Performance monitoring for model predictive control maintenance
An economically motivated performance measure is proposed for use with model predictive control applications. The typical case handled is that you have a trade-off situation between two conflicting goals: (i) the need to be close to a constraint, since this will give good production economy, and (ii...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3775 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 3770 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Moden, Per Erik Lundh, Michael |
description | An economically motivated performance measure is proposed for use with model predictive control applications. The typical case handled is that you have a trade-off situation between two conflicting goals: (i) the need to be close to a constraint, since this will give good production economy, and (ii) the need to avoid constraint violation, since that would mean producing an inferior quality, exceeding environmental constraints (thereby requiring a fee), or having some other costly drawback. The proposed performance measure uses consumption and production rates in the process and the corresponding cost and benefit factors, combined with the risks of constraint violations and their associated costs. There is a discussion on the hard task of choosing threshold values, and the approach is illustrated by applying it to a couple of examples. One of the examples is the Autoprofit benchmark pulp digester model. |
doi_str_mv | 10.23919/ECC.2013.6669289 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6669289</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6669289</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>6669289</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i241t-f7b5a265b2de5f789bf1d653fd6bd24961bab3af135b3e72c681499c473886e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj0FLxDAUhONBUNb-APHSP9Ca5DUvyUmkrLqwoAc9L0nzIpE2XbJF8N9bcWFgmA9mYBi7FbyVYIW93_Z9K7mAFhGtNPaCVVYb4LDKorRXrDqdvjjnQmuBSl2zhzcqcS6TywPV05zTMpeUP-uVrTHQWB8LhTQs6ZvqYc5Lmcd6cikvlP86N-wyuvFE1dk37ONp-96_NPvX513_uG-S7MTSRO2Vk6i8DKSiNtZHEVBBDOiD7CwK7zy4KEB5IC0HNKKzdug0GIPEYcPu_ncTER2OJU2u_BzON-EXwfVIww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Performance monitoring for model predictive control maintenance</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Moden, Per Erik ; Lundh, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Moden, Per Erik ; Lundh, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>An economically motivated performance measure is proposed for use with model predictive control applications. The typical case handled is that you have a trade-off situation between two conflicting goals: (i) the need to be close to a constraint, since this will give good production economy, and (ii) the need to avoid constraint violation, since that would mean producing an inferior quality, exceeding environmental constraints (thereby requiring a fee), or having some other costly drawback. The proposed performance measure uses consumption and production rates in the process and the corresponding cost and benefit factors, combined with the risks of constraint violations and their associated costs. There is a discussion on the hard task of choosing threshold values, and the approach is illustrated by applying it to a couple of examples. One of the examples is the Autoprofit benchmark pulp digester model.</description><identifier>EISBN: 9783033039629</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 3033039626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.23919/ECC.2013.6669289</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>EUCA</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Economics ; Loss measurement ; Monitoring ; Production ; Vectors</subject><ispartof>2013 European Control Conference (ECC), 2013, p.3770-3775</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6669289$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2057,27924,54919</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6669289$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moden, Per Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundh, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Performance monitoring for model predictive control maintenance</title><title>2013 European Control Conference (ECC)</title><addtitle>ECC</addtitle><description>An economically motivated performance measure is proposed for use with model predictive control applications. The typical case handled is that you have a trade-off situation between two conflicting goals: (i) the need to be close to a constraint, since this will give good production economy, and (ii) the need to avoid constraint violation, since that would mean producing an inferior quality, exceeding environmental constraints (thereby requiring a fee), or having some other costly drawback. The proposed performance measure uses consumption and production rates in the process and the corresponding cost and benefit factors, combined with the risks of constraint violations and their associated costs. There is a discussion on the hard task of choosing threshold values, and the approach is illustrated by applying it to a couple of examples. One of the examples is the Autoprofit benchmark pulp digester model.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Loss measurement</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Production</subject><subject>Vectors</subject><isbn>9783033039629</isbn><isbn>3033039626</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotj0FLxDAUhONBUNb-APHSP9Ca5DUvyUmkrLqwoAc9L0nzIpE2XbJF8N9bcWFgmA9mYBi7FbyVYIW93_Z9K7mAFhGtNPaCVVYb4LDKorRXrDqdvjjnQmuBSl2zhzcqcS6TywPV05zTMpeUP-uVrTHQWB8LhTQs6ZvqYc5Lmcd6cikvlP86N-wyuvFE1dk37ONp-96_NPvX513_uG-S7MTSRO2Vk6i8DKSiNtZHEVBBDOiD7CwK7zy4KEB5IC0HNKKzdug0GIPEYcPu_ncTER2OJU2u_BzON-EXwfVIww</recordid><startdate>201307</startdate><enddate>201307</enddate><creator>Moden, Per Erik</creator><creator>Lundh, Michael</creator><general>EUCA</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201307</creationdate><title>Performance monitoring for model predictive control maintenance</title><author>Moden, Per Erik ; Lundh, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i241t-f7b5a265b2de5f789bf1d653fd6bd24961bab3af135b3e72c681499c473886e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Loss measurement</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Production</topic><topic>Vectors</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moden, Per Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundh, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moden, Per Erik</au><au>Lundh, Michael</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Performance monitoring for model predictive control maintenance</atitle><btitle>2013 European Control Conference (ECC)</btitle><stitle>ECC</stitle><date>2013-07</date><risdate>2013</risdate><spage>3770</spage><epage>3775</epage><pages>3770-3775</pages><eisbn>9783033039629</eisbn><eisbn>3033039626</eisbn><abstract>An economically motivated performance measure is proposed for use with model predictive control applications. The typical case handled is that you have a trade-off situation between two conflicting goals: (i) the need to be close to a constraint, since this will give good production economy, and (ii) the need to avoid constraint violation, since that would mean producing an inferior quality, exceeding environmental constraints (thereby requiring a fee), or having some other costly drawback. The proposed performance measure uses consumption and production rates in the process and the corresponding cost and benefit factors, combined with the risks of constraint violations and their associated costs. There is a discussion on the hard task of choosing threshold values, and the approach is illustrated by applying it to a couple of examples. One of the examples is the Autoprofit benchmark pulp digester model.</abstract><pub>EUCA</pub><doi>10.23919/ECC.2013.6669289</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | EISBN: 9783033039629 |
ispartof | 2013 European Control Conference (ECC), 2013, p.3770-3775 |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ieee_primary_6669289 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Accuracy Economics Loss measurement Monitoring Production Vectors |
title | Performance monitoring for model predictive control maintenance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A08%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Performance%20monitoring%20for%20model%20predictive%20control%20maintenance&rft.btitle=2013%20European%20Control%20Conference%20(ECC)&rft.au=Moden,%20Per%20Erik&rft.date=2013-07&rft.spage=3770&rft.epage=3775&rft.pages=3770-3775&rft_id=info:doi/10.23919/ECC.2013.6669289&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E6669289%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9783033039629&rft.eisbn_list=3033039626&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6669289&rfr_iscdi=true |