Investigation into socketed CDM (SDM) tester parasitics

The ESD Association standards working group 5.3.2 is analyzing the procedure and stress that is applied to a device under test (DUT) using a socketed discharge model (SDM) test system, formerly referred to as socketed CDM. Our final goal is to define an SDM tester specification that will guarantee t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Chaine, M., Verhaege, K., Avery, L., Kelly, M., Gieser, H., Bock, K., Henry, L.G., Meuse, T., Brodbeck, T., Barth, J.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 310
container_issue
container_start_page 301
container_title
container_volume
creator Chaine, M.
Verhaege, K.
Avery, L.
Kelly, M.
Gieser, H.
Bock, K.
Henry, L.G.
Meuse, T.
Brodbeck, T.
Barth, J.
description The ESD Association standards working group 5.3.2 is analyzing the procedure and stress that is applied to a device under test (DUT) using a socketed discharge model (SDM) test system, formerly referred to as socketed CDM. Our final goal is to define an SDM tester specification that will guarantee test result reproducibility across different test equipment. This paper investigates the effect of tester background parasitics on the discharge current waveforms of an SDM tester. Characteristic waveforms were studied and SDM testing was performed on actual devices. It is shown that SDM tester parasitics determine the stress applied to the DUT. This directly affects the SDM failure threshold voltage levels and may lead to miscorrelation and nonreproducibility of test results across different SDM test systems. This paper empirically determines the relative contributions of the various tester parasitics to the total stress applied to the DUT. Our investigations indicate that the tester provides 10 to 20 pF parasitic capacitance discharge into each pin of the device. Tester background parasitic elements play such an important role in the SDM discharge event that correlation between test systems built by different manufacturers is unlikely without completely duplicating a particular tester.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/EOSESD.1998.737050
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_737050</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>737050</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>737050</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i104t-1bc53f4e68bf7108c0b8c78ff6560b3467448b2b3e8a93c400b8d693cf15814d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj01LxDAYhAMiKGv_wJ5y1MPWvE3SvDlKW3Vhlz1Uz0uSJhI_2qUJgv_ewu5cZuAZBoaQNbASgOnH7tB3fVuC1lgqrphkV6TQCgEVcsY1VDekSOmTLZISK6FuidqOvz7l-GFynEYaxzzRNLkvn_1Am3ZP7_t2_0Dz0vEzPZnZpJijS3fkOpjv5IuLr8j7c_fWvG52h5dt87TbRGAib8A6yYPwNdqggKFjFp3CEGpZM8tFrYRAW1nu0WjuBFv4UC8pgEQQA1-R9Xk3eu-Ppzn-mPnveH7H_wFHJkQV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Investigation into socketed CDM (SDM) tester parasitics</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Chaine, M. ; Verhaege, K. ; Avery, L. ; Kelly, M. ; Gieser, H. ; Bock, K. ; Henry, L.G. ; Meuse, T. ; Brodbeck, T. ; Barth, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chaine, M. ; Verhaege, K. ; Avery, L. ; Kelly, M. ; Gieser, H. ; Bock, K. ; Henry, L.G. ; Meuse, T. ; Brodbeck, T. ; Barth, J.</creatorcontrib><description>The ESD Association standards working group 5.3.2 is analyzing the procedure and stress that is applied to a device under test (DUT) using a socketed discharge model (SDM) test system, formerly referred to as socketed CDM. Our final goal is to define an SDM tester specification that will guarantee test result reproducibility across different test equipment. This paper investigates the effect of tester background parasitics on the discharge current waveforms of an SDM tester. Characteristic waveforms were studied and SDM testing was performed on actual devices. It is shown that SDM tester parasitics determine the stress applied to the DUT. This directly affects the SDM failure threshold voltage levels and may lead to miscorrelation and nonreproducibility of test results across different SDM test systems. This paper empirically determines the relative contributions of the various tester parasitics to the total stress applied to the DUT. Our investigations indicate that the tester provides 10 to 20 pF parasitic capacitance discharge into each pin of the device. Tester background parasitic elements play such an important role in the SDM discharge event that correlation between test systems built by different manufacturers is unlikely without completely duplicating a particular tester.</description><identifier>ISBN: 9781878303912</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1878303910</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/EOSESD.1998.737050</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Electrostatic discharge ; Manufacturing ; Parasitic capacitance ; Performance evaluation ; Reproducibility of results ; Standards Working Groups ; Stress ; System testing ; Test equipment ; Threshold voltage</subject><ispartof>Electrical Overstress/ Electrostatic Discharge Symposium Proceedings. 1998 (Cat. No.98TH8347), 1998, p.301-310</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/737050$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>310,311,781,785,790,791,2059,4051,4052,27929,54924</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/737050$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chaine, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhaege, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avery, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gieser, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bock, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, L.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meuse, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brodbeck, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barth, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Investigation into socketed CDM (SDM) tester parasitics</title><title>Electrical Overstress/ Electrostatic Discharge Symposium Proceedings. 1998 (Cat. No.98TH8347)</title><addtitle>EOSESD</addtitle><description>The ESD Association standards working group 5.3.2 is analyzing the procedure and stress that is applied to a device under test (DUT) using a socketed discharge model (SDM) test system, formerly referred to as socketed CDM. Our final goal is to define an SDM tester specification that will guarantee test result reproducibility across different test equipment. This paper investigates the effect of tester background parasitics on the discharge current waveforms of an SDM tester. Characteristic waveforms were studied and SDM testing was performed on actual devices. It is shown that SDM tester parasitics determine the stress applied to the DUT. This directly affects the SDM failure threshold voltage levels and may lead to miscorrelation and nonreproducibility of test results across different SDM test systems. This paper empirically determines the relative contributions of the various tester parasitics to the total stress applied to the DUT. Our investigations indicate that the tester provides 10 to 20 pF parasitic capacitance discharge into each pin of the device. Tester background parasitic elements play such an important role in the SDM discharge event that correlation between test systems built by different manufacturers is unlikely without completely duplicating a particular tester.</description><subject>Electrostatic discharge</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Parasitic capacitance</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of results</subject><subject>Standards Working Groups</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>System testing</subject><subject>Test equipment</subject><subject>Threshold voltage</subject><isbn>9781878303912</isbn><isbn>1878303910</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotj01LxDAYhAMiKGv_wJ5y1MPWvE3SvDlKW3Vhlz1Uz0uSJhI_2qUJgv_ewu5cZuAZBoaQNbASgOnH7tB3fVuC1lgqrphkV6TQCgEVcsY1VDekSOmTLZISK6FuidqOvz7l-GFynEYaxzzRNLkvn_1Am3ZP7_t2_0Dz0vEzPZnZpJijS3fkOpjv5IuLr8j7c_fWvG52h5dt87TbRGAib8A6yYPwNdqggKFjFp3CEGpZM8tFrYRAW1nu0WjuBFv4UC8pgEQQA1-R9Xk3eu-Ppzn-mPnveH7H_wFHJkQV</recordid><startdate>1998</startdate><enddate>1998</enddate><creator>Chaine, M.</creator><creator>Verhaege, K.</creator><creator>Avery, L.</creator><creator>Kelly, M.</creator><creator>Gieser, H.</creator><creator>Bock, K.</creator><creator>Henry, L.G.</creator><creator>Meuse, T.</creator><creator>Brodbeck, T.</creator><creator>Barth, J.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1998</creationdate><title>Investigation into socketed CDM (SDM) tester parasitics</title><author>Chaine, M. ; Verhaege, K. ; Avery, L. ; Kelly, M. ; Gieser, H. ; Bock, K. ; Henry, L.G. ; Meuse, T. ; Brodbeck, T. ; Barth, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i104t-1bc53f4e68bf7108c0b8c78ff6560b3467448b2b3e8a93c400b8d693cf15814d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Electrostatic discharge</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Parasitic capacitance</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of results</topic><topic>Standards Working Groups</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>System testing</topic><topic>Test equipment</topic><topic>Threshold voltage</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chaine, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhaege, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avery, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gieser, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bock, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henry, L.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meuse, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brodbeck, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barth, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chaine, M.</au><au>Verhaege, K.</au><au>Avery, L.</au><au>Kelly, M.</au><au>Gieser, H.</au><au>Bock, K.</au><au>Henry, L.G.</au><au>Meuse, T.</au><au>Brodbeck, T.</au><au>Barth, J.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Investigation into socketed CDM (SDM) tester parasitics</atitle><btitle>Electrical Overstress/ Electrostatic Discharge Symposium Proceedings. 1998 (Cat. No.98TH8347)</btitle><stitle>EOSESD</stitle><date>1998</date><risdate>1998</risdate><spage>301</spage><epage>310</epage><pages>301-310</pages><isbn>9781878303912</isbn><isbn>1878303910</isbn><abstract>The ESD Association standards working group 5.3.2 is analyzing the procedure and stress that is applied to a device under test (DUT) using a socketed discharge model (SDM) test system, formerly referred to as socketed CDM. Our final goal is to define an SDM tester specification that will guarantee test result reproducibility across different test equipment. This paper investigates the effect of tester background parasitics on the discharge current waveforms of an SDM tester. Characteristic waveforms were studied and SDM testing was performed on actual devices. It is shown that SDM tester parasitics determine the stress applied to the DUT. This directly affects the SDM failure threshold voltage levels and may lead to miscorrelation and nonreproducibility of test results across different SDM test systems. This paper empirically determines the relative contributions of the various tester parasitics to the total stress applied to the DUT. Our investigations indicate that the tester provides 10 to 20 pF parasitic capacitance discharge into each pin of the device. Tester background parasitic elements play such an important role in the SDM discharge event that correlation between test systems built by different manufacturers is unlikely without completely duplicating a particular tester.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/EOSESD.1998.737050</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISBN: 9781878303912
ispartof Electrical Overstress/ Electrostatic Discharge Symposium Proceedings. 1998 (Cat. No.98TH8347), 1998, p.301-310
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_737050
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Electrostatic discharge
Manufacturing
Parasitic capacitance
Performance evaluation
Reproducibility of results
Standards Working Groups
Stress
System testing
Test equipment
Threshold voltage
title Investigation into socketed CDM (SDM) tester parasitics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T05%3A27%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Investigation%20into%20socketed%20CDM%20(SDM)%20tester%20parasitics&rft.btitle=Electrical%20Overstress/%20Electrostatic%20Discharge%20Symposium%20Proceedings.%201998%20(Cat.%20No.98TH8347)&rft.au=Chaine,%20M.&rft.date=1998&rft.spage=301&rft.epage=310&rft.pages=301-310&rft.isbn=9781878303912&rft.isbn_list=1878303910&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/EOSESD.1998.737050&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E737050%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=737050&rfr_iscdi=true