Does the Supervision Mechanism Promote the Incentive Effects of Government Innovation Support on the R&D Input of Agricultural Enterprises?

The stimulating issues of government innovation support to the market players' R&D vitality has always been the focus of innovation. This article analyzes the impact of government innovation support's two policies, namely, government subsidies and tax & fee returns, on the R&D...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE access 2021, Vol.9, p.3339-3359
Hauptverfasser: Jiang, Zhangsheng, Zhao, Xinzi, Zhou, Jie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3359
container_issue
container_start_page 3339
container_title IEEE access
container_volume 9
creator Jiang, Zhangsheng
Zhao, Xinzi
Zhou, Jie
description The stimulating issues of government innovation support to the market players' R&D vitality has always been the focus of innovation. This article analyzes the impact of government innovation support's two policies, namely, government subsidies and tax & fee returns, on the R&D input of agricultural enterprises from the perspective of government intervention. Moreover, this article is primarily focusing on the institutional investors, leading shareholders, and social audit institutions in the corporate governance to play a role in the improvement of shareholding and audit supervision mechanism. This article conducts unbalanced panel data regression tests based on the relevant data of government innovation support of A-share agricultural enterprises listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2009 to 2019. The conclusions are as follows: Firstly, government subsidies have a significant crowding-out effect on R&D investment of agricultural enterprises, while tax & fee returns have a significant stimulating effect. Secondly, when the shareholding ratio of institutional investors and leading shareholders increases, the shareholding supervision mechanism strengthens the effect of government innovation support on enterprise R&D input. Finally, with the improvement of social audit institutions' auditing opinions, the enhancement of auditing supervision mechanisms has weakened the effect of government innovation support on enterprise innovation investment. These research findings can provide some academic supports and policy references for formulating appropriate government innovation support and giving full play to the role of shareholding supervision and audit supervision in corporate governance.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3047839
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_ieee_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_9309306</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9309306</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2475959543</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-a8e5548f5c6f12da406fdc51fc9c9c88c68eb1acce6815942d80e6e137524a363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUN1KwzAULqLgmHuC3QQE7zaT5qfplYxtzsFEcXpdYnbiOtamJunAZ_ClTd0QcwI5nO8nhy9JhgSPCcH57WQ6na_X4xSneEwxyyTNz5JeSkQ-opyK83_9ZTLwfofjkXHEs17yPbPgUdgCWrcNuEPpS1ujR9BbVZe-Qs_OVjbAL2NZa6hDeQA0NwZ08MgatLAHcHUVgYjX9qBCZxDNGusCim2nfLmZRbRpQ6eYfLhSt_vQOrVH8zqAa1zpwd9dJRdG7T0MTm8_ebufv04fRqunxXI6WY00Y2kYKQmcM2m4FoakG8WwMBvNidF5LCm1kPBOlNYgJOE5SzcSgwBCM54yRQXtJ9dH38bZzxZ8KHa2dXX8skhZxvNYjEYWPbK0s947MEVcs1LuqyC46IIvjsEXXfDFKfioGh5VJQD8KXKK4xX0B7Y0gTU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2475959543</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does the Supervision Mechanism Promote the Incentive Effects of Government Innovation Support on the R&amp;D Input of Agricultural Enterprises?</title><source>IEEE Open Access Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Jiang, Zhangsheng ; Zhao, Xinzi ; Zhou, Jie</creator><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Zhangsheng ; Zhao, Xinzi ; Zhou, Jie</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[The stimulating issues of government innovation support to the market players' R&D vitality has always been the focus of innovation. This article analyzes the impact of government innovation support's two policies, namely, government subsidies and tax & fee returns, on the R&D input of agricultural enterprises from the perspective of government intervention. Moreover, this article is primarily focusing on the institutional investors, leading shareholders, and social audit institutions in the corporate governance to play a role in the improvement of shareholding and audit supervision mechanism. This article conducts unbalanced panel data regression tests based on the relevant data of government innovation support of A-share agricultural enterprises listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2009 to 2019. The conclusions are as follows: Firstly, government subsidies have a significant crowding-out effect on R&D investment of agricultural enterprises, while tax & fee returns have a significant stimulating effect. Secondly, when the shareholding ratio of institutional investors and leading shareholders increases, the shareholding supervision mechanism strengthens the effect of government innovation support on enterprise R&D input. Finally, with the improvement of social audit institutions' auditing opinions, the enhancement of auditing supervision mechanisms has weakened the effect of government innovation support on enterprise innovation investment. These research findings can provide some academic supports and policy references for formulating appropriate government innovation support and giving full play to the role of shareholding supervision and audit supervision in corporate governance.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3047839</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IAECCG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway: IEEE</publisher><subject>Audit supervision ; Audits ; Companies ; Corporate governance ; Finance ; Government ; Government subsidies ; Impact analysis ; Innovations ; Institutional investments ; Investment ; Production ; R&amp;D ; Regression analysis ; Research &amp; development ; Research and development ; shareholding supervision ; Stockholders ; Subsidies ; Supervision ; tax &amp; fee returns ; Technological innovation</subject><ispartof>IEEE access, 2021, Vol.9, p.3339-3359</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-a8e5548f5c6f12da406fdc51fc9c9c88c68eb1acce6815942d80e6e137524a363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-a8e5548f5c6f12da406fdc51fc9c9c88c68eb1acce6815942d80e6e137524a363</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5805-0137</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9309306$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,4010,27610,27900,27901,27902,54908</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Zhangsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xinzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jie</creatorcontrib><title>Does the Supervision Mechanism Promote the Incentive Effects of Government Innovation Support on the R&amp;D Input of Agricultural Enterprises?</title><title>IEEE access</title><addtitle>Access</addtitle><description><![CDATA[The stimulating issues of government innovation support to the market players' R&D vitality has always been the focus of innovation. This article analyzes the impact of government innovation support's two policies, namely, government subsidies and tax & fee returns, on the R&D input of agricultural enterprises from the perspective of government intervention. Moreover, this article is primarily focusing on the institutional investors, leading shareholders, and social audit institutions in the corporate governance to play a role in the improvement of shareholding and audit supervision mechanism. This article conducts unbalanced panel data regression tests based on the relevant data of government innovation support of A-share agricultural enterprises listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2009 to 2019. The conclusions are as follows: Firstly, government subsidies have a significant crowding-out effect on R&D investment of agricultural enterprises, while tax & fee returns have a significant stimulating effect. Secondly, when the shareholding ratio of institutional investors and leading shareholders increases, the shareholding supervision mechanism strengthens the effect of government innovation support on enterprise R&D input. Finally, with the improvement of social audit institutions' auditing opinions, the enhancement of auditing supervision mechanisms has weakened the effect of government innovation support on enterprise innovation investment. These research findings can provide some academic supports and policy references for formulating appropriate government innovation support and giving full play to the role of shareholding supervision and audit supervision in corporate governance.]]></description><subject>Audit supervision</subject><subject>Audits</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Corporate governance</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Government subsidies</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Institutional investments</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>Production</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Research and development</subject><subject>shareholding supervision</subject><subject>Stockholders</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Supervision</subject><subject>tax &amp; fee returns</subject><subject>Technological innovation</subject><issn>2169-3536</issn><issn>2169-3536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ESBDL</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUN1KwzAULqLgmHuC3QQE7zaT5qfplYxtzsFEcXpdYnbiOtamJunAZ_ClTd0QcwI5nO8nhy9JhgSPCcH57WQ6na_X4xSneEwxyyTNz5JeSkQ-opyK83_9ZTLwfofjkXHEs17yPbPgUdgCWrcNuEPpS1ujR9BbVZe-Qs_OVjbAL2NZa6hDeQA0NwZ08MgatLAHcHUVgYjX9qBCZxDNGusCim2nfLmZRbRpQ6eYfLhSt_vQOrVH8zqAa1zpwd9dJRdG7T0MTm8_ebufv04fRqunxXI6WY00Y2kYKQmcM2m4FoakG8WwMBvNidF5LCm1kPBOlNYgJOE5SzcSgwBCM54yRQXtJ9dH38bZzxZ8KHa2dXX8skhZxvNYjEYWPbK0s947MEVcs1LuqyC46IIvjsEXXfDFKfioGh5VJQD8KXKK4xX0B7Y0gTU</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Jiang, Zhangsheng</creator><creator>Zhao, Xinzi</creator><creator>Zhou, Jie</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>ESBDL</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5805-0137</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Does the Supervision Mechanism Promote the Incentive Effects of Government Innovation Support on the R&amp;D Input of Agricultural Enterprises?</title><author>Jiang, Zhangsheng ; Zhao, Xinzi ; Zhou, Jie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-a8e5548f5c6f12da406fdc51fc9c9c88c68eb1acce6815942d80e6e137524a363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Audit supervision</topic><topic>Audits</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Corporate governance</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Government subsidies</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Institutional investments</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>Production</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Research and development</topic><topic>shareholding supervision</topic><topic>Stockholders</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Supervision</topic><topic>tax &amp; fee returns</topic><topic>Technological innovation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Zhangsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xinzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jie</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE Open Access Journals</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jiang, Zhangsheng</au><au>Zhao, Xinzi</au><au>Zhou, Jie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does the Supervision Mechanism Promote the Incentive Effects of Government Innovation Support on the R&amp;D Input of Agricultural Enterprises?</atitle><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle><stitle>Access</stitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>9</volume><spage>3339</spage><epage>3359</epage><pages>3339-3359</pages><issn>2169-3536</issn><eissn>2169-3536</eissn><coden>IAECCG</coden><abstract><![CDATA[The stimulating issues of government innovation support to the market players' R&D vitality has always been the focus of innovation. This article analyzes the impact of government innovation support's two policies, namely, government subsidies and tax & fee returns, on the R&D input of agricultural enterprises from the perspective of government intervention. Moreover, this article is primarily focusing on the institutional investors, leading shareholders, and social audit institutions in the corporate governance to play a role in the improvement of shareholding and audit supervision mechanism. This article conducts unbalanced panel data regression tests based on the relevant data of government innovation support of A-share agricultural enterprises listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2009 to 2019. The conclusions are as follows: Firstly, government subsidies have a significant crowding-out effect on R&D investment of agricultural enterprises, while tax & fee returns have a significant stimulating effect. Secondly, when the shareholding ratio of institutional investors and leading shareholders increases, the shareholding supervision mechanism strengthens the effect of government innovation support on enterprise R&D input. Finally, with the improvement of social audit institutions' auditing opinions, the enhancement of auditing supervision mechanisms has weakened the effect of government innovation support on enterprise innovation investment. These research findings can provide some academic supports and policy references for formulating appropriate government innovation support and giving full play to the role of shareholding supervision and audit supervision in corporate governance.]]></abstract><cop>Piscataway</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3047839</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5805-0137</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-3536
ispartof IEEE access, 2021, Vol.9, p.3339-3359
issn 2169-3536
2169-3536
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_9309306
source IEEE Open Access Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Audit supervision
Audits
Companies
Corporate governance
Finance
Government
Government subsidies
Impact analysis
Innovations
Institutional investments
Investment
Production
R&D
Regression analysis
Research & development
Research and development
shareholding supervision
Stockholders
Subsidies
Supervision
tax & fee returns
Technological innovation
title Does the Supervision Mechanism Promote the Incentive Effects of Government Innovation Support on the R&D Input of Agricultural Enterprises?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T13%3A34%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_ieee_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20the%20Supervision%20Mechanism%20Promote%20the%20Incentive%20Effects%20of%20Government%20Innovation%20Support%20on%20the%20R&D%20Input%20of%20Agricultural%20Enterprises?&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20access&rft.au=Jiang,%20Zhangsheng&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=9&rft.spage=3339&rft.epage=3359&rft.pages=3339-3359&rft.issn=2169-3536&rft.eissn=2169-3536&rft.coden=IAECCG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3047839&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_ieee_%3E2475959543%3C/proquest_ieee_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2475959543&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=9309306&rfr_iscdi=true