remote%20Sensing%20Symposium%20(Cat.%20No.01CH37217)&rft.au=Barrios,%20A.E.&rft.date=2001&rft.volume=2&rft.spage=904&rft.epage=905%20vol.2&rft.pages=904-905%20vol.2&rft.isbn=9780780370319&rft.isbn_list=0780370317&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/IGARSS.2001.976675&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E976675%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=976675&rfr_iscdi=true