Anisotropy of attenuation and backscatter in cancellous bone

Although bone sonometry is useful in the diagnosis of osteoporosis, the interactions between ultrasound and bone are not well understood yet. In order to investigate these processes, ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter in two orientations were measured in 43 human calcaneal specimens in vitro. In...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Wear, K.A.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1328 vol.2
container_issue
container_start_page 1325
container_title
container_volume 2
creator Wear, K.A.
description Although bone sonometry is useful in the diagnosis of osteoporosis, the interactions between ultrasound and bone are not well understood yet. In order to investigate these processes, ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter in two orientations were measured in 43 human calcaneal specimens in vitro. In the mediolateral orientation, the ultrasound propagation direction is approximately perpendicular to the trabecular axes. In the anteroposterior orientation, a wide range of angles between the ultrasound propagation direction and trabecular axes is encountered. Average attenuation slope was 18% greater while average backscatter coefficient was 50% lower in the AP orientation compared with the ML orientation. These results support the idea that absorption is a greater component of attenuation than scattering in human calcaneal trabecular bone.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/ULTSYM.2000.921567
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_921567</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>921567</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>595938</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i203t-6f8cbb6d59e8622b2619bcf01100fe003dffac38cfb201994f826b3e8af8a6df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEFLwzAcxQMqOOe-wE45eWv9J2nTBLyMoVOoeHA7eCpJmkC0S2rTHvbt7Zjw4MHj8fjxEFoTyAkB-Xio959f7zkFgFxSUvLqCq1kJWAW44yX_BotCJQkA0KqW3SX0jcAhZIWC_S0CT7FcYj9CUeH1TjaMKnRx4BVaLFW5ieZczpgH7BRwdiui1PCOgZ7j26c6pJd_fsSHV6e99vXrP7YvW03deYpsDHjThiteVtKKzilmnIitXEzDYCzAKx1ThkmjNMUiJSFE5RrZoVyQvHWsSV6uOz2Q_ydbBqbo09nEBXszNJQUghW8mIuri9Fb61t-sEf1XBqLqewPyvmVr0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>21483564</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Anisotropy of attenuation and backscatter in cancellous bone</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Wear, K.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wear, K.A.</creatorcontrib><description>Although bone sonometry is useful in the diagnosis of osteoporosis, the interactions between ultrasound and bone are not well understood yet. In order to investigate these processes, ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter in two orientations were measured in 43 human calcaneal specimens in vitro. In the mediolateral orientation, the ultrasound propagation direction is approximately perpendicular to the trabecular axes. In the anteroposterior orientation, a wide range of angles between the ultrasound propagation direction and trabecular axes is encountered. Average attenuation slope was 18% greater while average backscatter coefficient was 50% lower in the AP orientation compared with the ML orientation. These results support the idea that absorption is a greater component of attenuation than scattering in human calcaneal trabecular bone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0117</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780780363656</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0780363655</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ULTSYM.2000.921567</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Acoustic wave backscattering ; Anisotropic magnetoresistance ; Anisotropy ; Anthropometry ; Attenuation ; Attenuation measurement ; Backscatter ; Cancellous bone ; Diagnosis ; Humans ; In vitro ; Osteoporosis ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonic propagation ; Ultrasonic variables measurement</subject><ispartof>2000 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.00CH37121), 2000, Vol.2, p.1325-1328 vol.2</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/921567$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2052,4036,4037,25118,27902,54895</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/921567$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wear, K.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Anisotropy of attenuation and backscatter in cancellous bone</title><title>2000 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.00CH37121)</title><addtitle>ULTSYM</addtitle><description>Although bone sonometry is useful in the diagnosis of osteoporosis, the interactions between ultrasound and bone are not well understood yet. In order to investigate these processes, ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter in two orientations were measured in 43 human calcaneal specimens in vitro. In the mediolateral orientation, the ultrasound propagation direction is approximately perpendicular to the trabecular axes. In the anteroposterior orientation, a wide range of angles between the ultrasound propagation direction and trabecular axes is encountered. Average attenuation slope was 18% greater while average backscatter coefficient was 50% lower in the AP orientation compared with the ML orientation. These results support the idea that absorption is a greater component of attenuation than scattering in human calcaneal trabecular bone.</description><subject>Acoustic wave backscattering</subject><subject>Anisotropic magnetoresistance</subject><subject>Anisotropy</subject><subject>Anthropometry</subject><subject>Attenuation</subject><subject>Attenuation measurement</subject><subject>Backscatter</subject><subject>Cancellous bone</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In vitro</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonic propagation</subject><subject>Ultrasonic variables measurement</subject><issn>1051-0117</issn><isbn>9780780363656</isbn><isbn>0780363655</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotkEFLwzAcxQMqOOe-wE45eWv9J2nTBLyMoVOoeHA7eCpJmkC0S2rTHvbt7Zjw4MHj8fjxEFoTyAkB-Xio959f7zkFgFxSUvLqCq1kJWAW44yX_BotCJQkA0KqW3SX0jcAhZIWC_S0CT7FcYj9CUeH1TjaMKnRx4BVaLFW5ieZczpgH7BRwdiui1PCOgZ7j26c6pJd_fsSHV6e99vXrP7YvW03deYpsDHjThiteVtKKzilmnIitXEzDYCzAKx1ThkmjNMUiJSFE5RrZoVyQvHWsSV6uOz2Q_ydbBqbo09nEBXszNJQUghW8mIuri9Fb61t-sEf1XBqLqewPyvmVr0</recordid><startdate>2000</startdate><enddate>2000</enddate><creator>Wear, K.A.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2000</creationdate><title>Anisotropy of attenuation and backscatter in cancellous bone</title><author>Wear, K.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i203t-6f8cbb6d59e8622b2619bcf01100fe003dffac38cfb201994f826b3e8af8a6df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Acoustic wave backscattering</topic><topic>Anisotropic magnetoresistance</topic><topic>Anisotropy</topic><topic>Anthropometry</topic><topic>Attenuation</topic><topic>Attenuation measurement</topic><topic>Backscatter</topic><topic>Cancellous bone</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In vitro</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonic propagation</topic><topic>Ultrasonic variables measurement</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wear, K.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wear, K.A.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Anisotropy of attenuation and backscatter in cancellous bone</atitle><btitle>2000 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.00CH37121)</btitle><stitle>ULTSYM</stitle><date>2000</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>2</volume><spage>1325</spage><epage>1328 vol.2</epage><pages>1325-1328 vol.2</pages><issn>1051-0117</issn><isbn>9780780363656</isbn><isbn>0780363655</isbn><abstract>Although bone sonometry is useful in the diagnosis of osteoporosis, the interactions between ultrasound and bone are not well understood yet. In order to investigate these processes, ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter in two orientations were measured in 43 human calcaneal specimens in vitro. In the mediolateral orientation, the ultrasound propagation direction is approximately perpendicular to the trabecular axes. In the anteroposterior orientation, a wide range of angles between the ultrasound propagation direction and trabecular axes is encountered. Average attenuation slope was 18% greater while average backscatter coefficient was 50% lower in the AP orientation compared with the ML orientation. These results support the idea that absorption is a greater component of attenuation than scattering in human calcaneal trabecular bone.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ULTSYM.2000.921567</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1051-0117
ispartof 2000 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.00CH37121), 2000, Vol.2, p.1325-1328 vol.2
issn 1051-0117
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_921567
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Acoustic wave backscattering
Anisotropic magnetoresistance
Anisotropy
Anthropometry
Attenuation
Attenuation measurement
Backscatter
Cancellous bone
Diagnosis
Humans
In vitro
Osteoporosis
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonic propagation
Ultrasonic variables measurement
title Anisotropy of attenuation and backscatter in cancellous bone
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T00%3A56%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Anisotropy%20of%20attenuation%20and%20backscatter%20in%20cancellous%20bone&rft.btitle=2000%20IEEE%20Ultrasonics%20Symposium.%20Proceedings.%20An%20International%20Symposium%20(Cat.%20No.00CH37121)&rft.au=Wear,%20K.A.&rft.date=2000&rft.volume=2&rft.spage=1325&rft.epage=1328%20vol.2&rft.pages=1325-1328%20vol.2&rft.issn=1051-0117&rft.isbn=9780780363656&rft.isbn_list=0780363655&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ULTSYM.2000.921567&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_6IE%3E595938%3C/proquest_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21483564&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=921567&rfr_iscdi=true