MEMS reliability in shock environments

In order to determine the susceptibility of our MEMS (MicroElectroMechanical Systems) devices to shock, tests were performed using haversine shock pulses with widths of 1 to 0.2 ms in the range from 500 g to 40000 g. We chose a surface-micromachined microengine because it has all the components need...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Tanner, D.M., Walraven, J.A., Helgesen, K., Irwin, L.W., Brown, F., Smith, N.F., Masters, N.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 138
container_issue
container_start_page 129
container_title
container_volume
creator Tanner, D.M.
Walraven, J.A.
Helgesen, K.
Irwin, L.W.
Brown, F.
Smith, N.F.
Masters, N.
description In order to determine the susceptibility of our MEMS (MicroElectroMechanical Systems) devices to shock, tests were performed using haversine shock pulses with widths of 1 to 0.2 ms in the range from 500 g to 40000 g. We chose a surface-micromachined microengine because it has all the components needed for evaluation: springs that flex, gears that are anchored, and clamps and spring stops to maintain alignment. The microengines, which were unpowered for the tests, performed quite well at most shock levels with a majority functioning after the impact. Debris from the die edges moved at levels greater than 4000 g causing shorts in the actuators and posing reliability concerns. The coupling agent used to prevent stiction in the MEMS release weakened the die-attach bond, which produced failures at 10000 g and above. At 20000 g we began to observe structural damage in some of the thin flexures and 2.5-micron diameter pin joints. We observed electrical failures caused by the movement of debris. Additionally, we observed a new failure mode where stationary comb fingers contact the ground plane resulting in electrical shorts. These new failures were observed in our control group indicating that they were not shock related.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/RELPHY.2000.843903
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_843903</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>843903</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>843903</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i633-a91fd595a05049fdd38188e2468995a153189dc82207af3dfa4ff17be00308b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj1FLwzAUhQMiKLN_YE998q31pjdpbh5lVCd0KNtefBrpcoPRrpNmCPv3FjY4cOA78MERYi6hlBLs07ppP5afZQUAJSm0gDcis4ZgCmqqwdyJLKXvaQelwdZwLx5XzWqTj9xH18U-ns55HPL0ddz_5Dz8xfE4HHg4pQdxG1yfOLv2TGxfmu1iWbTvr2-L57aINWLhrAxeW-1Ag7LBeyRJxJWqyU5UapRk_Z6qCowL6INTIUjTMQACdQZnYn7RRmbe_Y7x4Mbz7vIF_wHo6j3H</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>MEMS reliability in shock environments</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Tanner, D.M. ; Walraven, J.A. ; Helgesen, K. ; Irwin, L.W. ; Brown, F. ; Smith, N.F. ; Masters, N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tanner, D.M. ; Walraven, J.A. ; Helgesen, K. ; Irwin, L.W. ; Brown, F. ; Smith, N.F. ; Masters, N.</creatorcontrib><description>In order to determine the susceptibility of our MEMS (MicroElectroMechanical Systems) devices to shock, tests were performed using haversine shock pulses with widths of 1 to 0.2 ms in the range from 500 g to 40000 g. We chose a surface-micromachined microengine because it has all the components needed for evaluation: springs that flex, gears that are anchored, and clamps and spring stops to maintain alignment. The microengines, which were unpowered for the tests, performed quite well at most shock levels with a majority functioning after the impact. Debris from the die edges moved at levels greater than 4000 g causing shorts in the actuators and posing reliability concerns. The coupling agent used to prevent stiction in the MEMS release weakened the die-attach bond, which produced failures at 10000 g and above. At 20000 g we began to observe structural damage in some of the thin flexures and 2.5-micron diameter pin joints. We observed electrical failures caused by the movement of debris. Additionally, we observed a new failure mode where stationary comb fingers contact the ground plane resulting in electrical shorts. These new failures were observed in our control group indicating that they were not shock related.</description><identifier>ISBN: 9780780358607</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0780358600</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/RELPHY.2000.843903</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Clamps ; Electric shock ; Gears ; Maintenance ; Microelectromechanical systems ; Micromechanical devices ; Performance evaluation ; Space vector pulse width modulation ; Springs ; System testing</subject><ispartof>2000 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings. 38th Annual (Cat. No.00CH37059), 2000, p.129-138</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/843903$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2051,4035,4036,27904,54899</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/843903$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tanner, D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walraven, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helgesen, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irwin, L.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, N.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masters, N.</creatorcontrib><title>MEMS reliability in shock environments</title><title>2000 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings. 38th Annual (Cat. No.00CH37059)</title><addtitle>RELPHY</addtitle><description>In order to determine the susceptibility of our MEMS (MicroElectroMechanical Systems) devices to shock, tests were performed using haversine shock pulses with widths of 1 to 0.2 ms in the range from 500 g to 40000 g. We chose a surface-micromachined microengine because it has all the components needed for evaluation: springs that flex, gears that are anchored, and clamps and spring stops to maintain alignment. The microengines, which were unpowered for the tests, performed quite well at most shock levels with a majority functioning after the impact. Debris from the die edges moved at levels greater than 4000 g causing shorts in the actuators and posing reliability concerns. The coupling agent used to prevent stiction in the MEMS release weakened the die-attach bond, which produced failures at 10000 g and above. At 20000 g we began to observe structural damage in some of the thin flexures and 2.5-micron diameter pin joints. We observed electrical failures caused by the movement of debris. Additionally, we observed a new failure mode where stationary comb fingers contact the ground plane resulting in electrical shorts. These new failures were observed in our control group indicating that they were not shock related.</description><subject>Clamps</subject><subject>Electric shock</subject><subject>Gears</subject><subject>Maintenance</subject><subject>Microelectromechanical systems</subject><subject>Micromechanical devices</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Space vector pulse width modulation</subject><subject>Springs</subject><subject>System testing</subject><isbn>9780780358607</isbn><isbn>0780358600</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotj1FLwzAUhQMiKLN_YE998q31pjdpbh5lVCd0KNtefBrpcoPRrpNmCPv3FjY4cOA78MERYi6hlBLs07ppP5afZQUAJSm0gDcis4ZgCmqqwdyJLKXvaQelwdZwLx5XzWqTj9xH18U-ns55HPL0ddz_5Dz8xfE4HHg4pQdxG1yfOLv2TGxfmu1iWbTvr2-L57aINWLhrAxeW-1Ag7LBeyRJxJWqyU5UapRk_Z6qCowL6INTIUjTMQACdQZnYn7RRmbe_Y7x4Mbz7vIF_wHo6j3H</recordid><startdate>2000</startdate><enddate>2000</enddate><creator>Tanner, D.M.</creator><creator>Walraven, J.A.</creator><creator>Helgesen, K.</creator><creator>Irwin, L.W.</creator><creator>Brown, F.</creator><creator>Smith, N.F.</creator><creator>Masters, N.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2000</creationdate><title>MEMS reliability in shock environments</title><author>Tanner, D.M. ; Walraven, J.A. ; Helgesen, K. ; Irwin, L.W. ; Brown, F. ; Smith, N.F. ; Masters, N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i633-a91fd595a05049fdd38188e2468995a153189dc82207af3dfa4ff17be00308b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Clamps</topic><topic>Electric shock</topic><topic>Gears</topic><topic>Maintenance</topic><topic>Microelectromechanical systems</topic><topic>Micromechanical devices</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Space vector pulse width modulation</topic><topic>Springs</topic><topic>System testing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tanner, D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walraven, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helgesen, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irwin, L.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, N.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masters, N.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tanner, D.M.</au><au>Walraven, J.A.</au><au>Helgesen, K.</au><au>Irwin, L.W.</au><au>Brown, F.</au><au>Smith, N.F.</au><au>Masters, N.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>MEMS reliability in shock environments</atitle><btitle>2000 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings. 38th Annual (Cat. No.00CH37059)</btitle><stitle>RELPHY</stitle><date>2000</date><risdate>2000</risdate><spage>129</spage><epage>138</epage><pages>129-138</pages><isbn>9780780358607</isbn><isbn>0780358600</isbn><abstract>In order to determine the susceptibility of our MEMS (MicroElectroMechanical Systems) devices to shock, tests were performed using haversine shock pulses with widths of 1 to 0.2 ms in the range from 500 g to 40000 g. We chose a surface-micromachined microengine because it has all the components needed for evaluation: springs that flex, gears that are anchored, and clamps and spring stops to maintain alignment. The microengines, which were unpowered for the tests, performed quite well at most shock levels with a majority functioning after the impact. Debris from the die edges moved at levels greater than 4000 g causing shorts in the actuators and posing reliability concerns. The coupling agent used to prevent stiction in the MEMS release weakened the die-attach bond, which produced failures at 10000 g and above. At 20000 g we began to observe structural damage in some of the thin flexures and 2.5-micron diameter pin joints. We observed electrical failures caused by the movement of debris. Additionally, we observed a new failure mode where stationary comb fingers contact the ground plane resulting in electrical shorts. These new failures were observed in our control group indicating that they were not shock related.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/RELPHY.2000.843903</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISBN: 9780780358607
ispartof 2000 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium Proceedings. 38th Annual (Cat. No.00CH37059), 2000, p.129-138
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_843903
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Clamps
Electric shock
Gears
Maintenance
Microelectromechanical systems
Micromechanical devices
Performance evaluation
Space vector pulse width modulation
Springs
System testing
title MEMS reliability in shock environments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T13%3A24%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=MEMS%20reliability%20in%20shock%20environments&rft.btitle=2000%20IEEE%20International%20Reliability%20Physics%20Symposium%20Proceedings.%2038th%20Annual%20(Cat.%20No.00CH37059)&rft.au=Tanner,%20D.M.&rft.date=2000&rft.spage=129&rft.epage=138&rft.pages=129-138&rft.isbn=9780780358607&rft.isbn_list=0780358600&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/RELPHY.2000.843903&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E843903%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=843903&rfr_iscdi=true