Mass and density estimates contribute to perceived heaviness with weights that depend on the densities' reliability

People perceive a smaller and denser object to be heavier than a larger, less dense object of the same mass. We developed a new model of heaviness perception that can explain this size-weight illusion. Modeling followed recent insights on principles of information integration. Perceived heaviness is...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Drewing, K., Tiest, W. M. B.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 598
container_issue
container_start_page 593
container_title
container_volume
creator Drewing, K.
Tiest, W. M. B.
description People perceive a smaller and denser object to be heavier than a larger, less dense object of the same mass. We developed a new model of heaviness perception that can explain this size-weight illusion. Modeling followed recent insights on principles of information integration. Perceived heaviness is modeled as a weighted average of one heaviness estimate derived from object mass and another one derived from object density with weights that follow estimate reliabilities. In an experiment, participants judged the heaviness of 18 objects using magnitude estimation methods. Objects varied in mass and density. We also varied the reliability of density information by varying visual reliability: Participants were blindfolded or had strongly impaired, mildly impaired or full vision. Because participants lifted each object via a string they required visual information on object size to assess object density. The pattern of mass and density influences on judged heaviness confirmed model predictions. Also as predicted, density influences on judged heaviness increased with increasing reliability, whereas mass influences decreased. Individual and average data were well fit by the model (r 2 s > 0.96). Density information contributed for 14%, 21 % and 29% to heaviness, when vision was strongly impaired, mildly impaired or not impaired, respectively. Overall, the results highly corroborate our model, which appears to be promising as unifying framework for a number of findings on the size-weight illusion.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/WHC.2013.6548475
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6548475</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6548475</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>6548475</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i217t-f3e6a994d8b732fc37bd87131b24049e31496f94c943f3dd037c250614f1896e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEFLxDAUhCMiqOveBS-5eWrNS9ImOUpRV1jxonhc0ubFRmpbmrjL_nsLFjwNc5hvmCHkGlgOwMzdx6bKOQORl4XUUhUn5BKkMoYxrYvTf6PUOVnH-MUYA-BSaHZB4ouNkdreUYd9DOlIMabwbRNG2gx9mkL9k5CmgY44NRj26GiLdh96nHOHkFp6wPDZpkhTa9NMGXGGDf1scWEGjLd0wi7YOnRzxRU587aLuF50Rd4fH96qTbZ9fXqu7rdZ4KBS5gWW1hjpdK0E941QtdMKBNRcMmlQgDSlN7IxUnjhHBOq4QUrQXrQpkSxIjd_3ICIu3GaZ03H3XKS-AWD4Fxg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Mass and density estimates contribute to perceived heaviness with weights that depend on the densities' reliability</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Drewing, K. ; Tiest, W. M. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Drewing, K. ; Tiest, W. M. B.</creatorcontrib><description>People perceive a smaller and denser object to be heavier than a larger, less dense object of the same mass. We developed a new model of heaviness perception that can explain this size-weight illusion. Modeling followed recent insights on principles of information integration. Perceived heaviness is modeled as a weighted average of one heaviness estimate derived from object mass and another one derived from object density with weights that follow estimate reliabilities. In an experiment, participants judged the heaviness of 18 objects using magnitude estimation methods. Objects varied in mass and density. We also varied the reliability of density information by varying visual reliability: Participants were blindfolded or had strongly impaired, mildly impaired or full vision. Because participants lifted each object via a string they required visual information on object size to assess object density. The pattern of mass and density influences on judged heaviness confirmed model predictions. Also as predicted, density influences on judged heaviness increased with increasing reliability, whereas mass influences decreased. Individual and average data were well fit by the model (r 2 s &gt; 0.96). Density information contributed for 14%, 21 % and 29% to heaviness, when vision was strongly impaired, mildly impaired or not impaired, respectively. Overall, the results highly corroborate our model, which appears to be promising as unifying framework for a number of findings on the size-weight illusion.</description><identifier>ISBN: 1479900877</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781479900879</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1479900885</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781479900886</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/WHC.2013.6548475</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>IEEE</publisher><subject>Estimation ; Eye protection ; Haptic interfaces ; heaviness perception ; optimal integration ; Predictive models ; Reliability ; Size-weight-illusion ; Solid modeling ; Visualization ; visuo-haptic interaction</subject><ispartof>2013 World Haptics Conference (WHC), 2013, p.593-598</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6548475$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>310,311,781,785,790,791,2059,27930,54925</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6548475$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Drewing, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiest, W. M. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Mass and density estimates contribute to perceived heaviness with weights that depend on the densities' reliability</title><title>2013 World Haptics Conference (WHC)</title><addtitle>WHC</addtitle><description>People perceive a smaller and denser object to be heavier than a larger, less dense object of the same mass. We developed a new model of heaviness perception that can explain this size-weight illusion. Modeling followed recent insights on principles of information integration. Perceived heaviness is modeled as a weighted average of one heaviness estimate derived from object mass and another one derived from object density with weights that follow estimate reliabilities. In an experiment, participants judged the heaviness of 18 objects using magnitude estimation methods. Objects varied in mass and density. We also varied the reliability of density information by varying visual reliability: Participants were blindfolded or had strongly impaired, mildly impaired or full vision. Because participants lifted each object via a string they required visual information on object size to assess object density. The pattern of mass and density influences on judged heaviness confirmed model predictions. Also as predicted, density influences on judged heaviness increased with increasing reliability, whereas mass influences decreased. Individual and average data were well fit by the model (r 2 s &gt; 0.96). Density information contributed for 14%, 21 % and 29% to heaviness, when vision was strongly impaired, mildly impaired or not impaired, respectively. Overall, the results highly corroborate our model, which appears to be promising as unifying framework for a number of findings on the size-weight illusion.</description><subject>Estimation</subject><subject>Eye protection</subject><subject>Haptic interfaces</subject><subject>heaviness perception</subject><subject>optimal integration</subject><subject>Predictive models</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Size-weight-illusion</subject><subject>Solid modeling</subject><subject>Visualization</subject><subject>visuo-haptic interaction</subject><isbn>1479900877</isbn><isbn>9781479900879</isbn><isbn>1479900885</isbn><isbn>9781479900886</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEFLxDAUhCMiqOveBS-5eWrNS9ImOUpRV1jxonhc0ubFRmpbmrjL_nsLFjwNc5hvmCHkGlgOwMzdx6bKOQORl4XUUhUn5BKkMoYxrYvTf6PUOVnH-MUYA-BSaHZB4ouNkdreUYd9DOlIMabwbRNG2gx9mkL9k5CmgY44NRj26GiLdh96nHOHkFp6wPDZpkhTa9NMGXGGDf1scWEGjLd0wi7YOnRzxRU587aLuF50Rd4fH96qTbZ9fXqu7rdZ4KBS5gWW1hjpdK0E941QtdMKBNRcMmlQgDSlN7IxUnjhHBOq4QUrQXrQpkSxIjd_3ICIu3GaZ03H3XKS-AWD4Fxg</recordid><startdate>201304</startdate><enddate>201304</enddate><creator>Drewing, K.</creator><creator>Tiest, W. M. B.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201304</creationdate><title>Mass and density estimates contribute to perceived heaviness with weights that depend on the densities' reliability</title><author>Drewing, K. ; Tiest, W. M. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i217t-f3e6a994d8b732fc37bd87131b24049e31496f94c943f3dd037c250614f1896e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Estimation</topic><topic>Eye protection</topic><topic>Haptic interfaces</topic><topic>heaviness perception</topic><topic>optimal integration</topic><topic>Predictive models</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Size-weight-illusion</topic><topic>Solid modeling</topic><topic>Visualization</topic><topic>visuo-haptic interaction</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Drewing, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiest, W. M. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Drewing, K.</au><au>Tiest, W. M. B.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Mass and density estimates contribute to perceived heaviness with weights that depend on the densities' reliability</atitle><btitle>2013 World Haptics Conference (WHC)</btitle><stitle>WHC</stitle><date>2013-04</date><risdate>2013</risdate><spage>593</spage><epage>598</epage><pages>593-598</pages><isbn>1479900877</isbn><isbn>9781479900879</isbn><eisbn>1479900885</eisbn><eisbn>9781479900886</eisbn><abstract>People perceive a smaller and denser object to be heavier than a larger, less dense object of the same mass. We developed a new model of heaviness perception that can explain this size-weight illusion. Modeling followed recent insights on principles of information integration. Perceived heaviness is modeled as a weighted average of one heaviness estimate derived from object mass and another one derived from object density with weights that follow estimate reliabilities. In an experiment, participants judged the heaviness of 18 objects using magnitude estimation methods. Objects varied in mass and density. We also varied the reliability of density information by varying visual reliability: Participants were blindfolded or had strongly impaired, mildly impaired or full vision. Because participants lifted each object via a string they required visual information on object size to assess object density. The pattern of mass and density influences on judged heaviness confirmed model predictions. Also as predicted, density influences on judged heaviness increased with increasing reliability, whereas mass influences decreased. Individual and average data were well fit by the model (r 2 s &gt; 0.96). Density information contributed for 14%, 21 % and 29% to heaviness, when vision was strongly impaired, mildly impaired or not impaired, respectively. Overall, the results highly corroborate our model, which appears to be promising as unifying framework for a number of findings on the size-weight illusion.</abstract><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/WHC.2013.6548475</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISBN: 1479900877
ispartof 2013 World Haptics Conference (WHC), 2013, p.593-598
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_6548475
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Estimation
Eye protection
Haptic interfaces
heaviness perception
optimal integration
Predictive models
Reliability
Size-weight-illusion
Solid modeling
Visualization
visuo-haptic interaction
title Mass and density estimates contribute to perceived heaviness with weights that depend on the densities' reliability
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T13%3A29%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Mass%20and%20density%20estimates%20contribute%20to%20perceived%20heaviness%20with%20weights%20that%20depend%20on%20the%20densities'%20reliability&rft.btitle=2013%20World%20Haptics%20Conference%20(WHC)&rft.au=Drewing,%20K.&rft.date=2013-04&rft.spage=593&rft.epage=598&rft.pages=593-598&rft.isbn=1479900877&rft.isbn_list=9781479900879&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/WHC.2013.6548475&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E6548475%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1479900885&rft.eisbn_list=9781479900886&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6548475&rfr_iscdi=true