Analysis of sfqCoDel for Active Queue Management

The availability of cheaper and high capacity Random Access Memory (RAM) has resulted in the growth of buffer size in all the computing devices. This aberrant increase of buffer capacity in network devices has resulted into high latency, leading to reduced throughput; thus decreasing the tendency of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Rao, V. Preethi, Tahiliani, Mohit P., Shenoy, Udaya Kumar K.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 267
container_issue
container_start_page 262
container_title
container_volume
creator Rao, V. Preethi
Tahiliani, Mohit P.
Shenoy, Udaya Kumar K.
description The availability of cheaper and high capacity Random Access Memory (RAM) has resulted in the growth of buffer size in all the computing devices. This aberrant increase of buffer capacity in network devices has resulted into high latency, leading to reduced throughput; thus decreasing the tendency of absorbing spontaneous burst of traffic. The requirement for Active Queue Management (AQM) has been evident for decades. These solutions require various parameter configuration and are dependent on a particular network condition to work efficiently. Hence an algorithm which is simple, efficient, does not require setting of parameters and works seamlessly irrespective of the network condition is required. Even though Controlled Delay (CoDel) is parameterless and adapts to dynamically changing link rates with no negative impact on utilization, it deviates from its primary purpose of reducing congestion when there is an increase in RTT and when congestion level varies abruptly. As a consequence, a variant of CoDel called Stochastic Fair Queue CoDel (sfqCoDel) is simulated and compared. The Stochastic Fair Queue CoDel proactively drops packets which occupy reasonably larger bandwidth as compared to CoDel, which proactively drops packet irrespective of the bandwidth consumption by packets. This paper aims to perform a comprehensive analysis of Stochastic Fair Queue CoDel for Active Queue Management. A comparison is also carried out between sfqCoDel with CoDel. The sfqCoDel appears to be much better than CoDel in certain areas where CoDel fails to perform well.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/ICADIWT.2014.6814669
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6814669</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6814669</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>6814669</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i123t-742dc00f6bdc4f29e391fd540697c45e005be08fad43879f2e39580d010d181b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj81Kw0AURseFoNY-gS7mBRLvncxM5i5L6k-hIkLFZZlk7kgkTTSTCn17C-3q2xzO4RPiHiFHBHpYVYvl6nOTK0CdW4faWroQN6hLIqUMmSsxT-kbAJCsc4quBSx63x1Sm-QQZYq_1bDkTsZhlItmav9Yvu95z_LV9_6Ld9xPt-Iy-i7x_Lwz8fH0uKlesvXb87G_zlpUxZSVWoUGINo6NDoq4oIwBqPBUtlowwCmZnDRB124kqI6AsZBAISADutiJu5O3paZtz9ju_PjYXs-VfwDN2xBrg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Analysis of sfqCoDel for Active Queue Management</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Rao, V. Preethi ; Tahiliani, Mohit P. ; Shenoy, Udaya Kumar K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rao, V. Preethi ; Tahiliani, Mohit P. ; Shenoy, Udaya Kumar K.</creatorcontrib><description>The availability of cheaper and high capacity Random Access Memory (RAM) has resulted in the growth of buffer size in all the computing devices. This aberrant increase of buffer capacity in network devices has resulted into high latency, leading to reduced throughput; thus decreasing the tendency of absorbing spontaneous burst of traffic. The requirement for Active Queue Management (AQM) has been evident for decades. These solutions require various parameter configuration and are dependent on a particular network condition to work efficiently. Hence an algorithm which is simple, efficient, does not require setting of parameters and works seamlessly irrespective of the network condition is required. Even though Controlled Delay (CoDel) is parameterless and adapts to dynamically changing link rates with no negative impact on utilization, it deviates from its primary purpose of reducing congestion when there is an increase in RTT and when congestion level varies abruptly. As a consequence, a variant of CoDel called Stochastic Fair Queue CoDel (sfqCoDel) is simulated and compared. The Stochastic Fair Queue CoDel proactively drops packets which occupy reasonably larger bandwidth as compared to CoDel, which proactively drops packet irrespective of the bandwidth consumption by packets. This paper aims to perform a comprehensive analysis of Stochastic Fair Queue CoDel for Active Queue Management. A comparison is also carried out between sfqCoDel with CoDel. The sfqCoDel appears to be much better than CoDel in certain areas where CoDel fails to perform well.</description><identifier>EISBN: 1479922595</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781479922598</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1479922587</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781479922581</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ICADIWT.2014.6814669</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>AQMs ; Bandwidth ; BufferBloat ; CoDel ; Delays ; Heuristic algorithms ; Internet ; Protocols ; Queueing analysis ; Random access memory</subject><ispartof>The Fifth International Conference on the Applications of Digital Information and Web Technologies (ICADIWT 2014), 2014, p.262-267</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6814669$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,2052,27902,54895</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6814669$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rao, V. Preethi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tahiliani, Mohit P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shenoy, Udaya Kumar K.</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of sfqCoDel for Active Queue Management</title><title>The Fifth International Conference on the Applications of Digital Information and Web Technologies (ICADIWT 2014)</title><addtitle>ICADIWT</addtitle><description>The availability of cheaper and high capacity Random Access Memory (RAM) has resulted in the growth of buffer size in all the computing devices. This aberrant increase of buffer capacity in network devices has resulted into high latency, leading to reduced throughput; thus decreasing the tendency of absorbing spontaneous burst of traffic. The requirement for Active Queue Management (AQM) has been evident for decades. These solutions require various parameter configuration and are dependent on a particular network condition to work efficiently. Hence an algorithm which is simple, efficient, does not require setting of parameters and works seamlessly irrespective of the network condition is required. Even though Controlled Delay (CoDel) is parameterless and adapts to dynamically changing link rates with no negative impact on utilization, it deviates from its primary purpose of reducing congestion when there is an increase in RTT and when congestion level varies abruptly. As a consequence, a variant of CoDel called Stochastic Fair Queue CoDel (sfqCoDel) is simulated and compared. The Stochastic Fair Queue CoDel proactively drops packets which occupy reasonably larger bandwidth as compared to CoDel, which proactively drops packet irrespective of the bandwidth consumption by packets. This paper aims to perform a comprehensive analysis of Stochastic Fair Queue CoDel for Active Queue Management. A comparison is also carried out between sfqCoDel with CoDel. The sfqCoDel appears to be much better than CoDel in certain areas where CoDel fails to perform well.</description><subject>AQMs</subject><subject>Bandwidth</subject><subject>BufferBloat</subject><subject>CoDel</subject><subject>Delays</subject><subject>Heuristic algorithms</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Protocols</subject><subject>Queueing analysis</subject><subject>Random access memory</subject><isbn>1479922595</isbn><isbn>9781479922598</isbn><isbn>1479922587</isbn><isbn>9781479922581</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotj81Kw0AURseFoNY-gS7mBRLvncxM5i5L6k-hIkLFZZlk7kgkTTSTCn17C-3q2xzO4RPiHiFHBHpYVYvl6nOTK0CdW4faWroQN6hLIqUMmSsxT-kbAJCsc4quBSx63x1Sm-QQZYq_1bDkTsZhlItmav9Yvu95z_LV9_6Ld9xPt-Iy-i7x_Lwz8fH0uKlesvXb87G_zlpUxZSVWoUGINo6NDoq4oIwBqPBUtlowwCmZnDRB124kqI6AsZBAISADutiJu5O3paZtz9ju_PjYXs-VfwDN2xBrg</recordid><startdate>20140201</startdate><enddate>20140201</enddate><creator>Rao, V. Preethi</creator><creator>Tahiliani, Mohit P.</creator><creator>Shenoy, Udaya Kumar K.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140201</creationdate><title>Analysis of sfqCoDel for Active Queue Management</title><author>Rao, V. Preethi ; Tahiliani, Mohit P. ; Shenoy, Udaya Kumar K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i123t-742dc00f6bdc4f29e391fd540697c45e005be08fad43879f2e39580d010d181b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>AQMs</topic><topic>Bandwidth</topic><topic>BufferBloat</topic><topic>CoDel</topic><topic>Delays</topic><topic>Heuristic algorithms</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Protocols</topic><topic>Queueing analysis</topic><topic>Random access memory</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rao, V. Preethi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tahiliani, Mohit P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shenoy, Udaya Kumar K.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rao, V. Preethi</au><au>Tahiliani, Mohit P.</au><au>Shenoy, Udaya Kumar K.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Analysis of sfqCoDel for Active Queue Management</atitle><btitle>The Fifth International Conference on the Applications of Digital Information and Web Technologies (ICADIWT 2014)</btitle><stitle>ICADIWT</stitle><date>2014-02-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><spage>262</spage><epage>267</epage><pages>262-267</pages><eisbn>1479922595</eisbn><eisbn>9781479922598</eisbn><eisbn>1479922587</eisbn><eisbn>9781479922581</eisbn><abstract>The availability of cheaper and high capacity Random Access Memory (RAM) has resulted in the growth of buffer size in all the computing devices. This aberrant increase of buffer capacity in network devices has resulted into high latency, leading to reduced throughput; thus decreasing the tendency of absorbing spontaneous burst of traffic. The requirement for Active Queue Management (AQM) has been evident for decades. These solutions require various parameter configuration and are dependent on a particular network condition to work efficiently. Hence an algorithm which is simple, efficient, does not require setting of parameters and works seamlessly irrespective of the network condition is required. Even though Controlled Delay (CoDel) is parameterless and adapts to dynamically changing link rates with no negative impact on utilization, it deviates from its primary purpose of reducing congestion when there is an increase in RTT and when congestion level varies abruptly. As a consequence, a variant of CoDel called Stochastic Fair Queue CoDel (sfqCoDel) is simulated and compared. The Stochastic Fair Queue CoDel proactively drops packets which occupy reasonably larger bandwidth as compared to CoDel, which proactively drops packet irrespective of the bandwidth consumption by packets. This paper aims to perform a comprehensive analysis of Stochastic Fair Queue CoDel for Active Queue Management. A comparison is also carried out between sfqCoDel with CoDel. The sfqCoDel appears to be much better than CoDel in certain areas where CoDel fails to perform well.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/ICADIWT.2014.6814669</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier EISBN: 1479922595
ispartof The Fifth International Conference on the Applications of Digital Information and Web Technologies (ICADIWT 2014), 2014, p.262-267
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_6814669
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects AQMs
Bandwidth
BufferBloat
CoDel
Delays
Heuristic algorithms
Internet
Protocols
Queueing analysis
Random access memory
title Analysis of sfqCoDel for Active Queue Management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T18%3A27%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20sfqCoDel%20for%20Active%20Queue%20Management&rft.btitle=The%20Fifth%20International%20Conference%20on%20the%20Applications%20of%20Digital%20Information%20and%20Web%20Technologies%20(ICADIWT%202014)&rft.au=Rao,%20V.%20Preethi&rft.date=2014-02-01&rft.spage=262&rft.epage=267&rft.pages=262-267&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ICADIWT.2014.6814669&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E6814669%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1479922595&rft.eisbn_list=9781479922598&rft.eisbn_list=1479922587&rft.eisbn_list=9781479922581&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6814669&rfr_iscdi=true