Positioning performance comparison between GPS and BDS with data recorded at four MGEX stations in 2020

In December 2018, the BeiDou III (BDS-3) basic system was completed and began to provide global services. along with the BeiDou second-generation satellite navigation system (BDS-2) and Beidou first-generation satellite navigation system (BDS-1), the whole BDS has advantages in the number of satelli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE access 2020-08, p.1-1
Hauptverfasser: Ma, Xiaping, Yu, Kegen, He, Xiaoxing, Montillet, Jean-Philippe, Li, Qinzheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title IEEE access
container_volume
creator Ma, Xiaping
Yu, Kegen
He, Xiaoxing
Montillet, Jean-Philippe
Li, Qinzheng
description In December 2018, the BeiDou III (BDS-3) basic system was completed and began to provide global services. along with the BeiDou second-generation satellite navigation system (BDS-2) and Beidou first-generation satellite navigation system (BDS-1), the whole BDS has advantages in the number of satellites, coverage, and positioning performance. This paper focuses on the comprehensive evaluation of BDS by comparing the data quality and positioning performance of BDS and those of Global Positioning System (GPS). The performance evaluation and comparison is based on 7-day observation data collected in April 2020 at three different geographical locations in China. The experimental results show that GPS and BDS have a number of significant differences. The number of visible satellites in BDS is twice that of GPS in China. The SNRs of GPS signals of different frequencies are quite different from each other, while BDS signals of different frequencies have very similar SNR observations. BDS-3 and GPS achieve similar positioning performance in terms of internal positional error, external positional accuracy, coordinate time series and Dilution of Precision (DOP). The mean and STD of the internal positional error of GPS and BDS are less than 3 m, while the external positional accuracy of both systems is better than 5 m. It is also observed that the overall variation in coordinate time series of the three coordinates of BDS is slightly smaller than that of GPS. In addition, the BDS DOP is basically equivalent to the GPS DOP, although occasionally the former is greater than the latter. The results are largely contrary to most of the results associated with performance comparison between BDS and GPS reported in the literature. The main reason would be that the number of visible satellites, observations and DOP of BDS are superior to GPS and single BDS-1, BDS-2 or BDS-3 in China. We believe that the development of BDS is still in progress and BDS is making continuous performance enhancement.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3015490
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_9163362</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9163362</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>9163362</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ieee_primary_91633623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9jkEKwjAURIMgKOoJ3PwLWJPGVrvUWnUjFOrCnXzbX43YpCQR8fYquHY2A2_gMYyNBQ-E4Ml0maZZUQQhD3kguYhmCe-wfijiZCIjGffYyLkb_2TxQdG8zy65ccoro5W-QEu2NrZBXRKUpmnRKmc0nMk_iTRs8wJQV7BaF_BU_goVegRLpbEVVYAeavOwsN9mR3Aev1YHSsP3zZB1a7w7Gv16wMab7JDuJoqITq1VDdrXKRGxlHEo_69vPRRFyg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Positioning performance comparison between GPS and BDS with data recorded at four MGEX stations in 2020</title><source>IEEE Open Access Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Ma, Xiaping ; Yu, Kegen ; He, Xiaoxing ; Montillet, Jean-Philippe ; Li, Qinzheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Ma, Xiaping ; Yu, Kegen ; He, Xiaoxing ; Montillet, Jean-Philippe ; Li, Qinzheng</creatorcontrib><description>In December 2018, the BeiDou III (BDS-3) basic system was completed and began to provide global services. along with the BeiDou second-generation satellite navigation system (BDS-2) and Beidou first-generation satellite navigation system (BDS-1), the whole BDS has advantages in the number of satellites, coverage, and positioning performance. This paper focuses on the comprehensive evaluation of BDS by comparing the data quality and positioning performance of BDS and those of Global Positioning System (GPS). The performance evaluation and comparison is based on 7-day observation data collected in April 2020 at three different geographical locations in China. The experimental results show that GPS and BDS have a number of significant differences. The number of visible satellites in BDS is twice that of GPS in China. The SNRs of GPS signals of different frequencies are quite different from each other, while BDS signals of different frequencies have very similar SNR observations. BDS-3 and GPS achieve similar positioning performance in terms of internal positional error, external positional accuracy, coordinate time series and Dilution of Precision (DOP). The mean and STD of the internal positional error of GPS and BDS are less than 3 m, while the external positional accuracy of both systems is better than 5 m. It is also observed that the overall variation in coordinate time series of the three coordinates of BDS is slightly smaller than that of GPS. In addition, the BDS DOP is basically equivalent to the GPS DOP, although occasionally the former is greater than the latter. The results are largely contrary to most of the results associated with performance comparison between BDS and GPS reported in the literature. The main reason would be that the number of visible satellites, observations and DOP of BDS are superior to GPS and single BDS-1, BDS-2 or BDS-3 in China. We believe that the development of BDS is still in progress and BDS is making continuous performance enhancement.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2169-3536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3015490</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IAECCG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>BDS ; Clocks ; Global Positioning System ; GPS ; Laboratories ; Orbits ; Performance comparison ; PPP ; Satellite broadcasting ; Satellites ; SPP</subject><ispartof>IEEE access, 2020-08, p.1-1</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9163362$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27633,27924,27925,54933</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ma, Xiaping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Kegen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Xiaoxing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montillet, Jean-Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qinzheng</creatorcontrib><title>Positioning performance comparison between GPS and BDS with data recorded at four MGEX stations in 2020</title><title>IEEE access</title><addtitle>Access</addtitle><description>In December 2018, the BeiDou III (BDS-3) basic system was completed and began to provide global services. along with the BeiDou second-generation satellite navigation system (BDS-2) and Beidou first-generation satellite navigation system (BDS-1), the whole BDS has advantages in the number of satellites, coverage, and positioning performance. This paper focuses on the comprehensive evaluation of BDS by comparing the data quality and positioning performance of BDS and those of Global Positioning System (GPS). The performance evaluation and comparison is based on 7-day observation data collected in April 2020 at three different geographical locations in China. The experimental results show that GPS and BDS have a number of significant differences. The number of visible satellites in BDS is twice that of GPS in China. The SNRs of GPS signals of different frequencies are quite different from each other, while BDS signals of different frequencies have very similar SNR observations. BDS-3 and GPS achieve similar positioning performance in terms of internal positional error, external positional accuracy, coordinate time series and Dilution of Precision (DOP). The mean and STD of the internal positional error of GPS and BDS are less than 3 m, while the external positional accuracy of both systems is better than 5 m. It is also observed that the overall variation in coordinate time series of the three coordinates of BDS is slightly smaller than that of GPS. In addition, the BDS DOP is basically equivalent to the GPS DOP, although occasionally the former is greater than the latter. The results are largely contrary to most of the results associated with performance comparison between BDS and GPS reported in the literature. The main reason would be that the number of visible satellites, observations and DOP of BDS are superior to GPS and single BDS-1, BDS-2 or BDS-3 in China. We believe that the development of BDS is still in progress and BDS is making continuous performance enhancement.</description><subject>BDS</subject><subject>Clocks</subject><subject>Global Positioning System</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Orbits</subject><subject>Performance comparison</subject><subject>PPP</subject><subject>Satellite broadcasting</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>SPP</subject><issn>2169-3536</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ESBDL</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNp9jkEKwjAURIMgKOoJ3PwLWJPGVrvUWnUjFOrCnXzbX43YpCQR8fYquHY2A2_gMYyNBQ-E4Ml0maZZUQQhD3kguYhmCe-wfijiZCIjGffYyLkb_2TxQdG8zy65ccoro5W-QEu2NrZBXRKUpmnRKmc0nMk_iTRs8wJQV7BaF_BU_goVegRLpbEVVYAeavOwsN9mR3Aev1YHSsP3zZB1a7w7Gv16wMab7JDuJoqITq1VDdrXKRGxlHEo_69vPRRFyg</recordid><startdate>20200808</startdate><enddate>20200808</enddate><creator>Ma, Xiaping</creator><creator>Yu, Kegen</creator><creator>He, Xiaoxing</creator><creator>Montillet, Jean-Philippe</creator><creator>Li, Qinzheng</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>ESBDL</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200808</creationdate><title>Positioning performance comparison between GPS and BDS with data recorded at four MGEX stations in 2020</title><author>Ma, Xiaping ; Yu, Kegen ; He, Xiaoxing ; Montillet, Jean-Philippe ; Li, Qinzheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ieee_primary_91633623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>BDS</topic><topic>Clocks</topic><topic>Global Positioning System</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Orbits</topic><topic>Performance comparison</topic><topic>PPP</topic><topic>Satellite broadcasting</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>SPP</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ma, Xiaping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Kegen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Xiaoxing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montillet, Jean-Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Qinzheng</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE Open Access Journals</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ma, Xiaping</au><au>Yu, Kegen</au><au>He, Xiaoxing</au><au>Montillet, Jean-Philippe</au><au>Li, Qinzheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Positioning performance comparison between GPS and BDS with data recorded at four MGEX stations in 2020</atitle><jtitle>IEEE access</jtitle><stitle>Access</stitle><date>2020-08-08</date><risdate>2020</risdate><spage>1</spage><epage>1</epage><pages>1-1</pages><eissn>2169-3536</eissn><coden>IAECCG</coden><abstract>In December 2018, the BeiDou III (BDS-3) basic system was completed and began to provide global services. along with the BeiDou second-generation satellite navigation system (BDS-2) and Beidou first-generation satellite navigation system (BDS-1), the whole BDS has advantages in the number of satellites, coverage, and positioning performance. This paper focuses on the comprehensive evaluation of BDS by comparing the data quality and positioning performance of BDS and those of Global Positioning System (GPS). The performance evaluation and comparison is based on 7-day observation data collected in April 2020 at three different geographical locations in China. The experimental results show that GPS and BDS have a number of significant differences. The number of visible satellites in BDS is twice that of GPS in China. The SNRs of GPS signals of different frequencies are quite different from each other, while BDS signals of different frequencies have very similar SNR observations. BDS-3 and GPS achieve similar positioning performance in terms of internal positional error, external positional accuracy, coordinate time series and Dilution of Precision (DOP). The mean and STD of the internal positional error of GPS and BDS are less than 3 m, while the external positional accuracy of both systems is better than 5 m. It is also observed that the overall variation in coordinate time series of the three coordinates of BDS is slightly smaller than that of GPS. In addition, the BDS DOP is basically equivalent to the GPS DOP, although occasionally the former is greater than the latter. The results are largely contrary to most of the results associated with performance comparison between BDS and GPS reported in the literature. The main reason would be that the number of visible satellites, observations and DOP of BDS are superior to GPS and single BDS-1, BDS-2 or BDS-3 in China. We believe that the development of BDS is still in progress and BDS is making continuous performance enhancement.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3015490</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2169-3536
ispartof IEEE access, 2020-08, p.1-1
issn 2169-3536
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_9163362
source IEEE Open Access Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects BDS
Clocks
Global Positioning System
GPS
Laboratories
Orbits
Performance comparison
PPP
Satellite broadcasting
Satellites
SPP
title Positioning performance comparison between GPS and BDS with data recorded at four MGEX stations in 2020
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T05%3A32%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Positioning%20performance%20comparison%20between%20GPS%20and%20BDS%20with%20data%20recorded%20at%20four%20MGEX%20stations%20in%202020&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20access&rft.au=Ma,%20Xiaping&rft.date=2020-08-08&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=1&rft.pages=1-1&rft.eissn=2169-3536&rft.coden=IAECCG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3015490&rft_dat=%3Cieee%3E9163362%3C/ieee%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=9163362&rfr_iscdi=true