Probabilistic Interface Automata
System specifications have long been expressed through automata-based languages, which allow for compositional construction of complex models and enable automated verification techniques such as model checking. Automata-based verification has been extensively used in the analysis of systems, where t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on software engineering 2016-09, Vol.42 (9), p.843-865 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 865 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 843 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on software engineering |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Pavese, Esteban Braberman, Victor Uchitel, Sebastian |
description | System specifications have long been expressed through automata-based languages, which allow for compositional construction of complex models and enable automated verification techniques such as model checking. Automata-based verification has been extensively used in the analysis of systems, where they are able to provide yes/no answers to queries regarding their temporal properties. Probabilistic modelling and checking aim at enriching this binary, qualitative information with quantitative information, more suitable to approaches such as reliability engineering. Compositional construction of software specifications reduces the specification effort, allowing the engineer to focus on specifying individual component behaviour to then analyse the composite system behaviour. Compositional construction also reduces the validation effort, since the validity of the composite specification should be dependent on the validity of the components. These component models are smaller and thus easier to validate. Compositional construction poses additional challenges in a probabilistic setting. Numerical annotations of probabilistically independent events must be contrasted against estimations or measurements, taking care of not compounding this quantification with exogenous factors, in particular the behaviour of other system components. Thus, the validity of compositionally constructed system specifications requires that the validated probabilistic behaviour of each component continues to be preserved in the composite system. However, existing probabilistic automata-based formalisms do not support specification of non-deterministic and probabilistic component behaviour which, when observed through logics such as pCTL, is preserved in the composite system. In this paper we present a probabilistic extension to Interface Automata which preserves pCTL properties under probabilistic fairness by ensuring a probabilistic branching simulation between component and composite automata. The extension not only supports probabilistic behaviour but also allows for weaker prerequisites to interfacing composition, that supports delayed synchronisation that may be required because of internal component behaviour. These results are equally applicable as an extension to non-probabilistic Interface Automata. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TSE.2016.2527000 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_7401103</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>7401103</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>4188625831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-48dd48821e2cf616d23ce6ae2c9248e611dc48899c2e47fd6989655b91fab7593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQhoMouFbvgpeC513z_XEspWqhoGA9h2x2Alvabk2yB_-9KVs8DcM87zvwIPRIcEMINi_br1VDMZENFVRhjK9QRQwzNRMUX6MKY6NrIbS5RXcp7QoglBIVmn_GoXVtv-9T7v18fcwQg_MwX4x5OLjs7tFNcPsED5c5Q9-vq-3yvd58vK2Xi03tqZa55rrruNaUAPVBEtlR5kG6shnKNUhCOl_uxngKXIVOGm2kEK0hwbVKGDZDz1PvKQ4_I6Rsd8MYj-WlJaVWCU01LxSeKB-HlCIEe4r9wcVfS7A9e7DFgz17sBcPJfI0RXoA-McVxwVn7A-fKFbl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1821758284</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Probabilistic Interface Automata</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Pavese, Esteban ; Braberman, Victor ; Uchitel, Sebastian</creator><creatorcontrib>Pavese, Esteban ; Braberman, Victor ; Uchitel, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><description>System specifications have long been expressed through automata-based languages, which allow for compositional construction of complex models and enable automated verification techniques such as model checking. Automata-based verification has been extensively used in the analysis of systems, where they are able to provide yes/no answers to queries regarding their temporal properties. Probabilistic modelling and checking aim at enriching this binary, qualitative information with quantitative information, more suitable to approaches such as reliability engineering. Compositional construction of software specifications reduces the specification effort, allowing the engineer to focus on specifying individual component behaviour to then analyse the composite system behaviour. Compositional construction also reduces the validation effort, since the validity of the composite specification should be dependent on the validity of the components. These component models are smaller and thus easier to validate. Compositional construction poses additional challenges in a probabilistic setting. Numerical annotations of probabilistically independent events must be contrasted against estimations or measurements, taking care of not compounding this quantification with exogenous factors, in particular the behaviour of other system components. Thus, the validity of compositionally constructed system specifications requires that the validated probabilistic behaviour of each component continues to be preserved in the composite system. However, existing probabilistic automata-based formalisms do not support specification of non-deterministic and probabilistic component behaviour which, when observed through logics such as pCTL, is preserved in the composite system. In this paper we present a probabilistic extension to Interface Automata which preserves pCTL properties under probabilistic fairness by ensuring a probabilistic branching simulation between component and composite automata. The extension not only supports probabilistic behaviour but also allows for weaker prerequisites to interfacing composition, that supports delayed synchronisation that may be required because of internal component behaviour. These results are equally applicable as an extension to non-probabilistic Interface Automata.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-5589</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-3520</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TSE.2016.2527000</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IESEDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Automata ; Automation ; Behaviour models ; Computational modeling ; Interconnected systems ; interface automata ; Model checking ; Probabilistic logic ; probability ; Probability distribution ; Semantics ; Software engineering ; Studies ; Synchronization ; Validity</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on software engineering, 2016-09, Vol.42 (9), p.843-865</ispartof><rights>Copyright IEEE Computer Society Sep 1, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-48dd48821e2cf616d23ce6ae2c9248e611dc48899c2e47fd6989655b91fab7593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7401103$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,796,27924,27925,54758</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7401103$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pavese, Esteban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braberman, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uchitel, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><title>Probabilistic Interface Automata</title><title>IEEE transactions on software engineering</title><addtitle>TSE</addtitle><description>System specifications have long been expressed through automata-based languages, which allow for compositional construction of complex models and enable automated verification techniques such as model checking. Automata-based verification has been extensively used in the analysis of systems, where they are able to provide yes/no answers to queries regarding their temporal properties. Probabilistic modelling and checking aim at enriching this binary, qualitative information with quantitative information, more suitable to approaches such as reliability engineering. Compositional construction of software specifications reduces the specification effort, allowing the engineer to focus on specifying individual component behaviour to then analyse the composite system behaviour. Compositional construction also reduces the validation effort, since the validity of the composite specification should be dependent on the validity of the components. These component models are smaller and thus easier to validate. Compositional construction poses additional challenges in a probabilistic setting. Numerical annotations of probabilistically independent events must be contrasted against estimations or measurements, taking care of not compounding this quantification with exogenous factors, in particular the behaviour of other system components. Thus, the validity of compositionally constructed system specifications requires that the validated probabilistic behaviour of each component continues to be preserved in the composite system. However, existing probabilistic automata-based formalisms do not support specification of non-deterministic and probabilistic component behaviour which, when observed through logics such as pCTL, is preserved in the composite system. In this paper we present a probabilistic extension to Interface Automata which preserves pCTL properties under probabilistic fairness by ensuring a probabilistic branching simulation between component and composite automata. The extension not only supports probabilistic behaviour but also allows for weaker prerequisites to interfacing composition, that supports delayed synchronisation that may be required because of internal component behaviour. These results are equally applicable as an extension to non-probabilistic Interface Automata.</description><subject>Automata</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Behaviour models</subject><subject>Computational modeling</subject><subject>Interconnected systems</subject><subject>interface automata</subject><subject>Model checking</subject><subject>Probabilistic logic</subject><subject>probability</subject><subject>Probability distribution</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Software engineering</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Synchronization</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0098-5589</issn><issn>1939-3520</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1LAzEQhoMouFbvgpeC513z_XEspWqhoGA9h2x2Alvabk2yB_-9KVs8DcM87zvwIPRIcEMINi_br1VDMZENFVRhjK9QRQwzNRMUX6MKY6NrIbS5RXcp7QoglBIVmn_GoXVtv-9T7v18fcwQg_MwX4x5OLjs7tFNcPsED5c5Q9-vq-3yvd58vK2Xi03tqZa55rrruNaUAPVBEtlR5kG6shnKNUhCOl_uxngKXIVOGm2kEK0hwbVKGDZDz1PvKQ4_I6Rsd8MYj-WlJaVWCU01LxSeKB-HlCIEe4r9wcVfS7A9e7DFgz17sBcPJfI0RXoA-McVxwVn7A-fKFbl</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Pavese, Esteban</creator><creator>Braberman, Victor</creator><creator>Uchitel, Sebastian</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>IEEE Computer Society</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>Probabilistic Interface Automata</title><author>Pavese, Esteban ; Braberman, Victor ; Uchitel, Sebastian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-48dd48821e2cf616d23ce6ae2c9248e611dc48899c2e47fd6989655b91fab7593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Automata</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Behaviour models</topic><topic>Computational modeling</topic><topic>Interconnected systems</topic><topic>interface automata</topic><topic>Model checking</topic><topic>Probabilistic logic</topic><topic>probability</topic><topic>Probability distribution</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Software engineering</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Synchronization</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pavese, Esteban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braberman, Victor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uchitel, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on software engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pavese, Esteban</au><au>Braberman, Victor</au><au>Uchitel, Sebastian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Probabilistic Interface Automata</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on software engineering</jtitle><stitle>TSE</stitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>843</spage><epage>865</epage><pages>843-865</pages><issn>0098-5589</issn><eissn>1939-3520</eissn><coden>IESEDJ</coden><abstract>System specifications have long been expressed through automata-based languages, which allow for compositional construction of complex models and enable automated verification techniques such as model checking. Automata-based verification has been extensively used in the analysis of systems, where they are able to provide yes/no answers to queries regarding their temporal properties. Probabilistic modelling and checking aim at enriching this binary, qualitative information with quantitative information, more suitable to approaches such as reliability engineering. Compositional construction of software specifications reduces the specification effort, allowing the engineer to focus on specifying individual component behaviour to then analyse the composite system behaviour. Compositional construction also reduces the validation effort, since the validity of the composite specification should be dependent on the validity of the components. These component models are smaller and thus easier to validate. Compositional construction poses additional challenges in a probabilistic setting. Numerical annotations of probabilistically independent events must be contrasted against estimations or measurements, taking care of not compounding this quantification with exogenous factors, in particular the behaviour of other system components. Thus, the validity of compositionally constructed system specifications requires that the validated probabilistic behaviour of each component continues to be preserved in the composite system. However, existing probabilistic automata-based formalisms do not support specification of non-deterministic and probabilistic component behaviour which, when observed through logics such as pCTL, is preserved in the composite system. In this paper we present a probabilistic extension to Interface Automata which preserves pCTL properties under probabilistic fairness by ensuring a probabilistic branching simulation between component and composite automata. The extension not only supports probabilistic behaviour but also allows for weaker prerequisites to interfacing composition, that supports delayed synchronisation that may be required because of internal component behaviour. These results are equally applicable as an extension to non-probabilistic Interface Automata.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TSE.2016.2527000</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0098-5589 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on software engineering, 2016-09, Vol.42 (9), p.843-865 |
issn | 0098-5589 1939-3520 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_7401103 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
subjects | Automata Automation Behaviour models Computational modeling Interconnected systems interface automata Model checking Probabilistic logic probability Probability distribution Semantics Software engineering Studies Synchronization Validity |
title | Probabilistic Interface Automata |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T12%3A25%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Probabilistic%20Interface%20Automata&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20software%20engineering&rft.au=Pavese,%20Esteban&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=843&rft.epage=865&rft.pages=843-865&rft.issn=0098-5589&rft.eissn=1939-3520&rft.coden=IESEDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TSE.2016.2527000&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E4188625831%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1821758284&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=7401103&rfr_iscdi=true |