A comparative study of 3D transmission formats for 4K auto-stereoscopic displays
In this contribution some 3D plus depth (3D+2Z) schemes currently discussed at JCT-3V (ITU/MPEG) for the coding and transmission of 3D content are compared to the well-known and simpler 2D plus depth (2D+Z) approach, i.e. the transmission of only one view and its related depth map. The results of th...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Tagungsbericht |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 4 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Grimaldi, Lucia Wegener, Matthias Neddens, Arion Schuur, Klaas |
| description | In this contribution some 3D plus depth (3D+2Z) schemes currently discussed at JCT-3V (ITU/MPEG) for the coding and transmission of 3D content are compared to the well-known and simpler 2D plus depth (2D+Z) approach, i.e. the transmission of only one view and its related depth map. The results of this comparison are presented with regard to coding performance and quality of the base and virtual views. In the light of these results, the 2D+Z format turns out to be competitive over a broad range of requirements for the delivery of consumer auto-stereoscopic 3D TV. Such a format is much easier to implement and to compress than competing 3D+2Z solutions. It can better deal with low quality depth maps and it doesn't need to bother with left-right consistencies. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1109/3DTV.2013.6676646 |
| format | Conference Proceeding |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6676646</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6676646</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>6676646</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-d7cb5af8e89a91601de6c3dba683392c14876610fd4a4f1f07f9eece071d95413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1KAzEURqMoWGsfQNzkBWbMTTLJZFla_7CgiyruSprcQKTTDJNUmLdXsbg63-rAdwi5BlYDMHMrluv3mjMQtVJaKalOyCVIbQwIZcQpmXBQUHEmPs7-N4cLMsv5kzEGWjcN4xPyOqcudb0dbIlfSHM5-JGmQMWSlsHucxdzjmlPQxo6W_IvqXym9lBSlQsOmLJLfXTUx9zv7JivyHmwu4yzI6fk7f5uvXisVi8PT4v5qoqgm1J57baNDS22xhpQDDwqJ_zWqlYIwx3I9ucWsOCllQEC08EgOmQavGkkiCm5-fNGRNz0Q-zsMG6OMcQ3s8lRlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>A comparative study of 3D transmission formats for 4K auto-stereoscopic displays</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Grimaldi, Lucia ; Wegener, Matthias ; Neddens, Arion ; Schuur, Klaas</creator><creatorcontrib>Grimaldi, Lucia ; Wegener, Matthias ; Neddens, Arion ; Schuur, Klaas</creatorcontrib><description>In this contribution some 3D plus depth (3D+2Z) schemes currently discussed at JCT-3V (ITU/MPEG) for the coding and transmission of 3D content are compared to the well-known and simpler 2D plus depth (2D+Z) approach, i.e. the transmission of only one view and its related depth map. The results of this comparison are presented with regard to coding performance and quality of the base and virtual views. In the light of these results, the 2D+Z format turns out to be competitive over a broad range of requirements for the delivery of consumer auto-stereoscopic 3D TV. Such a format is much easier to implement and to compress than competing 3D+2Z solutions. It can better deal with low quality depth maps and it doesn't need to bother with left-right consistencies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2161-2021</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2161-203X</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1479913693</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781479913695</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/3DTV.2013.6676646</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>2D+Z ; 3D coding ; 3D compression ; 3D format ; 3D transmission ; 3D+2Z ; auto-stereoscopic displays ; Bit rate ; disparity information ; Encoding ; multi-view ; rendering ; Rendering (computer graphics) ; Three-dimensional displays ; Transform coding ; Variable speed drives</subject><ispartof>2013 3DTV Vision Beyond Depth (3DTV-CON), 2013, p.1-4</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6676646$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2056,27924,54919</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6676646$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grimaldi, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wegener, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neddens, Arion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuur, Klaas</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative study of 3D transmission formats for 4K auto-stereoscopic displays</title><title>2013 3DTV Vision Beyond Depth (3DTV-CON)</title><addtitle>3DTV</addtitle><description>In this contribution some 3D plus depth (3D+2Z) schemes currently discussed at JCT-3V (ITU/MPEG) for the coding and transmission of 3D content are compared to the well-known and simpler 2D plus depth (2D+Z) approach, i.e. the transmission of only one view and its related depth map. The results of this comparison are presented with regard to coding performance and quality of the base and virtual views. In the light of these results, the 2D+Z format turns out to be competitive over a broad range of requirements for the delivery of consumer auto-stereoscopic 3D TV. Such a format is much easier to implement and to compress than competing 3D+2Z solutions. It can better deal with low quality depth maps and it doesn't need to bother with left-right consistencies.</description><subject>2D+Z</subject><subject>3D coding</subject><subject>3D compression</subject><subject>3D format</subject><subject>3D transmission</subject><subject>3D+2Z</subject><subject>auto-stereoscopic displays</subject><subject>Bit rate</subject><subject>disparity information</subject><subject>Encoding</subject><subject>multi-view</subject><subject>rendering</subject><subject>Rendering (computer graphics)</subject><subject>Three-dimensional displays</subject><subject>Transform coding</subject><subject>Variable speed drives</subject><issn>2161-2021</issn><issn>2161-203X</issn><isbn>1479913693</isbn><isbn>9781479913695</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kM1KAzEURqMoWGsfQNzkBWbMTTLJZFla_7CgiyruSprcQKTTDJNUmLdXsbg63-rAdwi5BlYDMHMrluv3mjMQtVJaKalOyCVIbQwIZcQpmXBQUHEmPs7-N4cLMsv5kzEGWjcN4xPyOqcudb0dbIlfSHM5-JGmQMWSlsHucxdzjmlPQxo6W_IvqXym9lBSlQsOmLJLfXTUx9zv7JivyHmwu4yzI6fk7f5uvXisVi8PT4v5qoqgm1J57baNDS22xhpQDDwqJ_zWqlYIwx3I9ucWsOCllQEC08EgOmQavGkkiCm5-fNGRNz0Q-zsMG6OMcQ3s8lRlQ</recordid><startdate>201310</startdate><enddate>201310</enddate><creator>Grimaldi, Lucia</creator><creator>Wegener, Matthias</creator><creator>Neddens, Arion</creator><creator>Schuur, Klaas</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201310</creationdate><title>A comparative study of 3D transmission formats for 4K auto-stereoscopic displays</title><author>Grimaldi, Lucia ; Wegener, Matthias ; Neddens, Arion ; Schuur, Klaas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-d7cb5af8e89a91601de6c3dba683392c14876610fd4a4f1f07f9eece071d95413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>2D+Z</topic><topic>3D coding</topic><topic>3D compression</topic><topic>3D format</topic><topic>3D transmission</topic><topic>3D+2Z</topic><topic>auto-stereoscopic displays</topic><topic>Bit rate</topic><topic>disparity information</topic><topic>Encoding</topic><topic>multi-view</topic><topic>rendering</topic><topic>Rendering (computer graphics)</topic><topic>Three-dimensional displays</topic><topic>Transform coding</topic><topic>Variable speed drives</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grimaldi, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wegener, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neddens, Arion</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuur, Klaas</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grimaldi, Lucia</au><au>Wegener, Matthias</au><au>Neddens, Arion</au><au>Schuur, Klaas</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>A comparative study of 3D transmission formats for 4K auto-stereoscopic displays</atitle><btitle>2013 3DTV Vision Beyond Depth (3DTV-CON)</btitle><stitle>3DTV</stitle><date>2013-10</date><risdate>2013</risdate><spage>1</spage><epage>4</epage><pages>1-4</pages><issn>2161-2021</issn><eissn>2161-203X</eissn><eisbn>1479913693</eisbn><eisbn>9781479913695</eisbn><abstract>In this contribution some 3D plus depth (3D+2Z) schemes currently discussed at JCT-3V (ITU/MPEG) for the coding and transmission of 3D content are compared to the well-known and simpler 2D plus depth (2D+Z) approach, i.e. the transmission of only one view and its related depth map. The results of this comparison are presented with regard to coding performance and quality of the base and virtual views. In the light of these results, the 2D+Z format turns out to be competitive over a broad range of requirements for the delivery of consumer auto-stereoscopic 3D TV. Such a format is much easier to implement and to compress than competing 3D+2Z solutions. It can better deal with low quality depth maps and it doesn't need to bother with left-right consistencies.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/3DTV.2013.6676646</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISSN: 2161-2021 |
| ispartof | 2013 3DTV Vision Beyond Depth (3DTV-CON), 2013, p.1-4 |
| issn | 2161-2021 2161-203X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_6676646 |
| source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
| subjects | 2D+Z 3D coding 3D compression 3D format 3D transmission 3D+2Z auto-stereoscopic displays Bit rate disparity information Encoding multi-view rendering Rendering (computer graphics) Three-dimensional displays Transform coding Variable speed drives |
| title | A comparative study of 3D transmission formats for 4K auto-stereoscopic displays |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T11%3A11%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20study%20of%203D%20transmission%20formats%20for%204K%20auto-stereoscopic%20displays&rft.btitle=2013%203DTV%20Vision%20Beyond%20Depth%20(3DTV-CON)&rft.au=Grimaldi,%20Lucia&rft.date=2013-10&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=4&rft.pages=1-4&rft.issn=2161-2021&rft.eissn=2161-203X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/3DTV.2013.6676646&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E6676646%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1479913693&rft.eisbn_list=9781479913695&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6676646&rfr_iscdi=true |