K -User Interference Channels With Backhaul Cooperation: DoF vs. Backhaul Load Trade-Off

In this paper, we consider K-user interference channels with M antennas per node and with backhaul collaboration in one side (among the transmitters or among the receivers), for M, K ∈ N, and investigate the tradeoff between the rate in the channel versus the communication load in the backhaul. In t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on information theory 2019-11, Vol.65 (11), p.7253-7267
Hauptverfasser: Kananian, Borna, Maddah-Ali, Mohammad Ali, Hossein Khalaj, Babak
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7267
container_issue 11
container_start_page 7253
container_title IEEE transactions on information theory
container_volume 65
creator Kananian, Borna
Maddah-Ali, Mohammad Ali
Hossein Khalaj, Babak
description In this paper, we consider K-user interference channels with M antennas per node and with backhaul collaboration in one side (among the transmitters or among the receivers), for M, K ∈ N, and investigate the tradeoff between the rate in the channel versus the communication load in the backhaul. In this investigation, each node is equipped with M antennas and we focus on a first order approximation result, where the rate of the wireless channel is measured by the degrees of freedom (DoF) per user, and the load of the backhaul is measured by the entropy of backhaul messages per user normalized by log of transmit power, at high power regimes. This tradeoff is fully characterized for the case of even values of K and approximately characterized for the case of odd values of K, with vanishing approximation gap as K grows. To achieve DoF of M per user, this result establishes the asymptotic optimality of the most straightforward scheme, called central processing, in which the messages are collected at one of the nodes, centrally processed, and forwarded back to each node. In addition, this result shows that the gain of the schemes, relying on distributed processing, through pairwise communication among the nodes (e.g., cooperative alignment) does not scale with the size of the network. For the converse, we develop a new outer-bound on the tradeoff based on splitting the set of collaborative nodes (transmitters or receivers) into two subsets and assuming full cooperation within each group. We further present a sufficient condition on the wireless channel connectivity, which although more relaxed, guarantees the validity of the above tradeoff. Finally, we show that verifying this condition takes a polynomial time in the network size.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TIT.2019.2926469
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_8753416</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>8753416</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>10_1109_TIT_2019_2926469</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-7780e220553781532b2f5af970c08980023a8189586494daaff18a99b21863813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEtLw0AUhQdRsFb3gpv5AxPvnUcy406j1WKhmxTdhWl6h0ZrUmai4L-3paKrw-E8Fh9jlwgZIrjralplEtBl0slc5-6IjdCYQrjc6GM2AkArnNb2lJ2l9Laz2qAcsddnLhaJIp92A8VAkbqGeLn2XUebxF_aYc3vfPO-9p8bXvb9lqIf2r674ff9hH-l7D-d9X7Fq-hXJOYhnLOT4DeJLn51zBaTh6p8ErP547S8nYlGgRlEUVggKcEYVVg0Si5lMD64AhqwzgJI5S1aZ2yunV55HwJa79xSos2VRTVmcPhtYp9SpFBvY_vh43eNUO_J1Dsy9Z5M_UtmN7k6TFoi-qvbwiiNufoBddBciA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>K -User Interference Channels With Backhaul Cooperation: DoF vs. Backhaul Load Trade-Off</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Kananian, Borna ; Maddah-Ali, Mohammad Ali ; Hossein Khalaj, Babak</creator><creatorcontrib>Kananian, Borna ; Maddah-Ali, Mohammad Ali ; Hossein Khalaj, Babak</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we consider K-user interference channels with M antennas per node and with backhaul collaboration in one side (among the transmitters or among the receivers), for M, K ∈ N, and investigate the tradeoff between the rate in the channel versus the communication load in the backhaul. In this investigation, each node is equipped with M antennas and we focus on a first order approximation result, where the rate of the wireless channel is measured by the degrees of freedom (DoF) per user, and the load of the backhaul is measured by the entropy of backhaul messages per user normalized by log of transmit power, at high power regimes. This tradeoff is fully characterized for the case of even values of K and approximately characterized for the case of odd values of K, with vanishing approximation gap as K grows. To achieve DoF of M per user, this result establishes the asymptotic optimality of the most straightforward scheme, called central processing, in which the messages are collected at one of the nodes, centrally processed, and forwarded back to each node. In addition, this result shows that the gain of the schemes, relying on distributed processing, through pairwise communication among the nodes (e.g., cooperative alignment) does not scale with the size of the network. For the converse, we develop a new outer-bound on the tradeoff based on splitting the set of collaborative nodes (transmitters or receivers) into two subsets and assuming full cooperation within each group. We further present a sufficient condition on the wireless channel connectivity, which although more relaxed, guarantees the validity of the above tradeoff. Finally, we show that verifying this condition takes a polynomial time in the network size.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9448</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-9654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TIT.2019.2926469</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IETTAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>centralized processing ; cooperation alignment ; Decoding ; degrees of freedom ; Interference alignment ; Interference channels ; Receiving antennas ; Transmitters ; Wireless communication</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on information theory, 2019-11, Vol.65 (11), p.7253-7267</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-7780e220553781532b2f5af970c08980023a8189586494daaff18a99b21863813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-7780e220553781532b2f5af970c08980023a8189586494daaff18a99b21863813</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3222-1874 ; 0000-0002-9289-2338 ; 0000-0002-7358-6140</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8753416$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,796,27924,27925,54758</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8753416$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kananian, Borna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maddah-Ali, Mohammad Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hossein Khalaj, Babak</creatorcontrib><title>K -User Interference Channels With Backhaul Cooperation: DoF vs. Backhaul Load Trade-Off</title><title>IEEE transactions on information theory</title><addtitle>TIT</addtitle><description>In this paper, we consider K-user interference channels with M antennas per node and with backhaul collaboration in one side (among the transmitters or among the receivers), for M, K ∈ N, and investigate the tradeoff between the rate in the channel versus the communication load in the backhaul. In this investigation, each node is equipped with M antennas and we focus on a first order approximation result, where the rate of the wireless channel is measured by the degrees of freedom (DoF) per user, and the load of the backhaul is measured by the entropy of backhaul messages per user normalized by log of transmit power, at high power regimes. This tradeoff is fully characterized for the case of even values of K and approximately characterized for the case of odd values of K, with vanishing approximation gap as K grows. To achieve DoF of M per user, this result establishes the asymptotic optimality of the most straightforward scheme, called central processing, in which the messages are collected at one of the nodes, centrally processed, and forwarded back to each node. In addition, this result shows that the gain of the schemes, relying on distributed processing, through pairwise communication among the nodes (e.g., cooperative alignment) does not scale with the size of the network. For the converse, we develop a new outer-bound on the tradeoff based on splitting the set of collaborative nodes (transmitters or receivers) into two subsets and assuming full cooperation within each group. We further present a sufficient condition on the wireless channel connectivity, which although more relaxed, guarantees the validity of the above tradeoff. Finally, we show that verifying this condition takes a polynomial time in the network size.</description><subject>centralized processing</subject><subject>cooperation alignment</subject><subject>Decoding</subject><subject>degrees of freedom</subject><subject>Interference alignment</subject><subject>Interference channels</subject><subject>Receiving antennas</subject><subject>Transmitters</subject><subject>Wireless communication</subject><issn>0018-9448</issn><issn>1557-9654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEtLw0AUhQdRsFb3gpv5AxPvnUcy406j1WKhmxTdhWl6h0ZrUmai4L-3paKrw-E8Fh9jlwgZIrjralplEtBl0slc5-6IjdCYQrjc6GM2AkArnNb2lJ2l9Laz2qAcsddnLhaJIp92A8VAkbqGeLn2XUebxF_aYc3vfPO-9p8bXvb9lqIf2r674ff9hH-l7D-d9X7Fq-hXJOYhnLOT4DeJLn51zBaTh6p8ErP547S8nYlGgRlEUVggKcEYVVg0Si5lMD64AhqwzgJI5S1aZ2yunV55HwJa79xSos2VRTVmcPhtYp9SpFBvY_vh43eNUO_J1Dsy9Z5M_UtmN7k6TFoi-qvbwiiNufoBddBciA</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Kananian, Borna</creator><creator>Maddah-Ali, Mohammad Ali</creator><creator>Hossein Khalaj, Babak</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3222-1874</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9289-2338</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7358-6140</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>K -User Interference Channels With Backhaul Cooperation: DoF vs. Backhaul Load Trade-Off</title><author>Kananian, Borna ; Maddah-Ali, Mohammad Ali ; Hossein Khalaj, Babak</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-7780e220553781532b2f5af970c08980023a8189586494daaff18a99b21863813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>centralized processing</topic><topic>cooperation alignment</topic><topic>Decoding</topic><topic>degrees of freedom</topic><topic>Interference alignment</topic><topic>Interference channels</topic><topic>Receiving antennas</topic><topic>Transmitters</topic><topic>Wireless communication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kananian, Borna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maddah-Ali, Mohammad Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hossein Khalaj, Babak</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on information theory</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kananian, Borna</au><au>Maddah-Ali, Mohammad Ali</au><au>Hossein Khalaj, Babak</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>K -User Interference Channels With Backhaul Cooperation: DoF vs. Backhaul Load Trade-Off</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on information theory</jtitle><stitle>TIT</stitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>7253</spage><epage>7267</epage><pages>7253-7267</pages><issn>0018-9448</issn><eissn>1557-9654</eissn><coden>IETTAW</coden><abstract>In this paper, we consider K-user interference channels with M antennas per node and with backhaul collaboration in one side (among the transmitters or among the receivers), for M, K ∈ N, and investigate the tradeoff between the rate in the channel versus the communication load in the backhaul. In this investigation, each node is equipped with M antennas and we focus on a first order approximation result, where the rate of the wireless channel is measured by the degrees of freedom (DoF) per user, and the load of the backhaul is measured by the entropy of backhaul messages per user normalized by log of transmit power, at high power regimes. This tradeoff is fully characterized for the case of even values of K and approximately characterized for the case of odd values of K, with vanishing approximation gap as K grows. To achieve DoF of M per user, this result establishes the asymptotic optimality of the most straightforward scheme, called central processing, in which the messages are collected at one of the nodes, centrally processed, and forwarded back to each node. In addition, this result shows that the gain of the schemes, relying on distributed processing, through pairwise communication among the nodes (e.g., cooperative alignment) does not scale with the size of the network. For the converse, we develop a new outer-bound on the tradeoff based on splitting the set of collaborative nodes (transmitters or receivers) into two subsets and assuming full cooperation within each group. We further present a sufficient condition on the wireless channel connectivity, which although more relaxed, guarantees the validity of the above tradeoff. Finally, we show that verifying this condition takes a polynomial time in the network size.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TIT.2019.2926469</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3222-1874</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9289-2338</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7358-6140</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0018-9448
ispartof IEEE transactions on information theory, 2019-11, Vol.65 (11), p.7253-7267
issn 0018-9448
1557-9654
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_8753416
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects centralized processing
cooperation alignment
Decoding
degrees of freedom
Interference alignment
Interference channels
Receiving antennas
Transmitters
Wireless communication
title K -User Interference Channels With Backhaul Cooperation: DoF vs. Backhaul Load Trade-Off
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T08%3A34%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=K%20-User%20Interference%20Channels%20With%20Backhaul%20Cooperation:%20DoF%20vs.%20Backhaul%20Load%20Trade-Off&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20information%20theory&rft.au=Kananian,%20Borna&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=7253&rft.epage=7267&rft.pages=7253-7267&rft.issn=0018-9448&rft.eissn=1557-9654&rft.coden=IETTAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TIT.2019.2926469&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_RIE%3E10_1109_TIT_2019_2926469%3C/crossref_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=8753416&rfr_iscdi=true