Flood Mapping Based on Synthetic Aperture Radar: An Assessment of Established Approaches

In our changing world, floods are a threat of increasing concern. Within this context, flood mapping is important for both damage assessment and forecast improvement. Due to the suitability of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) for flood mapping, a broad range of SAR-based flood mapping algorithms has b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing 2019-02, Vol.57 (2), p.722-739
Hauptverfasser: Landuyt, Lisa, Van Wesemael, Alexandra, Schumann, Guy J.-P., Hostache, Renaud, Verhoest, Niko E. C., Van Coillie, Frieke M. B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 739
container_issue 2
container_start_page 722
container_title IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing
container_volume 57
creator Landuyt, Lisa
Van Wesemael, Alexandra
Schumann, Guy J.-P.
Hostache, Renaud
Verhoest, Niko E. C.
Van Coillie, Frieke M. B.
description In our changing world, floods are a threat of increasing concern. Within this context, flood mapping is important for both damage assessment and forecast improvement. Due to the suitability of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) for flood mapping, a broad range of SAR-based flood mapping algorithms has been developed during the past years. However, most of these algorithms were presented based on a single test case only and comparisons between methods are rare. This paper presents an in-depth assessment and comparison of the established pixel-based flood mapping approaches, including global and enhanced thresholding, active contour modeling and change detection. The methods were tested on medium-resolution SAR images of different flood events and lakes across the U.K. and Ireland and were evaluated on both accuracy and robustness. Results indicate that the most suited method depends on the area of interest and its characteristics as well as the intended use of the observation product. Due to its high robustness and good performance, tiled thresholding is suited for automated, near-real time flood detection and monitoring. Active contour models can provide higher accuracies but require long computation times that strongly increase with increasing image sizes, making them more appropriate for accurate flood mapping in smaller areas of interest.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TGRS.2018.2860054
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_8432448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>8432448</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2170696400</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-fa8e018de7b737974e9159c5cfefd9e4f200817c6408783bf4f40a5e81a5e49a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsPIF4CnrdOstlN4m2VtgoVoa3gLaS7E7ul3V2T7aFvb0qLl5nL_80_fITcMxgxBvppOZ0vRhyYGnGVA2TiggxYlqkEciEuyQCYzhOuNL8mNyFsAJjImByQ78m2bSv6Ybuubn7oiw1Y0bahi0PTr7GvS1p06Pu9Rzq3lfXPtGhoEQKGsMOmp62j49Db1bYO60gWXedbW64x3JIrZ7cB7857SL4m4-XrWzL7nL6_FrOk5DrtE2cVxq8rlCuZSi0FapbpMisdukqjcBxAMVnmApRU6coJJ8BmqFgcQtt0SB5Pd2Px7x5Dbzbt3jex0nAmIdeRhJhip1Tp2xA8OtP5emf9wTAwR4HmKNAcBZqzwMg8nJgaEf_zSqRcCJX-AYKTa-0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2170696400</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Flood Mapping Based on Synthetic Aperture Radar: An Assessment of Established Approaches</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Landuyt, Lisa ; Van Wesemael, Alexandra ; Schumann, Guy J.-P. ; Hostache, Renaud ; Verhoest, Niko E. C. ; Van Coillie, Frieke M. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Landuyt, Lisa ; Van Wesemael, Alexandra ; Schumann, Guy J.-P. ; Hostache, Renaud ; Verhoest, Niko E. C. ; Van Coillie, Frieke M. B.</creatorcontrib><description>In our changing world, floods are a threat of increasing concern. Within this context, flood mapping is important for both damage assessment and forecast improvement. Due to the suitability of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) for flood mapping, a broad range of SAR-based flood mapping algorithms has been developed during the past years. However, most of these algorithms were presented based on a single test case only and comparisons between methods are rare. This paper presents an in-depth assessment and comparison of the established pixel-based flood mapping approaches, including global and enhanced thresholding, active contour modeling and change detection. The methods were tested on medium-resolution SAR images of different flood events and lakes across the U.K. and Ireland and were evaluated on both accuracy and robustness. Results indicate that the most suited method depends on the area of interest and its characteristics as well as the intended use of the observation product. Due to its high robustness and good performance, tiled thresholding is suited for automated, near-real time flood detection and monitoring. Active contour models can provide higher accuracies but require long computation times that strongly increase with increasing image sizes, making them more appropriate for accurate flood mapping in smaller areas of interest.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-2892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0644</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2018.2860054</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IGRSD2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Active contours ; Algorithms ; Change detection ; Computation ; Contours ; Damage assessment ; Detection ; Entropy ; Flood damage ; Flood forecasting ; Flood mapping ; Floods ; Histograms ; Image detection ; Lakes ; Mapping ; Methods ; Model accuracy ; Modelling ; Radar ; Radar imaging ; Robustness ; SAR (radar) ; Shape ; Synthetic aperture radar ; synthetic aperture radar (SAR) ; thresholding ; Urban areas</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 2019-02, Vol.57 (2), p.722-739</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-fa8e018de7b737974e9159c5cfefd9e4f200817c6408783bf4f40a5e81a5e49a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-fa8e018de7b737974e9159c5cfefd9e4f200817c6408783bf4f40a5e81a5e49a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8109-6010 ; 0000-0002-3161-2144 ; 0000-0002-7905-4882 ; 0000-0003-0968-7198 ; 0000-0003-4116-8881</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8432448$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8432448$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Landuyt, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Wesemael, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schumann, Guy J.-P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hostache, Renaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhoest, Niko E. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Coillie, Frieke M. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Flood Mapping Based on Synthetic Aperture Radar: An Assessment of Established Approaches</title><title>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing</title><addtitle>TGRS</addtitle><description>In our changing world, floods are a threat of increasing concern. Within this context, flood mapping is important for both damage assessment and forecast improvement. Due to the suitability of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) for flood mapping, a broad range of SAR-based flood mapping algorithms has been developed during the past years. However, most of these algorithms were presented based on a single test case only and comparisons between methods are rare. This paper presents an in-depth assessment and comparison of the established pixel-based flood mapping approaches, including global and enhanced thresholding, active contour modeling and change detection. The methods were tested on medium-resolution SAR images of different flood events and lakes across the U.K. and Ireland and were evaluated on both accuracy and robustness. Results indicate that the most suited method depends on the area of interest and its characteristics as well as the intended use of the observation product. Due to its high robustness and good performance, tiled thresholding is suited for automated, near-real time flood detection and monitoring. Active contour models can provide higher accuracies but require long computation times that strongly increase with increasing image sizes, making them more appropriate for accurate flood mapping in smaller areas of interest.</description><subject>Active contours</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Change detection</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Contours</subject><subject>Damage assessment</subject><subject>Detection</subject><subject>Entropy</subject><subject>Flood damage</subject><subject>Flood forecasting</subject><subject>Flood mapping</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Histograms</subject><subject>Image detection</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Radar</subject><subject>Radar imaging</subject><subject>Robustness</subject><subject>SAR (radar)</subject><subject>Shape</subject><subject>Synthetic aperture radar</subject><subject>synthetic aperture radar (SAR)</subject><subject>thresholding</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><issn>0196-2892</issn><issn>1558-0644</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsPIF4CnrdOstlN4m2VtgoVoa3gLaS7E7ul3V2T7aFvb0qLl5nL_80_fITcMxgxBvppOZ0vRhyYGnGVA2TiggxYlqkEciEuyQCYzhOuNL8mNyFsAJjImByQ78m2bSv6Ybuubn7oiw1Y0bahi0PTr7GvS1p06Pu9Rzq3lfXPtGhoEQKGsMOmp62j49Db1bYO60gWXedbW64x3JIrZ7cB7857SL4m4-XrWzL7nL6_FrOk5DrtE2cVxq8rlCuZSi0FapbpMisdukqjcBxAMVnmApRU6coJJ8BmqFgcQtt0SB5Pd2Px7x5Dbzbt3jex0nAmIdeRhJhip1Tp2xA8OtP5emf9wTAwR4HmKNAcBZqzwMg8nJgaEf_zSqRcCJX-AYKTa-0</recordid><startdate>20190201</startdate><enddate>20190201</enddate><creator>Landuyt, Lisa</creator><creator>Van Wesemael, Alexandra</creator><creator>Schumann, Guy J.-P.</creator><creator>Hostache, Renaud</creator><creator>Verhoest, Niko E. C.</creator><creator>Van Coillie, Frieke M. B.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8109-6010</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3161-2144</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7905-4882</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0968-7198</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4116-8881</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190201</creationdate><title>Flood Mapping Based on Synthetic Aperture Radar: An Assessment of Established Approaches</title><author>Landuyt, Lisa ; Van Wesemael, Alexandra ; Schumann, Guy J.-P. ; Hostache, Renaud ; Verhoest, Niko E. C. ; Van Coillie, Frieke M. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-fa8e018de7b737974e9159c5cfefd9e4f200817c6408783bf4f40a5e81a5e49a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Active contours</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Change detection</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Contours</topic><topic>Damage assessment</topic><topic>Detection</topic><topic>Entropy</topic><topic>Flood damage</topic><topic>Flood forecasting</topic><topic>Flood mapping</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Histograms</topic><topic>Image detection</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Radar</topic><topic>Radar imaging</topic><topic>Robustness</topic><topic>SAR (radar)</topic><topic>Shape</topic><topic>Synthetic aperture radar</topic><topic>synthetic aperture radar (SAR)</topic><topic>thresholding</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Landuyt, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Wesemael, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schumann, Guy J.-P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hostache, Renaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhoest, Niko E. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Coillie, Frieke M. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Landuyt, Lisa</au><au>Van Wesemael, Alexandra</au><au>Schumann, Guy J.-P.</au><au>Hostache, Renaud</au><au>Verhoest, Niko E. C.</au><au>Van Coillie, Frieke M. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Flood Mapping Based on Synthetic Aperture Radar: An Assessment of Established Approaches</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing</jtitle><stitle>TGRS</stitle><date>2019-02-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>722</spage><epage>739</epage><pages>722-739</pages><issn>0196-2892</issn><eissn>1558-0644</eissn><coden>IGRSD2</coden><abstract>In our changing world, floods are a threat of increasing concern. Within this context, flood mapping is important for both damage assessment and forecast improvement. Due to the suitability of synthetic aperture radar (SAR) for flood mapping, a broad range of SAR-based flood mapping algorithms has been developed during the past years. However, most of these algorithms were presented based on a single test case only and comparisons between methods are rare. This paper presents an in-depth assessment and comparison of the established pixel-based flood mapping approaches, including global and enhanced thresholding, active contour modeling and change detection. The methods were tested on medium-resolution SAR images of different flood events and lakes across the U.K. and Ireland and were evaluated on both accuracy and robustness. Results indicate that the most suited method depends on the area of interest and its characteristics as well as the intended use of the observation product. Due to its high robustness and good performance, tiled thresholding is suited for automated, near-real time flood detection and monitoring. Active contour models can provide higher accuracies but require long computation times that strongly increase with increasing image sizes, making them more appropriate for accurate flood mapping in smaller areas of interest.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TGRS.2018.2860054</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8109-6010</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3161-2144</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7905-4882</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0968-7198</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4116-8881</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0196-2892
ispartof IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 2019-02, Vol.57 (2), p.722-739
issn 0196-2892
1558-0644
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_8432448
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Active contours
Algorithms
Change detection
Computation
Contours
Damage assessment
Detection
Entropy
Flood damage
Flood forecasting
Flood mapping
Floods
Histograms
Image detection
Lakes
Mapping
Methods
Model accuracy
Modelling
Radar
Radar imaging
Robustness
SAR (radar)
Shape
Synthetic aperture radar
synthetic aperture radar (SAR)
thresholding
Urban areas
title Flood Mapping Based on Synthetic Aperture Radar: An Assessment of Established Approaches
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T07%3A42%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Flood%20Mapping%20Based%20on%20Synthetic%20Aperture%20Radar:%20An%20Assessment%20of%20Established%20Approaches&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20geoscience%20and%20remote%20sensing&rft.au=Landuyt,%20Lisa&rft.date=2019-02-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=722&rft.epage=739&rft.pages=722-739&rft.issn=0196-2892&rft.eissn=1558-0644&rft.coden=IGRSD2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2860054&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E2170696400%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2170696400&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=8432448&rfr_iscdi=true