Corrections for the effects of accidental coincidences, Compton scatter, and object size in positron emission mammography (PEM) imaging
Positron emission mammography (PEM) has begun to show promise as an effective method for the detection of breast lesions. Due to its utilization of tumor-avid radiopharmaceuticals labeled with positron-emitting radionuclides, this technique may be especially useful in imaging of women with radiodens...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on nuclear science 2001-06, Vol.48 (3), p.913-923 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 923 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 913 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on nuclear science |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Raylman, R.R. Majewski, S. Wojcik, R. Weisenberger, A.G. Kross, B. Popov, V. |
description | Positron emission mammography (PEM) has begun to show promise as an effective method for the detection of breast lesions. Due to its utilization of tumor-avid radiopharmaceuticals labeled with positron-emitting radionuclides, this technique may be especially useful in imaging of women with radiodense or fibrocystic breasts. While the use of these radiotracers affords PEM unique capabilities, it also introduces some limitations. Specifically, acceptance of accidental and Compton-scattered coincidence events can decrease lesion detectability. The authors studied the effect of accidental coincidence events on PEM images produced by the presence of /sup 18/F-Fluorodeoxyglucose in the organs of a subject using an anthropomorphic phantom. A delayed-coincidence technique was tested as a method for correcting PEM images for the occurrence of accidental events. Also, a Compton scatter correction algorithm designed specifically for PEM was developed and tested using a compressed breast phantom. Finally, the effect of object size on image counts and a correction for this effect were explored. The imager used in this study consisted of two PEM detector heads mounted 20 cm apart on a Lorad biopsy apparatus. The results demonstrated that a majority of the accidental coincidence events (/spl sim/80%) detected by this system were produced by radiotracer uptake in the adipose and muscle tissue of the torso. The presence of accidental coincidence events was shown to reduce lesion detectability. Much of this effect was eliminated by correction of the images utilizing estimates of accidental-coincidence contamination acquired with delayed coincidence circuitry built into the PEM system. The Compton scatter fraction for this system was /spl sim/14%. Utilization of a new scatter correction algorithm reduced the scatter fraction to /spl sim/1.5%. Finally, reduction of count recovery due to object size was measured and a correction to the data applied. Application of correction techniques for accidental coincidences, Compton scatter, and count loss due to image size increased target-to-background contrast ratios to approximately the maximum level theoretically achievable with this PEM system. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/23.940132 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_940132</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>940132</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2633161461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-ed9e77d56ce4ea9d4b35a8a6338eed56b6948cd3d4e3ee2fcee217d506df07883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0kFvFCEUAGBiNHGtHrx6Qg_VJp0KA8zA0WxqNanRg54Jy7zZZbMDI7CH-gf82752Gg8eakIg7_HxeCEQ8pKzC86Zed-KCyMZF-0jsuJK6YarXj8mK8a4bow05il5VsoeQ6mYWpHf65Qz-BpSLHRMmdYdUBhHTBWaRuq8DwPE6g7UpxDvAg_lnK7TNNcUafGuVsjn1MWBps0eD9ISfgENkc6phJoRwRRKwSvo5KYpbbObdzf03bfLL2c0TG4b4vY5eTK6Q4EX9-sJ-fHx8vv6U3P99erz-sN144URtYHBQN8PqvMgwZlBboRy2nVCaABMbzojtR_EIEEAtKPHiaNn3TCyXmtxQl4vdVOpwRYfKvidTzFi31YLiQPN28XMOf08QqkW2_dwOLgI6Vis4bJTsr-Tpw_KVrfCdIz9H3Ksp9rb_t78A_fpmCM-iTVGc6G0FIjOFuRzKiXDaOeM75hvLGf29hvYVtjlG6B9tdgAAH_d_eYf4amtxQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>998135843</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Corrections for the effects of accidental coincidences, Compton scatter, and object size in positron emission mammography (PEM) imaging</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Raylman, R.R. ; Majewski, S. ; Wojcik, R. ; Weisenberger, A.G. ; Kross, B. ; Popov, V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Raylman, R.R. ; Majewski, S. ; Wojcik, R. ; Weisenberger, A.G. ; Kross, B. ; Popov, V. ; Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA (US)</creatorcontrib><description>Positron emission mammography (PEM) has begun to show promise as an effective method for the detection of breast lesions. Due to its utilization of tumor-avid radiopharmaceuticals labeled with positron-emitting radionuclides, this technique may be especially useful in imaging of women with radiodense or fibrocystic breasts. While the use of these radiotracers affords PEM unique capabilities, it also introduces some limitations. Specifically, acceptance of accidental and Compton-scattered coincidence events can decrease lesion detectability. The authors studied the effect of accidental coincidence events on PEM images produced by the presence of /sup 18/F-Fluorodeoxyglucose in the organs of a subject using an anthropomorphic phantom. A delayed-coincidence technique was tested as a method for correcting PEM images for the occurrence of accidental events. Also, a Compton scatter correction algorithm designed specifically for PEM was developed and tested using a compressed breast phantom. Finally, the effect of object size on image counts and a correction for this effect were explored. The imager used in this study consisted of two PEM detector heads mounted 20 cm apart on a Lorad biopsy apparatus. The results demonstrated that a majority of the accidental coincidence events (/spl sim/80%) detected by this system were produced by radiotracer uptake in the adipose and muscle tissue of the torso. The presence of accidental coincidence events was shown to reduce lesion detectability. Much of this effect was eliminated by correction of the images utilizing estimates of accidental-coincidence contamination acquired with delayed coincidence circuitry built into the PEM system. The Compton scatter fraction for this system was /spl sim/14%. Utilization of a new scatter correction algorithm reduced the scatter fraction to /spl sim/1.5%. Finally, reduction of count recovery due to object size was measured and a correction to the data applied. Application of correction techniques for accidental coincidences, Compton scatter, and count loss due to image size increased target-to-background contrast ratios to approximately the maximum level theoretically achievable with this PEM system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9499</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-1578</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/23.940132</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IETNAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Accidental contamination ; Accidents ; ALGORITHMS ; Anthropomorphism ; Breast ; Coincidences ; Delay estimation ; DETECTION ; Elastic scattering ; Event detection ; Image compression ; Image contrast ; Image quality ; Image reconstruction ; Image sensors ; Imaging phantoms ; Lesions ; MAMMARY GLANDS ; Mammography ; ORGANS ; PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS ; Positron emission tomography ; POSITRONS ; Radioactive decay ; RADIOISOTOPES ; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS ; Scatter ; Scattering ; Testing</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on nuclear science, 2001-06, Vol.48 (3), p.913-923</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-ed9e77d56ce4ea9d4b35a8a6338eed56b6948cd3d4e3ee2fcee217d506df07883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-ed9e77d56ce4ea9d4b35a8a6338eed56b6948cd3d4e3ee2fcee217d506df07883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/940132$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,792,881,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/940132$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/834834$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raylman, R.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majewski, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wojcik, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weisenberger, A.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kross, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popov, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA (US)</creatorcontrib><title>Corrections for the effects of accidental coincidences, Compton scatter, and object size in positron emission mammography (PEM) imaging</title><title>IEEE transactions on nuclear science</title><addtitle>TNS</addtitle><description>Positron emission mammography (PEM) has begun to show promise as an effective method for the detection of breast lesions. Due to its utilization of tumor-avid radiopharmaceuticals labeled with positron-emitting radionuclides, this technique may be especially useful in imaging of women with radiodense or fibrocystic breasts. While the use of these radiotracers affords PEM unique capabilities, it also introduces some limitations. Specifically, acceptance of accidental and Compton-scattered coincidence events can decrease lesion detectability. The authors studied the effect of accidental coincidence events on PEM images produced by the presence of /sup 18/F-Fluorodeoxyglucose in the organs of a subject using an anthropomorphic phantom. A delayed-coincidence technique was tested as a method for correcting PEM images for the occurrence of accidental events. Also, a Compton scatter correction algorithm designed specifically for PEM was developed and tested using a compressed breast phantom. Finally, the effect of object size on image counts and a correction for this effect were explored. The imager used in this study consisted of two PEM detector heads mounted 20 cm apart on a Lorad biopsy apparatus. The results demonstrated that a majority of the accidental coincidence events (/spl sim/80%) detected by this system were produced by radiotracer uptake in the adipose and muscle tissue of the torso. The presence of accidental coincidence events was shown to reduce lesion detectability. Much of this effect was eliminated by correction of the images utilizing estimates of accidental-coincidence contamination acquired with delayed coincidence circuitry built into the PEM system. The Compton scatter fraction for this system was /spl sim/14%. Utilization of a new scatter correction algorithm reduced the scatter fraction to /spl sim/1.5%. Finally, reduction of count recovery due to object size was measured and a correction to the data applied. Application of correction techniques for accidental coincidences, Compton scatter, and count loss due to image size increased target-to-background contrast ratios to approximately the maximum level theoretically achievable with this PEM system.</description><subject>Accidental contamination</subject><subject>Accidents</subject><subject>ALGORITHMS</subject><subject>Anthropomorphism</subject><subject>Breast</subject><subject>Coincidences</subject><subject>Delay estimation</subject><subject>DETECTION</subject><subject>Elastic scattering</subject><subject>Event detection</subject><subject>Image compression</subject><subject>Image contrast</subject><subject>Image quality</subject><subject>Image reconstruction</subject><subject>Image sensors</subject><subject>Imaging phantoms</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>MAMMARY GLANDS</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>ORGANS</subject><subject>PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS</subject><subject>Positron emission tomography</subject><subject>POSITRONS</subject><subject>Radioactive decay</subject><subject>RADIOISOTOPES</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS</subject><subject>Scatter</subject><subject>Scattering</subject><subject>Testing</subject><issn>0018-9499</issn><issn>1558-1578</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0kFvFCEUAGBiNHGtHrx6Qg_VJp0KA8zA0WxqNanRg54Jy7zZZbMDI7CH-gf82752Gg8eakIg7_HxeCEQ8pKzC86Zed-KCyMZF-0jsuJK6YarXj8mK8a4bow05il5VsoeQ6mYWpHf65Qz-BpSLHRMmdYdUBhHTBWaRuq8DwPE6g7UpxDvAg_lnK7TNNcUafGuVsjn1MWBps0eD9ISfgENkc6phJoRwRRKwSvo5KYpbbObdzf03bfLL2c0TG4b4vY5eTK6Q4EX9-sJ-fHx8vv6U3P99erz-sN144URtYHBQN8PqvMgwZlBboRy2nVCaABMbzojtR_EIEEAtKPHiaNn3TCyXmtxQl4vdVOpwRYfKvidTzFi31YLiQPN28XMOf08QqkW2_dwOLgI6Vis4bJTsr-Tpw_KVrfCdIz9H3Ksp9rb_t78A_fpmCM-iTVGc6G0FIjOFuRzKiXDaOeM75hvLGf29hvYVtjlG6B9tdgAAH_d_eYf4amtxQ</recordid><startdate>20010601</startdate><enddate>20010601</enddate><creator>Raylman, R.R.</creator><creator>Majewski, S.</creator><creator>Wojcik, R.</creator><creator>Weisenberger, A.G.</creator><creator>Kross, B.</creator><creator>Popov, V.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010601</creationdate><title>Corrections for the effects of accidental coincidences, Compton scatter, and object size in positron emission mammography (PEM) imaging</title><author>Raylman, R.R. ; Majewski, S. ; Wojcik, R. ; Weisenberger, A.G. ; Kross, B. ; Popov, V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-ed9e77d56ce4ea9d4b35a8a6338eed56b6948cd3d4e3ee2fcee217d506df07883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Accidental contamination</topic><topic>Accidents</topic><topic>ALGORITHMS</topic><topic>Anthropomorphism</topic><topic>Breast</topic><topic>Coincidences</topic><topic>Delay estimation</topic><topic>DETECTION</topic><topic>Elastic scattering</topic><topic>Event detection</topic><topic>Image compression</topic><topic>Image contrast</topic><topic>Image quality</topic><topic>Image reconstruction</topic><topic>Image sensors</topic><topic>Imaging phantoms</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>MAMMARY GLANDS</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>ORGANS</topic><topic>PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS</topic><topic>Positron emission tomography</topic><topic>POSITRONS</topic><topic>Radioactive decay</topic><topic>RADIOISOTOPES</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS</topic><topic>Scatter</topic><topic>Scattering</topic><topic>Testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raylman, R.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majewski, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wojcik, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weisenberger, A.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kross, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popov, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA (US)</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on nuclear science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raylman, R.R.</au><au>Majewski, S.</au><au>Wojcik, R.</au><au>Weisenberger, A.G.</au><au>Kross, B.</au><au>Popov, V.</au><aucorp>Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport News, VA (US)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Corrections for the effects of accidental coincidences, Compton scatter, and object size in positron emission mammography (PEM) imaging</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on nuclear science</jtitle><stitle>TNS</stitle><date>2001-06-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>913</spage><epage>923</epage><pages>913-923</pages><issn>0018-9499</issn><eissn>1558-1578</eissn><coden>IETNAE</coden><abstract>Positron emission mammography (PEM) has begun to show promise as an effective method for the detection of breast lesions. Due to its utilization of tumor-avid radiopharmaceuticals labeled with positron-emitting radionuclides, this technique may be especially useful in imaging of women with radiodense or fibrocystic breasts. While the use of these radiotracers affords PEM unique capabilities, it also introduces some limitations. Specifically, acceptance of accidental and Compton-scattered coincidence events can decrease lesion detectability. The authors studied the effect of accidental coincidence events on PEM images produced by the presence of /sup 18/F-Fluorodeoxyglucose in the organs of a subject using an anthropomorphic phantom. A delayed-coincidence technique was tested as a method for correcting PEM images for the occurrence of accidental events. Also, a Compton scatter correction algorithm designed specifically for PEM was developed and tested using a compressed breast phantom. Finally, the effect of object size on image counts and a correction for this effect were explored. The imager used in this study consisted of two PEM detector heads mounted 20 cm apart on a Lorad biopsy apparatus. The results demonstrated that a majority of the accidental coincidence events (/spl sim/80%) detected by this system were produced by radiotracer uptake in the adipose and muscle tissue of the torso. The presence of accidental coincidence events was shown to reduce lesion detectability. Much of this effect was eliminated by correction of the images utilizing estimates of accidental-coincidence contamination acquired with delayed coincidence circuitry built into the PEM system. The Compton scatter fraction for this system was /spl sim/14%. Utilization of a new scatter correction algorithm reduced the scatter fraction to /spl sim/1.5%. Finally, reduction of count recovery due to object size was measured and a correction to the data applied. Application of correction techniques for accidental coincidences, Compton scatter, and count loss due to image size increased target-to-background contrast ratios to approximately the maximum level theoretically achievable with this PEM system.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/23.940132</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-9499 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on nuclear science, 2001-06, Vol.48 (3), p.913-923 |
issn | 0018-9499 1558-1578 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_940132 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Accidental contamination Accidents ALGORITHMS Anthropomorphism Breast Coincidences Delay estimation DETECTION Elastic scattering Event detection Image compression Image contrast Image quality Image reconstruction Image sensors Imaging phantoms Lesions MAMMARY GLANDS Mammography ORGANS PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND FIELDS Positron emission tomography POSITRONS Radioactive decay RADIOISOTOPES RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS Scatter Scattering Testing |
title | Corrections for the effects of accidental coincidences, Compton scatter, and object size in positron emission mammography (PEM) imaging |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T03%3A40%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Corrections%20for%20the%20effects%20of%20accidental%20coincidences,%20Compton%20scatter,%20and%20object%20size%20in%20positron%20emission%20mammography%20(PEM)%20imaging&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20nuclear%20science&rft.au=Raylman,%20R.R.&rft.aucorp=Thomas%20Jefferson%20National%20Accelerator%20Facility,%20Newport%20News,%20VA%20(US)&rft.date=2001-06-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=913&rft.epage=923&rft.pages=913-923&rft.issn=0018-9499&rft.eissn=1558-1578&rft.coden=IETNAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/23.940132&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E2633161461%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=998135843&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=940132&rfr_iscdi=true |