Intervention programs for a freshman integrated curriculum

The Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University (USA), through the Foundation Coalition, piloted learning environments and curriculum models based on four primary thrusts: integration of subject matter teaming and collaborative learning, technology-enabled education and continuous...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Malave, C.O., Imbrie, P.K., Watson, K.L.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 13D7/8 vol.3
container_issue
container_start_page 13D7/3
container_title
container_volume 3
creator Malave, C.O.
Imbrie, P.K.
Watson, K.L.
description The Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University (USA), through the Foundation Coalition, piloted learning environments and curriculum models based on four primary thrusts: integration of subject matter teaming and collaborative learning, technology-enabled education and continuous assessment and evaluation of methods and outcomes over a four-year period. In the fall of 1998 a variation of the model piloted by the Foundation Coalition was institutionalized. However, as with most piloted-then-adopted educational programs, a systemic and lasting change cannot be sustained unless all of the irregularities of student matriculation into and through the system are addressed. As part of the pilot program, an intervention strategy was developed to help facilitate students who did not meet the entrance requirement for participation. Not meeting the entrance requirement generally connotes a lack of something, but in this case it has much broader implication. Students not meeting the entrance requirement were found to fall into one of three categories: (1) those not having the minimum requirements; (2) those needing remediation in one or move subjects; or (3) those with advanced placement credit or credit-by-exam. Since the sum of all three categories represented a nontrivial percentage of the student population, an appropriate strategy for managing these students was necessary. This paper presents a variety of intervention programs that were implemented during the piloting of the integrated freshman curriculum. The paper presents assessment and evaluation of the intervention programs through the tracking of students' performance before and after involvement with the programs.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/FIE.1999.840480
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_840480</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>840480</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>840480</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i87t-2a88ac25e53c6120255f54d381001ccd50f2a73f85cfeb5df067f0402aafc5b03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj81Kw0AURgetYFpdC67mBRLv_NzMjTsprQYKbrrorkwnMzrSJGWSCL69hXb1Lc7hwMfYk4BCCKhe1vWqEFVVFaRBE9ywTCpj8lLp3S2bgyFQWGpFM5aBqCBH0nTP5sPwAwCKSpOx17obffr13Rj7jp9S_5VsO_DQJ255SH74bm3H41k6g9E33E0pRTcdp_aB3QV7HPzjdRdsu15tlx_55vO9Xr5t8khmzKUlsk6iR-VKIUEiBtSNIgEgnGsQgrRGBUIX_AGbAKUJoEFaGxweQC3Y8yUbvff7U4qtTX_7y2P1D8JvSJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Intervention programs for a freshman integrated curriculum</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Malave, C.O. ; Imbrie, P.K. ; Watson, K.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Malave, C.O. ; Imbrie, P.K. ; Watson, K.L.</creatorcontrib><description>The Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&amp;M University (USA), through the Foundation Coalition, piloted learning environments and curriculum models based on four primary thrusts: integration of subject matter teaming and collaborative learning, technology-enabled education and continuous assessment and evaluation of methods and outcomes over a four-year period. In the fall of 1998 a variation of the model piloted by the Foundation Coalition was institutionalized. However, as with most piloted-then-adopted educational programs, a systemic and lasting change cannot be sustained unless all of the irregularities of student matriculation into and through the system are addressed. As part of the pilot program, an intervention strategy was developed to help facilitate students who did not meet the entrance requirement for participation. Not meeting the entrance requirement generally connotes a lack of something, but in this case it has much broader implication. Students not meeting the entrance requirement were found to fall into one of three categories: (1) those not having the minimum requirements; (2) those needing remediation in one or move subjects; or (3) those with advanced placement credit or credit-by-exam. Since the sum of all three categories represented a nontrivial percentage of the student population, an appropriate strategy for managing these students was necessary. This paper presents a variety of intervention programs that were implemented during the piloting of the integrated freshman curriculum. The paper presents assessment and evaluation of the intervention programs through the tracking of students' performance before and after involvement with the programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-5848</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0780356438</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780780356436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2377-634X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/FIE.1999.840480</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Appropriate technology ; Calculus ; Collaborative work ; Continuing education ; Design engineering ; Educational institutions ; Educational programs ; Educational technology ; Mathematics ; Visual communication</subject><ispartof>FIE'99 Frontiers in Education. 29th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Designing the Future of Science and Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.99CH37011, 1999, Vol.3, p.13D7/3-13D7/8 vol.3</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/840480$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,4050,4051,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/840480$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Malave, C.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imbrie, P.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, K.L.</creatorcontrib><title>Intervention programs for a freshman integrated curriculum</title><title>FIE'99 Frontiers in Education. 29th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Designing the Future of Science and Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.99CH37011</title><addtitle>FIE</addtitle><description>The Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&amp;M University (USA), through the Foundation Coalition, piloted learning environments and curriculum models based on four primary thrusts: integration of subject matter teaming and collaborative learning, technology-enabled education and continuous assessment and evaluation of methods and outcomes over a four-year period. In the fall of 1998 a variation of the model piloted by the Foundation Coalition was institutionalized. However, as with most piloted-then-adopted educational programs, a systemic and lasting change cannot be sustained unless all of the irregularities of student matriculation into and through the system are addressed. As part of the pilot program, an intervention strategy was developed to help facilitate students who did not meet the entrance requirement for participation. Not meeting the entrance requirement generally connotes a lack of something, but in this case it has much broader implication. Students not meeting the entrance requirement were found to fall into one of three categories: (1) those not having the minimum requirements; (2) those needing remediation in one or move subjects; or (3) those with advanced placement credit or credit-by-exam. Since the sum of all three categories represented a nontrivial percentage of the student population, an appropriate strategy for managing these students was necessary. This paper presents a variety of intervention programs that were implemented during the piloting of the integrated freshman curriculum. The paper presents assessment and evaluation of the intervention programs through the tracking of students' performance before and after involvement with the programs.</description><subject>Appropriate technology</subject><subject>Calculus</subject><subject>Collaborative work</subject><subject>Continuing education</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Educational institutions</subject><subject>Educational programs</subject><subject>Educational technology</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Visual communication</subject><issn>0190-5848</issn><issn>2377-634X</issn><isbn>0780356438</isbn><isbn>9780780356436</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotj81Kw0AURgetYFpdC67mBRLv_NzMjTsprQYKbrrorkwnMzrSJGWSCL69hXb1Lc7hwMfYk4BCCKhe1vWqEFVVFaRBE9ywTCpj8lLp3S2bgyFQWGpFM5aBqCBH0nTP5sPwAwCKSpOx17obffr13Rj7jp9S_5VsO_DQJ255SH74bm3H41k6g9E33E0pRTcdp_aB3QV7HPzjdRdsu15tlx_55vO9Xr5t8khmzKUlsk6iR-VKIUEiBtSNIgEgnGsQgrRGBUIX_AGbAKUJoEFaGxweQC3Y8yUbvff7U4qtTX_7y2P1D8JvSJw</recordid><startdate>1999</startdate><enddate>1999</enddate><creator>Malave, C.O.</creator><creator>Imbrie, P.K.</creator><creator>Watson, K.L.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1999</creationdate><title>Intervention programs for a freshman integrated curriculum</title><author>Malave, C.O. ; Imbrie, P.K. ; Watson, K.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i87t-2a88ac25e53c6120255f54d381001ccd50f2a73f85cfeb5df067f0402aafc5b03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Appropriate technology</topic><topic>Calculus</topic><topic>Collaborative work</topic><topic>Continuing education</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Educational institutions</topic><topic>Educational programs</topic><topic>Educational technology</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Visual communication</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malave, C.O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imbrie, P.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, K.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malave, C.O.</au><au>Imbrie, P.K.</au><au>Watson, K.L.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Intervention programs for a freshman integrated curriculum</atitle><btitle>FIE'99 Frontiers in Education. 29th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Designing the Future of Science and Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.99CH37011</btitle><stitle>FIE</stitle><date>1999</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>3</volume><spage>13D7/3</spage><epage>13D7/8 vol.3</epage><pages>13D7/3-13D7/8 vol.3</pages><issn>0190-5848</issn><eissn>2377-634X</eissn><isbn>0780356438</isbn><isbn>9780780356436</isbn><abstract>The Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&amp;M University (USA), through the Foundation Coalition, piloted learning environments and curriculum models based on four primary thrusts: integration of subject matter teaming and collaborative learning, technology-enabled education and continuous assessment and evaluation of methods and outcomes over a four-year period. In the fall of 1998 a variation of the model piloted by the Foundation Coalition was institutionalized. However, as with most piloted-then-adopted educational programs, a systemic and lasting change cannot be sustained unless all of the irregularities of student matriculation into and through the system are addressed. As part of the pilot program, an intervention strategy was developed to help facilitate students who did not meet the entrance requirement for participation. Not meeting the entrance requirement generally connotes a lack of something, but in this case it has much broader implication. Students not meeting the entrance requirement were found to fall into one of three categories: (1) those not having the minimum requirements; (2) those needing remediation in one or move subjects; or (3) those with advanced placement credit or credit-by-exam. Since the sum of all three categories represented a nontrivial percentage of the student population, an appropriate strategy for managing these students was necessary. This paper presents a variety of intervention programs that were implemented during the piloting of the integrated freshman curriculum. The paper presents assessment and evaluation of the intervention programs through the tracking of students' performance before and after involvement with the programs.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/FIE.1999.840480</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0190-5848
ispartof FIE'99 Frontiers in Education. 29th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Designing the Future of Science and Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.99CH37011, 1999, Vol.3, p.13D7/3-13D7/8 vol.3
issn 0190-5848
2377-634X
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_840480
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Appropriate technology
Calculus
Collaborative work
Continuing education
Design engineering
Educational institutions
Educational programs
Educational technology
Mathematics
Visual communication
title Intervention programs for a freshman integrated curriculum
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T10%3A12%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Intervention%20programs%20for%20a%20freshman%20integrated%20curriculum&rft.btitle=FIE'99%20Frontiers%20in%20Education.%2029th%20Annual%20Frontiers%20in%20Education%20Conference.%20Designing%20the%20Future%20of%20Science%20and%20Engineering%20Education.%20Conference%20Proceedings%20(IEEE%20Cat.%20No.99CH37011&rft.au=Malave,%20C.O.&rft.date=1999&rft.volume=3&rft.spage=13D7/3&rft.epage=13D7/8%20vol.3&rft.pages=13D7/3-13D7/8%20vol.3&rft.issn=0190-5848&rft.eissn=2377-634X&rft.isbn=0780356438&rft.isbn_list=9780780356436&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/FIE.1999.840480&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E840480%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=840480&rfr_iscdi=true