Improved Model-Free Predictive Current Control for Synchronous Reluctance Motor Drives
An improved model-free predictive current control (IMFPCC) method for synchronous reluctance motor (SynRM) drives is presented in this paper. The main advantages of previous MFPCC are that it does not require specific SynRM models and it requires neither motor parameters nor back-EMF estimations. Ho...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on industrial electronics (1982) 2016-06, Vol.63 (6), p.3942-3953 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 3953 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 3942 |
| container_title | IEEE transactions on industrial electronics (1982) |
| container_volume | 63 |
| creator | Lin, Cheng-Kai Yu, Jen-te Lai, Yen-Shin Yu, Hsing-Cheng |
| description | An improved model-free predictive current control (IMFPCC) method for synchronous reluctance motor (SynRM) drives is presented in this paper. The main advantages of previous MFPCC are that it does not require specific SynRM models and it requires neither motor parameters nor back-EMF estimations. However, this approach has two disadvantages: 1) two current measurements are required in each sampling period, which may lead to the detection of undesirable current spikes caused by instantaneous switching inside the inverter, and 2) an unresolved problem of stagnant current-variation updates, which undermines the prediction performance. This paper intends to eliminate these two drawbacks while retaining all the merits of MFPCC. The proposed IMFPCC is simple and easy to realize. Furthermore, no pulsewidth modulation (PWM) technique is required. A 32-bit microprocessor, TMS320F2809, is utilized to implement both the proposed IMFPCC and the model-based predictive current control (MBPCC) for a performance comparison. Experiment results are provided to validate the proposed method and verify its feasibility. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TIE.2016.2527629 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_7403952</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>7403952</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>4053398361</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-9ea62d4ea0ea17cf19332d0ecd71ba0adaff807d2c6e46dcc2a8e1a13fe1f0d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEFLAzEQRoMoWKt3wcuC562ZZHezOUpttVBRtHoNMZnglu2mJruF_nsjLZ7mMN_7hnmEXAOdAFB5t1rMJoxCNWElExWTJ2QEZSlyKYv6lIwoE3VOaVGdk4sY15RCUUI5Ip-LzTb4Hdrs2Vts83lAzF4D2sb0zQ6z6RACdn029V0ffJs5H7L3fWe-g-_8ELM3bAfT685gKujT8iEkLF6SM6fbiFfHOSYf89lq-pQvXx4X0_tlbpiEPpeoK2YL1BQ1CONAcs4sRWMFfGmqrXaupsIyU2FRWWOYrhE0cIfgqOV8TG4PvemJnwFjr9Z-CF06qUDUNRe8LFlK0UPKBB9jQKe2odnosFdA1Z89leypP3vqaC8hNwekQcT_uCgol6nwF27dbOU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1788373552</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improved Model-Free Predictive Current Control for Synchronous Reluctance Motor Drives</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Lin, Cheng-Kai ; Yu, Jen-te ; Lai, Yen-Shin ; Yu, Hsing-Cheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Lin, Cheng-Kai ; Yu, Jen-te ; Lai, Yen-Shin ; Yu, Hsing-Cheng</creatorcontrib><description>An improved model-free predictive current control (IMFPCC) method for synchronous reluctance motor (SynRM) drives is presented in this paper. The main advantages of previous MFPCC are that it does not require specific SynRM models and it requires neither motor parameters nor back-EMF estimations. However, this approach has two disadvantages: 1) two current measurements are required in each sampling period, which may lead to the detection of undesirable current spikes caused by instantaneous switching inside the inverter, and 2) an unresolved problem of stagnant current-variation updates, which undermines the prediction performance. This paper intends to eliminate these two drawbacks while retaining all the merits of MFPCC. The proposed IMFPCC is simple and easy to realize. Furthermore, no pulsewidth modulation (PWM) technique is required. A 32-bit microprocessor, TMS320F2809, is utilized to implement both the proposed IMFPCC and the model-based predictive current control (MBPCC) for a performance comparison. Experiment results are provided to validate the proposed method and verify its feasibility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-0046</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-9948</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2016.2527629</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITIED6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Current control ; Current measurement ; Inverters ; Predictive current control ; Predictive models ; Reluctance motors ; Rotors ; six-switch three-phase inverter ; Stators ; synchronous reluctance motor</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on industrial electronics (1982), 2016-06, Vol.63 (6), p.3942-3953</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-9ea62d4ea0ea17cf19332d0ecd71ba0adaff807d2c6e46dcc2a8e1a13fe1f0d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-9ea62d4ea0ea17cf19332d0ecd71ba0adaff807d2c6e46dcc2a8e1a13fe1f0d33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6351-7475</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7403952$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,792,27901,27902,54733</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7403952$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lin, Cheng-Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Jen-te</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Yen-Shin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Hsing-Cheng</creatorcontrib><title>Improved Model-Free Predictive Current Control for Synchronous Reluctance Motor Drives</title><title>IEEE transactions on industrial electronics (1982)</title><addtitle>TIE</addtitle><description>An improved model-free predictive current control (IMFPCC) method for synchronous reluctance motor (SynRM) drives is presented in this paper. The main advantages of previous MFPCC are that it does not require specific SynRM models and it requires neither motor parameters nor back-EMF estimations. However, this approach has two disadvantages: 1) two current measurements are required in each sampling period, which may lead to the detection of undesirable current spikes caused by instantaneous switching inside the inverter, and 2) an unresolved problem of stagnant current-variation updates, which undermines the prediction performance. This paper intends to eliminate these two drawbacks while retaining all the merits of MFPCC. The proposed IMFPCC is simple and easy to realize. Furthermore, no pulsewidth modulation (PWM) technique is required. A 32-bit microprocessor, TMS320F2809, is utilized to implement both the proposed IMFPCC and the model-based predictive current control (MBPCC) for a performance comparison. Experiment results are provided to validate the proposed method and verify its feasibility.</description><subject>Current control</subject><subject>Current measurement</subject><subject>Inverters</subject><subject>Predictive current control</subject><subject>Predictive models</subject><subject>Reluctance motors</subject><subject>Rotors</subject><subject>six-switch three-phase inverter</subject><subject>Stators</subject><subject>synchronous reluctance motor</subject><issn>0278-0046</issn><issn>1557-9948</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEFLAzEQRoMoWKt3wcuC562ZZHezOUpttVBRtHoNMZnglu2mJruF_nsjLZ7mMN_7hnmEXAOdAFB5t1rMJoxCNWElExWTJ2QEZSlyKYv6lIwoE3VOaVGdk4sY15RCUUI5Ip-LzTb4Hdrs2Vts83lAzF4D2sb0zQ6z6RACdn029V0ffJs5H7L3fWe-g-_8ELM3bAfT685gKujT8iEkLF6SM6fbiFfHOSYf89lq-pQvXx4X0_tlbpiEPpeoK2YL1BQ1CONAcs4sRWMFfGmqrXaupsIyU2FRWWOYrhE0cIfgqOV8TG4PvemJnwFjr9Z-CF06qUDUNRe8LFlK0UPKBB9jQKe2odnosFdA1Z89leypP3vqaC8hNwekQcT_uCgol6nwF27dbOU</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>Lin, Cheng-Kai</creator><creator>Yu, Jen-te</creator><creator>Lai, Yen-Shin</creator><creator>Yu, Hsing-Cheng</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6351-7475</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>Improved Model-Free Predictive Current Control for Synchronous Reluctance Motor Drives</title><author>Lin, Cheng-Kai ; Yu, Jen-te ; Lai, Yen-Shin ; Yu, Hsing-Cheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-9ea62d4ea0ea17cf19332d0ecd71ba0adaff807d2c6e46dcc2a8e1a13fe1f0d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Current control</topic><topic>Current measurement</topic><topic>Inverters</topic><topic>Predictive current control</topic><topic>Predictive models</topic><topic>Reluctance motors</topic><topic>Rotors</topic><topic>six-switch three-phase inverter</topic><topic>Stators</topic><topic>synchronous reluctance motor</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lin, Cheng-Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Jen-te</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Yen-Shin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Hsing-Cheng</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on industrial electronics (1982)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lin, Cheng-Kai</au><au>Yu, Jen-te</au><au>Lai, Yen-Shin</au><au>Yu, Hsing-Cheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improved Model-Free Predictive Current Control for Synchronous Reluctance Motor Drives</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on industrial electronics (1982)</jtitle><stitle>TIE</stitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>3942</spage><epage>3953</epage><pages>3942-3953</pages><issn>0278-0046</issn><eissn>1557-9948</eissn><coden>ITIED6</coden><abstract>An improved model-free predictive current control (IMFPCC) method for synchronous reluctance motor (SynRM) drives is presented in this paper. The main advantages of previous MFPCC are that it does not require specific SynRM models and it requires neither motor parameters nor back-EMF estimations. However, this approach has two disadvantages: 1) two current measurements are required in each sampling period, which may lead to the detection of undesirable current spikes caused by instantaneous switching inside the inverter, and 2) an unresolved problem of stagnant current-variation updates, which undermines the prediction performance. This paper intends to eliminate these two drawbacks while retaining all the merits of MFPCC. The proposed IMFPCC is simple and easy to realize. Furthermore, no pulsewidth modulation (PWM) technique is required. A 32-bit microprocessor, TMS320F2809, is utilized to implement both the proposed IMFPCC and the model-based predictive current control (MBPCC) for a performance comparison. Experiment results are provided to validate the proposed method and verify its feasibility.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TIE.2016.2527629</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6351-7475</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISSN: 0278-0046 |
| ispartof | IEEE transactions on industrial electronics (1982), 2016-06, Vol.63 (6), p.3942-3953 |
| issn | 0278-0046 1557-9948 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_7403952 |
| source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
| subjects | Current control Current measurement Inverters Predictive current control Predictive models Reluctance motors Rotors six-switch three-phase inverter Stators synchronous reluctance motor |
| title | Improved Model-Free Predictive Current Control for Synchronous Reluctance Motor Drives |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T23%3A52%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improved%20Model-Free%20Predictive%20Current%20Control%20for%20Synchronous%20Reluctance%20Motor%20Drives&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20industrial%20electronics%20(1982)&rft.au=Lin,%20Cheng-Kai&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=3942&rft.epage=3953&rft.pages=3942-3953&rft.issn=0278-0046&rft.eissn=1557-9948&rft.coden=ITIED6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TIE.2016.2527629&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E4053398361%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1788373552&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=7403952&rfr_iscdi=true |