Flood Mapping Based on Synthetic Aperture Radar: An Assessment of Established Approaches
In our changing world, floods are a threat of increasing concern. Within this context, flood mapping is important for both damage assessment and forecast improvement. Due to the suitability of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) for flood mapping, a broad range of SAR-based flood mapping algorithms has b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing 2019-02, Vol.57 (2), p.722-739 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 739 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 722 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Landuyt, Lisa Van Wesemael, Alexandra Schumann, Guy J.-P. Hostache, Renaud Verhoest, Niko E. C. Van Coillie, Frieke M. B. |
description | In our changing world, floods are a threat of increasing concern. Within this context, flood mapping is important for both damage assessment and forecast improvement. Due to the suitability of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) for flood mapping, a broad range of SAR-based flood mapping algorithms has been developed during the past years. However, most of these algorithms were presented based on a single test case only and comparisons between methods are rare. This paper presents an in-depth assessment and comparison of the established pixel-based flood mapping approaches, including global and enhanced thresholding, active contour modeling and change detection. The methods were tested on medium-resolution SAR images of different flood events and lakes across the U.K. and Ireland and were evaluated on both accuracy and robustness. Results indicate that the most suited method depends on the area of interest and its characteristics as well as the intended use of the observation product. Due to its high robustness and good performance, tiled thresholding is suited for automated, near-real time flood detection and monitoring. Active contour models can provide higher accuracies but require long computation times that strongly increase with increasing image sizes, making them more appropriate for accurate flood mapping in smaller areas of interest. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TGRS.2018.2860054 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_8432448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>8432448</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2170696400</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-fa8e018de7b737974e9159c5cfefd9e4f200817c6408783bf4f40a5e81a5e49a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsPIF4CnrdOstlN4m2VtgoVoa3gLaS7E7ul3V2T7aFvb0qLl5nL_80_fITcMxgxBvppOZ0vRhyYGnGVA2TiggxYlqkEciEuyQCYzhOuNL8mNyFsAJjImByQ78m2bSv6Ybuubn7oiw1Y0bahi0PTr7GvS1p06Pu9Rzq3lfXPtGhoEQKGsMOmp62j49Db1bYO60gWXedbW64x3JIrZ7cB7857SL4m4-XrWzL7nL6_FrOk5DrtE2cVxq8rlCuZSi0FapbpMisdukqjcBxAMVnmApRU6coJJ8BmqFgcQtt0SB5Pd2Px7x5Dbzbt3jex0nAmIdeRhJhip1Tp2xA8OtP5emf9wTAwR4HmKNAcBZqzwMg8nJgaEf_zSqRcCJX-AYKTa-0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2170696400</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Flood Mapping Based on Synthetic Aperture Radar: An Assessment of Established Approaches</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Landuyt, Lisa ; Van Wesemael, Alexandra ; Schumann, Guy J.-P. ; Hostache, Renaud ; Verhoest, Niko E. C. ; Van Coillie, Frieke M. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Landuyt, Lisa ; Van Wesemael, Alexandra ; Schumann, Guy J.-P. ; Hostache, Renaud ; Verhoest, Niko E. C. ; Van Coillie, Frieke M. B.</creatorcontrib><description>In our changing world, floods are a threat of increasing concern. Within this context, flood mapping is important for both damage assessment and forecast improvement. Due to the suitability of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) for flood mapping, a broad range of SAR-based flood mapping algorithms has been developed during the past years. However, most of these algorithms were presented based on a single test case only and comparisons between methods are rare. This paper presents an in-depth assessment and comparison of the established pixel-based flood mapping approaches, including global and enhanced thresholding, active contour modeling and change detection. The methods were tested on medium-resolution SAR images of different flood events and lakes across the U.K. and Ireland and were evaluated on both accuracy and robustness. Results indicate that the most suited method depends on the area of interest and its characteristics as well as the intended use of the observation product. Due to its high robustness and good performance, tiled thresholding is suited for automated, near-real time flood detection and monitoring. Active contour models can provide higher accuracies but require long computation times that strongly increase with increasing image sizes, making them more appropriate for accurate flood mapping in smaller areas of interest.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-2892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0644</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2018.2860054</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IGRSD2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Active contours ; Algorithms ; Change detection ; Computation ; Contours ; Damage assessment ; Detection ; Entropy ; Flood damage ; Flood forecasting ; Flood mapping ; Floods ; Histograms ; Image detection ; Lakes ; Mapping ; Methods ; Model accuracy ; Modelling ; Radar ; Radar imaging ; Robustness ; SAR (radar) ; Shape ; Synthetic aperture radar ; synthetic aperture radar (SAR) ; thresholding ; Urban areas</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 2019-02, Vol.57 (2), p.722-739</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-fa8e018de7b737974e9159c5cfefd9e4f200817c6408783bf4f40a5e81a5e49a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-fa8e018de7b737974e9159c5cfefd9e4f200817c6408783bf4f40a5e81a5e49a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8109-6010 ; 0000-0002-3161-2144 ; 0000-0002-7905-4882 ; 0000-0003-0968-7198 ; 0000-0003-4116-8881</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8432448$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8432448$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Landuyt, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Wesemael, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schumann, Guy J.-P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hostache, Renaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhoest, Niko E. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Coillie, Frieke M. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Flood Mapping Based on Synthetic Aperture Radar: An Assessment of Established Approaches</title><title>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing</title><addtitle>TGRS</addtitle><description>In our changing world, floods are a threat of increasing concern. Within this context, flood mapping is important for both damage assessment and forecast improvement. Due to the suitability of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) for flood mapping, a broad range of SAR-based flood mapping algorithms has been developed during the past years. However, most of these algorithms were presented based on a single test case only and comparisons between methods are rare. This paper presents an in-depth assessment and comparison of the established pixel-based flood mapping approaches, including global and enhanced thresholding, active contour modeling and change detection. The methods were tested on medium-resolution SAR images of different flood events and lakes across the U.K. and Ireland and were evaluated on both accuracy and robustness. Results indicate that the most suited method depends on the area of interest and its characteristics as well as the intended use of the observation product. Due to its high robustness and good performance, tiled thresholding is suited for automated, near-real time flood detection and monitoring. Active contour models can provide higher accuracies but require long computation times that strongly increase with increasing image sizes, making them more appropriate for accurate flood mapping in smaller areas of interest.</description><subject>Active contours</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Change detection</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Contours</subject><subject>Damage assessment</subject><subject>Detection</subject><subject>Entropy</subject><subject>Flood damage</subject><subject>Flood forecasting</subject><subject>Flood mapping</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Histograms</subject><subject>Image detection</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Radar</subject><subject>Radar imaging</subject><subject>Robustness</subject><subject>SAR (radar)</subject><subject>Shape</subject><subject>Synthetic aperture radar</subject><subject>synthetic aperture radar (SAR)</subject><subject>thresholding</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><issn>0196-2892</issn><issn>1558-0644</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsPIF4CnrdOstlN4m2VtgoVoa3gLaS7E7ul3V2T7aFvb0qLl5nL_80_fITcMxgxBvppOZ0vRhyYGnGVA2TiggxYlqkEciEuyQCYzhOuNL8mNyFsAJjImByQ78m2bSv6Ybuubn7oiw1Y0bahi0PTr7GvS1p06Pu9Rzq3lfXPtGhoEQKGsMOmp62j49Db1bYO60gWXedbW64x3JIrZ7cB7857SL4m4-XrWzL7nL6_FrOk5DrtE2cVxq8rlCuZSi0FapbpMisdukqjcBxAMVnmApRU6coJJ8BmqFgcQtt0SB5Pd2Px7x5Dbzbt3jex0nAmIdeRhJhip1Tp2xA8OtP5emf9wTAwR4HmKNAcBZqzwMg8nJgaEf_zSqRcCJX-AYKTa-0</recordid><startdate>20190201</startdate><enddate>20190201</enddate><creator>Landuyt, Lisa</creator><creator>Van Wesemael, Alexandra</creator><creator>Schumann, Guy J.-P.</creator><creator>Hostache, Renaud</creator><creator>Verhoest, Niko E. C.</creator><creator>Van Coillie, Frieke M. B.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8109-6010</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3161-2144</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7905-4882</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0968-7198</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4116-8881</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190201</creationdate><title>Flood Mapping Based on Synthetic Aperture Radar: An Assessment of Established Approaches</title><author>Landuyt, Lisa ; Van Wesemael, Alexandra ; Schumann, Guy J.-P. ; Hostache, Renaud ; Verhoest, Niko E. C. ; Van Coillie, Frieke M. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-fa8e018de7b737974e9159c5cfefd9e4f200817c6408783bf4f40a5e81a5e49a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Active contours</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Change detection</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Contours</topic><topic>Damage assessment</topic><topic>Detection</topic><topic>Entropy</topic><topic>Flood damage</topic><topic>Flood forecasting</topic><topic>Flood mapping</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Histograms</topic><topic>Image detection</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Radar</topic><topic>Radar imaging</topic><topic>Robustness</topic><topic>SAR (radar)</topic><topic>Shape</topic><topic>Synthetic aperture radar</topic><topic>synthetic aperture radar (SAR)</topic><topic>thresholding</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Landuyt, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Wesemael, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schumann, Guy J.-P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hostache, Renaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhoest, Niko E. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Coillie, Frieke M. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Landuyt, Lisa</au><au>Van Wesemael, Alexandra</au><au>Schumann, Guy J.-P.</au><au>Hostache, Renaud</au><au>Verhoest, Niko E. C.</au><au>Van Coillie, Frieke M. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Flood Mapping Based on Synthetic Aperture Radar: An Assessment of Established Approaches</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing</jtitle><stitle>TGRS</stitle><date>2019-02-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>722</spage><epage>739</epage><pages>722-739</pages><issn>0196-2892</issn><eissn>1558-0644</eissn><coden>IGRSD2</coden><abstract>In our changing world, floods are a threat of increasing concern. Within this context, flood mapping is important for both damage assessment and forecast improvement. Due to the suitability of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) for flood mapping, a broad range of SAR-based flood mapping algorithms has been developed during the past years. However, most of these algorithms were presented based on a single test case only and comparisons between methods are rare. This paper presents an in-depth assessment and comparison of the established pixel-based flood mapping approaches, including global and enhanced thresholding, active contour modeling and change detection. The methods were tested on medium-resolution SAR images of different flood events and lakes across the U.K. and Ireland and were evaluated on both accuracy and robustness. Results indicate that the most suited method depends on the area of interest and its characteristics as well as the intended use of the observation product. Due to its high robustness and good performance, tiled thresholding is suited for automated, near-real time flood detection and monitoring. Active contour models can provide higher accuracies but require long computation times that strongly increase with increasing image sizes, making them more appropriate for accurate flood mapping in smaller areas of interest.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TGRS.2018.2860054</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8109-6010</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3161-2144</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7905-4882</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0968-7198</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4116-8881</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0196-2892 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 2019-02, Vol.57 (2), p.722-739 |
issn | 0196-2892 1558-0644 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_8432448 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Active contours Algorithms Change detection Computation Contours Damage assessment Detection Entropy Flood damage Flood forecasting Flood mapping Floods Histograms Image detection Lakes Mapping Methods Model accuracy Modelling Radar Radar imaging Robustness SAR (radar) Shape Synthetic aperture radar synthetic aperture radar (SAR) thresholding Urban areas |
title | Flood Mapping Based on Synthetic Aperture Radar: An Assessment of Established Approaches |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T07%3A42%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Flood%20Mapping%20Based%20on%20Synthetic%20Aperture%20Radar:%20An%20Assessment%20of%20Established%20Approaches&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20geoscience%20and%20remote%20sensing&rft.au=Landuyt,%20Lisa&rft.date=2019-02-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=722&rft.epage=739&rft.pages=722-739&rft.issn=0196-2892&rft.eissn=1558-0644&rft.coden=IGRSD2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2860054&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E2170696400%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2170696400&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=8432448&rfr_iscdi=true |