Silicon solar cell emitters: optimization and comparison of two different technologies

Considering recent modifications on n-type highly doped silicon parameters, a new emitter optimization was made based on one-dimensional models with analytical solutions. In order to obtain good accuracy, a fifth order approximation has been considered. Two kinds of emitters, homogeneous and locally...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Cid, M., Stem, N.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 282
container_issue
container_start_page 279
container_title
container_volume
creator Cid, M.
Stem, N.
description Considering recent modifications on n-type highly doped silicon parameters, a new emitter optimization was made based on one-dimensional models with analytical solutions. In order to obtain good accuracy, a fifth order approximation has been considered. Two kinds of emitters, homogeneous and locally deep diffused (LDD), with Gaussian profile of n/sup +/pp/sup +/ solar cells were optimized. According to the authors' results: homogeneous emitter solar cells show their maximum efficiencies (/spl eta//spl cong/ 21.60-21.74%) with doping levels N/sub s/=1/spl times/10/sup 19/-5/spl times/10/sup 18/ (cm/sup -3/) and (1.2-2.0) /spl mu/m emitter thickness range. LDD emitter solar cells provide a slightly higher efficiency (/spl eta/=21.82-21.92%), with N/sub s/=1/spl times/10/sup 20/ (cm/sup -3/) With 2.0 /spl mu/m thickness under metal-contacted surface and N/sub s/=1/spl times/10/sup 19/-5/spl times/10/sup 18/ (cm/sup -3/) with (1.2-2.0) /spl mu/m thickness range, (sheet resistance range 90-100 /spl Omega/) under passivated surface. Although LDD emitter solar cells have a higher efficiency than homogeneous emitter ones, the required technology is more complex and their overall interest for practical applications is questionable.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/PVSC.1997.654083
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_654083</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>654083</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>27340831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i229t-f5bdea5b17a1193fc6a705ecdbaa48284e0df5ecb57d06ee575e7da98a0476703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1LxDAQhgMqqOvexVO8eOs6adom9SaLX7CgsLrXkqZTHWmb2mQR_fVmWWFgeOFhmOdl7FzAQggor1826-VClKVaFHkGWh6weak0xJFSFUocshMQBSRaKnHMTr3_BEhBFuKEbdbUkXUD964zE7fYdRx7CgEnf8PdGKinXxMoEmZouHX9aCbyMbqWh2_HG2pbnHAIPKD9GFzn3gn9GTtqTedx_r9n7O3-7nX5mKyeH56Wt6uE0rQMSZvXDZq8FsoIUcrWFkZBjrapjcl0qjOEpo25zlUDBWKuclSNKbWBLIqBnLHL_V3nA1Xe0u6JqDOgDZWENNM6Mld7Zpzc1xZ9qHryO1EzoNv6KlVyV5qI4MUeJESsxol6M_1U-0rlHx4ja-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>27340831</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Silicon solar cell emitters: optimization and comparison of two different technologies</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Cid, M. ; Stem, N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cid, M. ; Stem, N.</creatorcontrib><description>Considering recent modifications on n-type highly doped silicon parameters, a new emitter optimization was made based on one-dimensional models with analytical solutions. In order to obtain good accuracy, a fifth order approximation has been considered. Two kinds of emitters, homogeneous and locally deep diffused (LDD), with Gaussian profile of n/sup +/pp/sup +/ solar cells were optimized. According to the authors' results: homogeneous emitter solar cells show their maximum efficiencies (/spl eta//spl cong/ 21.60-21.74%) with doping levels N/sub s/=1/spl times/10/sup 19/-5/spl times/10/sup 18/ (cm/sup -3/) and (1.2-2.0) /spl mu/m emitter thickness range. LDD emitter solar cells provide a slightly higher efficiency (/spl eta/=21.82-21.92%), with N/sub s/=1/spl times/10/sup 20/ (cm/sup -3/) With 2.0 /spl mu/m thickness under metal-contacted surface and N/sub s/=1/spl times/10/sup 19/-5/spl times/10/sup 18/ (cm/sup -3/) with (1.2-2.0) /spl mu/m thickness range, (sheet resistance range 90-100 /spl Omega/) under passivated surface. Although LDD emitter solar cells have a higher efficiency than homogeneous emitter ones, the required technology is more complex and their overall interest for practical applications is questionable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0160-8371</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780780337671</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0780337670</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/PVSC.1997.654083</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: IEEE</publisher><subject>Analytical models ; CARRIER LIFETIME ; CARRIER MOBILITY ; Charge carrier lifetime ; CHARGE CARRIERS ; Contact resistance ; CURRENT DENSITY ; DOPED MATERIALS ; Doping ; ENERGY EFFICIENCY ; Laboratories ; MATHEMATICAL MODELS ; Photonic band gap ; Photovoltaic cells ; Semiconductor process modeling ; Silicon ; SILICON SOLAR CELLS ; SOLAR ENERGY ; Surface resistance</subject><ispartof>Conference Record of the Twenty Sixth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 1997, 1997, p.279-282</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/654083$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,885,2058,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/654083$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/302488$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cid, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stem, N.</creatorcontrib><title>Silicon solar cell emitters: optimization and comparison of two different technologies</title><title>Conference Record of the Twenty Sixth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 1997</title><addtitle>PVSC</addtitle><description>Considering recent modifications on n-type highly doped silicon parameters, a new emitter optimization was made based on one-dimensional models with analytical solutions. In order to obtain good accuracy, a fifth order approximation has been considered. Two kinds of emitters, homogeneous and locally deep diffused (LDD), with Gaussian profile of n/sup +/pp/sup +/ solar cells were optimized. According to the authors' results: homogeneous emitter solar cells show their maximum efficiencies (/spl eta//spl cong/ 21.60-21.74%) with doping levels N/sub s/=1/spl times/10/sup 19/-5/spl times/10/sup 18/ (cm/sup -3/) and (1.2-2.0) /spl mu/m emitter thickness range. LDD emitter solar cells provide a slightly higher efficiency (/spl eta/=21.82-21.92%), with N/sub s/=1/spl times/10/sup 20/ (cm/sup -3/) With 2.0 /spl mu/m thickness under metal-contacted surface and N/sub s/=1/spl times/10/sup 19/-5/spl times/10/sup 18/ (cm/sup -3/) with (1.2-2.0) /spl mu/m thickness range, (sheet resistance range 90-100 /spl Omega/) under passivated surface. Although LDD emitter solar cells have a higher efficiency than homogeneous emitter ones, the required technology is more complex and their overall interest for practical applications is questionable.</description><subject>Analytical models</subject><subject>CARRIER LIFETIME</subject><subject>CARRIER MOBILITY</subject><subject>Charge carrier lifetime</subject><subject>CHARGE CARRIERS</subject><subject>Contact resistance</subject><subject>CURRENT DENSITY</subject><subject>DOPED MATERIALS</subject><subject>Doping</subject><subject>ENERGY EFFICIENCY</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>MATHEMATICAL MODELS</subject><subject>Photonic band gap</subject><subject>Photovoltaic cells</subject><subject>Semiconductor process modeling</subject><subject>Silicon</subject><subject>SILICON SOLAR CELLS</subject><subject>SOLAR ENERGY</subject><subject>Surface resistance</subject><issn>0160-8371</issn><isbn>9780780337671</isbn><isbn>0780337670</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNotkE1LxDAQhgMqqOvexVO8eOs6adom9SaLX7CgsLrXkqZTHWmb2mQR_fVmWWFgeOFhmOdl7FzAQggor1826-VClKVaFHkGWh6weak0xJFSFUocshMQBSRaKnHMTr3_BEhBFuKEbdbUkXUD964zE7fYdRx7CgEnf8PdGKinXxMoEmZouHX9aCbyMbqWh2_HG2pbnHAIPKD9GFzn3gn9GTtqTedx_r9n7O3-7nX5mKyeH56Wt6uE0rQMSZvXDZq8FsoIUcrWFkZBjrapjcl0qjOEpo25zlUDBWKuclSNKbWBLIqBnLHL_V3nA1Xe0u6JqDOgDZWENNM6Mld7Zpzc1xZ9qHryO1EzoNv6KlVyV5qI4MUeJESsxol6M_1U-0rlHx4ja-g</recordid><startdate>19970101</startdate><enddate>19970101</enddate><creator>Cid, M.</creator><creator>Stem, N.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., Piscataway, NJ (United States)</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970101</creationdate><title>Silicon solar cell emitters: optimization and comparison of two different technologies</title><author>Cid, M. ; Stem, N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i229t-f5bdea5b17a1193fc6a705ecdbaa48284e0df5ecb57d06ee575e7da98a0476703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Analytical models</topic><topic>CARRIER LIFETIME</topic><topic>CARRIER MOBILITY</topic><topic>Charge carrier lifetime</topic><topic>CHARGE CARRIERS</topic><topic>Contact resistance</topic><topic>CURRENT DENSITY</topic><topic>DOPED MATERIALS</topic><topic>Doping</topic><topic>ENERGY EFFICIENCY</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>MATHEMATICAL MODELS</topic><topic>Photonic band gap</topic><topic>Photovoltaic cells</topic><topic>Semiconductor process modeling</topic><topic>Silicon</topic><topic>SILICON SOLAR CELLS</topic><topic>SOLAR ENERGY</topic><topic>Surface resistance</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cid, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stem, N.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cid, M.</au><au>Stem, N.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Silicon solar cell emitters: optimization and comparison of two different technologies</atitle><btitle>Conference Record of the Twenty Sixth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 1997</btitle><stitle>PVSC</stitle><date>1997-01-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><spage>279</spage><epage>282</epage><pages>279-282</pages><issn>0160-8371</issn><isbn>9780780337671</isbn><isbn>0780337670</isbn><abstract>Considering recent modifications on n-type highly doped silicon parameters, a new emitter optimization was made based on one-dimensional models with analytical solutions. In order to obtain good accuracy, a fifth order approximation has been considered. Two kinds of emitters, homogeneous and locally deep diffused (LDD), with Gaussian profile of n/sup +/pp/sup +/ solar cells were optimized. According to the authors' results: homogeneous emitter solar cells show their maximum efficiencies (/spl eta//spl cong/ 21.60-21.74%) with doping levels N/sub s/=1/spl times/10/sup 19/-5/spl times/10/sup 18/ (cm/sup -3/) and (1.2-2.0) /spl mu/m emitter thickness range. LDD emitter solar cells provide a slightly higher efficiency (/spl eta/=21.82-21.92%), with N/sub s/=1/spl times/10/sup 20/ (cm/sup -3/) With 2.0 /spl mu/m thickness under metal-contacted surface and N/sub s/=1/spl times/10/sup 19/-5/spl times/10/sup 18/ (cm/sup -3/) with (1.2-2.0) /spl mu/m thickness range, (sheet resistance range 90-100 /spl Omega/) under passivated surface. Although LDD emitter solar cells have a higher efficiency than homogeneous emitter ones, the required technology is more complex and their overall interest for practical applications is questionable.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/PVSC.1997.654083</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0160-8371
ispartof Conference Record of the Twenty Sixth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 1997, 1997, p.279-282
issn 0160-8371
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_654083
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Analytical models
CARRIER LIFETIME
CARRIER MOBILITY
Charge carrier lifetime
CHARGE CARRIERS
Contact resistance
CURRENT DENSITY
DOPED MATERIALS
Doping
ENERGY EFFICIENCY
Laboratories
MATHEMATICAL MODELS
Photonic band gap
Photovoltaic cells
Semiconductor process modeling
Silicon
SILICON SOLAR CELLS
SOLAR ENERGY
Surface resistance
title Silicon solar cell emitters: optimization and comparison of two different technologies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T23%3A03%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Silicon%20solar%20cell%20emitters:%20optimization%20and%20comparison%20of%20two%20different%20technologies&rft.btitle=Conference%20Record%20of%20the%20Twenty%20Sixth%20IEEE%20Photovoltaic%20Specialists%20Conference%20-%201997&rft.au=Cid,%20M.&rft.date=1997-01-01&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=282&rft.pages=279-282&rft.issn=0160-8371&rft.isbn=9780780337671&rft.isbn_list=0780337670&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/PVSC.1997.654083&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_6IE%3E27340831%3C/proquest_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=27340831&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=654083&rfr_iscdi=true