A comparison of questionnaire-based and GUI-based requirements gathering
Software development includes gathering information about tasks, work practices and design options from users. Traditionally requirements gathering takes two forms. Interviews and participatory design (PD) practices gather rich information about the task and the domain but require face-to-face commu...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Tagungsbericht |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 43 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 35 |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Moore, J.M. Shipman, F.M. |
| description | Software development includes gathering information about tasks, work practices and design options from users. Traditionally requirements gathering takes two forms. Interviews and participatory design (PD) practices gather rich information about the task and the domain but require face-to-face communication between the software engineers and the users. When such communication is not possible, traditional software engineering frequently relies on questionnaires and other paper-based methods. Unfortunately, questionnaires often fail to capture implicit aspects of user tasks that may be identified through one-on-one interactions. This project investigates a method of gathering requirements whereby users, working independently of software engineers, construct rough interfaces augmented with textual argumentation. Our initial study has compared the use of GRC (Graphical Requirements Collector) with questionnaire-based requirements gathering. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1109/ASE.2000.873648 |
| format | Conference Proceeding |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_873648</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>873648</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>31087380</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i203t-5ea4620e84b72773db6077f984d3020462e7b324af86f91346f14a37b3084c173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkL1vwjAQxa1-SE0pc6VOmbqFnn2O7YwIUUBC6tAyR05yoa6IA3YY-t83Kkynd-93p6fH2DOHGedQvM0_lzMBADOjUUlzwxKhJGY81-KWPYJWRQ6ag75jCS_QZBIBHtg0xp_xCGQujdIJW8_Tuu-ONrjY-7Rv09OZ4uB6760LlFU2UpNa36Sr3eaqAp3Oo9eRH2K6t8M3Bef3T-y-tYdI0-ucsN378muxzrYfq81ivs2cAByynKxUAsjISgutsakUaN0WRjYIAkaPdIVC2taotuAoVculxXEHRtZc44S9Xv4eQ_-ftexcrOlwsJ76cyyRw1iIgRF8uYCOiMpjcJ0Nv-WlLPwD8F5Zmg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>31087380</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>A comparison of questionnaire-based and GUI-based requirements gathering</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Moore, J.M. ; Shipman, F.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Moore, J.M. ; Shipman, F.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Software development includes gathering information about tasks, work practices and design options from users. Traditionally requirements gathering takes two forms. Interviews and participatory design (PD) practices gather rich information about the task and the domain but require face-to-face communication between the software engineers and the users. When such communication is not possible, traditional software engineering frequently relies on questionnaires and other paper-based methods. Unfortunately, questionnaires often fail to capture implicit aspects of user tasks that may be identified through one-on-one interactions. This project investigates a method of gathering requirements whereby users, working independently of software engineers, construct rough interfaces augmented with textual argumentation. Our initial study has compared the use of GRC (Graphical Requirements Collector) with questionnaire-based requirements gathering.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1938-4300</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0769507107</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780769507101</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2643-1572</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ASE.2000.873648</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Computer science ; Design engineering ; Documentation ; Engineering management ; Information resources ; Programming ; Software engineering ; Software packages ; Software performance ; Solids</subject><ispartof>15th International Conference on Automated Software Engineering 2000, 2000, p.35-43</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/873648$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,777,781,786,787,2052,4036,4037,27906,54901</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/873648$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moore, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shipman, F.M.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of questionnaire-based and GUI-based requirements gathering</title><title>15th International Conference on Automated Software Engineering 2000</title><addtitle>ASE</addtitle><description>Software development includes gathering information about tasks, work practices and design options from users. Traditionally requirements gathering takes two forms. Interviews and participatory design (PD) practices gather rich information about the task and the domain but require face-to-face communication between the software engineers and the users. When such communication is not possible, traditional software engineering frequently relies on questionnaires and other paper-based methods. Unfortunately, questionnaires often fail to capture implicit aspects of user tasks that may be identified through one-on-one interactions. This project investigates a method of gathering requirements whereby users, working independently of software engineers, construct rough interfaces augmented with textual argumentation. Our initial study has compared the use of GRC (Graphical Requirements Collector) with questionnaire-based requirements gathering.</description><subject>Computer science</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Documentation</subject><subject>Engineering management</subject><subject>Information resources</subject><subject>Programming</subject><subject>Software engineering</subject><subject>Software packages</subject><subject>Software performance</subject><subject>Solids</subject><issn>1938-4300</issn><issn>2643-1572</issn><isbn>0769507107</isbn><isbn>9780769507101</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotkL1vwjAQxa1-SE0pc6VOmbqFnn2O7YwIUUBC6tAyR05yoa6IA3YY-t83Kkynd-93p6fH2DOHGedQvM0_lzMBADOjUUlzwxKhJGY81-KWPYJWRQ6ag75jCS_QZBIBHtg0xp_xCGQujdIJW8_Tuu-ONrjY-7Rv09OZ4uB6760LlFU2UpNa36Sr3eaqAp3Oo9eRH2K6t8M3Bef3T-y-tYdI0-ucsN378muxzrYfq81ivs2cAByynKxUAsjISgutsakUaN0WRjYIAkaPdIVC2taotuAoVculxXEHRtZc44S9Xv4eQ_-ftexcrOlwsJ76cyyRw1iIgRF8uYCOiMpjcJ0Nv-WlLPwD8F5Zmg</recordid><startdate>2000</startdate><enddate>2000</enddate><creator>Moore, J.M.</creator><creator>Shipman, F.M.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2000</creationdate><title>A comparison of questionnaire-based and GUI-based requirements gathering</title><author>Moore, J.M. ; Shipman, F.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i203t-5ea4620e84b72773db6077f984d3020462e7b324af86f91346f14a37b3084c173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Computer science</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Documentation</topic><topic>Engineering management</topic><topic>Information resources</topic><topic>Programming</topic><topic>Software engineering</topic><topic>Software packages</topic><topic>Software performance</topic><topic>Solids</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moore, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shipman, F.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moore, J.M.</au><au>Shipman, F.M.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>A comparison of questionnaire-based and GUI-based requirements gathering</atitle><btitle>15th International Conference on Automated Software Engineering 2000</btitle><stitle>ASE</stitle><date>2000</date><risdate>2000</risdate><spage>35</spage><epage>43</epage><pages>35-43</pages><issn>1938-4300</issn><eissn>2643-1572</eissn><isbn>0769507107</isbn><isbn>9780769507101</isbn><abstract>Software development includes gathering information about tasks, work practices and design options from users. Traditionally requirements gathering takes two forms. Interviews and participatory design (PD) practices gather rich information about the task and the domain but require face-to-face communication between the software engineers and the users. When such communication is not possible, traditional software engineering frequently relies on questionnaires and other paper-based methods. Unfortunately, questionnaires often fail to capture implicit aspects of user tasks that may be identified through one-on-one interactions. This project investigates a method of gathering requirements whereby users, working independently of software engineers, construct rough interfaces augmented with textual argumentation. Our initial study has compared the use of GRC (Graphical Requirements Collector) with questionnaire-based requirements gathering.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ASE.2000.873648</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISSN: 1938-4300 |
| ispartof | 15th International Conference on Automated Software Engineering 2000, 2000, p.35-43 |
| issn | 1938-4300 2643-1572 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_873648 |
| source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
| subjects | Computer science Design engineering Documentation Engineering management Information resources Programming Software engineering Software packages Software performance Solids |
| title | A comparison of questionnaire-based and GUI-based requirements gathering |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T22%3A11%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20questionnaire-based%20and%20GUI-based%20requirements%20gathering&rft.btitle=15th%20International%20Conference%20on%20Automated%20Software%20Engineering%202000&rft.au=Moore,%20J.M.&rft.date=2000&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=43&rft.pages=35-43&rft.issn=1938-4300&rft.eissn=2643-1572&rft.isbn=0769507107&rft.isbn_list=9780769507101&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ASE.2000.873648&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_6IE%3E31087380%3C/proquest_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=31087380&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=873648&rfr_iscdi=true |