An empirical analysis of differences between sustaining and disruptive technology innovations
This paper reviews the literature on disruptive technologies. It then describes a survey that captures the differences between disruptive technology areas and sustaining technology areas and the characteristics of the firms that engage in each. The survey of firms engaged in the commercialization of...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Tagungsbericht |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 201 vol.1 |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | 1 |
| creator | Kassicieh, S.K. Walsh, S.T. Romig, A. Cummings, J. McWhorter, P. Williams, D. |
| description | This paper reviews the literature on disruptive technologies. It then describes a survey that captures the differences between disruptive technology areas and sustaining technology areas and the characteristics of the firms that engage in each. The survey of firms engaged in the commercialization of sustaining technologies or of disruptive technologies is piloted and analyzed to determine differences in firm characteristics, situational issues and firm history. The survey focuses on the movement of the research findings from the laboratory into the marketplace and all of the problem areas that disruptive technologies face in this arena. The paper then states hypotheses that are tested. The data are described with results and conclusions reported. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1109/PICMET.2001.951926 |
| format | Conference Proceeding |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_951926</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>951926</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>951926</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ieee_primary_9519263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9jr0KwjAURgMi-PsCTnkBa6KttqMURQfBwVUk1lu9Um9Kblrp21vQ2W85wznDJ8REq0BrlcyO-_SwOQVzpXSQRDqZLztioONExeFCLVc9MWZ-qnZhGIVR1BfnNUl4legwM4U0ZIqGkaXN5Q3zHBxQBiyv4N8AJLlib5CQ7m16axN2VemxBukhe5At7L2RSGRr49ESj0Q3NwXD-MehmGw3p3Q3RQC4lA5fxjWX79HFX_kB3QxE8g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>An empirical analysis of differences between sustaining and disruptive technology innovations</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Kassicieh, S.K. ; Walsh, S.T. ; Romig, A. ; Cummings, J. ; McWhorter, P. ; Williams, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kassicieh, S.K. ; Walsh, S.T. ; Romig, A. ; Cummings, J. ; McWhorter, P. ; Williams, D.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reviews the literature on disruptive technologies. It then describes a survey that captures the differences between disruptive technology areas and sustaining technology areas and the characteristics of the firms that engage in each. The survey of firms engaged in the commercialization of sustaining technologies or of disruptive technologies is piloted and analyzed to determine differences in firm characteristics, situational issues and firm history. The survey focuses on the movement of the research findings from the laboratory into the marketplace and all of the problem areas that disruptive technologies face in this arena. The paper then states hypotheses that are tested. The data are described with results and conclusions reported.</description><identifier>ISBN: 1890843067</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781890843069</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/PICMET.2001.951926</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Commercialization ; Continuous improvement ; Innovation management ; Meeting planning ; Micromechanical devices ; Research and development ; Technological innovation ; Technology management ; Testing ; Veins</subject><ispartof>PICMET '01. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol.1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37199), 2001, Vol.1, p.201 vol.1</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/951926$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,778,782,787,788,2054,4038,4039,27908,54903</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/951926$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kassicieh, S.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, S.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romig, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummings, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McWhorter, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, D.</creatorcontrib><title>An empirical analysis of differences between sustaining and disruptive technology innovations</title><title>PICMET '01. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol.1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37199)</title><addtitle>PICMET</addtitle><description>This paper reviews the literature on disruptive technologies. It then describes a survey that captures the differences between disruptive technology areas and sustaining technology areas and the characteristics of the firms that engage in each. The survey of firms engaged in the commercialization of sustaining technologies or of disruptive technologies is piloted and analyzed to determine differences in firm characteristics, situational issues and firm history. The survey focuses on the movement of the research findings from the laboratory into the marketplace and all of the problem areas that disruptive technologies face in this arena. The paper then states hypotheses that are tested. The data are described with results and conclusions reported.</description><subject>Commercialization</subject><subject>Continuous improvement</subject><subject>Innovation management</subject><subject>Meeting planning</subject><subject>Micromechanical devices</subject><subject>Research and development</subject><subject>Technological innovation</subject><subject>Technology management</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Veins</subject><isbn>1890843067</isbn><isbn>9781890843069</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNp9jr0KwjAURgMi-PsCTnkBa6KttqMURQfBwVUk1lu9Um9Kblrp21vQ2W85wznDJ8REq0BrlcyO-_SwOQVzpXSQRDqZLztioONExeFCLVc9MWZ-qnZhGIVR1BfnNUl4legwM4U0ZIqGkaXN5Q3zHBxQBiyv4N8AJLlib5CQ7m16axN2VemxBukhe5At7L2RSGRr49ESj0Q3NwXD-MehmGw3p3Q3RQC4lA5fxjWX79HFX_kB3QxE8g</recordid><startdate>2001</startdate><enddate>2001</enddate><creator>Kassicieh, S.K.</creator><creator>Walsh, S.T.</creator><creator>Romig, A.</creator><creator>Cummings, J.</creator><creator>McWhorter, P.</creator><creator>Williams, D.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2001</creationdate><title>An empirical analysis of differences between sustaining and disruptive technology innovations</title><author>Kassicieh, S.K. ; Walsh, S.T. ; Romig, A. ; Cummings, J. ; McWhorter, P. ; Williams, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ieee_primary_9519263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Commercialization</topic><topic>Continuous improvement</topic><topic>Innovation management</topic><topic>Meeting planning</topic><topic>Micromechanical devices</topic><topic>Research and development</topic><topic>Technological innovation</topic><topic>Technology management</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Veins</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kassicieh, S.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, S.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romig, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummings, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McWhorter, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kassicieh, S.K.</au><au>Walsh, S.T.</au><au>Romig, A.</au><au>Cummings, J.</au><au>McWhorter, P.</au><au>Williams, D.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>An empirical analysis of differences between sustaining and disruptive technology innovations</atitle><btitle>PICMET '01. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol.1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37199)</btitle><stitle>PICMET</stitle><date>2001</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>1</volume><spage>201 vol.1</spage><pages>201 vol.1-</pages><isbn>1890843067</isbn><isbn>9781890843069</isbn><abstract>This paper reviews the literature on disruptive technologies. It then describes a survey that captures the differences between disruptive technology areas and sustaining technology areas and the characteristics of the firms that engage in each. The survey of firms engaged in the commercialization of sustaining technologies or of disruptive technologies is piloted and analyzed to determine differences in firm characteristics, situational issues and firm history. The survey focuses on the movement of the research findings from the laboratory into the marketplace and all of the problem areas that disruptive technologies face in this arena. The paper then states hypotheses that are tested. The data are described with results and conclusions reported.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/PICMET.2001.951926</doi></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISBN: 1890843067 |
| ispartof | PICMET '01. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol.1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37199), 2001, Vol.1, p.201 vol.1 |
| issn | |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_951926 |
| source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
| subjects | Commercialization Continuous improvement Innovation management Meeting planning Micromechanical devices Research and development Technological innovation Technology management Testing Veins |
| title | An empirical analysis of differences between sustaining and disruptive technology innovations |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T13%3A17%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=An%20empirical%20analysis%20of%20differences%20between%20sustaining%20and%20disruptive%20technology%20innovations&rft.btitle=PICMET%20'01.%20Portland%20International%20Conference%20on%20Management%20of%20Engineering%20and%20Technology.%20Proceedings%20Vol.1:%20Book%20of%20Summaries%20(IEEE%20Cat.%20No.01CH37199)&rft.au=Kassicieh,%20S.K.&rft.date=2001&rft.volume=1&rft.spage=201%20vol.1&rft.pages=201%20vol.1-&rft.isbn=1890843067&rft.isbn_list=9781890843069&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/PICMET.2001.951926&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E951926%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=951926&rfr_iscdi=true |