Reliability Analysis of a Pulsed High Magnetic Field Facility at WHMFC
To accurately evaluate the reliability of Pulsed High Magnetic Field Facility (PHMFF) at the Wuhan National Pulsed High Magnetic Field Centre (WHMFC), a reliability analysis method based on a Markov chain is introduced in this paper. Because PHMFF is developed to generate a pulsed high magnetic fiel...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity 2022-09, Vol.32 (6), p.1-5 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 5 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Xie, J. F. Wan, H. Zhang, S. Z. Han, X. T. Shi, J. T. Li, L. |
| description | To accurately evaluate the reliability of Pulsed High Magnetic Field Facility (PHMFF) at the Wuhan National Pulsed High Magnetic Field Centre (WHMFC), a reliability analysis method based on a Markov chain is introduced in this paper. Because PHMFF is developed to generate a pulsed high magnetic field for scientific experiments by dynamically constructing diversified magnetic field systems, the reliability of PHMFF is in fact determined by the actual operating magnetic field system. Considering that all magnetic field systems are composed of pulsed power modules, magnets, control modules and experimental test systems, in this paper, the reliability of these critical modules is first discussed. In the analysis of modules, the failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) method is used to determine the main failure modes, and then a Markov chain is established to analyze and calculate the reliability of the modules. Finally, based on the reliability of critical modules, the reliability of two typical magnetic field systems was estimated according to the reliability block diagram. The calculation results show that the reliability of all modules is above 95%, and although in complex magnetic field systems, the reliability still meets the experimental requirements. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TASC.2022.3157803 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_9730048</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9730048</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2645984162</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-f8d7ef20c051eddadcd9c244ade24fa6a4cb4cbde6f79fb26e92914a0a9655e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gHhZ8Jy638keSzCt0KJoxeOy3Z2tW2JTs-mh_96UFGFg5vC8w8uD0D0lE0qJflpNP8oJI4xNOJV5QfgFGlEpi4xJKi_7m0iaFYzxa3ST0pYQKgohR6h6hzradaxjd8TTna2PKSbcBGzx26FO4PE8br7x0m520EWHqwi1x5V1Q8J2-Gu-rMpbdBVsj9-d9xh9Vs-rcp4tXmcv5XSROaZ5l4XC5xAYcX0b8N5657VjQlgPTASrrHDrfjyokOuwZgo001RYYrWSEhQfo8fh775tfg-QOrNtDm1fOxmmhNSFoIr1FB0o1zYptRDMvo0_tj0aSsxJlznpMidd5qyrzzwMmQgA_7zOOSGi4H_GwmWc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2645984162</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability Analysis of a Pulsed High Magnetic Field Facility at WHMFC</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Xie, J. F. ; Wan, H. ; Zhang, S. Z. ; Han, X. T. ; Shi, J. T. ; Li, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Xie, J. F. ; Wan, H. ; Zhang, S. Z. ; Han, X. T. ; Shi, J. T. ; Li, L.</creatorcontrib><description>To accurately evaluate the reliability of Pulsed High Magnetic Field Facility (PHMFF) at the Wuhan National Pulsed High Magnetic Field Centre (WHMFC), a reliability analysis method based on a Markov chain is introduced in this paper. Because PHMFF is developed to generate a pulsed high magnetic field for scientific experiments by dynamically constructing diversified magnetic field systems, the reliability of PHMFF is in fact determined by the actual operating magnetic field system. Considering that all magnetic field systems are composed of pulsed power modules, magnets, control modules and experimental test systems, in this paper, the reliability of these critical modules is first discussed. In the analysis of modules, the failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) method is used to determine the main failure modes, and then a Markov chain is established to analyze and calculate the reliability of the modules. Finally, based on the reliability of critical modules, the reliability of two typical magnetic field systems was estimated according to the reliability block diagram. The calculation results show that the reliability of all modules is above 95%, and although in complex magnetic field systems, the reliability still meets the experimental requirements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-8223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-2515</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TASC.2022.3157803</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITASE9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Block diagrams ; Discharges (electric) ; Failure analysis ; Failure modes ; High magnetic field ; Magnetic fields ; Magnetism ; Magnets ; Maintenance engineering ; Markov analysis ; markov chain ; Markov chains ; Markov processes ; Mathematical analysis ; Modules ; Power system reliability ; pulsed high magnetic field facility (PHMFF) ; Reliability ; Reliability analysis ; reliability evaluation ; Superconducting magnets ; System reliability</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity, 2022-09, Vol.32 (6), p.1-5</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-f8d7ef20c051eddadcd9c244ade24fa6a4cb4cbde6f79fb26e92914a0a9655e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-f8d7ef20c051eddadcd9c244ade24fa6a4cb4cbde6f79fb26e92914a0a9655e63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1296-4048 ; 0000-0002-8633-6028 ; 0000-0001-6745-1074 ; 0000-0002-7296-7275 ; 0000-0002-7089-9598</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9730048$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,794,27911,27912,54745</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9730048$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xie, J. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, S. Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, X. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, J. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, L.</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability Analysis of a Pulsed High Magnetic Field Facility at WHMFC</title><title>IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity</title><addtitle>TASC</addtitle><description>To accurately evaluate the reliability of Pulsed High Magnetic Field Facility (PHMFF) at the Wuhan National Pulsed High Magnetic Field Centre (WHMFC), a reliability analysis method based on a Markov chain is introduced in this paper. Because PHMFF is developed to generate a pulsed high magnetic field for scientific experiments by dynamically constructing diversified magnetic field systems, the reliability of PHMFF is in fact determined by the actual operating magnetic field system. Considering that all magnetic field systems are composed of pulsed power modules, magnets, control modules and experimental test systems, in this paper, the reliability of these critical modules is first discussed. In the analysis of modules, the failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) method is used to determine the main failure modes, and then a Markov chain is established to analyze and calculate the reliability of the modules. Finally, based on the reliability of critical modules, the reliability of two typical magnetic field systems was estimated according to the reliability block diagram. The calculation results show that the reliability of all modules is above 95%, and although in complex magnetic field systems, the reliability still meets the experimental requirements.</description><subject>Block diagrams</subject><subject>Discharges (electric)</subject><subject>Failure analysis</subject><subject>Failure modes</subject><subject>High magnetic field</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Magnetism</subject><subject>Magnets</subject><subject>Maintenance engineering</subject><subject>Markov analysis</subject><subject>markov chain</subject><subject>Markov chains</subject><subject>Markov processes</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Modules</subject><subject>Power system reliability</subject><subject>pulsed high magnetic field facility (PHMFF)</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>reliability evaluation</subject><subject>Superconducting magnets</subject><subject>System reliability</subject><issn>1051-8223</issn><issn>1558-2515</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFZ_gHhZ8Jy638keSzCt0KJoxeOy3Z2tW2JTs-mh_96UFGFg5vC8w8uD0D0lE0qJflpNP8oJI4xNOJV5QfgFGlEpi4xJKi_7m0iaFYzxa3ST0pYQKgohR6h6hzradaxjd8TTna2PKSbcBGzx26FO4PE8br7x0m520EWHqwi1x5V1Q8J2-Gu-rMpbdBVsj9-d9xh9Vs-rcp4tXmcv5XSROaZ5l4XC5xAYcX0b8N5657VjQlgPTASrrHDrfjyokOuwZgo001RYYrWSEhQfo8fh775tfg-QOrNtDm1fOxmmhNSFoIr1FB0o1zYptRDMvo0_tj0aSsxJlznpMidd5qyrzzwMmQgA_7zOOSGi4H_GwmWc</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Xie, J. F.</creator><creator>Wan, H.</creator><creator>Zhang, S. Z.</creator><creator>Han, X. T.</creator><creator>Shi, J. T.</creator><creator>Li, L.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1296-4048</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8633-6028</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6745-1074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7296-7275</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7089-9598</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Reliability Analysis of a Pulsed High Magnetic Field Facility at WHMFC</title><author>Xie, J. F. ; Wan, H. ; Zhang, S. Z. ; Han, X. T. ; Shi, J. T. ; Li, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-f8d7ef20c051eddadcd9c244ade24fa6a4cb4cbde6f79fb26e92914a0a9655e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Block diagrams</topic><topic>Discharges (electric)</topic><topic>Failure analysis</topic><topic>Failure modes</topic><topic>High magnetic field</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Magnetism</topic><topic>Magnets</topic><topic>Maintenance engineering</topic><topic>Markov analysis</topic><topic>markov chain</topic><topic>Markov chains</topic><topic>Markov processes</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Modules</topic><topic>Power system reliability</topic><topic>pulsed high magnetic field facility (PHMFF)</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>reliability evaluation</topic><topic>Superconducting magnets</topic><topic>System reliability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xie, J. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, S. Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, X. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, J. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xie, J. F.</au><au>Wan, H.</au><au>Zhang, S. Z.</au><au>Han, X. T.</au><au>Shi, J. T.</au><au>Li, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability Analysis of a Pulsed High Magnetic Field Facility at WHMFC</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity</jtitle><stitle>TASC</stitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>5</epage><pages>1-5</pages><issn>1051-8223</issn><eissn>1558-2515</eissn><coden>ITASE9</coden><abstract>To accurately evaluate the reliability of Pulsed High Magnetic Field Facility (PHMFF) at the Wuhan National Pulsed High Magnetic Field Centre (WHMFC), a reliability analysis method based on a Markov chain is introduced in this paper. Because PHMFF is developed to generate a pulsed high magnetic field for scientific experiments by dynamically constructing diversified magnetic field systems, the reliability of PHMFF is in fact determined by the actual operating magnetic field system. Considering that all magnetic field systems are composed of pulsed power modules, magnets, control modules and experimental test systems, in this paper, the reliability of these critical modules is first discussed. In the analysis of modules, the failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) method is used to determine the main failure modes, and then a Markov chain is established to analyze and calculate the reliability of the modules. Finally, based on the reliability of critical modules, the reliability of two typical magnetic field systems was estimated according to the reliability block diagram. The calculation results show that the reliability of all modules is above 95%, and although in complex magnetic field systems, the reliability still meets the experimental requirements.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TASC.2022.3157803</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1296-4048</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8633-6028</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6745-1074</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7296-7275</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7089-9598</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISSN: 1051-8223 |
| ispartof | IEEE transactions on applied superconductivity, 2022-09, Vol.32 (6), p.1-5 |
| issn | 1051-8223 1558-2515 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_9730048 |
| source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
| subjects | Block diagrams Discharges (electric) Failure analysis Failure modes High magnetic field Magnetic fields Magnetism Magnets Maintenance engineering Markov analysis markov chain Markov chains Markov processes Mathematical analysis Modules Power system reliability pulsed high magnetic field facility (PHMFF) Reliability Reliability analysis reliability evaluation Superconducting magnets System reliability |
| title | Reliability Analysis of a Pulsed High Magnetic Field Facility at WHMFC |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T15%3A17%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20Analysis%20of%20a%20Pulsed%20High%20Magnetic%20Field%20Facility%20at%20WHMFC&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20applied%20superconductivity&rft.au=Xie,%20J.%20F.&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=5&rft.pages=1-5&rft.issn=1051-8223&rft.eissn=1558-2515&rft.coden=ITASE9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TASC.2022.3157803&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E2645984162%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2645984162&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=9730048&rfr_iscdi=true |