A comparison of methods to estimate particle size distribution parameters and associated errors from multiwavelength optical coefficients

Summary form only given. Under certain a priori assumptions, ground-based lidar can in principle determine both the volume backscatter coefficient /spl beta/(/spl lambda/) and extinction coefficient /spl alpha/(/spl lambda/). From these coefficients, we can estimate the underlying aerosol density n(...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser:	Herman, B.R., Gross, B.M., Moshary, F., Ahmed, S.A.
Format:	Tagungsbericht
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Broadband amplifiers Kernel Laser radar Low-noise amplifiers Microwave integrated circuits Optical amplifiers Positron emission tomography Pulse amplifiers Semiconductor optical amplifiers Stimulated emission
Online-Zugang:	Volltext bestellen
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	140
container_issue
container_start_page	139
container_title
container_volume
creator	Herman, B.R. Gross, B.M. Moshary, F. Ahmed, S.A.
description	Summary form only given. Under certain a priori assumptions, ground-based lidar can in principle determine both the volume backscatter coefficient /spl beta/(/spl lambda/) and extinction coefficient /spl alpha/(/spl lambda/). From these coefficients, we can estimate the underlying aerosol density n(r) within Mie theory. However, as is well known, serious problems result from the ill-posed nature of the Mie kernels and the inversion must be augmented by additional physical assumptions resulting in additional sources of measurement error.
doi_str_mv	10.1109/CLEO.2000.906828
format	Conference Proceeding
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_906828</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>906828</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>906828</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ieee_primary_9068283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j01LA0EMhgdEqB-9i6f8AdeZrbNtj1IqHgQv3su4m2kjMzvLJFX0H_ivDejZU-B9ePImxlw52zhn17ebp-1z01prm7XtVu3qxJw775e-7RZ33czMmd8UWm-X1vkz830PfclTqMRlhBIhoxzKwCAFkIVyEATFQn1CYPpCGIil0utRSA1FQRWsDGEcIDCXntQZAGstmsZaMuRjEvoI75hw3MsByqT7QtJqjJF6wlH40pzGkBjnf_PCXD9sXzaPN4SIu6nqKfVz9_vU4l_4A73cVTw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>A comparison of methods to estimate particle size distribution parameters and associated errors from multiwavelength optical coefficients</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Herman, B.R. ; Gross, B.M. ; Moshary, F. ; Ahmed, S.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Herman, B.R. ; Gross, B.M. ; Moshary, F. ; Ahmed, S.A.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary form only given. Under certain a priori assumptions, ground-based lidar can in principle determine both the volume backscatter coefficient /spl beta/(/spl lambda/) and extinction coefficient /spl alpha/(/spl lambda/). From these coefficients, we can estimate the underlying aerosol density n(r) within Mie theory. However, as is well known, serious problems result from the ill-posed nature of the Mie kernels and the inversion must be augmented by additional physical assumptions resulting in additional sources of measurement error.</description><identifier>ISBN: 1557526346</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781557526342</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/CLEO.2000.906828</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Broadband amplifiers ; Kernel ; Laser radar ; Low-noise amplifiers ; Microwave integrated circuits ; Optical amplifiers ; Positron emission tomography ; Pulse amplifiers ; Semiconductor optical amplifiers ; Stimulated emission</subject><ispartof>Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO 2000). Technical Digest. Postconference Edition. TOPS Vol.39 (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37088), 2000, p.139-140</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/906828$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,4050,4051,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/906828$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Herman, B.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, B.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moshary, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, S.A.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of methods to estimate particle size distribution parameters and associated errors from multiwavelength optical coefficients</title><title>Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO 2000). Technical Digest. Postconference Edition. TOPS Vol.39 (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37088)</title><addtitle>CLEO</addtitle><description>Summary form only given. Under certain a priori assumptions, ground-based lidar can in principle determine both the volume backscatter coefficient /spl beta/(/spl lambda/) and extinction coefficient /spl alpha/(/spl lambda/). From these coefficients, we can estimate the underlying aerosol density n(r) within Mie theory. However, as is well known, serious problems result from the ill-posed nature of the Mie kernels and the inversion must be augmented by additional physical assumptions resulting in additional sources of measurement error.</description><subject>Broadband amplifiers</subject><subject>Kernel</subject><subject>Laser radar</subject><subject>Low-noise amplifiers</subject><subject>Microwave integrated circuits</subject><subject>Optical amplifiers</subject><subject>Positron emission tomography</subject><subject>Pulse amplifiers</subject><subject>Semiconductor optical amplifiers</subject><subject>Stimulated emission</subject><isbn>1557526346</isbn><isbn>9781557526342</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNp9j01LA0EMhgdEqB-9i6f8AdeZrbNtj1IqHgQv3su4m2kjMzvLJFX0H_ivDejZU-B9ePImxlw52zhn17ebp-1z01prm7XtVu3qxJw775e-7RZ33czMmd8UWm-X1vkz830PfclTqMRlhBIhoxzKwCAFkIVyEATFQn1CYPpCGIil0utRSA1FQRWsDGEcIDCXntQZAGstmsZaMuRjEvoI75hw3MsByqT7QtJqjJF6wlH40pzGkBjnf_PCXD9sXzaPN4SIu6nqKfVz9_vU4l_4A73cVTw</recordid><startdate>2000</startdate><enddate>2000</enddate><creator>Herman, B.R.</creator><creator>Gross, B.M.</creator><creator>Moshary, F.</creator><creator>Ahmed, S.A.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2000</creationdate><title>A comparison of methods to estimate particle size distribution parameters and associated errors from multiwavelength optical coefficients</title><author>Herman, B.R. ; Gross, B.M. ; Moshary, F. ; Ahmed, S.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ieee_primary_9068283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Broadband amplifiers</topic><topic>Kernel</topic><topic>Laser radar</topic><topic>Low-noise amplifiers</topic><topic>Microwave integrated circuits</topic><topic>Optical amplifiers</topic><topic>Positron emission tomography</topic><topic>Pulse amplifiers</topic><topic>Semiconductor optical amplifiers</topic><topic>Stimulated emission</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Herman, B.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, B.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moshary, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, S.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Herman, B.R.</au><au>Gross, B.M.</au><au>Moshary, F.</au><au>Ahmed, S.A.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>A comparison of methods to estimate particle size distribution parameters and associated errors from multiwavelength optical coefficients</atitle><btitle>Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO 2000). Technical Digest. Postconference Edition. TOPS Vol.39 (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37088)</btitle><stitle>CLEO</stitle><date>2000</date><risdate>2000</risdate><spage>139</spage><epage>140</epage><pages>139-140</pages><isbn>1557526346</isbn><isbn>9781557526342</isbn><abstract>Summary form only given. Under certain a priori assumptions, ground-based lidar can in principle determine both the volume backscatter coefficient /spl beta/(/spl lambda/) and extinction coefficient /spl alpha/(/spl lambda/). From these coefficients, we can estimate the underlying aerosol density n(r) within Mie theory. However, as is well known, serious problems result from the ill-posed nature of the Mie kernels and the inversion must be augmented by additional physical assumptions resulting in additional sources of measurement error.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/CLEO.2000.906828</doi></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier	ISBN: 1557526346
ispartof	Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO 2000). Technical Digest. Postconference Edition. TOPS Vol.39 (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37088), 2000, p.139-140
issn
language	eng
recordid	cdi_ieee_primary_906828
source	IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects	Broadband amplifiers Kernel Laser radar Low-noise amplifiers Microwave integrated circuits Optical amplifiers Positron emission tomography Pulse amplifiers Semiconductor optical amplifiers Stimulated emission
title	A comparison of methods to estimate particle size distribution parameters and associated errors from multiwavelength optical coefficients
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T12%3A34%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20methods%20to%20estimate%20particle%20size%20distribution%20parameters%20and%20associated%20errors%20from%20multiwavelength%20optical%20coefficients&rft.btitle=Conference%20on%20Lasers%20and%20Electro-Optics%20(CLEO%202000).%20Technical%20Digest.%20Postconference%20Edition.%20TOPS%20Vol.39%20(IEEE%20Cat.%20No.00CH37088)&rft.au=Herman,%20B.R.&rft.date=2000&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=140&rft.pages=139-140&rft.isbn=1557526346&rft.isbn_list=9781557526342&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/CLEO.2000.906828&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E906828%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=906828&rfr_iscdi=true