Probabilistic checkpointing in time warp parallel simulation
In the Time Warp (TW) protocol, the system state must be checkpointed to facilitate the rollback operation. While increasing the checkpointing frequency increases the state saving cost, an infrequent scheme also escalates the coast forward effort when a large number of executed events are redone. Th...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 373 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 366 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Seng Chuan Tay Yong Meng Teo |
description | In the Time Warp (TW) protocol, the system state must be checkpointed to facilitate the rollback operation. While increasing the checkpointing frequency increases the state saving cost, an infrequent scheme also escalates the coast forward effort when a large number of executed events are redone. This paper proposes a probabilistic approach to checkpointing. We derive the rollback probability, and compute the expected coast forward effort if a state is not saved. To reduce implementation overheads, the rollback probability and coast forward cost are predetermined and make available at runtime as a lookup table. Based on the derived expectation, a store vector is saved only if the expected coast forward effort is larger than the state saving cost and vice versa. Our experiments show that the cost model reduces the simulation elapsed time by close to 30% as compared to saving the system state after each event execution, and saving the system state at a predefined interval. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/MASCOT.2000.876560 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_876560</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>876560</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>876560</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i174t-750e676c43145f5882476f0ae2f20ec5abea124c1acaf49707af2318e1ad72d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj8tKxDAUQIMPsI7zA7PKD7Te3DS5LbgZii8YGcFxPdxmEo32RVsR_15hXJ3dORwhVgoypaC8flq_VNtdhgCQFWSNhRORoCaTAiKdimVJBZAtDRAW9kwkyqBNyejyQlxO0wcAgjI6ETfPY19zHZs4zdFJ9-7d59DHbo7dm4ydnGPr5TePgxx45KbxjZxi-9XwHPvuSpwHbia__OdCvN7d7qqHdLO9f6zWmzQqyue_LHhL1uVa5SaYosCcbAD2GBC8M1x7Vpg7xY5DXhIQB9Sq8IoPhAfQC7E6eqP3fj-MseXxZ3_81r8OCEqy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Probabilistic checkpointing in time warp parallel simulation</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Seng Chuan Tay ; Yong Meng Teo</creator><creatorcontrib>Seng Chuan Tay ; Yong Meng Teo</creatorcontrib><description>In the Time Warp (TW) protocol, the system state must be checkpointed to facilitate the rollback operation. While increasing the checkpointing frequency increases the state saving cost, an infrequent scheme also escalates the coast forward effort when a large number of executed events are redone. This paper proposes a probabilistic approach to checkpointing. We derive the rollback probability, and compute the expected coast forward effort if a state is not saved. To reduce implementation overheads, the rollback probability and coast forward cost are predetermined and make available at runtime as a lookup table. Based on the derived expectation, a store vector is saved only if the expected coast forward effort is larger than the state saving cost and vice versa. Our experiments show that the cost model reduces the simulation elapsed time by close to 30% as compared to saving the system state after each event execution, and saving the system state at a predefined interval.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-7539</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780769507286</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 076950728X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2375-0227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/MASCOT.2000.876560</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Checkpointing ; Computational modeling ; Cost function ; Discrete event simulation ; Frequency ; Information technology ; Protocols ; Runtime ; Table lookup ; Time warp simulation</subject><ispartof>Proceedings 8th International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (Cat. No.PR00728), 2000, p.366-373</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/876560$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2052,4036,4037,27902,54895</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/876560$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seng Chuan Tay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yong Meng Teo</creatorcontrib><title>Probabilistic checkpointing in time warp parallel simulation</title><title>Proceedings 8th International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (Cat. No.PR00728)</title><addtitle>MASCOT</addtitle><description>In the Time Warp (TW) protocol, the system state must be checkpointed to facilitate the rollback operation. While increasing the checkpointing frequency increases the state saving cost, an infrequent scheme also escalates the coast forward effort when a large number of executed events are redone. This paper proposes a probabilistic approach to checkpointing. We derive the rollback probability, and compute the expected coast forward effort if a state is not saved. To reduce implementation overheads, the rollback probability and coast forward cost are predetermined and make available at runtime as a lookup table. Based on the derived expectation, a store vector is saved only if the expected coast forward effort is larger than the state saving cost and vice versa. Our experiments show that the cost model reduces the simulation elapsed time by close to 30% as compared to saving the system state after each event execution, and saving the system state at a predefined interval.</description><subject>Checkpointing</subject><subject>Computational modeling</subject><subject>Cost function</subject><subject>Discrete event simulation</subject><subject>Frequency</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Protocols</subject><subject>Runtime</subject><subject>Table lookup</subject><subject>Time warp simulation</subject><issn>1526-7539</issn><issn>2375-0227</issn><isbn>9780769507286</isbn><isbn>076950728X</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotj8tKxDAUQIMPsI7zA7PKD7Te3DS5LbgZii8YGcFxPdxmEo32RVsR_15hXJ3dORwhVgoypaC8flq_VNtdhgCQFWSNhRORoCaTAiKdimVJBZAtDRAW9kwkyqBNyejyQlxO0wcAgjI6ETfPY19zHZs4zdFJ9-7d59DHbo7dm4ydnGPr5TePgxx45KbxjZxi-9XwHPvuSpwHbia__OdCvN7d7qqHdLO9f6zWmzQqyue_LHhL1uVa5SaYosCcbAD2GBC8M1x7Vpg7xY5DXhIQB9Sq8IoPhAfQC7E6eqP3fj-MseXxZ3_81r8OCEqy</recordid><startdate>2000</startdate><enddate>2000</enddate><creator>Seng Chuan Tay</creator><creator>Yong Meng Teo</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2000</creationdate><title>Probabilistic checkpointing in time warp parallel simulation</title><author>Seng Chuan Tay ; Yong Meng Teo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i174t-750e676c43145f5882476f0ae2f20ec5abea124c1acaf49707af2318e1ad72d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Checkpointing</topic><topic>Computational modeling</topic><topic>Cost function</topic><topic>Discrete event simulation</topic><topic>Frequency</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Protocols</topic><topic>Runtime</topic><topic>Table lookup</topic><topic>Time warp simulation</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seng Chuan Tay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yong Meng Teo</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seng Chuan Tay</au><au>Yong Meng Teo</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Probabilistic checkpointing in time warp parallel simulation</atitle><btitle>Proceedings 8th International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (Cat. No.PR00728)</btitle><stitle>MASCOT</stitle><date>2000</date><risdate>2000</risdate><spage>366</spage><epage>373</epage><pages>366-373</pages><issn>1526-7539</issn><eissn>2375-0227</eissn><isbn>9780769507286</isbn><isbn>076950728X</isbn><abstract>In the Time Warp (TW) protocol, the system state must be checkpointed to facilitate the rollback operation. While increasing the checkpointing frequency increases the state saving cost, an infrequent scheme also escalates the coast forward effort when a large number of executed events are redone. This paper proposes a probabilistic approach to checkpointing. We derive the rollback probability, and compute the expected coast forward effort if a state is not saved. To reduce implementation overheads, the rollback probability and coast forward cost are predetermined and make available at runtime as a lookup table. Based on the derived expectation, a store vector is saved only if the expected coast forward effort is larger than the state saving cost and vice versa. Our experiments show that the cost model reduces the simulation elapsed time by close to 30% as compared to saving the system state after each event execution, and saving the system state at a predefined interval.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/MASCOT.2000.876560</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1526-7539 |
ispartof | Proceedings 8th International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (Cat. No.PR00728), 2000, p.366-373 |
issn | 1526-7539 2375-0227 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_876560 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Checkpointing Computational modeling Cost function Discrete event simulation Frequency Information technology Protocols Runtime Table lookup Time warp simulation |
title | Probabilistic checkpointing in time warp parallel simulation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T02%3A53%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Probabilistic%20checkpointing%20in%20time%20warp%20parallel%20simulation&rft.btitle=Proceedings%208th%20International%20Symposium%20on%20Modeling,%20Analysis%20and%20Simulation%20of%20Computer%20and%20Telecommunication%20Systems%20(Cat.%20No.PR00728)&rft.au=Seng%20Chuan%20Tay&rft.date=2000&rft.spage=366&rft.epage=373&rft.pages=366-373&rft.issn=1526-7539&rft.eissn=2375-0227&rft.isbn=9780769507286&rft.isbn_list=076950728X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/MASCOT.2000.876560&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E876560%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=876560&rfr_iscdi=true |