Neural network speaker dependent isolated Malay speech recognition system: handcrafted vs genetic algorithm

We compare two approaches in selecting neural network learning parameters and architecture. Traditionally they are found by trial and error (handcrafted) and alternatively, can be found using a genetic algorithm. Trial and error can find good solutions but the drawback is this method is time consumi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Salam, M.S.H., Mohamad, D., Salleh, S.H.S.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 734 vol.2
container_issue
container_start_page 731
container_title
container_volume 2
creator Salam, M.S.H.
Mohamad, D.
Salleh, S.H.S.
description We compare two approaches in selecting neural network learning parameters and architecture. Traditionally they are found by trial and error (handcrafted) and alternatively, can be found using a genetic algorithm. Trial and error can find good solutions but the drawback is this method is time consuming and it can only try a few possible solutions while the genetic algorithm is known to be able to search for a good solution intelligently and faster with greater diversity of possible solutions. We tested the approaches on ten isolated Malay digits from 0 to 9. Three factors are compared between the two approaches: time to get a good solution; network learning convergence; and the recognition rate. Our findings show that the neural network using the genetic algorithm achieved 94% recognition rate while the handcrafted neural network achieved 95%. However, using the genetic algorithm, a good solution can be found within days while with the handcrafted method it took weeks. The network learning convergence for both approaches were relatively the same.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/ISSPA.2001.950252
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_950252</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>950252</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>950252</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i174t-df1bd66e5ffb42236035446f97a3190e0203ec871d59ff900fa8a1fe996bf7aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotUNtqwzAUM4zBRtcP2J78A8mO49y8t1J2KXQX6PZcTuLjxGuaFNvbyN83pRMSehFCiLFbAbEQoO5Xm83HIk4ARKwySLLkgs1VUcJEmReTrtjc-2-YkGZCKLhmuzf6cdjxnsLf4HbcHwh35LimA_Wa-sCtHzoMpPkrdjieAlS33FE9NL0Ndui5H32g_QNvsde1Q3MK_3re0FRqa45dMzgb2v0NuzTYeZr_-4x9PT1-Ll-i9fvzarlYR1YUaYi0EZXOc8qMqdIkkTnILE1zowqU02aCBCTVZSF0poxRAAZLFIaUyitTIMoZuzv3WiLaHpzdoxu350fkEclZWUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Neural network speaker dependent isolated Malay speech recognition system: handcrafted vs genetic algorithm</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Salam, M.S.H. ; Mohamad, D. ; Salleh, S.H.S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Salam, M.S.H. ; Mohamad, D. ; Salleh, S.H.S.</creatorcontrib><description>We compare two approaches in selecting neural network learning parameters and architecture. Traditionally they are found by trial and error (handcrafted) and alternatively, can be found using a genetic algorithm. Trial and error can find good solutions but the drawback is this method is time consuming and it can only try a few possible solutions while the genetic algorithm is known to be able to search for a good solution intelligently and faster with greater diversity of possible solutions. We tested the approaches on ten isolated Malay digits from 0 to 9. Three factors are compared between the two approaches: time to get a good solution; network learning convergence; and the recognition rate. Our findings show that the neural network using the genetic algorithm achieved 94% recognition rate while the handcrafted neural network achieved 95%. However, using the genetic algorithm, a good solution can be found within days while with the handcrafted method it took weeks. The network learning convergence for both approaches were relatively the same.</description><identifier>ISBN: 9780780367036</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0780367030</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ISSPA.2001.950252</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Automatic speech recognition ; Computer errors ; Genetic algorithms ; Isolation technology ; Linear predictive coding ; Neural networks ; Signal processing ; Speech analysis ; Speech recognition ; Testing</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Signal Processing and its Applications (Cat.No.01EX467), 2001, Vol.2, p.731-734 vol.2</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/950252$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,4050,4051,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/950252$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salam, M.S.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamad, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salleh, S.H.S.</creatorcontrib><title>Neural network speaker dependent isolated Malay speech recognition system: handcrafted vs genetic algorithm</title><title>Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Signal Processing and its Applications (Cat.No.01EX467)</title><addtitle>ISSPA</addtitle><description>We compare two approaches in selecting neural network learning parameters and architecture. Traditionally they are found by trial and error (handcrafted) and alternatively, can be found using a genetic algorithm. Trial and error can find good solutions but the drawback is this method is time consuming and it can only try a few possible solutions while the genetic algorithm is known to be able to search for a good solution intelligently and faster with greater diversity of possible solutions. We tested the approaches on ten isolated Malay digits from 0 to 9. Three factors are compared between the two approaches: time to get a good solution; network learning convergence; and the recognition rate. Our findings show that the neural network using the genetic algorithm achieved 94% recognition rate while the handcrafted neural network achieved 95%. However, using the genetic algorithm, a good solution can be found within days while with the handcrafted method it took weeks. The network learning convergence for both approaches were relatively the same.</description><subject>Automatic speech recognition</subject><subject>Computer errors</subject><subject>Genetic algorithms</subject><subject>Isolation technology</subject><subject>Linear predictive coding</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Signal processing</subject><subject>Speech analysis</subject><subject>Speech recognition</subject><subject>Testing</subject><isbn>9780780367036</isbn><isbn>0780367030</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotUNtqwzAUM4zBRtcP2J78A8mO49y8t1J2KXQX6PZcTuLjxGuaFNvbyN83pRMSehFCiLFbAbEQoO5Xm83HIk4ARKwySLLkgs1VUcJEmReTrtjc-2-YkGZCKLhmuzf6cdjxnsLf4HbcHwh35LimA_Wa-sCtHzoMpPkrdjieAlS33FE9NL0Ndui5H32g_QNvsde1Q3MK_3re0FRqa45dMzgb2v0NuzTYeZr_-4x9PT1-Ll-i9fvzarlYR1YUaYi0EZXOc8qMqdIkkTnILE1zowqU02aCBCTVZSF0poxRAAZLFIaUyitTIMoZuzv3WiLaHpzdoxu350fkEclZWUw</recordid><startdate>2001</startdate><enddate>2001</enddate><creator>Salam, M.S.H.</creator><creator>Mohamad, D.</creator><creator>Salleh, S.H.S.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2001</creationdate><title>Neural network speaker dependent isolated Malay speech recognition system: handcrafted vs genetic algorithm</title><author>Salam, M.S.H. ; Mohamad, D. ; Salleh, S.H.S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i174t-df1bd66e5ffb42236035446f97a3190e0203ec871d59ff900fa8a1fe996bf7aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Automatic speech recognition</topic><topic>Computer errors</topic><topic>Genetic algorithms</topic><topic>Isolation technology</topic><topic>Linear predictive coding</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Signal processing</topic><topic>Speech analysis</topic><topic>Speech recognition</topic><topic>Testing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salam, M.S.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamad, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salleh, S.H.S.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salam, M.S.H.</au><au>Mohamad, D.</au><au>Salleh, S.H.S.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Neural network speaker dependent isolated Malay speech recognition system: handcrafted vs genetic algorithm</atitle><btitle>Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Signal Processing and its Applications (Cat.No.01EX467)</btitle><stitle>ISSPA</stitle><date>2001</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>2</volume><spage>731</spage><epage>734 vol.2</epage><pages>731-734 vol.2</pages><isbn>9780780367036</isbn><isbn>0780367030</isbn><abstract>We compare two approaches in selecting neural network learning parameters and architecture. Traditionally they are found by trial and error (handcrafted) and alternatively, can be found using a genetic algorithm. Trial and error can find good solutions but the drawback is this method is time consuming and it can only try a few possible solutions while the genetic algorithm is known to be able to search for a good solution intelligently and faster with greater diversity of possible solutions. We tested the approaches on ten isolated Malay digits from 0 to 9. Three factors are compared between the two approaches: time to get a good solution; network learning convergence; and the recognition rate. Our findings show that the neural network using the genetic algorithm achieved 94% recognition rate while the handcrafted neural network achieved 95%. However, using the genetic algorithm, a good solution can be found within days while with the handcrafted method it took weeks. The network learning convergence for both approaches were relatively the same.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ISSPA.2001.950252</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISBN: 9780780367036
ispartof Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Signal Processing and its Applications (Cat.No.01EX467), 2001, Vol.2, p.731-734 vol.2
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_950252
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Automatic speech recognition
Computer errors
Genetic algorithms
Isolation technology
Linear predictive coding
Neural networks
Signal processing
Speech analysis
Speech recognition
Testing
title Neural network speaker dependent isolated Malay speech recognition system: handcrafted vs genetic algorithm
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T04%3A03%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Neural%20network%20speaker%20dependent%20isolated%20Malay%20speech%20recognition%20system:%20handcrafted%20vs%20genetic%20algorithm&rft.btitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Sixth%20International%20Symposium%20on%20Signal%20Processing%20and%20its%20Applications%20(Cat.No.01EX467)&rft.au=Salam,%20M.S.H.&rft.date=2001&rft.volume=2&rft.spage=731&rft.epage=734%20vol.2&rft.pages=731-734%20vol.2&rft.isbn=9780780367036&rft.isbn_list=0780367030&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ISSPA.2001.950252&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E950252%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=950252&rfr_iscdi=true