A Proposed Method for Establishing Partial Discharge Acceptance Limits on API 541 and 546 Sacrificial Test Coils
Recent revisions to API standards have identified offline partial discharge analysis as an appropriate factory acceptance test (FAT) to evaluate the quality of certain new medium voltage motor and generator stator windings. As a starting point, API 541 recommends a partial discharge (PD) level of 10...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on industry applications 2017-01, Vol.53 (1), p.718-722 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 722 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 718 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on industry applications |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Ul Haq, Saeed Stranges, Meredith K. W. Wood, Barry |
description | Recent revisions to API standards have identified offline partial discharge analysis as an appropriate factory acceptance test (FAT) to evaluate the quality of certain new medium voltage motor and generator stator windings. As a starting point, API 541 recommends a partial discharge (PD) level of 100 pC (pico-Coulombs) for sacrificial stator coils measured with an IEC 60270 compliant instrument. The recommended PD level is subject to discussion between the purchaser and the manufacturer until more data are available. This paper provides PD data from sacrificial coils and stator windings to support discussions on PD acceptance criteria. Three instruments were used for PD tests on resin-rich, press-cured sacrificial coils in laboratory conditions controlled to minimize noise, and in the typical environment of a FAT. These coils were then tested daily for a week, with identical measurement conditions of noise, time of day, operator, and instrument. Also, included are examples of offline PD data from two complete stator windings. The first was a new winding, tested in the factory on two different days. The second was an aged winding tested using the same methods but in different locations. Instrument selection, testing location, elapsed time between measurements and insulation system construction can influence offline PD measurements. The current evidence suggests that statistical distributions drawn from similar test conditions are more applicable than specific PD limits. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TIA.2016.2608327 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_7564484</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>7564484</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>10_1109_TIA_2016_2608327</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-2e82a0c4f3e86721d7284624582917160210f269aea4ad8fd0748160eebaf243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LwzAYhYMoOKf3gjf5A51vPpoml2XOOZg4sPclS99ska4tSW_893ZseHXgcJ5z8RDyzGDBGJjXalMuODC14Aq04MUNmTEjTGaEKm7JDMCIzBgj78lDSj8ATOZMzshQ0l3shz5hQz9xPPYN9X2kqzTafRvSMXQHurNxDLalbyG5o40HpKVzOIy2c0i34RTGRPuOlrsNzSWjtmumVPTbuhh8cGe0wjTSZR_a9EjuvG0TPl1zTqr3VbX8yLZf682y3GZOghgzjppbcNIL1KrgrCm4lorLXHPDCqaAM_BcGYtW2kb7Bgqppxpxbz2XYk7gcutin1JEXw8xnGz8rRnUZ2H1JKw-C6uvwibk5YIERPyfF7mSUkvxB7sxZRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Proposed Method for Establishing Partial Discharge Acceptance Limits on API 541 and 546 Sacrificial Test Coils</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Ul Haq, Saeed ; Stranges, Meredith K. W. ; Wood, Barry</creator><creatorcontrib>Ul Haq, Saeed ; Stranges, Meredith K. W. ; Wood, Barry</creatorcontrib><description>Recent revisions to API standards have identified offline partial discharge analysis as an appropriate factory acceptance test (FAT) to evaluate the quality of certain new medium voltage motor and generator stator windings. As a starting point, API 541 recommends a partial discharge (PD) level of 100 pC (pico-Coulombs) for sacrificial stator coils measured with an IEC 60270 compliant instrument. The recommended PD level is subject to discussion between the purchaser and the manufacturer until more data are available. This paper provides PD data from sacrificial coils and stator windings to support discussions on PD acceptance criteria. Three instruments were used for PD tests on resin-rich, press-cured sacrificial coils in laboratory conditions controlled to minimize noise, and in the typical environment of a FAT. These coils were then tested daily for a week, with identical measurement conditions of noise, time of day, operator, and instrument. Also, included are examples of offline PD data from two complete stator windings. The first was a new winding, tested in the factory on two different days. The second was an aged winding tested using the same methods but in different locations. Instrument selection, testing location, elapsed time between measurements and insulation system construction can influence offline PD measurements. The current evidence suggests that statistical distributions drawn from similar test conditions are more applicable than specific PD limits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-9994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9367</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TIA.2016.2608327</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITIACR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Coil ; Coils ; Instruments ; Insulation ; partial discharge (PD) ; partial discharge measurements ; Partial discharges ; Production facilities ; stator ; Testing ; voltage ; Voltage measurement</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on industry applications, 2017-01, Vol.53 (1), p.718-722</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-2e82a0c4f3e86721d7284624582917160210f269aea4ad8fd0748160eebaf243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-2e82a0c4f3e86721d7284624582917160210f269aea4ad8fd0748160eebaf243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7564484$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7564484$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ul Haq, Saeed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stranges, Meredith K. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Barry</creatorcontrib><title>A Proposed Method for Establishing Partial Discharge Acceptance Limits on API 541 and 546 Sacrificial Test Coils</title><title>IEEE transactions on industry applications</title><addtitle>TIA</addtitle><description>Recent revisions to API standards have identified offline partial discharge analysis as an appropriate factory acceptance test (FAT) to evaluate the quality of certain new medium voltage motor and generator stator windings. As a starting point, API 541 recommends a partial discharge (PD) level of 100 pC (pico-Coulombs) for sacrificial stator coils measured with an IEC 60270 compliant instrument. The recommended PD level is subject to discussion between the purchaser and the manufacturer until more data are available. This paper provides PD data from sacrificial coils and stator windings to support discussions on PD acceptance criteria. Three instruments were used for PD tests on resin-rich, press-cured sacrificial coils in laboratory conditions controlled to minimize noise, and in the typical environment of a FAT. These coils were then tested daily for a week, with identical measurement conditions of noise, time of day, operator, and instrument. Also, included are examples of offline PD data from two complete stator windings. The first was a new winding, tested in the factory on two different days. The second was an aged winding tested using the same methods but in different locations. Instrument selection, testing location, elapsed time between measurements and insulation system construction can influence offline PD measurements. The current evidence suggests that statistical distributions drawn from similar test conditions are more applicable than specific PD limits.</description><subject>Coil</subject><subject>Coils</subject><subject>Instruments</subject><subject>Insulation</subject><subject>partial discharge (PD)</subject><subject>partial discharge measurements</subject><subject>Partial discharges</subject><subject>Production facilities</subject><subject>stator</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>voltage</subject><subject>Voltage measurement</subject><issn>0093-9994</issn><issn>1939-9367</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kF1LwzAYhYMoOKf3gjf5A51vPpoml2XOOZg4sPclS99ska4tSW_893ZseHXgcJ5z8RDyzGDBGJjXalMuODC14Aq04MUNmTEjTGaEKm7JDMCIzBgj78lDSj8ATOZMzshQ0l3shz5hQz9xPPYN9X2kqzTafRvSMXQHurNxDLalbyG5o40HpKVzOIy2c0i34RTGRPuOlrsNzSWjtmumVPTbuhh8cGe0wjTSZR_a9EjuvG0TPl1zTqr3VbX8yLZf682y3GZOghgzjppbcNIL1KrgrCm4lorLXHPDCqaAM_BcGYtW2kb7Bgqppxpxbz2XYk7gcutin1JEXw8xnGz8rRnUZ2H1JKw-C6uvwibk5YIERPyfF7mSUkvxB7sxZRg</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Ul Haq, Saeed</creator><creator>Stranges, Meredith K. W.</creator><creator>Wood, Barry</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>A Proposed Method for Establishing Partial Discharge Acceptance Limits on API 541 and 546 Sacrificial Test Coils</title><author>Ul Haq, Saeed ; Stranges, Meredith K. W. ; Wood, Barry</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-2e82a0c4f3e86721d7284624582917160210f269aea4ad8fd0748160eebaf243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Coil</topic><topic>Coils</topic><topic>Instruments</topic><topic>Insulation</topic><topic>partial discharge (PD)</topic><topic>partial discharge measurements</topic><topic>Partial discharges</topic><topic>Production facilities</topic><topic>stator</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>voltage</topic><topic>Voltage measurement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ul Haq, Saeed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stranges, Meredith K. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Barry</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on industry applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ul Haq, Saeed</au><au>Stranges, Meredith K. W.</au><au>Wood, Barry</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Proposed Method for Establishing Partial Discharge Acceptance Limits on API 541 and 546 Sacrificial Test Coils</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on industry applications</jtitle><stitle>TIA</stitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>718</spage><epage>722</epage><pages>718-722</pages><issn>0093-9994</issn><eissn>1939-9367</eissn><coden>ITIACR</coden><abstract>Recent revisions to API standards have identified offline partial discharge analysis as an appropriate factory acceptance test (FAT) to evaluate the quality of certain new medium voltage motor and generator stator windings. As a starting point, API 541 recommends a partial discharge (PD) level of 100 pC (pico-Coulombs) for sacrificial stator coils measured with an IEC 60270 compliant instrument. The recommended PD level is subject to discussion between the purchaser and the manufacturer until more data are available. This paper provides PD data from sacrificial coils and stator windings to support discussions on PD acceptance criteria. Three instruments were used for PD tests on resin-rich, press-cured sacrificial coils in laboratory conditions controlled to minimize noise, and in the typical environment of a FAT. These coils were then tested daily for a week, with identical measurement conditions of noise, time of day, operator, and instrument. Also, included are examples of offline PD data from two complete stator windings. The first was a new winding, tested in the factory on two different days. The second was an aged winding tested using the same methods but in different locations. Instrument selection, testing location, elapsed time between measurements and insulation system construction can influence offline PD measurements. The current evidence suggests that statistical distributions drawn from similar test conditions are more applicable than specific PD limits.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TIA.2016.2608327</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0093-9994 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on industry applications, 2017-01, Vol.53 (1), p.718-722 |
issn | 0093-9994 1939-9367 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_7564484 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Coil Coils Instruments Insulation partial discharge (PD) partial discharge measurements Partial discharges Production facilities stator Testing voltage Voltage measurement |
title | A Proposed Method for Establishing Partial Discharge Acceptance Limits on API 541 and 546 Sacrificial Test Coils |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T02%3A56%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Proposed%20Method%20for%20Establishing%20Partial%20Discharge%20Acceptance%20Limits%20on%20API%20541%20and%20546%20Sacrificial%20Test%20Coils&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20industry%20applications&rft.au=Ul%20Haq,%20Saeed&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=718&rft.epage=722&rft.pages=718-722&rft.issn=0093-9994&rft.eissn=1939-9367&rft.coden=ITIACR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TIA.2016.2608327&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_RIE%3E10_1109_TIA_2016_2608327%3C/crossref_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=7564484&rfr_iscdi=true |