Direct Energy Trading of Microgrids in Distribution Energy Market

Recent advancement of distributed renewable generation has motivated microgrids to trade energy directly with one another, as well as with the utility, in order to minimize their operational costs. Energy trading among microgrids, however, confronts challenges such as reaching a fair trading price,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on power systems 2020-01, Vol.35 (1), p.639-651
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Hongseok, Lee, Joohee, Bahrami, Shahab, Wong, Vincent W. S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 651
container_issue 1
container_start_page 639
container_title IEEE transactions on power systems
container_volume 35
creator Kim, Hongseok
Lee, Joohee
Bahrami, Shahab
Wong, Vincent W. S.
description Recent advancement of distributed renewable generation has motivated microgrids to trade energy directly with one another, as well as with the utility, in order to minimize their operational costs. Energy trading among microgrids, however, confronts challenges such as reaching a fair trading price, maximizing participants' profit, and satisfying power network constraints. In this paper, we formulate the direct energy trading among multiple microgrids as a generalized Nash bargaining (GNB) problem that involves the distribution network's operational constraints (e.g., power balance equations and voltage limits). We prove that solving the GNB problem maximizes the social welfare and also fairly distributes the revenue among the microgrids based on their market power. To address the nonconvexity of the GNB problem, we propose a two-phase approach. The first phase involves solving the optimal power flow problem in a distributed fashion using the alternative direction method of multipliers to determine the amount of energy trading. The second phase determines the market clearing price and mutual payments of the microgrids. Simulation results on an IEEE 33-bus system with four microgrids show that the proposed framework substantially reduces total network cost by 37.2%. Our results suggest direct trading need be enforced by regulators to maximize the social welfare.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2926305
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_8753627</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>8753627</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2339345095</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-21169635673cb94843e322a8b620c5e36f9137072eede966bf441f33edc3fadd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA7CJxDpl7LEde1m1vKRWIChiaeUxqVwgKXa66N-T0sJqFnPPndFh7JLDiHOwN4vn95fXkQBuR8IKjaCO2IArZVLQmT1mAzBGpcYqOGVnMa4AQPeLARtPfaCyS24bCsttsgh55Ztl0tbJ3JehXQZfxcQ3ydTHLvhi0_m2-QvP8_BB3Tk7qfPPSBeHOWRvd7eLyUM6e7p_nIxnaYlSdqngXFuNSmdYFlYaiYRC5KbQAkpFqGvLMYNMEFVktS5qKXmNSFWJdV5VOGTX-951aL83FDu3ajeh6U86gWhRKrCqT4l9qn8-xkC1Wwf_lYet4-B2qtyvKrdT5Q6qeuhqD3ki-gdMplCLDH8AditkSA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2339345095</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Direct Energy Trading of Microgrids in Distribution Energy Market</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Kim, Hongseok ; Lee, Joohee ; Bahrami, Shahab ; Wong, Vincent W. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hongseok ; Lee, Joohee ; Bahrami, Shahab ; Wong, Vincent W. S.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent advancement of distributed renewable generation has motivated microgrids to trade energy directly with one another, as well as with the utility, in order to minimize their operational costs. Energy trading among microgrids, however, confronts challenges such as reaching a fair trading price, maximizing participants' profit, and satisfying power network constraints. In this paper, we formulate the direct energy trading among multiple microgrids as a generalized Nash bargaining (GNB) problem that involves the distribution network's operational constraints (e.g., power balance equations and voltage limits). We prove that solving the GNB problem maximizes the social welfare and also fairly distributes the revenue among the microgrids based on their market power. To address the nonconvexity of the GNB problem, we propose a two-phase approach. The first phase involves solving the optimal power flow problem in a distributed fashion using the alternative direction method of multipliers to determine the amount of energy trading. The second phase determines the market clearing price and mutual payments of the microgrids. Simulation results on an IEEE 33-bus system with four microgrids show that the proposed framework substantially reduces total network cost by 37.2%. Our results suggest direct trading need be enforced by regulators to maximize the social welfare.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-8950</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0679</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2926305</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITPSEG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>ADMM ; Batteries ; Companies ; direct energy trading ; distributed optimization ; Distribution management ; Economic models ; Electric power grids ; Energy conservation ; Energy costs ; Energy distribution ; Energy industry ; generalized Nash bargaining ; Indexes ; Mathematical model ; Microgrid ; Microgrids ; Operating costs ; optimal power flow ; Optimization ; Power flow ; Reactive power ; Regulators</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on power systems, 2020-01, Vol.35 (1), p.639-651</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-21169635673cb94843e322a8b620c5e36f9137072eede966bf441f33edc3fadd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-21169635673cb94843e322a8b620c5e36f9137072eede966bf441f33edc3fadd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3554-0539 ; 0000-0002-5744-2358 ; 0000-0002-1519-8174 ; 0000-0003-3821-4365</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8753627$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,796,27924,27925,54758</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8753627$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hongseok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Joohee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahrami, Shahab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Vincent W. S.</creatorcontrib><title>Direct Energy Trading of Microgrids in Distribution Energy Market</title><title>IEEE transactions on power systems</title><addtitle>TPWRS</addtitle><description>Recent advancement of distributed renewable generation has motivated microgrids to trade energy directly with one another, as well as with the utility, in order to minimize their operational costs. Energy trading among microgrids, however, confronts challenges such as reaching a fair trading price, maximizing participants' profit, and satisfying power network constraints. In this paper, we formulate the direct energy trading among multiple microgrids as a generalized Nash bargaining (GNB) problem that involves the distribution network's operational constraints (e.g., power balance equations and voltage limits). We prove that solving the GNB problem maximizes the social welfare and also fairly distributes the revenue among the microgrids based on their market power. To address the nonconvexity of the GNB problem, we propose a two-phase approach. The first phase involves solving the optimal power flow problem in a distributed fashion using the alternative direction method of multipliers to determine the amount of energy trading. The second phase determines the market clearing price and mutual payments of the microgrids. Simulation results on an IEEE 33-bus system with four microgrids show that the proposed framework substantially reduces total network cost by 37.2%. Our results suggest direct trading need be enforced by regulators to maximize the social welfare.</description><subject>ADMM</subject><subject>Batteries</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>direct energy trading</subject><subject>distributed optimization</subject><subject>Distribution management</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Electric power grids</subject><subject>Energy conservation</subject><subject>Energy costs</subject><subject>Energy distribution</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>generalized Nash bargaining</subject><subject>Indexes</subject><subject>Mathematical model</subject><subject>Microgrid</subject><subject>Microgrids</subject><subject>Operating costs</subject><subject>optimal power flow</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Power flow</subject><subject>Reactive power</subject><subject>Regulators</subject><issn>0885-8950</issn><issn>1558-0679</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA7CJxDpl7LEde1m1vKRWIChiaeUxqVwgKXa66N-T0sJqFnPPndFh7JLDiHOwN4vn95fXkQBuR8IKjaCO2IArZVLQmT1mAzBGpcYqOGVnMa4AQPeLARtPfaCyS24bCsttsgh55Ztl0tbJ3JehXQZfxcQ3ydTHLvhi0_m2-QvP8_BB3Tk7qfPPSBeHOWRvd7eLyUM6e7p_nIxnaYlSdqngXFuNSmdYFlYaiYRC5KbQAkpFqGvLMYNMEFVktS5qKXmNSFWJdV5VOGTX-951aL83FDu3ajeh6U86gWhRKrCqT4l9qn8-xkC1Wwf_lYet4-B2qtyvKrdT5Q6qeuhqD3ki-gdMplCLDH8AditkSA</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Kim, Hongseok</creator><creator>Lee, Joohee</creator><creator>Bahrami, Shahab</creator><creator>Wong, Vincent W. S.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3554-0539</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5744-2358</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1519-8174</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3821-4365</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Direct Energy Trading of Microgrids in Distribution Energy Market</title><author>Kim, Hongseok ; Lee, Joohee ; Bahrami, Shahab ; Wong, Vincent W. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-21169635673cb94843e322a8b620c5e36f9137072eede966bf441f33edc3fadd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>ADMM</topic><topic>Batteries</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>direct energy trading</topic><topic>distributed optimization</topic><topic>Distribution management</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Electric power grids</topic><topic>Energy conservation</topic><topic>Energy costs</topic><topic>Energy distribution</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>generalized Nash bargaining</topic><topic>Indexes</topic><topic>Mathematical model</topic><topic>Microgrid</topic><topic>Microgrids</topic><topic>Operating costs</topic><topic>optimal power flow</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Power flow</topic><topic>Reactive power</topic><topic>Regulators</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hongseok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Joohee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahrami, Shahab</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Vincent W. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Hongseok</au><au>Lee, Joohee</au><au>Bahrami, Shahab</au><au>Wong, Vincent W. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Direct Energy Trading of Microgrids in Distribution Energy Market</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power systems</jtitle><stitle>TPWRS</stitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>639</spage><epage>651</epage><pages>639-651</pages><issn>0885-8950</issn><eissn>1558-0679</eissn><coden>ITPSEG</coden><abstract>Recent advancement of distributed renewable generation has motivated microgrids to trade energy directly with one another, as well as with the utility, in order to minimize their operational costs. Energy trading among microgrids, however, confronts challenges such as reaching a fair trading price, maximizing participants' profit, and satisfying power network constraints. In this paper, we formulate the direct energy trading among multiple microgrids as a generalized Nash bargaining (GNB) problem that involves the distribution network's operational constraints (e.g., power balance equations and voltage limits). We prove that solving the GNB problem maximizes the social welfare and also fairly distributes the revenue among the microgrids based on their market power. To address the nonconvexity of the GNB problem, we propose a two-phase approach. The first phase involves solving the optimal power flow problem in a distributed fashion using the alternative direction method of multipliers to determine the amount of energy trading. The second phase determines the market clearing price and mutual payments of the microgrids. Simulation results on an IEEE 33-bus system with four microgrids show that the proposed framework substantially reduces total network cost by 37.2%. Our results suggest direct trading need be enforced by regulators to maximize the social welfare.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2926305</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3554-0539</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5744-2358</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1519-8174</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3821-4365</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0885-8950
ispartof IEEE transactions on power systems, 2020-01, Vol.35 (1), p.639-651
issn 0885-8950
1558-0679
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_8753627
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects ADMM
Batteries
Companies
direct energy trading
distributed optimization
Distribution management
Economic models
Electric power grids
Energy conservation
Energy costs
Energy distribution
Energy industry
generalized Nash bargaining
Indexes
Mathematical model
Microgrid
Microgrids
Operating costs
optimal power flow
Optimization
Power flow
Reactive power
Regulators
title Direct Energy Trading of Microgrids in Distribution Energy Market
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A59%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Direct%20Energy%20Trading%20of%20Microgrids%20in%20Distribution%20Energy%20Market&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20power%20systems&rft.au=Kim,%20Hongseok&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=639&rft.epage=651&rft.pages=639-651&rft.issn=0885-8950&rft.eissn=1558-0679&rft.coden=ITPSEG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2926305&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E2339345095%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2339345095&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=8753627&rfr_iscdi=true