From Mechanics to Meaning

While generative approaches to game design offer great promise, systems can only reliably generate what they can "understand," which is often represented in a limited, implicit form in hand-crafted evaluation functions or constructive rules. Proceduralist readings, a semiformal approach fo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on games 2019-03, Vol.11 (1), p.69-78
Hauptverfasser: Summerville, Adam, Martens, Chris, Harmon, Sarah, Mateas, Michael, Osborn, Joseph, Wardrip-Fruin, Noah, Jhala, Arnav
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:While generative approaches to game design offer great promise, systems can only reliably generate what they can "understand," which is often represented in a limited, implicit form in hand-crafted evaluation functions or constructive rules. Proceduralist readings, a semiformal approach for interpreting the meaning of a game based on its underlying processes and interactions in conjunction with aesthetic and cultural cues, offer a novel, systematic approach to game understanding. We formalize proceduralist argumentation as a logic program that performs static reasoning over game specifications to derive higher level meanings, as part of Gemini, a bidirectional game analysis and generation system.
ISSN:2475-1502
2475-1510
DOI:10.1109/TCIAIG.2017.2765599