Direct Energy Trading of Microgrids in Distribution Energy Market
Recent advancement of distributed renewable generation has motivated microgrids to trade energy directly with one another, as well as with the utility, in order to minimize their operational costs. Energy trading among microgrids, however, confronts challenges such as reaching a fair trading price,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on power systems 2020-01, Vol.35 (1), p.639-651 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 651 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 639 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on power systems |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Kim, Hongseok Lee, Joohee Bahrami, Shahab Wong, Vincent W. S. |
description | Recent advancement of distributed renewable generation has motivated microgrids to trade energy directly with one another, as well as with the utility, in order to minimize their operational costs. Energy trading among microgrids, however, confronts challenges such as reaching a fair trading price, maximizing participants' profit, and satisfying power network constraints. In this paper, we formulate the direct energy trading among multiple microgrids as a generalized Nash bargaining (GNB) problem that involves the distribution network's operational constraints (e.g., power balance equations and voltage limits). We prove that solving the GNB problem maximizes the social welfare and also fairly distributes the revenue among the microgrids based on their market power. To address the nonconvexity of the GNB problem, we propose a two-phase approach. The first phase involves solving the optimal power flow problem in a distributed fashion using the alternative direction method of multipliers to determine the amount of energy trading. The second phase determines the market clearing price and mutual payments of the microgrids. Simulation results on an IEEE 33-bus system with four microgrids show that the proposed framework substantially reduces total network cost by 37.2%. Our results suggest direct trading need be enforced by regulators to maximize the social welfare. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2926305 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_8753627</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>8753627</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2339345095</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-21169635673cb94843e322a8b620c5e36f9137072eede966bf441f33edc3fadd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA7CJxDpl7LEde1m1vKRWIChiaeUxqVwgKXa66N-T0sJqFnPPndFh7JLDiHOwN4vn95fXkQBuR8IKjaCO2IArZVLQmT1mAzBGpcYqOGVnMa4AQPeLARtPfaCyS24bCsttsgh55Ztl0tbJ3JehXQZfxcQ3ydTHLvhi0_m2-QvP8_BB3Tk7qfPPSBeHOWRvd7eLyUM6e7p_nIxnaYlSdqngXFuNSmdYFlYaiYRC5KbQAkpFqGvLMYNMEFVktS5qKXmNSFWJdV5VOGTX-951aL83FDu3ajeh6U86gWhRKrCqT4l9qn8-xkC1Wwf_lYet4-B2qtyvKrdT5Q6qeuhqD3ki-gdMplCLDH8AditkSA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2339345095</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Direct Energy Trading of Microgrids in Distribution Energy Market</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Kim, Hongseok ; Lee, Joohee ; Bahrami, Shahab ; Wong, Vincent W. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hongseok ; Lee, Joohee ; Bahrami, Shahab ; Wong, Vincent W. S.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent advancement of distributed renewable generation has motivated microgrids to trade energy directly with one another, as well as with the utility, in order to minimize their operational costs. Energy trading among microgrids, however, confronts challenges such as reaching a fair trading price, maximizing participants' profit, and satisfying power network constraints. In this paper, we formulate the direct energy trading among multiple microgrids as a generalized Nash bargaining (GNB) problem that involves the distribution network's operational constraints (e.g., power balance equations and voltage limits). We prove that solving the GNB problem maximizes the social welfare and also fairly distributes the revenue among the microgrids based on their market power. To address the nonconvexity of the GNB problem, we propose a two-phase approach. The first phase involves solving the optimal power flow problem in a distributed fashion using the alternative direction method of multipliers to determine the amount of energy trading. The second phase determines the market clearing price and mutual payments of the microgrids. Simulation results on an IEEE 33-bus system with four microgrids show that the proposed framework substantially reduces total network cost by 37.2%. Our results suggest direct trading need be enforced by regulators to maximize the social welfare.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-8950</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0679</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2926305</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITPSEG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>ADMM ; Batteries ; Companies ; direct energy trading ; distributed optimization ; Distribution management ; Economic models ; Electric power grids ; Energy conservation ; Energy costs ; Energy distribution ; Energy industry ; generalized Nash bargaining ; Indexes ; Mathematical model ; Microgrid ; Microgrids ; Operating costs ; optimal power flow ; Optimization ; Power flow ; Reactive power ; Regulators</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on power systems, 2020-01, Vol.35 (1), p.639-651</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-21169635673cb94843e322a8b620c5e36f9137072eede966bf441f33edc3fadd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-21169635673cb94843e322a8b620c5e36f9137072eede966bf441f33edc3fadd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3554-0539 ; 0000-0002-5744-2358 ; 0000-0002-1519-8174 ; 0000-0003-3821-4365</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8753627$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,796,27924,27925,54758</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8753627$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hongseok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Joohee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahrami, Shahab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Vincent W. S.</creatorcontrib><title>Direct Energy Trading of Microgrids in Distribution Energy Market</title><title>IEEE transactions on power systems</title><addtitle>TPWRS</addtitle><description>Recent advancement of distributed renewable generation has motivated microgrids to trade energy directly with one another, as well as with the utility, in order to minimize their operational costs. Energy trading among microgrids, however, confronts challenges such as reaching a fair trading price, maximizing participants' profit, and satisfying power network constraints. In this paper, we formulate the direct energy trading among multiple microgrids as a generalized Nash bargaining (GNB) problem that involves the distribution network's operational constraints (e.g., power balance equations and voltage limits). We prove that solving the GNB problem maximizes the social welfare and also fairly distributes the revenue among the microgrids based on their market power. To address the nonconvexity of the GNB problem, we propose a two-phase approach. The first phase involves solving the optimal power flow problem in a distributed fashion using the alternative direction method of multipliers to determine the amount of energy trading. The second phase determines the market clearing price and mutual payments of the microgrids. Simulation results on an IEEE 33-bus system with four microgrids show that the proposed framework substantially reduces total network cost by 37.2%. Our results suggest direct trading need be enforced by regulators to maximize the social welfare.</description><subject>ADMM</subject><subject>Batteries</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>direct energy trading</subject><subject>distributed optimization</subject><subject>Distribution management</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Electric power grids</subject><subject>Energy conservation</subject><subject>Energy costs</subject><subject>Energy distribution</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>generalized Nash bargaining</subject><subject>Indexes</subject><subject>Mathematical model</subject><subject>Microgrid</subject><subject>Microgrids</subject><subject>Operating costs</subject><subject>optimal power flow</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Power flow</subject><subject>Reactive power</subject><subject>Regulators</subject><issn>0885-8950</issn><issn>1558-0679</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA7CJxDpl7LEde1m1vKRWIChiaeUxqVwgKXa66N-T0sJqFnPPndFh7JLDiHOwN4vn95fXkQBuR8IKjaCO2IArZVLQmT1mAzBGpcYqOGVnMa4AQPeLARtPfaCyS24bCsttsgh55Ztl0tbJ3JehXQZfxcQ3ydTHLvhi0_m2-QvP8_BB3Tk7qfPPSBeHOWRvd7eLyUM6e7p_nIxnaYlSdqngXFuNSmdYFlYaiYRC5KbQAkpFqGvLMYNMEFVktS5qKXmNSFWJdV5VOGTX-951aL83FDu3ajeh6U86gWhRKrCqT4l9qn8-xkC1Wwf_lYet4-B2qtyvKrdT5Q6qeuhqD3ki-gdMplCLDH8AditkSA</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Kim, Hongseok</creator><creator>Lee, Joohee</creator><creator>Bahrami, Shahab</creator><creator>Wong, Vincent W. S.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3554-0539</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5744-2358</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1519-8174</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3821-4365</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Direct Energy Trading of Microgrids in Distribution Energy Market</title><author>Kim, Hongseok ; Lee, Joohee ; Bahrami, Shahab ; Wong, Vincent W. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-21169635673cb94843e322a8b620c5e36f9137072eede966bf441f33edc3fadd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>ADMM</topic><topic>Batteries</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>direct energy trading</topic><topic>distributed optimization</topic><topic>Distribution management</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Electric power grids</topic><topic>Energy conservation</topic><topic>Energy costs</topic><topic>Energy distribution</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>generalized Nash bargaining</topic><topic>Indexes</topic><topic>Mathematical model</topic><topic>Microgrid</topic><topic>Microgrids</topic><topic>Operating costs</topic><topic>optimal power flow</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Power flow</topic><topic>Reactive power</topic><topic>Regulators</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hongseok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Joohee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahrami, Shahab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Vincent W. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Hongseok</au><au>Lee, Joohee</au><au>Bahrami, Shahab</au><au>Wong, Vincent W. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Direct Energy Trading of Microgrids in Distribution Energy Market</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power systems</jtitle><stitle>TPWRS</stitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>639</spage><epage>651</epage><pages>639-651</pages><issn>0885-8950</issn><eissn>1558-0679</eissn><coden>ITPSEG</coden><abstract>Recent advancement of distributed renewable generation has motivated microgrids to trade energy directly with one another, as well as with the utility, in order to minimize their operational costs. Energy trading among microgrids, however, confronts challenges such as reaching a fair trading price, maximizing participants' profit, and satisfying power network constraints. In this paper, we formulate the direct energy trading among multiple microgrids as a generalized Nash bargaining (GNB) problem that involves the distribution network's operational constraints (e.g., power balance equations and voltage limits). We prove that solving the GNB problem maximizes the social welfare and also fairly distributes the revenue among the microgrids based on their market power. To address the nonconvexity of the GNB problem, we propose a two-phase approach. The first phase involves solving the optimal power flow problem in a distributed fashion using the alternative direction method of multipliers to determine the amount of energy trading. The second phase determines the market clearing price and mutual payments of the microgrids. Simulation results on an IEEE 33-bus system with four microgrids show that the proposed framework substantially reduces total network cost by 37.2%. Our results suggest direct trading need be enforced by regulators to maximize the social welfare.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2926305</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3554-0539</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5744-2358</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1519-8174</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3821-4365</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0885-8950 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on power systems, 2020-01, Vol.35 (1), p.639-651 |
issn | 0885-8950 1558-0679 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_8753627 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | ADMM Batteries Companies direct energy trading distributed optimization Distribution management Economic models Electric power grids Energy conservation Energy costs Energy distribution Energy industry generalized Nash bargaining Indexes Mathematical model Microgrid Microgrids Operating costs optimal power flow Optimization Power flow Reactive power Regulators |
title | Direct Energy Trading of Microgrids in Distribution Energy Market |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A59%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Direct%20Energy%20Trading%20of%20Microgrids%20in%20Distribution%20Energy%20Market&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20power%20systems&rft.au=Kim,%20Hongseok&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=639&rft.epage=651&rft.pages=639-651&rft.issn=0885-8950&rft.eissn=1558-0679&rft.coden=ITPSEG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2926305&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E2339345095%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2339345095&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=8753627&rfr_iscdi=true |