Efficient control plane for passive optical burst switching network

One of the main drawbacks of classical Optical Burst Switching (OBS) solutions is the loss of bursts when contentions occur. Time-domain Wavelength Interleaved Networking (TWIN) is a lossless solution with contention resolution in the edge nodes providing a simple and passive switching in the core n...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Triki, A., Gavignet, P., Arzur, B., Rouzic, E. L., Gravey, A.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 540
container_issue
container_start_page 535
container_title
container_volume
creator Triki, A.
Gavignet, P.
Arzur, B.
Rouzic, E. L.
Gravey, A.
description One of the main drawbacks of classical Optical Burst Switching (OBS) solutions is the loss of bursts when contentions occur. Time-domain Wavelength Interleaved Networking (TWIN) is a lossless solution with contention resolution in the edge nodes providing a simple and passive switching in the core nodes and satisfying both low-energy and efficient bandwidth use criteria. However, this solution requires an efficient control plane. In this paper, we compare three different control planes based on either centralized or distributed schemes. Moreover we use two different slot allocation strategies (contiguous or disjoint). The performances of the proposed solutions are compared in terms of total delay, jitter, queue length and bandwidth utilization. The simulation parameters are carefully chosen to take into account implementation constraints. We find that the centralized solution with contiguous slot allocation is the most efficient and it allows a throughput up to 7 Gb/s.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/ICOIN.2013.6496682
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ieee_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ieee_primary_6496682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6496682</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>6496682</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-391687765e4e1c51d46c31572c2623de70b903170b447ade5cb350b611dbe7373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMtOhDAUQOsrkYz8gG76A2Bvbx-wNGRUkomz0cTdBMpFqwiEVif-vSbOxtVZnOQsDmOXIHIAUV7X1bZ-yKUAzI0qjSnkEUtLW4AyFrVVUByzRCLKTBtdnPxzAk5ZAlqLTCn9fM7SEN6EECBQmdImrFr3vXeexsjdNMZlGvg8NCPxflr43ITgv4hPc_SuGXj7uYTIw95H9-rHFz5S3E_L-wU765shUHrgij3drh-r-2yzvaurm03mweqYYQmmsNZoUgROQ6eMQ9BWOmkkdmRFWwqEXyhlm460a1GL1gB0LVm0uGJXf11PRLt58R_N8r07LMEfc5JQCQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Efficient control plane for passive optical burst switching network</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Triki, A. ; Gavignet, P. ; Arzur, B. ; Rouzic, E. L. ; Gravey, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Triki, A. ; Gavignet, P. ; Arzur, B. ; Rouzic, E. L. ; Gravey, A.</creatorcontrib><description>One of the main drawbacks of classical Optical Burst Switching (OBS) solutions is the loss of bursts when contentions occur. Time-domain Wavelength Interleaved Networking (TWIN) is a lossless solution with contention resolution in the edge nodes providing a simple and passive switching in the core nodes and satisfying both low-energy and efficient bandwidth use criteria. However, this solution requires an efficient control plane. In this paper, we compare three different control planes based on either centralized or distributed schemes. Moreover we use two different slot allocation strategies (contiguous or disjoint). The performances of the proposed solutions are compared in terms of total delay, jitter, queue length and bandwidth utilization. The simulation parameters are carefully chosen to take into account implementation constraints. We find that the centralized solution with contiguous slot allocation is the most efficient and it allows a throughput up to 7 Gb/s.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1550-445X</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781467357401</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1467357405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2332-5658</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781467357418</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1467357413</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781467357425</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1467357421</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/ICOIN.2013.6496682</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Delays ; Jitter ; Optical packet switching ; Optical sensors ; Optical switches ; Passive optical networks ; Resource management</subject><ispartof>The International Conference on Information Networking 2013 (ICOIN), 2013, p.535-540</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6496682$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6496682$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Triki, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gavignet, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arzur, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rouzic, E. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gravey, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Efficient control plane for passive optical burst switching network</title><title>The International Conference on Information Networking 2013 (ICOIN)</title><addtitle>ICOIN</addtitle><description>One of the main drawbacks of classical Optical Burst Switching (OBS) solutions is the loss of bursts when contentions occur. Time-domain Wavelength Interleaved Networking (TWIN) is a lossless solution with contention resolution in the edge nodes providing a simple and passive switching in the core nodes and satisfying both low-energy and efficient bandwidth use criteria. However, this solution requires an efficient control plane. In this paper, we compare three different control planes based on either centralized or distributed schemes. Moreover we use two different slot allocation strategies (contiguous or disjoint). The performances of the proposed solutions are compared in terms of total delay, jitter, queue length and bandwidth utilization. The simulation parameters are carefully chosen to take into account implementation constraints. We find that the centralized solution with contiguous slot allocation is the most efficient and it allows a throughput up to 7 Gb/s.</description><subject>Delays</subject><subject>Jitter</subject><subject>Optical packet switching</subject><subject>Optical sensors</subject><subject>Optical switches</subject><subject>Passive optical networks</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><issn>1550-445X</issn><issn>2332-5658</issn><isbn>9781467357401</isbn><isbn>1467357405</isbn><isbn>9781467357418</isbn><isbn>1467357413</isbn><isbn>9781467357425</isbn><isbn>1467357421</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkMtOhDAUQOsrkYz8gG76A2Bvbx-wNGRUkomz0cTdBMpFqwiEVif-vSbOxtVZnOQsDmOXIHIAUV7X1bZ-yKUAzI0qjSnkEUtLW4AyFrVVUByzRCLKTBtdnPxzAk5ZAlqLTCn9fM7SEN6EECBQmdImrFr3vXeexsjdNMZlGvg8NCPxflr43ITgv4hPc_SuGXj7uYTIw95H9-rHFz5S3E_L-wU765shUHrgij3drh-r-2yzvaurm03mweqYYQmmsNZoUgROQ6eMQ9BWOmkkdmRFWwqEXyhlm460a1GL1gB0LVm0uGJXf11PRLt58R_N8r07LMEfc5JQCQ</recordid><startdate>201301</startdate><enddate>201301</enddate><creator>Triki, A.</creator><creator>Gavignet, P.</creator><creator>Arzur, B.</creator><creator>Rouzic, E. L.</creator><creator>Gravey, A.</creator><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201301</creationdate><title>Efficient control plane for passive optical burst switching network</title><author>Triki, A. ; Gavignet, P. ; Arzur, B. ; Rouzic, E. L. ; Gravey, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i175t-391687765e4e1c51d46c31572c2623de70b903170b447ade5cb350b611dbe7373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Delays</topic><topic>Jitter</topic><topic>Optical packet switching</topic><topic>Optical sensors</topic><topic>Optical switches</topic><topic>Passive optical networks</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Triki, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gavignet, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arzur, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rouzic, E. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gravey, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Triki, A.</au><au>Gavignet, P.</au><au>Arzur, B.</au><au>Rouzic, E. L.</au><au>Gravey, A.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Efficient control plane for passive optical burst switching network</atitle><btitle>The International Conference on Information Networking 2013 (ICOIN)</btitle><stitle>ICOIN</stitle><date>2013-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><spage>535</spage><epage>540</epage><pages>535-540</pages><issn>1550-445X</issn><eissn>2332-5658</eissn><isbn>9781467357401</isbn><isbn>1467357405</isbn><eisbn>9781467357418</eisbn><eisbn>1467357413</eisbn><eisbn>9781467357425</eisbn><eisbn>1467357421</eisbn><abstract>One of the main drawbacks of classical Optical Burst Switching (OBS) solutions is the loss of bursts when contentions occur. Time-domain Wavelength Interleaved Networking (TWIN) is a lossless solution with contention resolution in the edge nodes providing a simple and passive switching in the core nodes and satisfying both low-energy and efficient bandwidth use criteria. However, this solution requires an efficient control plane. In this paper, we compare three different control planes based on either centralized or distributed schemes. Moreover we use two different slot allocation strategies (contiguous or disjoint). The performances of the proposed solutions are compared in terms of total delay, jitter, queue length and bandwidth utilization. The simulation parameters are carefully chosen to take into account implementation constraints. We find that the centralized solution with contiguous slot allocation is the most efficient and it allows a throughput up to 7 Gb/s.</abstract><doi>10.1109/ICOIN.2013.6496682</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1550-445X
ispartof The International Conference on Information Networking 2013 (ICOIN), 2013, p.535-540
issn 1550-445X
2332-5658
language eng
recordid cdi_ieee_primary_6496682
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Delays
Jitter
Optical packet switching
Optical sensors
Optical switches
Passive optical networks
Resource management
title Efficient control plane for passive optical burst switching network
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T16%3A32%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ieee_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Efficient%20control%20plane%20for%20passive%20optical%20burst%20switching%20network&rft.btitle=The%20International%20Conference%20on%20Information%20Networking%202013%20(ICOIN)&rft.au=Triki,%20A.&rft.date=2013-01&rft.spage=535&rft.epage=540&rft.pages=535-540&rft.issn=1550-445X&rft.eissn=2332-5658&rft.isbn=9781467357401&rft.isbn_list=1467357405&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/ICOIN.2013.6496682&rft_dat=%3Cieee_6IE%3E6496682%3C/ieee_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9781467357418&rft.eisbn_list=1467357413&rft.eisbn_list=9781467357425&rft.eisbn_list=1467357421&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6496682&rfr_iscdi=true