Process maturity and inspector proficiency: feedback mechanisms for software inspections
Recent research suggests that people related issues account for as much as 50% of explained sources of variation in software code inspections and that process related issues account for less than 30%. This paper examines the impact of two feedback mechanisms (process maturity and inspector proficien...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Tagungsbericht |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 13 pp. |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | Track3 |
| creator | Rodgers, T.L. Dean, D.L. |
| description | Recent research suggests that people related issues account for as much as 50% of explained sources of variation in software code inspections and that process related issues account for less than 30%. This paper examines the impact of two feedback mechanisms (process maturity and inspector proficiency) on square inspections. Results of a survey of thirty-one experienced software developers and follow-up interviews are presented. Key findings include that significant process variations appear to exist within relatively mature organizations and that teams own inspection processes. The paper also addresses the significance and potential of feedback mechanism research. The findings extend to other formal technical reviews and provide insights into managing different-place, different time inspections. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1109/HICSS.1999.772895 |
| format | Conference Proceeding |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_772895</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>772895</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>772895</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ieee_primary_7728953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9jssKwjAURAMi-OoH6Co_YE2sNcatKLoT6sJdifEGozYpuRHp3yuoW1czcObAEDLkLOWcycl2tyqKlEspUyGmC5m3SI-JucwZYzzrkATx-q5sNsuEyLvkuA9eAyKtVHwEGxuq3JlahzXo6AOtgzdWW3C6WVIDcD4pfaMV6ItyFiuk5j1Cb-JTBfh51jsckLZRd4Tkm30y2qwPq-3YAkBZB1up0JSfj9lf-AJJ9ULN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Process maturity and inspector proficiency: feedback mechanisms for software inspections</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Rodgers, T.L. ; Dean, D.L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rodgers, T.L. ; Dean, D.L.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent research suggests that people related issues account for as much as 50% of explained sources of variation in software code inspections and that process related issues account for less than 30%. This paper examines the impact of two feedback mechanisms (process maturity and inspector proficiency) on square inspections. Results of a survey of thirty-one experienced software developers and follow-up interviews are presented. Key findings include that significant process variations appear to exist within relatively mature organizations and that teams own inspection processes. The paper also addresses the significance and potential of feedback mechanism research. The findings extend to other formal technical reviews and provide insights into managing different-place, different time inspections.</description><identifier>ISBN: 0769500013</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780769500010</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.1999.772895</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Capability maturity model ; Inspection ; Process planning ; Productivity ; Resource management ; Software engineering ; Software quality ; State feedback ; Time to market ; Velocity measurement</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers, 1999, Vol.Track3, p.13 pp.</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/772895$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2051,4035,4036,27904,54899</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/772895$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rodgers, T.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dean, D.L.</creatorcontrib><title>Process maturity and inspector proficiency: feedback mechanisms for software inspections</title><title>Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers</title><addtitle>HICSS</addtitle><description>Recent research suggests that people related issues account for as much as 50% of explained sources of variation in software code inspections and that process related issues account for less than 30%. This paper examines the impact of two feedback mechanisms (process maturity and inspector proficiency) on square inspections. Results of a survey of thirty-one experienced software developers and follow-up interviews are presented. Key findings include that significant process variations appear to exist within relatively mature organizations and that teams own inspection processes. The paper also addresses the significance and potential of feedback mechanism research. The findings extend to other formal technical reviews and provide insights into managing different-place, different time inspections.</description><subject>Capability maturity model</subject><subject>Inspection</subject><subject>Process planning</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Software engineering</subject><subject>Software quality</subject><subject>State feedback</subject><subject>Time to market</subject><subject>Velocity measurement</subject><isbn>0769500013</isbn><isbn>9780769500010</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNp9jssKwjAURAMi-OoH6Co_YE2sNcatKLoT6sJdifEGozYpuRHp3yuoW1czcObAEDLkLOWcycl2tyqKlEspUyGmC5m3SI-JucwZYzzrkATx-q5sNsuEyLvkuA9eAyKtVHwEGxuq3JlahzXo6AOtgzdWW3C6WVIDcD4pfaMV6ItyFiuk5j1Cb-JTBfh51jsckLZRd4Tkm30y2qwPq-3YAkBZB1up0JSfj9lf-AJJ9ULN</recordid><startdate>1999</startdate><enddate>1999</enddate><creator>Rodgers, T.L.</creator><creator>Dean, D.L.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1999</creationdate><title>Process maturity and inspector proficiency: feedback mechanisms for software inspections</title><author>Rodgers, T.L. ; Dean, D.L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ieee_primary_7728953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Capability maturity model</topic><topic>Inspection</topic><topic>Process planning</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Software engineering</topic><topic>Software quality</topic><topic>State feedback</topic><topic>Time to market</topic><topic>Velocity measurement</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rodgers, T.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dean, D.L.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rodgers, T.L.</au><au>Dean, D.L.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Process maturity and inspector proficiency: feedback mechanisms for software inspections</atitle><btitle>Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers</btitle><stitle>HICSS</stitle><date>1999</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>Track3</volume><spage>13 pp.</spage><pages>13 pp.-</pages><isbn>0769500013</isbn><isbn>9780769500010</isbn><abstract>Recent research suggests that people related issues account for as much as 50% of explained sources of variation in software code inspections and that process related issues account for less than 30%. This paper examines the impact of two feedback mechanisms (process maturity and inspector proficiency) on square inspections. Results of a survey of thirty-one experienced software developers and follow-up interviews are presented. Key findings include that significant process variations appear to exist within relatively mature organizations and that teams own inspection processes. The paper also addresses the significance and potential of feedback mechanism research. The findings extend to other formal technical reviews and provide insights into managing different-place, different time inspections.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/HICSS.1999.772895</doi></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISBN: 0769500013 |
| ispartof | Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers, 1999, Vol.Track3, p.13 pp. |
| issn | |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_772895 |
| source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
| subjects | Capability maturity model Inspection Process planning Productivity Resource management Software engineering Software quality State feedback Time to market Velocity measurement |
| title | Process maturity and inspector proficiency: feedback mechanisms for software inspections |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T18%3A38%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Process%20maturity%20and%20inspector%20proficiency:%20feedback%20mechanisms%20for%20software%20inspections&rft.btitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%2032nd%20Annual%20Hawaii%20International%20Conference%20on%20Systems%20Sciences.%201999.%20HICSS-32.%20Abstracts%20and%20CD-ROM%20of%20Full%20Papers&rft.au=Rodgers,%20T.L.&rft.date=1999&rft.volume=Track3&rft.spage=13%20pp.&rft.pages=13%20pp.-&rft.isbn=0769500013&rft.isbn_list=9780769500010&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/HICSS.1999.772895&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E772895%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=772895&rfr_iscdi=true |